Matches in SemOpenAlex for { <https://semopenalex.org/work/W2083047553> ?p ?o ?g. }
Showing items 1 to 85 of
85
with 100 items per page.
- W2083047553 endingPage "217" @default.
- W2083047553 startingPage "216" @default.
- W2083047553 abstract "retention, while others may seem silent. From histological evaluation of so-called incidental sinuses we know that every sinus is accompanied by acute, chronic or mixed acute-chronic tissue inflammation, even if it may seem clinically uninflamed [6] . Thus varying degrees of inflammation may bias the effects of treatment, wound healing and recurrence. Thirdly, from recent long-term examinations we know that recurrence rate is a function of time. Pilonidal sinus recurrences may occur from the time of surgery up to 22 years and beyond. Putting this into a time frame, 60% of all recurrences will be seen within 5 years [7] . This has been proven on more than 500 patients, who received long-term follow-up of 2 decades. It is therefore obvious that a very short-term follow-up will result in very low recurrence rate. As a benchmark, the 5and 10-year recurrence rate is the new gold standard. The authors of the presented study [8] enrolled 30 consecutive pilonidal sinus patients within 4 months for the study, which makes them a high-volume hospital in terms of pilonidal sinus surgery. They treated them with incision of tracts and the pilonidal cave, adding phenol liquid cauterization, dressing and 1 week’s daily follow-up to that therapy. They followed up patient satisfaction and if patients recommended their therapy to fellow patients. Some remarks need to be added to this small study with a 14-month mean follow-up time. Firstly, the results show Pilonidal sinus disease is a disease of young men that results in prolonged time off from work, its incidence being approximately 1 in 1,000. Now, 129 years after the first description of pilonidal sinus disease, there is a wide range of therapies and still controversy about the management of the condition. The only cure may be surgery, but every new conservative method needs to be thoroughly examined and compared with established methods in terms of aggressiveness and effectiveness. This is the case with phenol treatment of pilonidal sinus disease. First instituted in 1964 by Maurice and Greenwood [1] , they found a recurrence rate of 19% after 18 months of follow-up. Twenty-four studies using phenol have been published since then, with patient numbers up to 143, follow-up periods between 1 month [2] and 98 months [3] , and a recurrence rate between 9% [4] and 19% [5] . Recurrence rates vary widely and there are some explanations for this inconsistency. Firstly, pilonidal sinus disease is thought to be an acquired disease of hair interrupting the skin integrity, thus forming persisting epithelial tracts around hair. If tracts containing hair are only removed or destroyed partially, remnants will persist in the deeper layers of the skin, acting as a source of recurrent disease. Secondly, success and failure of pilonidal sinus therapy depend on the degree of inflammation of the pilonidal sinus, which is especially true for phenol treatment. Some sinuses present with overt inflammation and" @default.
- W2083047553 created "2016-06-24" @default.
- W2083047553 creator A5056938980 @default.
- W2083047553 date "2010-01-01" @default.
- W2083047553 modified "2023-09-22" @default.
- W2083047553 title "5- and 10-Year Recurrence Rate Is the New Gold Standard in Pilonidal Sinus Surgery Benchmarking" @default.
- W2083047553 cites W125215600 @default.
- W2083047553 cites W133950478 @default.
- W2083047553 cites W2000471667 @default.
- W2083047553 cites W2014189679 @default.
- W2083047553 cites W2021444289 @default.
- W2083047553 cites W2042139992 @default.
- W2083047553 cites W2060277827 @default.
- W2083047553 cites W2068518233 @default.
- W2083047553 cites W2072387905 @default.
- W2083047553 cites W2159404755 @default.
- W2083047553 doi "https://doi.org/10.1159/000285292" @default.
- W2083047553 hasPubMedId "https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/20357506" @default.
- W2083047553 hasPublicationYear "2010" @default.
- W2083047553 type Work @default.
- W2083047553 sameAs 2083047553 @default.
- W2083047553 citedByCount "28" @default.
- W2083047553 countsByYear W20830475532013 @default.
- W2083047553 countsByYear W20830475532014 @default.
- W2083047553 countsByYear W20830475532015 @default.
- W2083047553 countsByYear W20830475532016 @default.
- W2083047553 countsByYear W20830475532017 @default.
- W2083047553 countsByYear W20830475532018 @default.
- W2083047553 countsByYear W20830475532020 @default.
- W2083047553 countsByYear W20830475532021 @default.
- W2083047553 countsByYear W20830475532022 @default.
- W2083047553 countsByYear W20830475532023 @default.
- W2083047553 crossrefType "journal-article" @default.
- W2083047553 hasAuthorship W2083047553A5056938980 @default.
- W2083047553 hasBestOaLocation W20830475531 @default.
- W2083047553 hasConcept C126322002 @default.
- W2083047553 hasConcept C141071460 @default.
- W2083047553 hasConcept C144133560 @default.
- W2083047553 hasConcept C157369684 @default.
- W2083047553 hasConcept C162853370 @default.
- W2083047553 hasConcept C168563851 @default.
- W2083047553 hasConcept C2776407911 @default.
- W2083047553 hasConcept C2909496165 @default.
- W2083047553 hasConcept C40993552 @default.
- W2083047553 hasConcept C59822182 @default.
- W2083047553 hasConcept C61434518 @default.
- W2083047553 hasConcept C71924100 @default.
- W2083047553 hasConcept C86251818 @default.
- W2083047553 hasConcept C86803240 @default.
- W2083047553 hasConceptScore W2083047553C126322002 @default.
- W2083047553 hasConceptScore W2083047553C141071460 @default.
- W2083047553 hasConceptScore W2083047553C144133560 @default.
- W2083047553 hasConceptScore W2083047553C157369684 @default.
- W2083047553 hasConceptScore W2083047553C162853370 @default.
- W2083047553 hasConceptScore W2083047553C168563851 @default.
- W2083047553 hasConceptScore W2083047553C2776407911 @default.
- W2083047553 hasConceptScore W2083047553C2909496165 @default.
- W2083047553 hasConceptScore W2083047553C40993552 @default.
- W2083047553 hasConceptScore W2083047553C59822182 @default.
- W2083047553 hasConceptScore W2083047553C61434518 @default.
- W2083047553 hasConceptScore W2083047553C71924100 @default.
- W2083047553 hasConceptScore W2083047553C86251818 @default.
- W2083047553 hasConceptScore W2083047553C86803240 @default.
- W2083047553 hasIssue "3" @default.
- W2083047553 hasLocation W20830475531 @default.
- W2083047553 hasLocation W20830475532 @default.
- W2083047553 hasOpenAccess W2083047553 @default.
- W2083047553 hasPrimaryLocation W20830475531 @default.
- W2083047553 hasRelatedWork W116423126 @default.
- W2083047553 hasRelatedWork W2049060086 @default.
- W2083047553 hasRelatedWork W2071559112 @default.
- W2083047553 hasRelatedWork W2078645770 @default.
- W2083047553 hasRelatedWork W2094845346 @default.
- W2083047553 hasRelatedWork W2300273913 @default.
- W2083047553 hasRelatedWork W2989636748 @default.
- W2083047553 hasRelatedWork W3013130071 @default.
- W2083047553 hasRelatedWork W3111549674 @default.
- W2083047553 hasRelatedWork W3168640066 @default.
- W2083047553 hasVolume "19" @default.
- W2083047553 isParatext "false" @default.
- W2083047553 isRetracted "false" @default.
- W2083047553 magId "2083047553" @default.
- W2083047553 workType "article" @default.