FRINK Linked Data Fragments server

Matches in SemOpenAlex for { <https://semopenalex.org/work/W2083467263> ?p ?o ?g. }

• W2083467263 endingPage "14" @default.
• W2083467263 startingPage "9" @default.
• W2083467263 abstract "Future OncologyVol. 3, No. 1 EditorialExpanding the indications for sentinel lymph node surgery in breast cancerJudy C Boughey & Kelly K HuntJudy C BougheyMayo Clinic, Department of Surgery, 200 First Street, SW Rochester, MN 55905, USA. Search for more papers by this authorEmail the corresponding author at Boughey.Judy@mayo.edu & Kelly K Hunt† Author for correspondenceThe University of Texas, MD Anderson Cancer Center, Department of Surgical Oncology, 1515 Holcombe Boulevard, Unit 444, Houston, TX 77030, USA. Search for more papers by this authorEmail the corresponding author at khunt@mdanderson.orgPublished Online:5 Feb 2007https://doi.org/10.2217/14796694.3.1.9AboutSectionsView ArticleView Full TextPDF/EPUB ToolsAdd to favoritesDownload CitationsTrack CitationsPermissionsReprints ShareShare onFacebookTwitterLinkedInReddit View articleBibliography1 Krag DN, Weaver DL, Alex JC et al.: Surgical resection and radiolocalization of the sentinel lymph node in breast cancer using a gamma probe. Surg. Oncol.2,335–339; discussion 340 (1993).Crossref, Medline, CAS, Google Scholar2 Giuliano AE, Kirgan DM, Guenther JM et al.: Lymphatic mapping and sentinel lymphadenectomy for breast cancer. Ann. Surg.220,391–398; discussion 398–401 (1994).Crossref, Medline, CAS, Google Scholar3 Lucci A, Mackie L, Beitsch P et al.: Surgical complications associated with sentinel lymph node dissection (SLND) plus axillary lymph node dissection, versus SLND alone in The American College of Surgeons Oncology Group (ACOSOG) Trial Z0011. Ann. Surg. Oncol.13,4 (2006).Google Scholar4 Wilke LG, McCall LM, Posther KE et al.: Surgical complications associated with sentinel lymph node biopsy: results from a prospective international cooperative group trial. Ann. Surg. Oncol.13,491–500 (2006).Crossref, Medline, Google Scholar5 Hill AD, Borgen PI, Cody HS 3rd: Sentinel node biopsy in male breast cancer. Eur. J. Surg. Oncol.25,442–443 (1999).Crossref, Medline, CAS, Google Scholar6 Port ER, Fey JV, Cody HS 3rd et al.: Sentinel lymph node biopsy in patients with male breast carcinoma. Cancer91,319–323 (2001).Crossref, Medline, CAS, Google Scholar7 Boughey JC, Bedrosian I, Meric-Bernstam F et al.: Comparative analysis of sentinel lymph node operation in male and female breast cancer patients. J. Am. Coll. Surg.203,475–480 (2006).Crossref, Medline, Google Scholar8 Cimmino VM, Degnim AC, Sabel MS et al.: Efficacy of sentinel lymph node biopsy in male breast cancer. J. Surg. Oncol.86,74–77 (2004).Crossref, Medline, Google Scholar9 Goyal A, Horgan K, Kissin M et al.: Sentinel lymph node biopsy in male breast cancer patients. Eur. J. Surg. Oncol.30,480–483 (2004).Crossref, Medline, CAS, Google Scholar10 Boughey JC, Ross MI, Babiera GV et al.: Sentinel lymph node surgery in locally recurrent breast cancer. Clin. Breast Cancer7,248–253 (2006).Crossref, Medline, Google Scholar11 Port ER, Fey J, Gemignani ML et al.: Reoperative sentinel lymph node biopsy: a new option for patients with primary or locally recurrent breast carcinoma. J. Am. Coll. Surg.195,167–172 (2002).Crossref, Medline, Google Scholar12 Taback B, Nguyen P, Hansen N et al.: Sentinel lymph node biopsy for local recurrence of breast cancer after breast-conserving therapy. Ann. Surg. Oncol.13,1099–1104 (2006).Crossref, Medline, Google Scholar13 Roumen RM, Kuijt GP, Liem IH: Lymphatic mapping and sentinel node harvesting in patients with recurrent breast cancer. Eur. J. Surg. Oncol.32(10),1076–1081 (2006).Crossref, Medline, CAS, Google Scholar14 Garcia-Etienne CP, Fey J, Borgen P, Cody HS, Port ER: Prior axillary surgery is not a contraindication to sentinel lymph node biopsy: results of reoperative sentinel lymph node biopsy in 133 patients. Ann. Surg. Oncol.13,9 (2006).Crossref, Google Scholar15 Milardovic R, Castellon I, Mills C et al.: Scintigraphic visualization of an epigastric sentinel node in recurrent breast cancer after lumpectomy and postoperative radiation therapy. Clin. Nucl. Med.31,207–208 (2006).Crossref, Medline, Google Scholar16 Boughey JC, Khakpour N, Meric-Bernstam F et al.: Selective use of sentinel lymph node surgery during prophylactic mastectomy. Cancer107,1440–1447 (2006).Crossref, Medline, Google Scholar17 Black DS, Specht M, Lee JM et al.: Detecting occult breast cancer in prophylactic mastectomies: sentinel node biopsy vs pre-operative MRI. Ann. Surg. Oncol.13,9 (2006).Google Scholar18 Kumar R, Potenta S, Alavi A: Sentinel lymph node biopsy in multifocal and multicentric breast cancer. J. Am. Coll. Surg.198,674–676 (2004).Crossref, Medline, Google Scholar19 Tousimis E, Van Zee KJ, Fey JV et al.: The accuracy of sentinel lymph node biopsy in multicentric and multifocal invasive breast cancers. J. Am. Coll. Surg.197,529–535 (2003).Crossref, Medline, Google Scholar20 Ozmen V, Muslumanoglu M, Cabioglu N et al.: Increased false negative rates in sentinel lymph node biopsies in patients with multi-focal breast cancer. Breast Cancer Res. Treat.76,237–244 (2002).Crossref, Medline, CAS, Google Scholar21 Fernandez K, Swanson M, Verbanac K et al.: Is sentinel lymphadenectomy accurate in multifocal and multicentric breast cancer. Ann. Surg. Oncol.9,S16–S17 (2002).Google Scholar22 Jin Kim H, Heerdt AS, Cody HS et al.: Sentinel lymph node drainage in multicentric breast cancers. Breast J.8,356–361 (2002).Crossref, Medline, Google Scholar23 Schrenk P, Wayand W: Sentinel-node biopsy in axillary lymph-node staging for patients with multicentric breast cancer. Lancet357,122 (2001).Crossref, Medline, CAS, Google Scholar24 Veronesi P, Intra M, Vento AR et al.: Sentinel lymph node biopsy for localised ductal carcinoma in situ? Breast14,520–522 (2005).Crossref, Medline, CAS, Google Scholar25 Camp R, Feezor R, Kasraeian A et al.: Sentinel lymph node biopsy for ductal carcinoma in situ: an evolving approach at the University of Florida. Breast J.11,394–397 (2005).Crossref, Medline, Google Scholar26 Yen TW, Hunt KK, Ross MI et al.: Predictors of invasive breast cancer in patients with an initial diagnosis of ductal carcinoma in situ: a guide to selective use of sentinel lymph node biopsy in management of ductal carcinoma in situ. J. Am. Coll. Surg.200,516–526 (2005).Crossref, Medline, Google Scholar27 Gentilini O, Cremonesi M, Trifiro G et al.: Safety of sentinel node biopsy in pregnant patients with breast cancer. Ann. Oncol.15,1348–1351 (2004).Crossref, Medline, CAS, Google Scholar28 Keleher A, Wendt R 3rd, Delpassand E et al.: The safety of lymphatic mapping in pregnant breast cancer patients using Tc-99m sulfur colloid. Breast J.10,92–95 (2004).Crossref, Google Scholar29 Pandit-Taskar N, Dauer LT, Montgomery L et al.: Organ and fetal absorbed dose estimates from 99mTc-sulfur colloid lymphoscintigraphy and sentinel node localization in breast cancer patients. J. Nucl. Med.47,1202–1208 (2006).Medline, CAS, Google Scholar30 Reitsamer R, Peintinger F, Rettenbacher L et al.: Sentinel lymph node biopsy in breast cancer patients after neoadjuvant chemotherapy. J. Surg. Oncol.84,63–67 (2003).Crossref, Medline, Google Scholar31 Breslin TM, Cohen L, Sahin A et al.: Sentinel lymph node biopsy is accurate after neoadjuvant chemotherapy for breast cancer. J. Clin. Oncol.18,3480–3486 (2000).Crossref, Medline, CAS, Google Scholar32 Mamounas EP, Brown A, Anderson S et al.: Sentinel node biopsy after neoadjuvant chemotherapy in breast cancer: results from National Surgical Adjuvant Breast and Bowel Project Protocol B-27. J. Clin. Oncol.23,2694–2702 (2005).Crossref, Medline, Google Scholar33 van Rijk MC, Nieweg OE, Rutgers EJ et al.: Sentinel node biopsy before neoadjuvant chemotherapy spares breast cancer patients axillary lymph node dissection. Ann. Surg. Oncol.13,475–479 (2006).Crossref, Medline, Google Scholar34 Newman ES, Diehl KM, Cimmino VM et al.: Sentinel lymph node biopsy performed after neoadjuvant chemotherapy is accurate in patients with documented node-positive disease at presentation. Ann. Surg. Oncol.13,10 (2006).Crossref, Medline, Google Scholar35 Heuts EM, van der Ent FW, Kengen RA et al.: Results of sentinel node biopsy not affected by previous excisional biopsy. Eur. J. Surg. Oncol.32,278–281 (2006).Crossref, Medline, CAS, Google Scholar36 Haigh PI, Hansen NM, Qi K et al.: Biopsy method and excision volume do not affect success rate of subsequent sentinel lymph node dissection in breast cancer. Ann. Surg. Oncol.7,21–27 (2000).Crossref, Medline, CAS, Google Scholar37 Luini A, Galimberti V, Gatti G et al.: The sentinel node biopsy after previous breast surgery: preliminary results on 543 patients treated at the European Institute of Oncology. Breast Cancer Res. Treat.89,159–163 (2005).Crossref, Medline, Google Scholar38 Jakub JW, Ebert MD, Cantor A et al.: Breast cancer in patients with prior augmentation: presentation, stage, and lymphatic mapping. Plast. Reconstr. Surg.114,1737–1742 (2004).Crossref, Medline, Google Scholar39 Gray RJ, Forstner-Barthell AW, Pockaj BA et al.: Breast-conserving therapy and sentinel lymph node biopsy are feasible in cancer patients with previous implant breast augmentation. Am. J. Surg.188,122–125 (2004).Crossref, Medline, Google Scholar40 Golshan M, Lesnikoski BA, Lester S: Sentinel lymph node biopsy for occult breast cancer detected during breast reduction surgery. Am. Surg.72,397–400 (2006).Crossref, Medline, Google Scholar41 Schrenk P, Wolfl S, Bogner S et al.: Symmetrization reduction mammaplasty combined with sentinel node biopsy in patients operated for contralateral breast cancer. J. Surg. Oncol.94,9–15 (2006).Crossref, Medline, Google Scholar42 Bedrosian I, Reynolds C, Mick R et al.: Accuracy of sentinel lymph node biopsy in patients with large primary breast tumors. Cancer88,2540–2545 (2000).Crossref, Medline, CAS, Google Scholar43 Stearns V, Ewing CA, Slack R et al.: Sentinel lymphadenectomy after neoadjuvant chemotherapy for breast cancer may reliably represent the axilla except for inflammatory breast cancer. Ann. Surg. Oncol.9,235–242 (2002).Crossref, Medline, Google ScholarFiguresReferencesRelatedDetailsCited BySentinel Lymph Node Surgery in Uncommon Clinical CircumstancesSurgical Oncology Clinics of North America, Vol. 19, No. 3 Vol. 3, No. 1 eToC Sign up Follow us on social media for the latest updates Metrics Downloaded 92 times History Published online 5 February 2007 Published in print February 2007 Information© Future Medicine LtdPDF download" @default.
• W2083467263 created "2016-06-24" @default.
• W2083467263 creator A5017411324 @default.
• W2083467263 creator A5033544737 @default.
• W2083467263 date "2007-02-01" @default.
• W2083467263 modified "2023-09-23" @default.
• W2083467263 title "Expanding the indications for sentinel lymph node surgery in breast cancer" @default.
• W2083467263 cites W1927915303 @default.
• W2083467263 cites W1967863713 @default.
• W2083467263 cites W1970996665 @default.
• W2083467263 cites W1971750395 @default.
• W2083467263 cites W1977766159 @default.
• W2083467263 cites W1979112812 @default.
• W2083467263 cites W1984027799 @default.
• W2083467263 cites W1993539759 @default.
• W2083467263 cites W1994856556 @default.
• W2083467263 cites W1998669348 @default.
• W2083467263 cites W2006927623 @default.
• W2083467263 cites W2021942220 @default.
• W2083467263 cites W2031441095 @default.
• W2083467263 cites W2039110392 @default.
• W2083467263 cites W2042669906 @default.
• W2083467263 cites W2042915415 @default.
• W2083467263 cites W2045662847 @default.
• W2083467263 cites W2049035553 @default.
• W2083467263 cites W2049335192 @default.
• W2083467263 cites W2058100143 @default.
• W2083467263 cites W2068242586 @default.
• W2083467263 cites W2070027712 @default.
• W2083467263 cites W2070289490 @default.
• W2083467263 cites W2074202593 @default.
• W2083467263 cites W2077240246 @default.
• W2083467263 cites W2078260396 @default.
• W2083467263 cites W2087076522 @default.
• W2083467263 cites W2093803037 @default.
• W2083467263 cites W2098641762 @default.
• W2083467263 cites W2116945435 @default.
• W2083467263 cites W2122700859 @default.
• W2083467263 cites W2133165795 @default.
• W2083467263 cites W2147077806 @default.
• W2083467263 cites W2149321682 @default.
• W2083467263 cites W2150138481 @default.
• W2083467263 cites W2171152396 @default.
• W2083467263 cites W2331142721 @default.
• W2083467263 cites W24745340 @default.
• W2083467263 cites W4236207137 @default.
• W2083467263 cites W4375905852 @default.
• W2083467263 doi "https://doi.org/10.2217/14796694.3.1.9" @default.
• W2083467263 hasPubMedId "https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/17280496" @default.
• W2083467263 hasPublicationYear "2007" @default.
• W2083467263 type Work @default.
• W2083467263 sameAs 2083467263 @default.
• W2083467263 citedByCount "1" @default.
• W2083467263 crossrefType "journal-article" @default.
• W2083467263 hasAuthorship W2083467263A5017411324 @default.
• W2083467263 hasAuthorship W2083467263A5033544737 @default.
• W2083467263 hasConcept C121608353 @default.
• W2083467263 hasConcept C126322002 @default.
• W2083467263 hasConcept C141071460 @default.
• W2083467263 hasConcept C2776608951 @default.
• W2083467263 hasConcept C2780212769 @default.
• W2083467263 hasConcept C2781392513 @default.
• W2083467263 hasConcept C2908949552 @default.
• W2083467263 hasConcept C509974204 @default.
• W2083467263 hasConcept C530470458 @default.
• W2083467263 hasConcept C71924100 @default.
• W2083467263 hasConceptScore W2083467263C121608353 @default.
• W2083467263 hasConceptScore W2083467263C126322002 @default.
• W2083467263 hasConceptScore W2083467263C141071460 @default.
• W2083467263 hasConceptScore W2083467263C2776608951 @default.
• W2083467263 hasConceptScore W2083467263C2780212769 @default.
• W2083467263 hasConceptScore W2083467263C2781392513 @default.
• W2083467263 hasConceptScore W2083467263C2908949552 @default.
• W2083467263 hasConceptScore W2083467263C509974204 @default.
• W2083467263 hasConceptScore W2083467263C530470458 @default.
• W2083467263 hasConceptScore W2083467263C71924100 @default.
• W2083467263 hasIssue "1" @default.
• W2083467263 hasLocation W20834672631 @default.
• W2083467263 hasLocation W20834672632 @default.
• W2083467263 hasOpenAccess W2083467263 @default.
• W2083467263 hasPrimaryLocation W20834672631 @default.
• W2083467263 hasRelatedWork W1987327643 @default.
• W2083467263 hasRelatedWork W2076716349 @default.
• W2083467263 hasRelatedWork W2331446574 @default.
• W2083467263 hasRelatedWork W2407310859 @default.
• W2083467263 hasRelatedWork W2415181253 @default.
• W2083467263 hasRelatedWork W2896740813 @default.
• W2083467263 hasRelatedWork W3115275336 @default.
• W2083467263 hasRelatedWork W3198270945 @default.
• W2083467263 hasRelatedWork W3207506191 @default.
• W2083467263 hasRelatedWork W1889344703 @default.
• W2083467263 hasVolume "3" @default.
• W2083467263 isParatext "false" @default.
• W2083467263 isRetracted "false" @default.
• W2083467263 magId "2083467263" @default.
• W2083467263 workType "article" @default.