FRINK Linked Data Fragments server

Matches in SemOpenAlex for { <https://semopenalex.org/work/W2081609991> ?p ?o ?g. }

• W2081609991 endingPage "184" @default.
• W2081609991 startingPage "170" @default.
• W2081609991 abstract "For many decades, lassitude and malaise hae afflieled the relationship btiween psychology and religion. Intemt and actioity in this rtlalionship are now being renewed, and old controoersies with ntID terms are resurfacing. This article rroiews the extensioe empirical literature on the topic and shows that rtligiosity is a compla phenomenon with numerouscorrtlates and consequencesthat defy simple inttrprtialions. A meta-analysis of 24 pertinent studies rroealed no support for the preconception that religiousness is necessarily correlated with psychopathology; but it also showed only slightly positioe corrtlates of rtligion. Sociological and psychiatric reports were more faoorable to religion. The data's ambiguities compare with those ambiguities that formerly charaelerized psychotherapy research. Beller specification of concepts and methods of measuring rtligiosity are alleoiating this problem. which suggests that ambiguous results ref/eel a multidimensional phenomenon that has mixed posit iDe and negatioe aspects. Aoeraging such dioerse factors generally yields unimpressioe findings. whereas using specificity promises clearer and more powerful results. Clinical education. practice, and research nud rroision so that professionals will be beller informed of the eoidence. more open to the study of such oariables. and more efficacious in their work with persons who approach life from a rtligious perspeelioe. In a recent article on psychotherapy and religious values, I indicated that a renascence of psychological interest in religion is occurring (Bergin, 1980a, 1980b). Value assumptions underlying clinical approaches are often considered alien by a large proportion of the population in treatment, who endorse more traditional religious perspectives. I argued that religion should be considered more systematically in personality theories and therapeutic interventions. Responses to these themes were numerous, divergent, and vigorous. The topic is not dead, as was once lamented (Beit-Hallahmi, 1974), and a new National Institute of Mental Health (NIMH) bibliography on the subject is now available (Summerlin, 1980). The present review considers the assertion by critics (Ellis, 1980; Walls, 1980) that religiosity is antithectical to emotional health and rationality, a view widely held in the clinical professions. Ellis (1980) stated this position bluntly and honestly:" @default.
• W2081609991 created "2016-06-24" @default.
• W2081609991 creator A5030218979 @default.
• W2081609991 date "1983-04-01" @default.
• W2081609991 modified "2023-09-30" @default.
• W2081609991 title "Religiosity and mental health: A critical reevaluation and meta-analysis." @default.
• W2081609991 cites W1491267160 @default.
• W2081609991 cites W1546098095 @default.
• W2081609991 cites W1578162203 @default.
• W2081609991 cites W1966114254 @default.
• W2081609991 cites W1966402955 @default.
• W2081609991 cites W1976027652 @default.
• W2081609991 cites W1976912930 @default.
• W2081609991 cites W1983214986 @default.
• W2081609991 cites W1983513623 @default.
• W2081609991 cites W1985227273 @default.
• W2081609991 cites W1986365412 @default.
• W2081609991 cites W1986598947 @default.
• W2081609991 cites W1989854477 @default.
• W2081609991 cites W1993125524 @default.
• W2081609991 cites W1997471295 @default.
• W2081609991 cites W2000315367 @default.
• W2081609991 cites W2001474566 @default.
• W2081609991 cites W2018220527 @default.
• W2081609991 cites W2028256626 @default.
• W2081609991 cites W2030557080 @default.
• W2081609991 cites W2035081946 @default.
• W2081609991 cites W2045128344 @default.
• W2081609991 cites W2054869676 @default.
• W2081609991 cites W2069287576 @default.
• W2081609991 cites W2074582818 @default.
• W2081609991 cites W2076304740 @default.
• W2081609991 cites W2076883770 @default.
• W2081609991 cites W2078659417 @default.
• W2081609991 cites W2079274116 @default.
• W2081609991 cites W2083216614 @default.
• W2081609991 cites W2084001463 @default.
• W2081609991 cites W2085869174 @default.
• W2081609991 cites W2134753206 @default.
• W2081609991 cites W2149660253 @default.
• W2081609991 cites W2158547575 @default.
• W2081609991 cites W2315995135 @default.
• W2081609991 cites W2316538042 @default.
• W2081609991 cites W2316672674 @default.
• W2081609991 cites W2317725516 @default.
• W2081609991 cites W2317786705 @default.
• W2081609991 cites W2317850911 @default.
• W2081609991 cites W2320161436 @default.
• W2081609991 cites W2320914942 @default.
• W2081609991 cites W2325328166 @default.
• W2081609991 cites W2325910883 @default.
• W2081609991 cites W2326821205 @default.
• W2081609991 cites W2327608354 @default.
• W2081609991 cites W2328342544 @default.
• W2081609991 cites W2329992527 @default.
• W2081609991 cites W2330447324 @default.
• W2081609991 cites W2331222946 @default.
• W2081609991 cites W2332275992 @default.
• W2081609991 cites W2332777550 @default.
• W2081609991 cites W2333391225 @default.
• W2081609991 cites W2333899101 @default.
• W2081609991 cites W2341573737 @default.
• W2081609991 cites W2395383751 @default.
• W2081609991 cites W2418851476 @default.
• W2081609991 cites W2442370514 @default.
• W2081609991 cites W2797016153 @default.
• W2081609991 cites W2999441350 @default.
• W2081609991 doi "https://doi.org/10.1037/0735-7028.14.2.170" @default.
• W2081609991 hasPublicationYear "1983" @default.
• W2081609991 type Work @default.
• W2081609991 sameAs 2081609991 @default.
• W2081609991 citedByCount "438" @default.
• W2081609991 countsByYear W20816099912012 @default.
• W2081609991 countsByYear W20816099912013 @default.
• W2081609991 countsByYear W20816099912014 @default.
• W2081609991 countsByYear W20816099912015 @default.
• W2081609991 countsByYear W20816099912016 @default.
• W2081609991 countsByYear W20816099912017 @default.
• W2081609991 countsByYear W20816099912018 @default.
• W2081609991 countsByYear W20816099912019 @default.
• W2081609991 countsByYear W20816099912020 @default.
• W2081609991 countsByYear W20816099912021 @default.
• W2081609991 countsByYear W20816099912022 @default.
• W2081609991 countsByYear W20816099912023 @default.
• W2081609991 crossrefType "journal-article" @default.
• W2081609991 hasAuthorship W2081609991A5030218979 @default.
• W2081609991 hasBestOaLocation W20816099912 @default.
• W2081609991 hasConcept C126322002 @default.
• W2081609991 hasConcept C134362201 @default.
• W2081609991 hasConcept C144024400 @default.
• W2081609991 hasConcept C15744967 @default.
• W2081609991 hasConcept C2779793952 @default.
• W2081609991 hasConcept C542102704 @default.
• W2081609991 hasConcept C71924100 @default.
• W2081609991 hasConcept C77805123 @default.
• W2081609991 hasConcept C95190672 @default.
• W2081609991 hasConceptScore W2081609991C126322002 @default.
• W2081609991 hasConceptScore W2081609991C134362201 @default.

• next