Matches in SemOpenAlex for { <https://semopenalex.org/work/W2085036618> ?p ?o ?g. }
- W2085036618 endingPage "13018" @default.
- W2085036618 startingPage "13012" @default.
- W2085036618 abstract "Previous studies reached different conclusions about whether class I hyaluronan synthases (HASs) elongate hyaluronic acid (HA) by addition to the reducing or the nonreducing end. Here we used two strategies to determine the direction of HA synthesis by purified class I HASs from Streptococcus equisimilis and Streptococcus pyogenes. In the first strategy we used each of the two UDP-sugar substrates separately to pulse label either the beginning or the end of HA chains. We then quantified the relative rates of radioactive HA degradation by treatment with β-glycosidases that act at the nonreducing end. The results with both purified HASs demonstrated that HA elongation occurred at the reducing end. In the second strategy, we used purified S. equisimilis HAS, UDP-glucuronic acid, and UDP[β-32P]-Glc-NAc to radiolabel nascent HA chains. Under conditions of limiting substrate, the 32P-labeled products were separated from the substrates by paper chromatography and identified as HA-[32P]UDP saccharides based on their degradation by snake venom phosphodiesterase or hyaluronidase and by their binding to a specific HA-binding protein. The 32P radioactivity was chased (released) by incubation with unlabeled UDP-sugars, showing that the HA-UDP linkages turn over during HA biosynthesis. In contrast, HA-[32P]UDP products made by the purified class II Pasteurella multocida HAS were not released by adding unlabeled UDP-sugars, consistent with growth at the nonreducing end for this enzyme. The results demonstrate that the streptococcal class I HAS enzymes polymerize HA chains at the reducing end. Previous studies reached different conclusions about whether class I hyaluronan synthases (HASs) elongate hyaluronic acid (HA) by addition to the reducing or the nonreducing end. Here we used two strategies to determine the direction of HA synthesis by purified class I HASs from Streptococcus equisimilis and Streptococcus pyogenes. In the first strategy we used each of the two UDP-sugar substrates separately to pulse label either the beginning or the end of HA chains. We then quantified the relative rates of radioactive HA degradation by treatment with β-glycosidases that act at the nonreducing end. The results with both purified HASs demonstrated that HA elongation occurred at the reducing end. In the second strategy, we used purified S. equisimilis HAS, UDP-glucuronic acid, and UDP[β-32P]-Glc-NAc to radiolabel nascent HA chains. Under conditions of limiting substrate, the 32P-labeled products were separated from the substrates by paper chromatography and identified as HA-[32P]UDP saccharides based on their degradation by snake venom phosphodiesterase or hyaluronidase and by their binding to a specific HA-binding protein. The 32P radioactivity was chased (released) by incubation with unlabeled UDP-sugars, showing that the HA-UDP linkages turn over during HA biosynthesis. In contrast, HA-[32P]UDP products made by the purified class II Pasteurella multocida HAS were not released by adding unlabeled UDP-sugars, consistent with growth at the nonreducing end for this enzyme. The results demonstrate that the streptococcal class I HAS enzymes polymerize HA chains at the reducing end. Since the first HAS 1The abbreviations used are: HAS, hyaluronan synthase; HA, hyaluronic acid, hyaluronate, or hyaluronan; biotin-HABP, biotinylated HA-binding protein; pmHAS, Pasteurella multocida HAS; seHAS, Streptococcus equisimilis HAS; spHAS, Streptococcus pyogenes HAS; GlcUA, glucuronic acid; Ni-NTA, nickel-nitrilotriacetic acid; PBS, phosphate-buffered saline.1The abbreviations used are: HAS, hyaluronan synthase; HA, hyaluronic acid, hyaluronate, or hyaluronan; biotin-HABP, biotinylated HA-binding protein; pmHAS, Pasteurella multocida HAS; seHAS, Streptococcus equisimilis HAS; spHAS, Streptococcus pyogenes HAS; GlcUA, glucuronic acid; Ni-NTA, nickel-nitrilotriacetic acid; PBS, phosphate-buffered saline. was identified and cloned in 1993 (1.DeAngelis P.L. Papaconstantinou J. Weigel P.H. J. Biol. Chem. 1993; 268: 14568-14571Abstract Full Text PDF PubMed Google Scholar, 2.DeAngelis P.L. Papaconstantinou J. Weigel P.H. J. Biol. Chem. 1993; 268: 19181-19184Abstract Full Text PDF PubMed Google Scholar) we have learned much about the structure and function of these unusual glycosyltransferases (3.Weigel P.H. Hascall V.C. Tammi M. J. Biol. Chem. 1997; 272: 13997-14000Abstract Full Text Full Text PDF PubMed Scopus (619) Google Scholar, 4.Spicer A.P. McDonald J.A. J. Biol. Chem. 1998; 273: 1923-1932Abstract Full Text Full Text PDF PubMed Scopus (290) Google Scholar, 5.DeAngelis P.L. Cell. Mol. Life Sci. 1999; 56: 670-682Crossref PubMed Scopus (162) Google Scholar, 6.Itano N. Kimata K. IUBMB Life. 2002; 54: 195-199Crossref PubMed Scopus (301) Google Scholar, 7.Weigel P.H. IUBMB Life. 2002; 54: 201-211Crossref PubMed Scopus (70) Google Scholar). The molecular masses of the streptococcal (∼49 kDa) or eukaryotic (∼65 kDa) HASs are relatively small in view of the multiple functions mediated by these enzymes in order to synthesize HA (8.Tlapak-Simmons V.L. Baggenstoss B.A. Kumari K. Heldermon C. Weigel P.H. J. Biol. Chem. 1999; 274: 4246-4253Abstract Full Text Full Text PDF PubMed Scopus (62) Google Scholar). HAS binds UDP-glucuronic acid (UDP-GlcUA) and UDP-N-acetylglucosamine (UDP-GlcNAc) in the presence of MgCl2 and catalyzes two distinct intracellular glycosyltransferase reactions. HAS also binds and translocates the growing HA chain through the enzyme, thereby extruding the polymer through the cell membrane, and releases the HA chain extracellularly after up to 50,000 monosaccharides (∼107 Da) have been assembled. Based on differences in protein structure and mechanism of action, the known HASs have been categorized into two classes (5.DeAngelis P.L. Cell. Mol. Life Sci. 1999; 56: 670-682Crossref PubMed Scopus (162) Google Scholar). Class I members include HASs from Streptococcus, mammals, and other eukaryotes, whereas the bacterial HAS from Pasteurella multocida is the only class II member. Despite great progress in our understanding of HAS structure and function, there is still controversy regarding the direction of HA synthesis. Stoolmiller and Dorfman (9.Stoolmiller A.C. Dorfman A. J. Biol. Chem. 1969; 244: 236-246Abstract Full Text PDF PubMed Google Scholar) concluded in 1969 that the streptococcal HAS adds new sugars to the nonreducing end of HA. In conflict with this result, Prehm in 1983 (10.Prehm P. Biochem. J. 1983; 211: 191-198Crossref PubMed Scopus (120) Google Scholar) and Asplund et al. in 1998 (11.Asplund T. Brinck J. Suzuki M. Briskin M.J. Heldin P. Biochim. Biophys. Acta. 1998; 1380: 377-388Crossref PubMed Scopus (44) Google Scholar) performed studies with membranes from eukaryotic cells and concluded that HA synthesis occurs at the reducing end. Although differences in the contributions of the three mammalian HAS isoenzymes to these latter results were not considered, it is highly likely that the mechanisms of HA chain elongation for all of the class I HAS members are the same (3.Weigel P.H. Hascall V.C. Tammi M. J. Biol. Chem. 1997; 272: 13997-14000Abstract Full Text Full Text PDF PubMed Scopus (619) Google Scholar). Recently, Hoshi et al. (12.Hoshi H. Nakagawa H. Nishiguchi S. Iwata K. Niikura K. Monde K. Nishimura S. J. Biol. Chem. 2004; 279: 2341-2349Abstract Full Text Full Text PDF PubMed Scopus (20) Google Scholar) reported that recombinant truncated variants of human HAS2 expressed in Escherichia coli were able to synthesize short HA oligosaccharides by addition to the nonreducing end. Because the crude membranes used in all the above studies contain multiple glycosyltransferases, some of these reported results might have alternate interpretations. To resolve these conflicting results about the direction of HA synthesis, which is a fundamental mechanistic feature of HAS function, we performed several types of experiments using two purified streptococcal HASs. Our results verify that addition of new saccharides does occur at the reducing end. Materials, Strains, and Plasmids—Reagents were supplied by Sigma unless stated otherwise. Media components were from Difco. The has gene from Streptococcus equisimilis or Streptococcus pyogenes was inserted into the pKK223-3 vector (Amersham Biosciences) and cloned into E. coli SURE™ cells (2.DeAngelis P.L. Papaconstantinou J. Weigel P.H. J. Biol. Chem. 1993; 268: 19181-19184Abstract Full Text PDF PubMed Google Scholar, 13.Kumari K. Weigel P.H. J. Biol. Chem. 1997; 272: 32539-32546Abstract Full Text Full Text PDF PubMed Scopus (75) Google Scholar). Each HAS contained a C-terminal fusion of six His residues to facilitate purification (14.Tlapak-Simmons V.L. Baggenstoss B.A. Clyne T. Weigel P.H. J. Biol. Chem. 1999; 274: 4239-4245Abstract Full Text Full Text PDF PubMed Scopus (79) Google Scholar). Streptavidin-coated 96-well plates were from BD Biosciences. The biotinylated HA-binding protein was from Seikagaku. UDP-[3H]GlcNAc (60 Ci/mmol) was from American Radiochemical, Inc., and UDP-[14C]GlcUA (285 mCi/mmol) was from Amersham Biosciences. Purified pmHAS (15.DeAngelis P.L. Oatman L.C. Gay D.F. J. Biol. Chem. 2003; 278: 35199-35203Abstract Full Text Full Text PDF PubMed Scopus (87) Google Scholar) along with and 3H-tetrasaccharides and 3H-octasaccharides of HA were generous gifts from Paul DeAngelis. UDP[32P]-GlcNAc (containing [32P]phosphate in the β position) was synthesized at a specific radioactivity of ∼50 Ci/mmol as described by Reitman et al. (16.Reitman M.L. Lang L. Kornfeld S. Methods Enzymol. 1984; 107: 163-172Crossref PubMed Scopus (24) Google Scholar). Bovine liver β-glucuronidase was from Roche Applied Science. N-Acetylglucosaminidase was purified by the method of Li and Li (17.Li S.-C. Li Y.-T. J. Biol. Chem. 1970; 245: 5153-5160Abstract Full Text PDF PubMed Google Scholar) using jack beans obtained from a grocery store. Cell Growth and Membrane Preparation—E. coli SURE™ cells containing the HAS-encoding plasmids were grown at 32 °C in Luria broth, HAS expression was induced, and membranes containing seHAS or spHAS were prepared as described recently (18.Tlapak-Simmons V.L. Baron C.A. Weigel P.H. Biochemistry. 2004; 43: 9234-9242Crossref PubMed Scopus (45) Google Scholar). The membrane pellets were washed once with PBS containing 1.3 m glycerol and protease inhibitors, sonicated briefly, aliquoted, and recentrifuged at 100,000 × g for 1 h. The final pellets were stored at -80 °C (14.Tlapak-Simmons V.L. Baggenstoss B.A. Clyne T. Weigel P.H. J. Biol. Chem. 1999; 274: 4239-4245Abstract Full Text Full Text PDF PubMed Scopus (79) Google Scholar) HAS Extraction and Purification—The extraction buffer, the procedure for solubilizing membranes, and affinity chromatography over a Ni2+-nitrilotriacetic acid resin (Qiagen Inc.) have been described in detail (14.Tlapak-Simmons V.L. Baggenstoss B.A. Clyne T. Weigel P.H. J. Biol. Chem. 1999; 274: 4239-4245Abstract Full Text Full Text PDF PubMed Scopus (79) Google Scholar, 18.Tlapak-Simmons V.L. Baron C.A. Weigel P.H. Biochemistry. 2004; 43: 9234-9242Crossref PubMed Scopus (45) Google Scholar). HAS was eluted with 25 mm sodium and potassium phosphate, pH 7.0, 50 mm NaCl, 1 mm dithiothreitol, 2.7 m glycerol, 1 mm dodecylmaltoside, 0.5 μg/ml leupeptin, 0.7 μg/ml pepstatin, 46 μg/ml phenylmethylsulfonyl fluoride, and 200 mm histidine. HAS activity was determined using the standard assay conditions described previously (14.Tlapak-Simmons V.L. Baggenstoss B.A. Clyne T. Weigel P.H. J. Biol. Chem. 1999; 274: 4239-4245Abstract Full Text Full Text PDF PubMed Scopus (79) Google Scholar, 17.Li S.-C. Li Y.-T. J. Biol. Chem. 1970; 245: 5153-5160Abstract Full Text PDF PubMed Google Scholar) Protein concentrations were determined with the Coomassie protein assay reagent (Pierce) using bovine serum albumin as the standard. Pulse Labeling of HA Chains and Direction of Synthesis Assay— Purified seHAS or spHAS was prepared as noted above, except that the enzyme was not eluted from the Ni-NTA column after washing. Instead, the bound enzyme was incubated for two short successive periods designed to label HA chains early or late during one round of chain synthesis. There were four labeling situations for each HAS, namely early or late labeling with either UDP-[14C]GlcUA or UDP-[3H]GlcNAc. The first incubation was for 1.5 min at 22 °C with 0.08 mm UDP-GlcUA and 0.08 mm UDP-GlcNAc as well as 0.14 μCi of UDP-[14C]GlcUA, 0.2 μCi of UDP-[3H]GlcNAc, or no radiolabeled UDP-sugar. The HA·HAS·Ni-NTA resin complex was then washed with 4 column volumes of wash buffer (50 mm Na2KPO4, pH 7.0, 150 mm NaCl, 0.5% dodecylmaltoside, and 2 m glycerol), and the second labeling mixture was then added. After 1.5 min at 22 °C the resin was washed as above, and the radiolabeled HA was eluted with digestion buffer (25 mm sodium acetate, pH 5.2, containing 50 mm NaCl) at 37 °C for 1 h. Recovery of labeled HA was essentially complete as judged by the subsequent elution of bound HAS and any remaining HA with 1% trifluoroacetic acid. A 1-ml sample of labeled HA (∼ 50,000 dpm) was then incubated at 37 °C for the indicated times (Fig. 1) with 5 units of β-glucuronidase and 0.15 units of β-N-acetylglucosaminidase. The exoglycosidase digestions were terminated by the addition of SDS to a 2% (w/v) final concentration at room temperature. The amount of [14C]HA or [3H]HA remaining was determined by descending paper chromatography using Whatman 3MM paper developed in 1 m ammonium acetate, pH 5.5, and ethanol (7:13). The piece (∼1 × 1 cm) at the origin containing large HA products was cut out and incubated in 1 ml of distilled water overnight; 5 ml of UltimaGold scintillation fluid (Packard) was added, and radioactivity was determined using a Packard model A2300 scintillation counter. Controls included samples treated with only one exoglycosidase or sheep testicular hyaluronidase to verify, respectively, that degradation required both endoglycosidases and that the radiolabeled material was destroyed by hyaluronidase. Synthesis of 32P-labeled HA—UDP[32P]-labeled HA was produced by incubating purified seHAS or pmHAS with 0.025 μm UDP[32P]-GlcNAc and 0.025 μm UDP-GlcUA. These conditions present limiting amounts of UDP-sugars so that the enzymes can only make short HA oligosaccharides. For seHAS, the reaction was performed in 50 μl of 25 mm sodium and potassium phosphate, pH 7.0 containing 50 mm NaCl, 20 mm MgCl2, 1 mm dithiothreitol, 1 mm EDTA, 2 m glycerol, and 2 mm bovine cardiolipin. For pmHAS, the reaction was performed in 25 mm Tris, pH 7.5, containing 1 m ethylene glycol and 5 mm MnCl2. One μg of purified seHAS or pmHAS was added to initiate HA synthesis, which was allowed to proceed for 1.5 min at 22 °C for seHAS or 6 h at 30 °C for pmHAS. pmHAS has a long lag period for the initiation of HA synthesis, especially at low substrate concentrations. Reactions were then terminated by the addition of 2 mm UDP (14.Tlapak-Simmons V.L. Baggenstoss B.A. Clyne T. Weigel P.H. J. Biol. Chem. 1999; 274: 4239-4245Abstract Full Text Full Text PDF PubMed Scopus (79) Google Scholar). At the end of the labeling period in some experiments, the samples were then incubated with unlabeled UDP-GlcNAc and UDP-GlcUA (1 mm each), sheep testicular hyaluronidase, or snake venom phosphodiesterase for 3 h at 30 °C with gentle agitation in a MicroMixer E-36 (Taitec). The 32P-labeled products were separated from unincorporated substrates by descending paper chromatography as described above. The 32P content at the origin and at 1-cm increments along each chromatogram strip were assessed by monitoring Cherenkov radiation using a Packard model A2300 scintillation counter. The Biotin-HABP HA Capture Assay—Streptavidin-coated wells were treated for 1 h at 22 °C with PBS containing 0.05% (v/v) Tween 20 and either 3 μg/ml biotin-HABP alone, 3 μg/ml biotin-HABP plus 100 μg/ml unlabeled HA, or 3 μg/ml biotin-HABP plus 25 μg/ml free biotin. The treated wells were then washed extensively with PBS/Tween and incubated for 2 h at 30 °C with 5–50 μl of a seHAS or pmHAS reaction mix (50 μl total volume) containing 32P-labeled products. The supernatants containing unbound 32P were removed, and the wells were washed. Bound 32P components were removed from each well by three consecutive treatments with 1 mg/ml sheep testicular hyaluronidase in PBS/Tween at 30 °C. Ninety percent of the bound radioactivity was released in the first hyaluronidase digestion. The three digestion supernatants for each well were collected and pooled, and their Cherenkov radiation was determined. Total (100%) bound 32P values were the sum of radioactivity recovered in all three hyaluronidase treatments, which reduced the radioactivity in the wells to background levels (assessed with a Geiger counter). Direction of Synthesis by Degradation of Pulse-labeled HA— Purified seHAS and spHAS were used to pulse label polysaccharide chains (11.Asplund T. Brinck J. Suzuki M. Briskin M.J. Heldin P. Biochim. Biophys. Acta. 1998; 1380: 377-388Crossref PubMed Scopus (44) Google Scholar, 19.Robbins P.W. Bray D. Dankert M. Wright A. Science. 1967; 158: 1536-1542Crossref PubMed Scopus (105) Google Scholar). While still bound to the Ni-NTA resin, purified HAS was incubated with both substrates for two successive 1.5-min periods. One of the two UDP-sugars was radiolabeled, either in the first or the last 1.5 min phase of chain synthesis. After the first phase of synthesis, the unincorporated UDP-sugars were washed away, and the second incubation was performed with either radiolabeled UDP-sugar or non-radiolabeled UDP-sugar. This procedure creates four situations in which HA chains are radiolabeled, either with [3H]-GlcNAc or [14C]GlcUA, either at the beginning or at the end of the chain. The labeled HA was eluted and then digested with β-N-acetylglucosaminidase and β-glucuronidase for various times (Fig. 1). The combined exoglycosidases were able to degrade the 14C- or 3H-labeled HA completely (not shown). When the HA was pulse-labeled late (the second synthesis phase), the rate of radioactivity release was relatively slow (Fig. 1, A–D, open symbols). In contrast, when the HA was pulse-labeled early (the first synthesis phase), the rate of radioactivity release was relatively fast (Fig. 1, A–D, filled symbols). For example, when HA produced by purified seHAS was labeled with [3H]GlcNAc in the first phase and then incubated with nonlabeled substrates in the second phase, 47 ± 1% of the [3H]HA remained intact after 180 min of glycosidase treatment (Fig. 1D). When the order of labeling was switched so that the last sugars added, rather than the first, were radiolabeled, then 84 ± 3% of the [3H]HA remained after 180 min of digestion. The results were the same for both seHAS and spHAS, using either labeled UDP-sugar in either labeling phase. The earliest sugars incorporated during HA synthesis were released preferentially by the two exoglycosidases. Preferentially released sugars are closer to the nonreducing end, at which the two glycosidases act, whereas sugars that are resistant to release are closer to the reducing end. Thus, the sugars that were added earliest (first) were nearest to the reducing end. As chain growth progressed and chain length increased, these sugars then became closer to the nonreducing end. We conclude that seHAS and spHAS synthesize HA by the addition of monosaccharides to the reducing end of the polysaccharide. To obtain independent evidence for this conclusion, we sought to demonstrate the presence of HA-UDP intermediates that turn over rapidly during HA biosynthesis. As shown in Schemes 1 and 2, the addition of sugars to the reducing end necessarily produces HA-UDP intermediates. Scheme 1, presented here,UDP−GlcUA+UDP−GlcNAc+(HA)n−UDP→(HA)n+1−UDP+UDP+UDPScheme 1 shows the fate of the three UDP groups that participate in one round of disaccharide synthesis. Each UDP-sugar added to the polymer chain is transferred intact, without cleavage of its UDP linkage. The UDP released during each transfer step comes from the HA-UDP intermediate formed by the addition of the previous sugar. Thus, of the two net UDP groups released when a disaccharide unit is assembled at the reducing end, only one UDP comes from the last two UDP-sugars added. The other UDP (set as UDP (boldface) in this example) comes from the last sugar added prior to addition of the new disaccharide unit. Scheme 2, shown here, (i)N−UDP+A−UDP→A−N−UDP+UDP (Eq. 2) (ii)A−N−UDP+A−UDP→A−N−A−UDP+UDP (iii)A−N−A−UDP+N−UDP→A−N−A−N−UDP+UDP illustrates the individual steps in this reaction mechanism with GlcUA and GlcNAc indicated by A and N, respectively, and the UDP groups for these sugars indicated, respectively, by italic or boldface font. Because a key feature of synthesis at the reducing end is the rapid turnover of the UDP groups on growing HA chains, we sought to demonstrate this feature for class I HASs. Using UDP[32P]-GlcNAc and limiting substrate concentrations, we established conditions in which seHAS makes a very large number of shorter HA chains rather than fewer longer chains (Fig. 2). These conditions favor detection of seHAS products that are end-labeled with 32P. After descending paper chromatography, UDP[32P]-GlcNAc and a variety of smaller 32P-labeled breakdowns (such as UDP[32P], UMP[32P], [32P]phosphate and [32P]pyrophosphate) migrated in a broad region ∼17–27 cm from the origin (Fig. 2A). In the presence of purified seHAS most of the 32P products were found at the origin, although this varied from experiment to experiment, but some products also migrated as a broad peak between ∼7 and 13 cm. However, in the absence of seHAS, essentially background radioactivity was detected between the origin and the large peak starting at ∼17 cm (Fig. 2C). When samples were treated with snake venom phosphodiesterase or hyaluronidase prior to chromatography, the radioactivity at the origin and in the 7–13 cm region was substantially reduced, close to that of the no-HAS controls (Fig. 2, B and C). In multiple experiments, the amount of larger 32P products remaining at the origin after chromatography was reduced by ∼80% after treatment with either hyaluronidase or phosphodiesterase (Fig. 2D), supporting the conclusion that these products are UDP[32P]-HA oligomers. As chromatography references, we used reduced HA-alditol oligomers containing 4 or 8 sugars; these migrated, respectively, at 10–15 cm and 0–2 cm (Fig. 2B). In a separate experiment (Fig. 3), similar samples were incubated after the labeling period and prior to chromatography with unlabeled substrates. The “chase” with UDP-sugars eliminated almost all of the 32P products. The results are consistent with the conclusion that seHAS synthesizes HA saccharides that are still linked to UDP and that the HA-[32P]UDP linkage is dynamic. The experiment in Fig. 3 also shows that, at a fixed UDP-sugar concentration, the amount of 32P products first increases and then decreases as the seHAS concentration is increased. A maximum occurred at ∼0.4 μm enzyme; above and below this value 32P incorporation decreased by >90% to near control levels. This biphasic behavior is expected because, as the enzyme concentration decreases, fewer but longer end-labeled HA chains are made (i.e. the maximum number of HA chains is equal to the number of seHAS molecules). As the enzyme concentration increases, shorter and shorter oligosaccharides are made until a point is reached at which, theoretically, only disaccharides or no products can be made. To confirm that seHAS synthesizes HA-UDP, we also developed an HA capture assay using streptavidin-coated wells loaded with biotin-HABP. If the 32P products made by seHAS are HA oligosaccharides, then they should be bound by this highly specific HABP, which is purified from bovine cartilage (20.Kongtawelert P. Ghosh P. Anal. Biochem. 1990; 185: 313-318Crossref PubMed Scopus (51) Google Scholar). In particular, most of the larger HA saccharides remaining at the origin are likely longer than a dodecamer, which is the minimum size needed to occupy the HABP binding site with high affinity (21.Christner J.E. Brown M.L. Dziewiakowski D.D. J. Biol. Chem. 1979; 254: 4624-4630Abstract Full Text PDF PubMed Google Scholar). These larger HA products are preferentially represented in this assay, because only a few percent of the total radiolabeled products is captured by the biotin-HABP. When increasing volumes of seHAS reaction mix were incubated per well, the amount of bound 32P progressively increased ∼4–5-fold (Fig. 4). However, when the streptavidin-coated wells were treated with either free biotin or unlabeled HA during the initial incubation with biotin-HABP, the amount of bound 32P was decreased by 92 and 88%, respectively. These controls demonstrate that the capture of HA-[32P]UDP in this assay is specifically mediated by the biotin-HABP. Consistent with the conclusion that the 32P products are HA-UDP, virtually all of the captured radioactivity was released by hyaluronidase treatment. Finally, treatment of the seHAS/UDP[32P]-GlcNAc reaction mixes with unlabeled UDP-sugars, hyaluronidase, or phosphodiesterase decreased the 32P radioactivity captured by the biotin-HABP by ∼90% (Fig. 5, black bars). Reaction mixes using the class II pmHAS and UDP[32P]-GlcNAc also produced HA-[32P]UDP products that were captured by the biotin-HABP-coated well assay (Fig. 5, gray bars), as indicated by ∼90% decreases in bound 32P-radioactivity after hyaluronidase or phosphodiesterase treatment. Unlike the results with seHAS, however, the UDP-sugar chase did not decrease the amount of HA-[32P]UDP recovered from pmHAS reactions. With the exception of mouse HAS1 (22.Yoshida M. Itano N. Yamada Y. Kimata K. J. Biol. Chem. 2000; 275: 497-506Abstract Full Text Full Text PDF PubMed Scopus (106) Google Scholar), the mammalian HASs have been very difficult to solubilize and purify. In contrast, we have readily been able to purify large amounts of the recombinant streptococcal HASs (14.Tlapak-Simmons V.L. Baggenstoss B.A. Clyne T. Weigel P.H. J. Biol. Chem. 1999; 274: 4239-4245Abstract Full Text Full Text PDF PubMed Scopus (79) Google Scholar, 17.Li S.-C. Li Y.-T. J. Biol. Chem. 1970; 245: 5153-5160Abstract Full Text PDF PubMed Google Scholar). Consequently, the streptococcal HASs have been an excellent experimental model in which to address the molecular details of how the class I HAS enzymes function (7.Weigel P.H. IUBMB Life. 2002; 54: 201-211Crossref PubMed Scopus (70) Google Scholar). To determine the direction of synthesis by purified seHAS and spHAS, we pulse-labeled HA either at the beginning or at the end of chains during one round of chain synthesis. We then quantified the rate of radioactivity released from the labeled HA by β-glucuronidase and β-N-acetylglucosaminidase, both of which act only at the nonreducing end. The results showed that the first sugars added during HA biosynthesis were preferentially removed by the later glycosidase treatment, i.e. the first sugars added become closer to the nonreducing end as HA chains elongate. Thus, both of the purified class I enzymes extend HA chains by addition to the reducing end and, therefore, the direction of HA chain growth is from the nonreducing to the reducing end of the polysaccharide. Our second strategy to confirm that these class I HASs catalyze HA chain growth at the reducing end used purified seHAS and UDP-GlcNAc, with 32P in the β position, to radiolabel nascent HA chains. The results showed that purified seHAS synthesizes HA with a UDP group remaining at the reducing end of the growing HA chain. HA-[32P]UDP products, made using a high ratio of enzyme-to-substrate, could be separated from the substrates by paper chromatography and were destroyed by treatment with hyaluronidase or phosphodiesterase. Importantly, the 32P could also be removed by “chasing” the enzyme reaction mixtures with excess unlabeled UDP-sugars. These results demonstrate that the [32P]UDP group is present at the reducing end and turns over when a new UDP-sugar is added. For the class II pmHAS, because the sugar addition is at the nonreducing end, a chase had no effect, and the [32P]UDP was not removed from the HA chain. Our results confirm the earlier studies by Prehm (10.Prehm P. Biochem. J. 1983; 211: 191-198Crossref PubMed Scopus (120) Google Scholar) and Asplund et al. (11.Asplund T. Brinck J. Suzuki M. Briskin M.J. Heldin P. Biochim. Biophys. Acta. 1998; 1380: 377-388Crossref PubMed Scopus (44) Google Scholar) and demonstrate that class I HASs can elongate at the reducing end. The conflicting results of Stoolmiller and Dorfman (9.Stoolmiller A.C. Dorfman A. J. Biol. Chem. 1969; 244: 236-246Abstract Full Text PDF PubMed Google Scholar) may have been due to other glycosyltransferases in the crude membrane preparations used, whose products may have confounded the analysis. There are at least two possible explanations for the report (12.Hoshi H. Nakagawa H. Nishiguchi S. Iwata K. Niikura K. Monde K. Nishimura S. J. Biol. Chem. 2004; 279: 2341-2349Abstract Full Text Full Text PDF PubMed Scopus (20) Google Scholar) that a recombinant HAS2 fragment, expressed in E. coli, was able to synthesize short oligosaccharides by addition to the nonreducing end. First, because only indirect evidence was obtained in the latter study, the authors did not rule out that another cellular glycosyltransferase, whose specificity was altered by expression of the HAS fragment, was responsible for the observed synthesis. Direct evidence would have been provided if a purified HAS fragment was shown to possess this activity. However, if the results are valid, they indicate a second possibility, i.e. that the normal mode of synthesis by intact HAS may be dramatically altered by elimination of multiple protein domains and disruption of the protein's normal topological organization (3.Weig" @default.
- W2085036618 created "2016-06-24" @default.
- W2085036618 creator A5018155879 @default.
- W2085036618 creator A5027182004 @default.
- W2085036618 creator A5030269173 @default.
- W2085036618 creator A5037151630 @default.
- W2085036618 creator A5060284076 @default.
- W2085036618 creator A5070546753 @default.
- W2085036618 date "2005-04-01" @default.
- W2085036618 modified "2023-09-27" @default.
- W2085036618 title "Hyaluronan Biosynthesis by Class I Streptococcal Hyaluronan Synthases Occurs at the Reducing End" @default.
- W2085036618 cites W1509786858 @default.
- W2085036618 cites W1516201991 @default.
- W2085036618 cites W1526481208 @default.
- W2085036618 cites W1534772847 @default.
- W2085036618 cites W1535201878 @default.
- W2085036618 cites W1598716882 @default.
- W2085036618 cites W1636195124 @default.
- W2085036618 cites W1678318463 @default.
- W2085036618 cites W1912870130 @default.
- W2085036618 cites W1963769732 @default.
- W2085036618 cites W1964995917 @default.
- W2085036618 cites W1967428326 @default.
- W2085036618 cites W1971003485 @default.
- W2085036618 cites W1987632841 @default.
- W2085036618 cites W1988726642 @default.
- W2085036618 cites W2001729687 @default.
- W2085036618 cites W2002552794 @default.
- W2085036618 cites W2022646939 @default.
- W2085036618 cites W2025565866 @default.
- W2085036618 cites W2030593951 @default.
- W2085036618 cites W2041310231 @default.
- W2085036618 cites W2046469748 @default.
- W2085036618 cites W2047025323 @default.
- W2085036618 cites W2049399739 @default.
- W2085036618 cites W2057267126 @default.
- W2085036618 cites W2070528883 @default.
- W2085036618 cites W2170722547 @default.
- W2085036618 cites W2235306616 @default.
- W2085036618 cites W2346166755 @default.
- W2085036618 cites W4244406676 @default.
- W2085036618 doi "https://doi.org/10.1074/jbc.m409788200" @default.
- W2085036618 hasPubMedCentralId "https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/1592226" @default.
- W2085036618 hasPubMedId "https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/15668242" @default.
- W2085036618 hasPublicationYear "2005" @default.
- W2085036618 type Work @default.
- W2085036618 sameAs 2085036618 @default.
- W2085036618 citedByCount "55" @default.
- W2085036618 countsByYear W20850366182012 @default.
- W2085036618 countsByYear W20850366182013 @default.
- W2085036618 countsByYear W20850366182014 @default.
- W2085036618 countsByYear W20850366182015 @default.
- W2085036618 countsByYear W20850366182016 @default.
- W2085036618 countsByYear W20850366182017 @default.
- W2085036618 countsByYear W20850366182018 @default.
- W2085036618 countsByYear W20850366182020 @default.
- W2085036618 countsByYear W20850366182021 @default.
- W2085036618 countsByYear W20850366182022 @default.
- W2085036618 countsByYear W20850366182023 @default.
- W2085036618 crossrefType "journal-article" @default.
- W2085036618 hasAuthorship W2085036618A5018155879 @default.
- W2085036618 hasAuthorship W2085036618A5027182004 @default.
- W2085036618 hasAuthorship W2085036618A5030269173 @default.
- W2085036618 hasAuthorship W2085036618A5037151630 @default.
- W2085036618 hasAuthorship W2085036618A5060284076 @default.
- W2085036618 hasAuthorship W2085036618A5070546753 @default.
- W2085036618 hasBestOaLocation W20850366181 @default.
- W2085036618 hasConcept C181199279 @default.
- W2085036618 hasConcept C185592680 @default.
- W2085036618 hasConcept C553450214 @default.
- W2085036618 hasConcept C55493867 @default.
- W2085036618 hasConcept C86803240 @default.
- W2085036618 hasConcept C89423630 @default.
- W2085036618 hasConceptScore W2085036618C181199279 @default.
- W2085036618 hasConceptScore W2085036618C185592680 @default.
- W2085036618 hasConceptScore W2085036618C553450214 @default.
- W2085036618 hasConceptScore W2085036618C55493867 @default.
- W2085036618 hasConceptScore W2085036618C86803240 @default.
- W2085036618 hasConceptScore W2085036618C89423630 @default.
- W2085036618 hasIssue "13" @default.
- W2085036618 hasLocation W20850366181 @default.
- W2085036618 hasLocation W20850366182 @default.
- W2085036618 hasLocation W20850366183 @default.
- W2085036618 hasOpenAccess W2085036618 @default.
- W2085036618 hasPrimaryLocation W20850366181 @default.
- W2085036618 hasRelatedWork W1596201692 @default.
- W2085036618 hasRelatedWork W1773159253 @default.
- W2085036618 hasRelatedWork W2016693952 @default.
- W2085036618 hasRelatedWork W2089283920 @default.
- W2085036618 hasRelatedWork W2110255731 @default.
- W2085036618 hasRelatedWork W2148779442 @default.
- W2085036618 hasRelatedWork W2468955615 @default.
- W2085036618 hasRelatedWork W3147583431 @default.
- W2085036618 hasRelatedWork W411039584 @default.
- W2085036618 hasRelatedWork W4225636118 @default.
- W2085036618 hasVolume "280" @default.
- W2085036618 isParatext "false" @default.
- W2085036618 isRetracted "false" @default.