FRINK Linked Data Fragments server

Matches in SemOpenAlex for { <https://semopenalex.org/work/W2084032440> ?p ?o ?g. }

• W2084032440 endingPage "279" @default.
• W2084032440 startingPage "261" @default.
• W2084032440 abstract "This discussion examines the insensitivity of the design and conduct of a national evaluation study. fundamental problem with the evaluation is that it typifies a misapplication of the treatmentcontrol or experimental design in educational research. First, the application of this design to a population of dropouts is unintentionally unethical, denying dropouts the opportunity to come back into the social system by entering an alternative school. Second, there are significant methodological flaws in the application of this design. control group in this study is actually a negative treatment group or a reactive control group (Cook & Campbell 1979) composed of individuals refused participation in the program. claim that withholding treatments from a portion of the group will provide more accurate estimates of the treatment effect (as argued by Tukey, 1978, and Gilbert, McPeek, & Mosteller, 1978) is spurious in this case. Controlled trials can actually ensure a more inaccurate estimate of treatment effects. This discussion demonstrates how a control group does not provide the no-cause baseline information expected of it. A discussion of this fundamental paradigm in educational evaluation parallels the controversy surrounding Ibsen's baths in his play An Enemy of the People (1958). Dr. Stockmann, the play's protagonist, was a medical official of the town's baths. After discovering contaminants in the baths, Stockmann attempted to publish his findings. He encountered significant resistance from the townspeople, who derived their income from tourists frequenting the baths. I have encountered similar resistance to the discussion of the misuse of a paradigm fundamental to educational research. Dr. Stockmann believed that The whole of [our] flourishing municipal life derive[d] its sustenance from a lie (p. 627). author contends that a parallel exists in an evaluation that relies on information drawn from a misapplication of the treatment-control design. Stockmann's community and the evaluation community are blinded by different agendas. difference between the two is that Stockmann's findings centered around personal and economic motivational factors, while the misapplication of the experimental design in this case was the result of real world constraints and insensitivity. results, however, are the same: both forms of blindness and resistance to substantive criticism function at the expense of others (in each case the individuals they seek to assist). A brief examination of the real world constraints and views of the federal bureaucracy, the research corporation, and the education research establishment I am indebted to Lee J. Cronbach and my colleagues at RMC Research Corporation and Stanford University for their insightful criticism and generous assistance in the preparation of this manuscript." @default.
• W2084032440 created "2016-06-24" @default.
• W2084032440 creator A5040222771 @default.
• W2084032440 date "1982-09-01" @default.
• W2084032440 modified "2023-09-25" @default.
• W2084032440 title "Ibsen’s Baths: Reactivity and Insensitivity (A Misapplication of the Treatment-Control Design in a National Evaluation)" @default.
• W2084032440 cites W1491087240 @default.
• W2084032440 cites W1510524832 @default.
• W2084032440 cites W1527280191 @default.
• W2084032440 cites W1581649338 @default.
• W2084032440 cites W1835706784 @default.
• W2084032440 cites W1855791052 @default.
• W2084032440 cites W1977446554 @default.
• W2084032440 cites W1980956348 @default.
• W2084032440 cites W1990184638 @default.
• W2084032440 cites W1995823987 @default.
• W2084032440 cites W2007412531 @default.
• W2084032440 cites W2012507831 @default.
• W2084032440 cites W2013256551 @default.
• W2084032440 cites W2021392360 @default.
• W2084032440 cites W2026250491 @default.
• W2084032440 cites W2038252730 @default.
• W2084032440 cites W2043110326 @default.
• W2084032440 cites W2058101029 @default.
• W2084032440 cites W2059676028 @default.
• W2084032440 cites W2062422931 @default.
• W2084032440 cites W2067927349 @default.
• W2084032440 cites W2076191055 @default.
• W2084032440 cites W2079132362 @default.
• W2084032440 cites W2079900424 @default.
• W2084032440 cites W2090310840 @default.
• W2084032440 cites W2094419105 @default.
• W2084032440 cites W2116521681 @default.
• W2084032440 cites W2128874915 @default.
• W2084032440 cites W2144846366 @default.
• W2084032440 cites W2208260469 @default.
• W2084032440 cites W2317577728 @default.
• W2084032440 cites W231857989 @default.
• W2084032440 cites W232949168 @default.
• W2084032440 cites W2335743130 @default.
• W2084032440 cites W253772060 @default.
• W2084032440 cites W258362147 @default.
• W2084032440 cites W2616762518 @default.
• W2084032440 cites W2753533763 @default.
• W2084032440 cites W2798254328 @default.
• W2084032440 cites W29301864 @default.
• W2084032440 cites W297056360 @default.
• W2084032440 cites W563288227 @default.
• W2084032440 cites W625008555 @default.
• W2084032440 doi "https://doi.org/10.3102/01623737004003261" @default.
• W2084032440 hasPublicationYear "1982" @default.
• W2084032440 type Work @default.
• W2084032440 sameAs 2084032440 @default.
• W2084032440 citedByCount "15" @default.
• W2084032440 countsByYear W20840324402014 @default.
• W2084032440 countsByYear W20840324402015 @default.
• W2084032440 countsByYear W20840324402019 @default.
• W2084032440 crossrefType "journal-article" @default.
• W2084032440 hasAuthorship W2084032440A5040222771 @default.
• W2084032440 hasConcept C100480397 @default.
• W2084032440 hasConcept C142724271 @default.
• W2084032440 hasConcept C144024400 @default.
• W2084032440 hasConcept C149923435 @default.
• W2084032440 hasConcept C15744967 @default.
• W2084032440 hasConcept C162324750 @default.
• W2084032440 hasConcept C17744445 @default.
• W2084032440 hasConcept C187736073 @default.
• W2084032440 hasConcept C18903297 @default.
• W2084032440 hasConcept C199539241 @default.
• W2084032440 hasConcept C21547014 @default.
• W2084032440 hasConcept C2775922551 @default.
• W2084032440 hasConcept C2775924081 @default.
• W2084032440 hasConcept C2908647359 @default.
• W2084032440 hasConcept C38652104 @default.
• W2084032440 hasConcept C41008148 @default.
• W2084032440 hasConcept C41065033 @default.
• W2084032440 hasConcept C41458344 @default.
• W2084032440 hasConcept C57473165 @default.
• W2084032440 hasConcept C71924100 @default.
• W2084032440 hasConcept C77805123 @default.
• W2084032440 hasConcept C86803240 @default.
• W2084032440 hasConceptScore W2084032440C100480397 @default.
• W2084032440 hasConceptScore W2084032440C142724271 @default.
• W2084032440 hasConceptScore W2084032440C144024400 @default.
• W2084032440 hasConceptScore W2084032440C149923435 @default.
• W2084032440 hasConceptScore W2084032440C15744967 @default.
• W2084032440 hasConceptScore W2084032440C162324750 @default.
• W2084032440 hasConceptScore W2084032440C17744445 @default.
• W2084032440 hasConceptScore W2084032440C187736073 @default.
• W2084032440 hasConceptScore W2084032440C18903297 @default.
• W2084032440 hasConceptScore W2084032440C199539241 @default.
• W2084032440 hasConceptScore W2084032440C21547014 @default.
• W2084032440 hasConceptScore W2084032440C2775922551 @default.
• W2084032440 hasConceptScore W2084032440C2775924081 @default.
• W2084032440 hasConceptScore W2084032440C2908647359 @default.
• W2084032440 hasConceptScore W2084032440C38652104 @default.
• W2084032440 hasConceptScore W2084032440C41008148 @default.
• W2084032440 hasConceptScore W2084032440C41065033 @default.

• next