FRINK Linked Data Fragments server

Matches in SemOpenAlex for { <https://semopenalex.org/work/W2082662325> ?p ?o ?g. }

• W2082662325 abstract "Vol. 118, No. 2 AnnouncementsOpen AccessConflict of Interest in Medical Research, Education, and Practice David B. Resnik David B. Resnik Search for more papers by this author Published:1 February 2010https://doi.org/10.1289/ehp.118-a92Cited by:5AboutSectionsPDF ToolsDownload CitationsTrack Citations ShareShare onFacebookTwitterLinked InReddit Concerns about the potentially corrupting influence of private industry on medical research, education, and practice have been growing since the 1970s, when the U.S. Congress passed the first anti-kickback law applying to medicine. Since then, Congress has banned self-referrals in medicine, enacted laws that regulate the commercialization of publicly funded biomedical research, and held hearings on conflicts of interest in biomedicine. Government agencies have issued policies concerning disclosure of financial interests in research, professional associations have published guidelines pertaining to financial relationships with industry, and scientific journals have developed conflict of interest policies.The Institute of Medicine (IOM)’s Conflict of Interest in Medical Research, Education, and Practice makes an important contribution to the continuing debate about financial conflicts of interest in medicine. This report reviews empirical studies, analytic essays, regulations, and guidance documents concerning conflicts of interest in medical research and makes recommendations for researchers, educators, physicians, institutions, corporations, and government agencies. The report consists of nine chapters as well as appendices that examine particular topics in greater depth, such as the relevance of psychological research on subconscious biases to conflict of interest policies, and a comparative analysis of conflicts of interest in nonmedical professions.To draft this report, the IOM assembled experts from various fields including medicine, public health, law, health policy, ethics, philosophy, and economics. The authors acknowledge that collaboration with industry is a double-edged sword: Collaboration can produce important benefits, but it can compromise the integrity of professional judgment and erode the public’s trust in medicine. In crafting their recommendations, the authors strike a balance between protecting medical research, education, and practice from the harmful effects of industry collaboration and avoiding unnecessary administrative burdens that could undermine the benefits of collaboration. They make judicious use of empirical evidence to support their conclusions and recommendations. When evidence was lacking, the authors developed arguments based on their own experience and judgment as well as different approaches found in the literature.The IOM report makes 16 recommendations for reforming medicine, some of which would require radical changes. For example, the report recommends that all academic medical centers, teaching hospitals, and training sites prohibit faculty, students, residents, and fellows from accepting gifts from pharmaceutical, biotechnology, or medical device companies, except in some circumstances, and not allow drug and medical sales representatives to have access to faculty, except by invitation in specified situations. The IOM report also recommends that academic medical centers, hospitals, and training sites develop a new system of funding continuing medical education that is free from industry influence; that research institutions prohibit investigators from conducting research with human subjects if they have a significant financial interest related to a product that would be affected by the research, except when the investigator’s participation is essential for conducting the research; and that physicians in private practice refrain from accepting items of value from pharmaceutical, biotechnology, or medical device companies.The report also contains a conceptual framework that provides a foundation for policy recommendations. This includes a definition of conflict of interest (“a set of circumstances that creates a risk that professional judgment or actions regarding a primary interest will be unduly influenced by a secondary interest”) and criteria for assessing conflict of interest policies, such as proportionality (does the policy focus on the most important conflicts and is the policy practical?), transparency (is the policy understandable to those to whom it applies?), accountability (does the policy have enforcement procedures?), and fairness (does the policy apply equally to all relevant people in similar situations?). The authors also discuss problems with interpreting and applying the notion of an apparent conflict of interest.This comprehensive and insightful report will undoubtedly have considerable influence over research, scholarship, and policy development for years to come. It is highly recommended reading for physicians, medical researchers, and medical educators.FiguresReferencesRelatedDetailsCited by Doolan G, Benke G and Giles G (2014) An Update on Occupation and Prostate Cancer, Asian Pacific Journal of Cancer Prevention, 10.7314/APJCP.2014.15.2.501, 15:2, (501-516), Online publication date: 30-Jan-2014. Alavanja M and Bonner M (2012) Occupational Pesticide Exposures and Cancer Risk: A Review, Journal of Toxicology and Environmental Health, Part B, 10.1080/10937404.2012.632358, 15:4, (238-263), Online publication date: 1-May-2012. Koutros S, Alavanja M, Lubin J, Sandler D, Hoppin J, Lynch C, Knott C, Blair A and Freeman L (2010) An Update of Cancer Incidence in the Agricultural Health Study, Journal of Occupational and Environmental Medicine, 10.1097/JOM.0b013e3181f72b7c, 52:11, (1098-1105), Online publication date: 1-Nov-2010. Multigner L, Ndong J, Giusti A, Romana M, Delacroix-Maillard H, Cordier S, Jégou B, Thome J and Blanchet P (2010) Chlordecone Exposure and Risk of Prostate Cancer, Journal of Clinical Oncology, 10.1200/JCO.2009.27.2153, 28:21, (3457-3462), Online publication date: 20-Jul-2010. Ye M, Beach J, Martin J and Senthilselvan A (2013) Occupational Pesticide Exposures and Respiratory Health, International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health, 10.3390/ijerph10126442, 10:12, (6442-6471) Vol. 118, No. 2 February 2010Metrics About Article Metrics Publication History Originally published1 February 2010Published in print1 February 2010 Financial disclosuresPDF download License information EHP is an open-access journal published with support from the National Institute of Environmental Health Sciences, National Institutes of Health. All content is public domain unless otherwise noted. Note to readers with disabilities EHP strives to ensure that all journal content is accessible to all readers. However, some figures and Supplemental Material published in EHP articles may not conform to 508 standards due to the complexity of the information being presented. If you need assistance accessing journal content, please contact [email protected]. Our staff will work with you to assess and meet your accessibility needs within 3 working days." @default.
• W2082662325 created "2016-06-24" @default.
• W2082662325 creator A5061129814 @default.
• W2082662325 date "2010-02-01" @default.
• W2082662325 modified "2023-10-14" @default.
• W2082662325 title "Conflict of Interest in Medical Research, Education, and Practice <i>Institute of Medicine, Committee on Conflict of Interest in Medical Research, Education, and Practice, edited by Bernard Lo and Marilyn J. Field</i> . Washington, DC:National Academies Press, 2009. 440 pp. ISBN: 978-0-309-13188-9, $54.95. " @default.
• W2082662325 doi "https://doi.org/10.1289/ehp.118-a92" @default.
• W2082662325 hasPublicationYear "2010" @default.
• W2082662325 type Work @default.
• W2082662325 sameAs 2082662325 @default.
• W2082662325 citedByCount "5" @default.
• W2082662325 countsByYear W20826623252012 @default.
• W2082662325 countsByYear W20826623252013 @default.
• W2082662325 countsByYear W20826623252014 @default.
• W2082662325 crossrefType "journal-article" @default.
• W2082662325 hasAuthorship W2082662325A5061129814 @default.
• W2082662325 hasBestOaLocation W20826623251 @default.
• W2082662325 hasConcept C138885662 @default.
• W2082662325 hasConcept C144024400 @default.
• W2082662325 hasConcept C158154518 @default.
• W2082662325 hasConcept C17744445 @default.
• W2082662325 hasConcept C199539241 @default.
• W2082662325 hasConcept C2776475305 @default.
• W2082662325 hasConcept C2777276634 @default.
• W2082662325 hasConcept C2778137410 @default.
• W2082662325 hasConcept C39549134 @default.
• W2082662325 hasConcept C41895202 @default.
• W2082662325 hasConcept C71924100 @default.
• W2082662325 hasConceptScore W2082662325C138885662 @default.
• W2082662325 hasConceptScore W2082662325C144024400 @default.
• W2082662325 hasConceptScore W2082662325C158154518 @default.
• W2082662325 hasConceptScore W2082662325C17744445 @default.
• W2082662325 hasConceptScore W2082662325C199539241 @default.
• W2082662325 hasConceptScore W2082662325C2776475305 @default.
• W2082662325 hasConceptScore W2082662325C2777276634 @default.
• W2082662325 hasConceptScore W2082662325C2778137410 @default.
• W2082662325 hasConceptScore W2082662325C39549134 @default.
• W2082662325 hasConceptScore W2082662325C41895202 @default.
• W2082662325 hasConceptScore W2082662325C71924100 @default.
• W2082662325 hasIssue "2" @default.
• W2082662325 hasLocation W20826623251 @default.
• W2082662325 hasOpenAccess W2082662325 @default.
• W2082662325 hasPrimaryLocation W20826623251 @default.
• W2082662325 hasRelatedWork W1602897623 @default.
• W2082662325 hasRelatedWork W2044066346 @default.
• W2082662325 hasRelatedWork W2748952813 @default.
• W2082662325 hasRelatedWork W2899084033 @default.
• W2082662325 hasRelatedWork W2907044148 @default.
• W2082662325 hasRelatedWork W2967564833 @default.
• W2082662325 hasRelatedWork W2981132024 @default.
• W2082662325 hasRelatedWork W334580143 @default.
• W2082662325 hasRelatedWork W4232182641 @default.
• W2082662325 hasRelatedWork W4289139295 @default.
• W2082662325 hasVolume "118" @default.
• W2082662325 isParatext "false" @default.
• W2082662325 isRetracted "false" @default.
• W2082662325 magId "2082662325" @default.
• W2082662325 workType "article" @default.