Matches in SemOpenAlex for { <https://semopenalex.org/work/W2082333860> ?p ?o ?g. }
Showing items 1 to 79 of
79
with 100 items per page.
- W2082333860 endingPage "489" @default.
- W2082333860 startingPage "484" @default.
- W2082333860 abstract "Background: The Final Professional Examination for medical students at Leicester Medical School involves the use of real patients, and senior clinicians assess students over a series of consultations with these patients. What the patients themselves think of the students is not known.Aims: This qualitative study identifies the perceptions and opinions which patients who have been used in this examination have of the student candidates, and whether these may be used to enhance the training of medical students.Method: Patients who had participated in a number of examination diets were interviewed in either a group interview or individually. The interviews were loosely structured in order to discover the experiences that these patients had and how they interpreted them. Data was analysed inductively using the constant comparative method.Results: The large majority of views of patients fell into the following categories: observations on student conduct during the examination (both in terms of affective and professional behaviours), demographic characteristics of students and views on student performance.Conclusions: Based on the results of this study, educational recommendations are made which might improve student performance in the examination and lead to greater patient satisfaction with the ‘end product’ of the medical school, namely the graduating student. These include the incorporation of students’ observation of infection control measures within the assessment schedule, and more direct preparation of students in handling uncertainty and their anxieties within the consultation.Practice points Patients used for finals examinations make judgments on the student candidates.These judgements are based on behavioural characteristics of students.Anxiety demonstrated by students is perceived by patients to be associated with poorer performance and competence.Patients have major concerns about hygiene and infection control in the examination setting.Patients are keen to provide feedback to students on their performance, but not to contribute to the overall score or mark." @default.
- W2082333860 created "2016-06-24" @default.
- W2082333860 creator A5054752960 @default.
- W2082333860 date "2007-01-01" @default.
- W2082333860 modified "2023-09-26" @default.
- W2082333860 title "Patients’ experiences and perceptions of medical student candidates sitting a finals examination" @default.
- W2082333860 cites W1984035919 @default.
- W2082333860 cites W1993648306 @default.
- W2082333860 cites W1997723889 @default.
- W2082333860 cites W2013148575 @default.
- W2082333860 cites W2013613908 @default.
- W2082333860 cites W2024821284 @default.
- W2082333860 cites W2025468315 @default.
- W2082333860 cites W2026623970 @default.
- W2082333860 cites W2028852072 @default.
- W2082333860 cites W2049839512 @default.
- W2082333860 cites W2055707768 @default.
- W2082333860 cites W2057296150 @default.
- W2082333860 cites W2058363607 @default.
- W2082333860 cites W2059366750 @default.
- W2082333860 cites W2074985123 @default.
- W2082333860 cites W2104262839 @default.
- W2082333860 cites W2116189637 @default.
- W2082333860 cites W2121330222 @default.
- W2082333860 cites W2123047989 @default.
- W2082333860 cites W2130068972 @default.
- W2082333860 cites W2142045903 @default.
- W2082333860 cites W2142360956 @default.
- W2082333860 cites W2147973523 @default.
- W2082333860 cites W2163557015 @default.
- W2082333860 doi "https://doi.org/10.1080/01421590701509621" @default.
- W2082333860 hasPubMedId "https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/17885977" @default.
- W2082333860 hasPublicationYear "2007" @default.
- W2082333860 type Work @default.
- W2082333860 sameAs 2082333860 @default.
- W2082333860 citedByCount "6" @default.
- W2082333860 countsByYear W20823338602017 @default.
- W2082333860 countsByYear W20823338602020 @default.
- W2082333860 countsByYear W20823338602021 @default.
- W2082333860 crossrefType "journal-article" @default.
- W2082333860 hasAuthorship W2082333860A5054752960 @default.
- W2082333860 hasConcept C118552586 @default.
- W2082333860 hasConcept C15744967 @default.
- W2082333860 hasConcept C169760540 @default.
- W2082333860 hasConcept C26760741 @default.
- W2082333860 hasConcept C509550671 @default.
- W2082333860 hasConcept C512399662 @default.
- W2082333860 hasConcept C558461103 @default.
- W2082333860 hasConcept C71924100 @default.
- W2082333860 hasConceptScore W2082333860C118552586 @default.
- W2082333860 hasConceptScore W2082333860C15744967 @default.
- W2082333860 hasConceptScore W2082333860C169760540 @default.
- W2082333860 hasConceptScore W2082333860C26760741 @default.
- W2082333860 hasConceptScore W2082333860C509550671 @default.
- W2082333860 hasConceptScore W2082333860C512399662 @default.
- W2082333860 hasConceptScore W2082333860C558461103 @default.
- W2082333860 hasConceptScore W2082333860C71924100 @default.
- W2082333860 hasIssue "5" @default.
- W2082333860 hasLocation W20823338601 @default.
- W2082333860 hasLocation W20823338602 @default.
- W2082333860 hasOpenAccess W2082333860 @default.
- W2082333860 hasPrimaryLocation W20823338601 @default.
- W2082333860 hasRelatedWork W1966975529 @default.
- W2082333860 hasRelatedWork W1994964845 @default.
- W2082333860 hasRelatedWork W2019646663 @default.
- W2082333860 hasRelatedWork W2070725689 @default.
- W2082333860 hasRelatedWork W2159482350 @default.
- W2082333860 hasRelatedWork W2165343866 @default.
- W2082333860 hasRelatedWork W2326629460 @default.
- W2082333860 hasRelatedWork W2748952813 @default.
- W2082333860 hasRelatedWork W2899084033 @default.
- W2082333860 hasRelatedWork W4297109642 @default.
- W2082333860 hasVolume "29" @default.
- W2082333860 isParatext "false" @default.
- W2082333860 isRetracted "false" @default.
- W2082333860 magId "2082333860" @default.
- W2082333860 workType "article" @default.