Matches in SemOpenAlex for { <https://semopenalex.org/work/W2082135890> ?p ?o ?g. }
- W2082135890 endingPage "235.e1" @default.
- W2082135890 startingPage "228" @default.
- W2082135890 abstract "Purpose To compare visual function after deep anterior lamellar keratoplasty (DALK) with visual function after penetrating keratoplasty (PK) for keratoconus and correlate this with corneal thickness. Design Retrospective case series. Methods Twenty-three patients (32 eyes) with unilateral or bilateral DALK or PK for keratoconus were analyzed for visual quality after suture removal. Evaluation included measurement of visual acuity, contrast sensitivity, and higher order aberrations (HOAs) (WaveScan®; Visx, Santa Clara, California, USA). Readings were performed with both spectacle and rigid contact lens correction of refractive error. Total and residual stromal thickness after DALK was measured using optical coherence tomography (OCT) and correlated to visual quality. Results Eyes after PK had better visual acuity than eyes after DALK (P = .018). Subgroup analysis of DALK eyes revealed that the level of visual acuity was related to the thickness of residual recipient corneal stroma. Eyes with a recipient corneal bed thickness of <20 μm had visual acuities similar to eyes with a PK, whereas those with a recipient thickness of >80 μm had a significantly reduced visual acuity (P = .0009). Contrast sensitivity was similar in DALK and PK eyes. There was no significant difference in HOAs between eyes with DALK or PK. Conclusions These data suggest that the main parameter for good visual function after DALK for keratoconus is the thickness of residual recipient stromal bed. An eye with a DALK with a residual bed of <20 μm can achieve a similar visual result as a PK. To compare visual function after deep anterior lamellar keratoplasty (DALK) with visual function after penetrating keratoplasty (PK) for keratoconus and correlate this with corneal thickness. Retrospective case series. Twenty-three patients (32 eyes) with unilateral or bilateral DALK or PK for keratoconus were analyzed for visual quality after suture removal. Evaluation included measurement of visual acuity, contrast sensitivity, and higher order aberrations (HOAs) (WaveScan®; Visx, Santa Clara, California, USA). Readings were performed with both spectacle and rigid contact lens correction of refractive error. Total and residual stromal thickness after DALK was measured using optical coherence tomography (OCT) and correlated to visual quality. Eyes after PK had better visual acuity than eyes after DALK (P = .018). Subgroup analysis of DALK eyes revealed that the level of visual acuity was related to the thickness of residual recipient corneal stroma. Eyes with a recipient corneal bed thickness of <20 μm had visual acuities similar to eyes with a PK, whereas those with a recipient thickness of >80 μm had a significantly reduced visual acuity (P = .0009). Contrast sensitivity was similar in DALK and PK eyes. There was no significant difference in HOAs between eyes with DALK or PK. These data suggest that the main parameter for good visual function after DALK for keratoconus is the thickness of residual recipient stromal bed. An eye with a DALK with a residual bed of <20 μm can achieve a similar visual result as a PK." @default.
- W2082135890 created "2016-06-24" @default.
- W2082135890 creator A5003831591 @default.
- W2082135890 creator A5004492143 @default.
- W2082135890 creator A5014732193 @default.
- W2082135890 creator A5021253891 @default.
- W2082135890 creator A5027708575 @default.
- W2082135890 creator A5069032977 @default.
- W2082135890 creator A5078902898 @default.
- W2082135890 date "2007-02-01" @default.
- W2082135890 modified "2023-10-12" @default.
- W2082135890 title "Quality of Vision and Graft Thickness in Deep Anterior Lamellar and Penetrating Corneal Allografts" @default.
- W2082135890 cites W1507999061 @default.
- W2082135890 cites W1815078519 @default.
- W2082135890 cites W183196896 @default.
- W2082135890 cites W1969665625 @default.
- W2082135890 cites W1972562652 @default.
- W2082135890 cites W1977317569 @default.
- W2082135890 cites W1987451547 @default.
- W2082135890 cites W1999760682 @default.
- W2082135890 cites W2000906677 @default.
- W2082135890 cites W2003503945 @default.
- W2082135890 cites W2006534668 @default.
- W2082135890 cites W2010090512 @default.
- W2082135890 cites W2016406654 @default.
- W2082135890 cites W2018308476 @default.
- W2082135890 cites W2023539203 @default.
- W2082135890 cites W2023958422 @default.
- W2082135890 cites W2030498136 @default.
- W2082135890 cites W2062669885 @default.
- W2082135890 cites W2065116655 @default.
- W2082135890 cites W2068364217 @default.
- W2082135890 cites W2073029533 @default.
- W2082135890 cites W2074911323 @default.
- W2082135890 cites W2074960265 @default.
- W2082135890 cites W2080638938 @default.
- W2082135890 cites W2083528480 @default.
- W2082135890 cites W2083663404 @default.
- W2082135890 cites W2090082301 @default.
- W2082135890 cites W2097381117 @default.
- W2082135890 cites W2106941470 @default.
- W2082135890 cites W2114581712 @default.
- W2082135890 cites W2114969944 @default.
- W2082135890 cites W2125717362 @default.
- W2082135890 cites W2145839429 @default.
- W2082135890 cites W2147068629 @default.
- W2082135890 cites W2147171404 @default.
- W2082135890 cites W2316626703 @default.
- W2082135890 cites W2397488201 @default.
- W2082135890 cites W2401597638 @default.
- W2082135890 cites W2416786592 @default.
- W2082135890 cites W2473674151 @default.
- W2082135890 cites W4233395512 @default.
- W2082135890 cites W4235817023 @default.
- W2082135890 cites W66192970 @default.
- W2082135890 doi "https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ajo.2006.10.043" @default.
- W2082135890 hasPubMedId "https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/17258522" @default.
- W2082135890 hasPublicationYear "2007" @default.
- W2082135890 type Work @default.
- W2082135890 sameAs 2082135890 @default.
- W2082135890 citedByCount "211" @default.
- W2082135890 countsByYear W20821358902012 @default.
- W2082135890 countsByYear W20821358902013 @default.
- W2082135890 countsByYear W20821358902014 @default.
- W2082135890 countsByYear W20821358902015 @default.
- W2082135890 countsByYear W20821358902016 @default.
- W2082135890 countsByYear W20821358902017 @default.
- W2082135890 countsByYear W20821358902018 @default.
- W2082135890 countsByYear W20821358902019 @default.
- W2082135890 countsByYear W20821358902020 @default.
- W2082135890 countsByYear W20821358902021 @default.
- W2082135890 countsByYear W20821358902022 @default.
- W2082135890 countsByYear W20821358902023 @default.
- W2082135890 crossrefType "journal-article" @default.
- W2082135890 hasAuthorship W2082135890A5003831591 @default.
- W2082135890 hasAuthorship W2082135890A5004492143 @default.
- W2082135890 hasAuthorship W2082135890A5014732193 @default.
- W2082135890 hasAuthorship W2082135890A5021253891 @default.
- W2082135890 hasAuthorship W2082135890A5027708575 @default.
- W2082135890 hasAuthorship W2082135890A5069032977 @default.
- W2082135890 hasAuthorship W2082135890A5078902898 @default.
- W2082135890 hasConcept C118487528 @default.
- W2082135890 hasConcept C120665830 @default.
- W2082135890 hasConcept C121332964 @default.
- W2082135890 hasConcept C165788157 @default.
- W2082135890 hasConcept C2776502983 @default.
- W2082135890 hasConcept C2776882836 @default.
- W2082135890 hasConcept C2778257484 @default.
- W2082135890 hasConcept C2778918178 @default.
- W2082135890 hasConcept C71924100 @default.
- W2082135890 hasConceptScore W2082135890C118487528 @default.
- W2082135890 hasConceptScore W2082135890C120665830 @default.
- W2082135890 hasConceptScore W2082135890C121332964 @default.
- W2082135890 hasConceptScore W2082135890C165788157 @default.
- W2082135890 hasConceptScore W2082135890C2776502983 @default.
- W2082135890 hasConceptScore W2082135890C2776882836 @default.
- W2082135890 hasConceptScore W2082135890C2778257484 @default.
- W2082135890 hasConceptScore W2082135890C2778918178 @default.