FRINK Linked Data Fragments server

Matches in SemOpenAlex for { <https://semopenalex.org/work/W2083085858> ?p ?o ?g. }

• W2083085858 endingPage "430" @default.
• W2083085858 startingPage "417" @default.
• W2083085858 abstract "Producing literature reviews of complex evidence for policymaking questions is a challenging methodological area. There are several established and emerging approaches to such reviews, but unanswered questions remain, especially around how to begin to make sense of large data sets drawn from heterogeneous sources. Drawing on Kuhn's notion of scientific paradigms, we developed a new method—meta-narrative review—for sorting and interpreting the 1024 sources identified in our exploratory searches. We took as our initial unit of analysis the unfolding ‘storyline’ of a research tradition over time. We mapped these storylines by using both electronic and manual tracking to trace the influence of seminal theoretical and empirical work on subsequent research within a tradition. We then drew variously on the different storylines to build up a rich picture of our field of study. We identified 13 key meta-narratives from literatures as disparate as rural sociology, clinical epidemiology, marketing and organisational studies. Researchers in different traditions had conceptualised, explained and investigated diffusion of innovations differently and had used different criteria for judging the quality of empirical work. Moreover, they told very different over-arching stories of the progress of their research. Within each tradition, accounts of research depicted human characters emplotted in a story of (in the early stages) pioneering endeavour and (later) systematic puzzle-solving, variously embellished with scientific dramas, surprises and ‘twists in the plot’. By first separating out, and then drawing together, these different meta-narratives, we produced a synthesis that embraced the many complexities and ambiguities of ‘diffusion of innovations’ in an organisational setting. We were able to make sense of seemingly contradictory data by systematically exposing and exploring tensions between research paradigms as set out in their over-arching storylines. In some traditions, scientific revolutions were identifiable in which breakaway researchers had abandoned the prevailing paradigm and introduced a new set of concepts, theories and empirical methods. We concluded that meta-narrative review adds value to the synthesis of heterogeneous bodies of literature, in which different groups of scientists have conceptualised and investigated the ‘same’ problem in different ways and produced seemingly contradictory findings. Its contribution to the mixed economy of methods for the systematic review of complex evidence should be explored further." @default.
• W2083085858 created "2016-06-24" @default.
• W2083085858 creator A5008349910 @default.
• W2083085858 creator A5011665070 @default.
• W2083085858 creator A5013237650 @default.
• W2083085858 creator A5016442226 @default.
• W2083085858 creator A5033985291 @default.
• W2083085858 creator A5076360070 @default.
• W2083085858 date "2005-07-01" @default.
• W2083085858 modified "2023-10-05" @default.
• W2083085858 title "Storylines of research in diffusion of innovation: a meta-narrative approach to systematic review" @default.
• W2083085858 cites W1581643558 @default.
• W2083085858 cites W1977195843 @default.
• W2083085858 cites W1993336395 @default.
• W2083085858 cites W2015804289 @default.
• W2083085858 cites W2022181758 @default.
• W2083085858 cites W2023728827 @default.
• W2083085858 cites W2041544120 @default.
• W2083085858 cites W2056789386 @default.
• W2083085858 cites W2067877381 @default.
• W2083085858 cites W2068449134 @default.
• W2083085858 cites W2076892439 @default.
• W2083085858 cites W2080970299 @default.
• W2083085858 cites W2081753990 @default.
• W2083085858 cites W2087551506 @default.
• W2083085858 cites W2094056187 @default.
• W2083085858 cites W2105403790 @default.
• W2083085858 cites W2119652992 @default.
• W2083085858 cites W2123421531 @default.
• W2083085858 cites W2132454116 @default.
• W2083085858 cites W2143932166 @default.
• W2083085858 cites W2150504366 @default.
• W2083085858 cites W2163562470 @default.
• W2083085858 cites W2179492332 @default.
• W2083085858 doi "https://doi.org/10.1016/j.socscimed.2004.12.001" @default.
• W2083085858 hasPubMedId "https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/15893056" @default.
• W2083085858 hasPublicationYear "2005" @default.
• W2083085858 type Work @default.
• W2083085858 sameAs 2083085858 @default.
• W2083085858 citedByCount "643" @default.
• W2083085858 countsByYear W20830858582012 @default.
• W2083085858 countsByYear W20830858582013 @default.
• W2083085858 countsByYear W20830858582014 @default.
• W2083085858 countsByYear W20830858582015 @default.
• W2083085858 countsByYear W20830858582016 @default.
• W2083085858 countsByYear W20830858582017 @default.
• W2083085858 countsByYear W20830858582018 @default.
• W2083085858 countsByYear W20830858582019 @default.
• W2083085858 countsByYear W20830858582020 @default.
• W2083085858 countsByYear W20830858582021 @default.
• W2083085858 countsByYear W20830858582022 @default.
• W2083085858 countsByYear W20830858582023 @default.
• W2083085858 crossrefType "journal-article" @default.
• W2083085858 hasAuthorship W2083085858A5008349910 @default.
• W2083085858 hasAuthorship W2083085858A5011665070 @default.
• W2083085858 hasAuthorship W2083085858A5013237650 @default.
• W2083085858 hasAuthorship W2083085858A5016442226 @default.
• W2083085858 hasAuthorship W2083085858A5033985291 @default.
• W2083085858 hasAuthorship W2083085858A5076360070 @default.
• W2083085858 hasConcept C105795698 @default.
• W2083085858 hasConcept C111472728 @default.
• W2083085858 hasConcept C120936955 @default.
• W2083085858 hasConcept C124952713 @default.
• W2083085858 hasConcept C138885662 @default.
• W2083085858 hasConcept C142362112 @default.
• W2083085858 hasConcept C144024400 @default.
• W2083085858 hasConcept C167651023 @default.
• W2083085858 hasConcept C19417346 @default.
• W2083085858 hasConcept C199033989 @default.
• W2083085858 hasConcept C202444582 @default.
• W2083085858 hasConcept C2775936607 @default.
• W2083085858 hasConcept C33923547 @default.
• W2083085858 hasConcept C36289849 @default.
• W2083085858 hasConcept C41895202 @default.
• W2083085858 hasConcept C75291252 @default.
• W2083085858 hasConcept C9652623 @default.
• W2083085858 hasConceptScore W2083085858C105795698 @default.
• W2083085858 hasConceptScore W2083085858C111472728 @default.
• W2083085858 hasConceptScore W2083085858C120936955 @default.
• W2083085858 hasConceptScore W2083085858C124952713 @default.
• W2083085858 hasConceptScore W2083085858C138885662 @default.
• W2083085858 hasConceptScore W2083085858C142362112 @default.
• W2083085858 hasConceptScore W2083085858C144024400 @default.
• W2083085858 hasConceptScore W2083085858C167651023 @default.
• W2083085858 hasConceptScore W2083085858C19417346 @default.
• W2083085858 hasConceptScore W2083085858C199033989 @default.
• W2083085858 hasConceptScore W2083085858C202444582 @default.
• W2083085858 hasConceptScore W2083085858C2775936607 @default.
• W2083085858 hasConceptScore W2083085858C33923547 @default.
• W2083085858 hasConceptScore W2083085858C36289849 @default.
• W2083085858 hasConceptScore W2083085858C41895202 @default.
• W2083085858 hasConceptScore W2083085858C75291252 @default.
• W2083085858 hasConceptScore W2083085858C9652623 @default.
• W2083085858 hasIssue "2" @default.
• W2083085858 hasLocation W20830858581 @default.
• W2083085858 hasLocation W20830858582 @default.
• W2083085858 hasOpenAccess W2083085858 @default.
• W2083085858 hasPrimaryLocation W20830858581 @default.

• next