Matches in SemOpenAlex for { <https://semopenalex.org/work/W2083670497> ?p ?o ?g. }
Showing items 1 to 72 of
72
with 100 items per page.
- W2083670497 endingPage "421" @default.
- W2083670497 startingPage "416" @default.
- W2083670497 abstract "During spinning-up maneuvers of a spacecraft, the spin thrusters can produce a e nite transverse velocity offset or bias in the plane perpendicular to the spin axis. A two-burn scheme is introduced to eliminate this offset. The fundamental transcendental equation for the two-burn scheme is of the same form as Kepler' s equation. The relationship between the transcendental equation and Kepler' s equation is investigated. Numerical results demonstrate the effectiveness of the two-burn scheme. scribe the spin-rate-control e ight algorithm that is used both to alter and to maintain spin rate. The problem is challenging because the thruster causes body-e xed torques about three axes and body-e xed forces along two axes. In this paper, a maneuver scheme is presented that annihilates the transverse velocity bias accrued during spinning-up maneuvers. This offset velocity is directly dependent on the unbalanced force of the spinup thrusters and so is particularly noticeable if there is a large thruster couple mismatch or if (as in the case of the Galileo spacecraft)thereisonlyonespinupthruster (i.e.,nocoupleavailable as depicted in Fig. 1 ). The maneuver scheme consists of two burns with a coast period in between. The initial burn angle is given by a transcendental equation similar to Kepler' s equation. However, in contrast to Kepler' s equation, which has a unique solution for a given eccentricity, the transcendental velocity equation can have an ine nite number of solutions. (The fact that there are close analogies between the classic problem of rigid-body motion and the orbital motion of two bodies is notnew— it has been noted in an interesting paper by Cochran et al. 2 ) OurproblemisrelatedtothatdiscussedbyLonguskietal., 3 where a two-burn scheme is introduced to annihilate angular momentum bias due to transverse torques during a spinning-up maneuver. We consider the problem of transverse velocity accumulation due to transverse forces, which is not addressed in Ref. 3. Our approach makesuseoftheanalytical approximation 4 for velocityaccrued due toappliedforcesina spinupmaneuver.Theresulting transcendental equationisdifferentfromthatofRef.3butiscloselyrelated.Finally, we investigate the existence of multiple solutions for the two-burn scheme." @default.
- W2083670497 created "2016-06-24" @default.
- W2083670497 creator A5001511739 @default.
- W2083670497 creator A5032583458 @default.
- W2083670497 date "1997-05-01" @default.
- W2083670497 modified "2023-09-27" @default.
- W2083670497 title "Annihilation of Transverse Velocity Bias During Spinning-Up Maneuvers" @default.
- W2083670497 cites W1994165713 @default.
- W2083670497 cites W1995539865 @default.
- W2083670497 cites W2016809310 @default.
- W2083670497 cites W2026689867 @default.
- W2083670497 doi "https://doi.org/10.2514/2.4074" @default.
- W2083670497 hasPublicationYear "1997" @default.
- W2083670497 type Work @default.
- W2083670497 sameAs 2083670497 @default.
- W2083670497 citedByCount "7" @default.
- W2083670497 countsByYear W20836704972016 @default.
- W2083670497 countsByYear W20836704972019 @default.
- W2083670497 crossrefType "journal-article" @default.
- W2083670497 hasAuthorship W2083670497A5001511739 @default.
- W2083670497 hasAuthorship W2083670497A5032583458 @default.
- W2083670497 hasConcept C121332964 @default.
- W2083670497 hasConcept C127413603 @default.
- W2083670497 hasConcept C146978453 @default.
- W2083670497 hasConcept C154815118 @default.
- W2083670497 hasConcept C154945302 @default.
- W2083670497 hasConcept C154954056 @default.
- W2083670497 hasConcept C185544564 @default.
- W2083670497 hasConcept C201941533 @default.
- W2083670497 hasConcept C2775924081 @default.
- W2083670497 hasConcept C41008148 @default.
- W2083670497 hasConcept C47446073 @default.
- W2083670497 hasConcept C57879066 @default.
- W2083670497 hasConcept C66938386 @default.
- W2083670497 hasConcept C74650414 @default.
- W2083670497 hasConcept C78519656 @default.
- W2083670497 hasConceptScore W2083670497C121332964 @default.
- W2083670497 hasConceptScore W2083670497C127413603 @default.
- W2083670497 hasConceptScore W2083670497C146978453 @default.
- W2083670497 hasConceptScore W2083670497C154815118 @default.
- W2083670497 hasConceptScore W2083670497C154945302 @default.
- W2083670497 hasConceptScore W2083670497C154954056 @default.
- W2083670497 hasConceptScore W2083670497C185544564 @default.
- W2083670497 hasConceptScore W2083670497C201941533 @default.
- W2083670497 hasConceptScore W2083670497C2775924081 @default.
- W2083670497 hasConceptScore W2083670497C41008148 @default.
- W2083670497 hasConceptScore W2083670497C47446073 @default.
- W2083670497 hasConceptScore W2083670497C57879066 @default.
- W2083670497 hasConceptScore W2083670497C66938386 @default.
- W2083670497 hasConceptScore W2083670497C74650414 @default.
- W2083670497 hasConceptScore W2083670497C78519656 @default.
- W2083670497 hasIssue "3" @default.
- W2083670497 hasLocation W20836704971 @default.
- W2083670497 hasOpenAccess W2083670497 @default.
- W2083670497 hasPrimaryLocation W20836704971 @default.
- W2083670497 hasRelatedWork W1984437551 @default.
- W2083670497 hasRelatedWork W1995951411 @default.
- W2083670497 hasRelatedWork W1997519543 @default.
- W2083670497 hasRelatedWork W2024719122 @default.
- W2083670497 hasRelatedWork W2046161730 @default.
- W2083670497 hasRelatedWork W2064545012 @default.
- W2083670497 hasRelatedWork W2072585239 @default.
- W2083670497 hasRelatedWork W2083670497 @default.
- W2083670497 hasRelatedWork W2085161089 @default.
- W2083670497 hasRelatedWork W3179433803 @default.
- W2083670497 hasVolume "20" @default.
- W2083670497 isParatext "false" @default.
- W2083670497 isRetracted "false" @default.
- W2083670497 magId "2083670497" @default.
- W2083670497 workType "article" @default.