FRINK Linked Data Fragments server

Matches in SemOpenAlex for { <https://semopenalex.org/work/W2082048211> ?p ?o ?g. }

• W2082048211 endingPage "201" @default.
• W2082048211 startingPage "179" @default.
• W2082048211 abstract "Abstract Field experience with limestone and sandstone production indicates theexistence of wide differences between the reservoir behavior of these two typesof formation. Little attention appears to have been given to the separate studyof the flow of fluids and the retention of fluids in limestones. This paperpresents data and arguments to demonstrate the existence of a difference?between the two types of formation, and urges the separate intensiveinvestigation of limestone reservoirs. All experimental data presented pertainto dolomitic limestone formations in West Texas and New Mexico. Two kinds of porous media are recognized intergranular and intermediate.Intergranular rocks are those in which the porosity and permeability aredetermined by the geometrical properties and the sorting of the sedimentaryunits; intermediate rocks, those in which there is no direct relationshipbetween grain properties and the porosity and permeability. Limestones ingeneral are intermediate media. The partial relationship between porosity andpermeability of any class of porous media is represented by an area of finiteextent and definite shape on the permeability-porosity plane. The horizontal and vertical variations of porosity and of permeability inlimestone and sandstone formations are discussed and compared. Comparisons are made of connate-water content,. the relativepermeability-saturation relationship, and. capillary phenomena in the two kindsof rocks. A number of tentative conclusions are drawn relative to the reservoirproperties of limestones; in particular,dolomitic limestones are oilbearing and apparently are oil productive in zones of permeability less than0.1 millidarcy, andprimary depletion (by gas expansion) oil saturationsmay be lower in dolomitic limestones than in sandstones. Introduction It is well known that the reservoir performance of limestones displays numerousirregularities when compared with that of sandstones, and that the departuresfrom normal behavior of limestones are more frequent and generallymore marked than in sandstones. This is particularly true of fracturedlimestones and those that have undergone considerable development of secondaryporosity. A review of the literature of production research published during the past ISyears reveals a startling absence of theoretical and experimentalinvestigations directed specifically toward explaining and predicting theperformance of limestone reservoirs, even though such problems as theprediction of 'water encroachment and the estimation of ultimate recoveriescontinue at the. inspired guess stage. By far the greater part of theexperimental data reported pertain to measurements on sandstone core samples, while the theoretical studies, almost without exception, are developed from theassumption of an ideal porous medium and therefore seldom are applicable tolimestone formations. T.P. 1791" @default.
• W2082048211 created "2016-06-24" @default.
• W2082048211 creator A5043831375 @default.
• W2082048211 creator A5073465404 @default.
• W2082048211 date "1945-12-01" @default.
• W2082048211 modified "2023-09-25" @default.
• W2082048211 title "An Introductory Discussion of the Reservoir Performance of Limestone Formations" @default.
• W2082048211 doi "https://doi.org/10.2118/945179-g" @default.
• W2082048211 hasPublicationYear "1945" @default.
• W2082048211 type Work @default.
• W2082048211 sameAs 2082048211 @default.
• W2082048211 citedByCount "15" @default.
• W2082048211 countsByYear W20820482112012 @default.
• W2082048211 countsByYear W20820482112014 @default.
• W2082048211 countsByYear W20820482112016 @default.
• W2082048211 countsByYear W20820482112018 @default.
• W2082048211 countsByYear W20820482112023 @default.
• W2082048211 crossrefType "journal-article" @default.
• W2082048211 hasAuthorship W2082048211A5043831375 @default.
• W2082048211 hasAuthorship W2082048211A5073465404 @default.
• W2082048211 hasBestOaLocation W20820482111 @default.
• W2082048211 hasConcept C111696304 @default.
• W2082048211 hasConcept C113215200 @default.
• W2082048211 hasConcept C11413529 @default.
• W2082048211 hasConcept C114614502 @default.
• W2082048211 hasConcept C120882062 @default.
• W2082048211 hasConcept C127313418 @default.
• W2082048211 hasConcept C159985019 @default.
• W2082048211 hasConcept C17409809 @default.
• W2082048211 hasConcept C184102282 @default.
• W2082048211 hasConcept C185592680 @default.
• W2082048211 hasConcept C187320778 @default.
• W2082048211 hasConcept C192562407 @default.
• W2082048211 hasConcept C199289684 @default.
• W2082048211 hasConcept C2780026712 @default.
• W2082048211 hasConcept C33923547 @default.
• W2082048211 hasConcept C41625074 @default.
• W2082048211 hasConcept C55493867 @default.
• W2082048211 hasConcept C5900021 @default.
• W2082048211 hasConcept C6648577 @default.
• W2082048211 hasConcept C78762247 @default.
• W2082048211 hasConcept C9930424 @default.
• W2082048211 hasConceptScore W2082048211C111696304 @default.
• W2082048211 hasConceptScore W2082048211C113215200 @default.
• W2082048211 hasConceptScore W2082048211C11413529 @default.
• W2082048211 hasConceptScore W2082048211C114614502 @default.
• W2082048211 hasConceptScore W2082048211C120882062 @default.
• W2082048211 hasConceptScore W2082048211C127313418 @default.
• W2082048211 hasConceptScore W2082048211C159985019 @default.
• W2082048211 hasConceptScore W2082048211C17409809 @default.
• W2082048211 hasConceptScore W2082048211C184102282 @default.
• W2082048211 hasConceptScore W2082048211C185592680 @default.
• W2082048211 hasConceptScore W2082048211C187320778 @default.
• W2082048211 hasConceptScore W2082048211C192562407 @default.
• W2082048211 hasConceptScore W2082048211C199289684 @default.
• W2082048211 hasConceptScore W2082048211C2780026712 @default.
• W2082048211 hasConceptScore W2082048211C33923547 @default.
• W2082048211 hasConceptScore W2082048211C41625074 @default.
• W2082048211 hasConceptScore W2082048211C55493867 @default.
• W2082048211 hasConceptScore W2082048211C5900021 @default.
• W2082048211 hasConceptScore W2082048211C6648577 @default.
• W2082048211 hasConceptScore W2082048211C78762247 @default.
• W2082048211 hasConceptScore W2082048211C9930424 @default.
• W2082048211 hasIssue "01" @default.
• W2082048211 hasLocation W20820482111 @default.
• W2082048211 hasOpenAccess W2082048211 @default.
• W2082048211 hasPrimaryLocation W20820482111 @default.
• W2082048211 hasRelatedWork W2042481767 @default.
• W2082048211 hasRelatedWork W2351944735 @default.
• W2082048211 hasRelatedWork W2356938477 @default.
• W2082048211 hasRelatedWork W2361590093 @default.
• W2082048211 hasRelatedWork W2363469292 @default.
• W2082048211 hasRelatedWork W2374200761 @default.
• W2082048211 hasRelatedWork W2392761073 @default.
• W2082048211 hasRelatedWork W2789252045 @default.
• W2082048211 hasRelatedWork W3211985234 @default.
• W2082048211 hasRelatedWork W2467454710 @default.
• W2082048211 hasVolume "160" @default.
• W2082048211 isParatext "false" @default.
• W2082048211 isRetracted "false" @default.
• W2082048211 magId "2082048211" @default.
• W2082048211 workType "article" @default.