FRINK Linked Data Fragments server

Matches in SemOpenAlex for { <https://semopenalex.org/work/W2083845579> ?p ?o ?g. }

• W2083845579 endingPage "927" @default.
• W2083845579 startingPage "915" @default.
• W2083845579 abstract "Langston Hughes’s Poetry and the Metaphysics of Simplicity Karl Henzy (bio) Arnold Rampersad and David Roessel, in their edition of the Collected Poems of Langston Hughes, tell us that while for “many readers of African descent” Hughes “is their poet laureate,” for “a substantial number of readers and, especially, scholar-critics, Hughes’s approach to poetry was far too simple and unlearned” (3). Indeed, Hughes’s contemporary from the Harlem Renaissance, Countee Cullen, considered Hughes’s poetry to be so artless that he “wondered whether some of Langston Hughes’s poems were poems at all” (Ikonne 151). And by 1985, Rampersad could still say, lamentably, that [w]ith few exceptions, literary critics have resisted offering even a modestly complicated theory concerning his creativity. His relentless affability and charm, his deep, open love of the black masses, his devotion to their folk forms, and his insistence on writing poetry that they could understand, all have contributed to the notion that Langston Hughes was intellectually and emotionally shallow. (“Origins” 180) These views result from the deceptive lightness of Hughes’s style and the games he plays with voice and tone. As a result, critics have tended to conflate Hughes’s own consciousness with those of the “blues people” who appear in his poems, and to neglect the proper materials by which a poet such as Hughes does his thinking. Hughes’s poetry is simple but not simplistic. The kind of simplicity Hughes creates is not only difficult to achieve and intellectually challenging, it calls for a whole “metaphysics of simplicity.” Associations in readers’ minds about the concepts of heaviness and lightness date back, in the West, more than two-thousand years. Hughes’s poetry is frequently quite light, even when his subject matter is the heavy problem of suffering and loss of hope, as is the case, for instance, in his volume Montage of a Dream Deferred (1951). Where we expect, in “Harlem,” a cry of pain, Hughes dances playfully through a series of questions.1 Of course, the experiences he alludes to in the poem—frustration, bitterness, and rage—are anything but light, but because we are aware that the poem could be a straightforward howl of pain, the questions and the rhymes generate a vertiginous affect, “light” by comparison to the depths of anguish over which they hover. Yet lightness, in this instance, is anything but “intellectually and emotionally shallow”; it is a strategic move both for keeping fresh an awareness of ongoing betrayal and for asserting the betrayed’s refusal to be defined or defeated by that betrayal. And such a move turns on its head an ancient association of heavy art with what is profound and of light art with what is shallow. [End Page 915] As Czech writer Milan Kundera muses in his philosophical novel The Unbearable Lightness of Being, the pre-Socratic philosopher Parmenides “divided the world into pairs of opposites,” including lightness and heaviness, and he attributed positivity to lightness and negativity to heaviness (5). But later thinkers soon reversed Parmenides’ oppositions, and by the Romantic period centuries later Beethoven was not unusual in thinking that “only necessity is heavy, and only what is heavy is valuable. . . . Beethoven’s hero is a lifter of metaphysical weights” (33). And Beethoven, in composing his last work, the Opus 135 String Quartet, turned a frivolous inspiration into a serious quartet, a joke into a metaphysical truth. It is an interesting tale of light going to heavy . . . Yet oddly enough, the transformation fails to surprise us. We would have been shocked, on the other hand, if Beethoven had transformed the seriousness of his quartet into . . . the most trifling of jokes. (195–96) But our sense of the inappropriate in this case would derive from the fact that “we no longer know how to think as Parmenides thought.” Kundera, however, assures us that both “history [and] . . . individual human life [are] unbearably light, light as a feather, as dust swirling into the air, as whatever will no longer exist tomorrow” (223). The whole “lightness/heaviness opposition is the most mysterious, most ambiguous of all” (6). We cannot see properly what Hughes is doing in his poetry if we come to..." @default.
• W2083845579 created "2016-06-24" @default.
• W2083845579 creator A5071567182 @default.
• W2083845579 date "2011-01-01" @default.
• W2083845579 modified "2023-10-17" @default.
• W2083845579 title "Langston Hughes’s Poetry and the Metaphysics of Simplicity" @default.
• W2083845579 cites W1501984063 @default.
• W2083845579 cites W1510214694 @default.
• W2083845579 cites W1519222424 @default.
• W2083845579 cites W1527138941 @default.
• W2083845579 cites W1554804827 @default.
• W2083845579 cites W1597097400 @default.
• W2083845579 cites W1608365788 @default.
• W2083845579 cites W2001234851 @default.
• W2083845579 cites W2002522882 @default.
• W2083845579 cites W2007438246 @default.
• W2083845579 cites W2092334124 @default.
• W2083845579 cites W2132588208 @default.
• W2083845579 cites W568332410 @default.
• W2083845579 cites W585179846 @default.
• W2083845579 cites W657720749 @default.
• W2083845579 cites W127644411 @default.
• W2083845579 doi "https://doi.org/10.1353/cal.2011.0184" @default.
• W2083845579 hasPublicationYear "2011" @default.
• W2083845579 type Work @default.
• W2083845579 sameAs 2083845579 @default.
• W2083845579 citedByCount "2" @default.
• W2083845579 countsByYear W20838455792016 @default.
• W2083845579 crossrefType "journal-article" @default.
• W2083845579 hasAuthorship W2083845579A5071567182 @default.
• W2083845579 hasConcept C111472728 @default.
• W2083845579 hasConcept C124952713 @default.
• W2083845579 hasConcept C138885662 @default.
• W2083845579 hasConcept C142362112 @default.
• W2083845579 hasConcept C164913051 @default.
• W2083845579 hasConcept C182744844 @default.
• W2083845579 hasConcept C2776372474 @default.
• W2083845579 hasConcept C2776445246 @default.
• W2083845579 hasConcept C2780586882 @default.
• W2083845579 hasConceptScore W2083845579C111472728 @default.
• W2083845579 hasConceptScore W2083845579C124952713 @default.
• W2083845579 hasConceptScore W2083845579C138885662 @default.
• W2083845579 hasConceptScore W2083845579C142362112 @default.
• W2083845579 hasConceptScore W2083845579C164913051 @default.
• W2083845579 hasConceptScore W2083845579C182744844 @default.
• W2083845579 hasConceptScore W2083845579C2776372474 @default.
• W2083845579 hasConceptScore W2083845579C2776445246 @default.
• W2083845579 hasConceptScore W2083845579C2780586882 @default.
• W2083845579 hasIssue "3" @default.
• W2083845579 hasLocation W20838455791 @default.
• W2083845579 hasOpenAccess W2083845579 @default.
• W2083845579 hasPrimaryLocation W20838455791 @default.
• W2083845579 hasRelatedWork W2346914283 @default.
• W2083845579 hasRelatedWork W2351402169 @default.
• W2083845579 hasRelatedWork W2355049900 @default.
• W2083845579 hasRelatedWork W2358425720 @default.
• W2083845579 hasRelatedWork W2366351037 @default.
• W2083845579 hasRelatedWork W2373438911 @default.
• W2083845579 hasRelatedWork W2375168801 @default.
• W2083845579 hasRelatedWork W2391391981 @default.
• W2083845579 hasRelatedWork W2748952813 @default.
• W2083845579 hasRelatedWork W3192799332 @default.
• W2083845579 hasVolume "34" @default.
• W2083845579 isParatext "false" @default.
• W2083845579 isRetracted "false" @default.
• W2083845579 magId "2083845579" @default.
• W2083845579 workType "article" @default.