FRINK Linked Data Fragments server

Matches in SemOpenAlex for { <https://semopenalex.org/work/W2084206637> ?p ?o ?g. }

• W2084206637 endingPage "27" @default.
• W2084206637 startingPage "27" @default.
• W2084206637 abstract "National Survey of Families and Households 1987-88 (N = 13,017) data were used to generate population estimates of in- and out-of-household caregiving for persons of all ages. More than 1 in 7 U.S. adults reported caring for relatives or friends during the previous year, including more than 1 in 5 women aged 35-64. About one third of this care was provided to nonelderly persons. Multivariate analyses revealed that gender, age, marital status, education, ethnicity, education, and employment status helped predict the likelihood of caregiving. Demographic change and feminist scholarship have helped focus more attention on informal caregiving than ever before. Until recently, the work that family members and friends did to help ill or disabled members of society remained relatively invisible due to a lack of scientific attention, conceptualization, and measurement (Daniels, 1987). However, demographic changes have now increased the relative risk of becoming a caregiver at some time--or even multiple times--during a lifetime, and caregiving is emerging as an issue of increased public interest and prominence (Brody, 1990). There are several trends that have worked together to increase the likelihood of becoming a caregiver, which is a role that often contributes to increased strain in families. The U.S. is an aging society where a growing proportion of the total population is aged 65 and older (Watkins, Mencken, & Bongaarts, 1987). Contemporary adults can expect their parents and partners to live longer lives, which increases the risk that chronic illnesses and functional disability will occur that will require nonordinary care (Verbrugge, 1989). The decline in overall family size means that caregiving responsibilities for aging parents are falling on fewer shoulders than they did in the past. A higher divorce rate is contributing to a larger share of middle-aged and older persons living without a spouse, thereby accelerating the rate at which care from someone outside of the household may be needed (Uhlenberg, Cooney, & Boyd, 1990). At the same time, the dramatic increase in the rate of women's paid employment has made it problematic to assume that full-time women homemakers can be counted on to care for the increase in the number of frail elderly (Coward, Home, & Dwyer, 1992; Seccombe, 1992). The increased rate of paid employment among women, even those who have preschool-aged children, has also provoked added concern about the caregiving load of families with younger disabled, as well as able, dependents (Seccombe, 1992). Feminist scholarship, in particular, has endeavored to bring the invisible private workload of caregiving for both young and old to increased public attention. Feminists have also sought to foster the social reconstruction of caregiving work into activities that include men as well as women and that enlists not only private interest but also public interest (Daniels, 1987; Hooyman, 1990, 1992; Pascall, 1986; Seccombe, 1992). Undoubtedly, the last few decades of research emphasizing informal caregiving for the frail elderly has helped pave the way for research that now more comprehensively considers caregiving for frail and disabled persons of all ages (Kahana, Biegel, & Wykle, 1994). Understanding the changing historical prevalence and predictors of caregiving across the lifespan is critical for family practitioners and policy makers who make decisions about need levels and the provision of family benefits and services. A population-level perspective on caregiving prevalence is important for targeting demographic groups that are likely to need complementary formal service help to enhance and support their provision of informal family support (Litwak, 1985). Researchers who undertake smallscale intensive studies of caregiving and care receiving are able to administer the detailed measures that are necessary for understanding the processes and outcomes of caregiving, but they often have difficulty recruiting large representative samples. …" @default.
• W2084206637 created "2016-06-24" @default.
• W2084206637 creator A5027538373 @default.
• W2084206637 date "1996-01-01" @default.
• W2084206637 modified "2023-09-23" @default.
• W2084206637 title "Caregiving across the Lifespan: National Prevalence and Predictors" @default.
• W2084206637 cites W1579300589 @default.
• W2084206637 cites W1582546098 @default.
• W2084206637 cites W1967995457 @default.
• W2084206637 cites W1969670923 @default.
• W2084206637 cites W1984736685 @default.
• W2084206637 cites W1987752892 @default.
• W2084206637 cites W1992372186 @default.
• W2084206637 cites W2005790571 @default.
• W2084206637 cites W2017347515 @default.
• W2084206637 cites W2048149162 @default.
• W2084206637 cites W2055621170 @default.
• W2084206637 cites W2078368686 @default.
• W2084206637 cites W2086084774 @default.
• W2084206637 cites W2104920029 @default.
• W2084206637 cites W2139854924 @default.
• W2084206637 cites W2323299193 @default.
• W2084206637 cites W3041283123 @default.
• W2084206637 cites W646446940 @default.
• W2084206637 cites W2588240659 @default.
• W2084206637 doi "https://doi.org/10.2307/584767" @default.
• W2084206637 hasPublicationYear "1996" @default.
• W2084206637 type Work @default.
• W2084206637 sameAs 2084206637 @default.
• W2084206637 citedByCount "121" @default.
• W2084206637 countsByYear W20842066372012 @default.
• W2084206637 countsByYear W20842066372013 @default.
• W2084206637 countsByYear W20842066372014 @default.
• W2084206637 countsByYear W20842066372015 @default.
• W2084206637 countsByYear W20842066372016 @default.
• W2084206637 countsByYear W20842066372017 @default.
• W2084206637 countsByYear W20842066372018 @default.
• W2084206637 countsByYear W20842066372019 @default.
• W2084206637 countsByYear W20842066372021 @default.
• W2084206637 countsByYear W20842066372022 @default.
• W2084206637 countsByYear W20842066372023 @default.
• W2084206637 crossrefType "journal-article" @default.
• W2084206637 hasAuthorship W2084206637A5027538373 @default.
• W2084206637 hasConcept C144024400 @default.
• W2084206637 hasConcept C149923435 @default.
• W2084206637 hasConcept C15744967 @default.
• W2084206637 hasConcept C71924100 @default.
• W2084206637 hasConcept C74909509 @default.
• W2084206637 hasConceptScore W2084206637C144024400 @default.
• W2084206637 hasConceptScore W2084206637C149923435 @default.
• W2084206637 hasConceptScore W2084206637C15744967 @default.
• W2084206637 hasConceptScore W2084206637C71924100 @default.
• W2084206637 hasConceptScore W2084206637C74909509 @default.
• W2084206637 hasIssue "1" @default.
• W2084206637 hasLocation W20842066371 @default.
• W2084206637 hasOpenAccess W2084206637 @default.
• W2084206637 hasPrimaryLocation W20842066371 @default.
• W2084206637 hasRelatedWork W2086581780 @default.
• W2084206637 hasRelatedWork W2096837391 @default.
• W2084206637 hasRelatedWork W2731179596 @default.
• W2084206637 hasRelatedWork W2748952813 @default.
• W2084206637 hasRelatedWork W2899084033 @default.
• W2084206637 hasRelatedWork W2989465648 @default.
• W2084206637 hasRelatedWork W3016523364 @default.
• W2084206637 hasRelatedWork W3113324569 @default.
• W2084206637 hasRelatedWork W3193662951 @default.
• W2084206637 hasRelatedWork W4367669404 @default.
• W2084206637 hasVolume "45" @default.
• W2084206637 isParatext "false" @default.
• W2084206637 isRetracted "false" @default.
• W2084206637 magId "2084206637" @default.
• W2084206637 workType "article" @default.