FRINK Linked Data Fragments server

Matches in SemOpenAlex for { <https://semopenalex.org/work/W2085127789> ?p ?o ?g. }

• W2085127789 endingPage "478" @default.
• W2085127789 startingPage "472" @default.
• W2085127789 abstract "Object Minimally invasive decompressive surgery using a microscope or endoscope has been widely performed for the treatment of lumbar spinal canal stenosis (LSS). In this study the authors aimed to assess outcomes following microscopic bilateral decompression via a unilateral approach (MBDU) in terms of postoperative bone regrowth and preservation of the facet joints in patients with degenerative lumbar spondylolisthesis (DS) as compared with those in patients with LSS. Methods In the period from May 1998 to February 2007 at the authors' institution, 85 patients underwent MBDU at L4–5. Clinical outcome was evaluated before surgery and at the final follow-up using the Japanese Orthopaedic Association (JOA) score for low-back pain. The following radiographic parameters were assessed at the L4–5 segment before surgery and at the final follow-up: 1) percentage slip on standing lateral radiographs, 2) percentage slip on dynamic radiographs, 3) disc arc on dynamic radiographs, and 4) percentage of facet joint preservation on CT. Bone regrowth on the ventral and dorsal sides of the facet joint on CT were assessed at the final follow-up. Results The cases of 47 patients (23 with DS at L-4 and 24 with LSS at L4–5 without instability) who had a follow-up of at least 2 years were retrospectively reviewed. The improvement ratio in the JOA score, that is, the percentage improvement as indicated by the difference between preoperative and postoperative JOA scores, was not significantly different between patients with DS and LSS. The percentage slip had progressed at the latest follow-up in both groups (1.4% and 1.1%, respectively), and there was no significant difference between the 2 groups. The percentage of facet joint preservation in the DS and LSS groups was 72.8% and 83.4%, respectively, on the approach side and 95.5% and 96.5% on the contralateral side. Facet joint preservation was significantly less on the approach side than on the contralateral side in both groups. The average amount of bone regrowth on the dorsal and ventral sides of the facet joint was 3.4 and 0.9 mm, respectively, in the DS group and 2.0 and 1.0 mm in the LSS group. The difference between the 2 groups was not significant. Facet joint preservation and bone regrowth were not correlated with clinical outcomes. Conclusions Microscopic bilateral decompression via a unilateral approach can prevent postoperative spinal instability because of good preservation of the posterior elements including the facet joints, which is thought to be the main reason for the relatively small amount of bone regrowth after surgery." @default.
• W2085127789 created "2016-06-24" @default.
• W2085127789 creator A5020163990 @default.
• W2085127789 creator A5020717626 @default.
• W2085127789 creator A5024742369 @default.
• W2085127789 creator A5038894052 @default.
• W2085127789 creator A5069834662 @default.
• W2085127789 creator A5086343918 @default.
• W2085127789 date "2013-05-01" @default.
• W2085127789 modified "2023-09-30" @default.
• W2085127789 title "Radiographic evaluation of postoperative bone regrowth after microscopic bilateral decompression via a unilateral approach for degenerative lumbar spondylolisthesis" @default.
• W2085127789 cites W1512672803 @default.
• W2085127789 cites W1572462549 @default.
• W2085127789 cites W1982466252 @default.
• W2085127789 cites W1995855049 @default.
• W2085127789 cites W2031078554 @default.
• W2085127789 cites W2040017528 @default.
• W2085127789 cites W2042600579 @default.
• W2085127789 cites W2056794119 @default.
• W2085127789 cites W2062322284 @default.
• W2085127789 cites W2064134150 @default.
• W2085127789 cites W2077342075 @default.
• W2085127789 cites W2082644701 @default.
• W2085127789 cites W2085532137 @default.
• W2085127789 cites W2148644684 @default.
• W2085127789 cites W2162331196 @default.
• W2085127789 cites W2314283683 @default.
• W2085127789 cites W2901210452 @default.
• W2085127789 doi "https://doi.org/10.3171/2013.2.spine12633" @default.
• W2085127789 hasPubMedId "https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/23521685" @default.
• W2085127789 hasPublicationYear "2013" @default.
• W2085127789 type Work @default.
• W2085127789 sameAs 2085127789 @default.
• W2085127789 citedByCount "36" @default.
• W2085127789 countsByYear W20851277892016 @default.
• W2085127789 countsByYear W20851277892017 @default.
• W2085127789 countsByYear W20851277892018 @default.
• W2085127789 countsByYear W20851277892019 @default.
• W2085127789 countsByYear W20851277892020 @default.
• W2085127789 countsByYear W20851277892021 @default.
• W2085127789 countsByYear W20851277892022 @default.
• W2085127789 countsByYear W20851277892023 @default.
• W2085127789 crossrefType "journal-article" @default.
• W2085127789 hasAuthorship W2085127789A5020163990 @default.
• W2085127789 hasAuthorship W2085127789A5020717626 @default.
• W2085127789 hasAuthorship W2085127789A5024742369 @default.
• W2085127789 hasAuthorship W2085127789A5038894052 @default.
• W2085127789 hasAuthorship W2085127789A5069834662 @default.
• W2085127789 hasAuthorship W2085127789A5086343918 @default.
• W2085127789 hasConcept C118552586 @default.
• W2085127789 hasConcept C141071460 @default.
• W2085127789 hasConcept C15744967 @default.
• W2085127789 hasConcept C187288502 @default.
• W2085127789 hasConcept C2775871850 @default.
• W2085127789 hasConcept C2776623965 @default.
• W2085127789 hasConcept C2779326565 @default.
• W2085127789 hasConcept C2779480328 @default.
• W2085127789 hasConcept C2780775167 @default.
• W2085127789 hasConcept C2865642 @default.
• W2085127789 hasConcept C2911149213 @default.
• W2085127789 hasConcept C36454342 @default.
• W2085127789 hasConcept C43122875 @default.
• W2085127789 hasConcept C44575665 @default.
• W2085127789 hasConcept C71924100 @default.
• W2085127789 hasConcept C77805123 @default.
• W2085127789 hasConceptScore W2085127789C118552586 @default.
• W2085127789 hasConceptScore W2085127789C141071460 @default.
• W2085127789 hasConceptScore W2085127789C15744967 @default.
• W2085127789 hasConceptScore W2085127789C187288502 @default.
• W2085127789 hasConceptScore W2085127789C2775871850 @default.
• W2085127789 hasConceptScore W2085127789C2776623965 @default.
• W2085127789 hasConceptScore W2085127789C2779326565 @default.
• W2085127789 hasConceptScore W2085127789C2779480328 @default.
• W2085127789 hasConceptScore W2085127789C2780775167 @default.
• W2085127789 hasConceptScore W2085127789C2865642 @default.
• W2085127789 hasConceptScore W2085127789C2911149213 @default.
• W2085127789 hasConceptScore W2085127789C36454342 @default.
• W2085127789 hasConceptScore W2085127789C43122875 @default.
• W2085127789 hasConceptScore W2085127789C44575665 @default.
• W2085127789 hasConceptScore W2085127789C71924100 @default.
• W2085127789 hasConceptScore W2085127789C77805123 @default.
• W2085127789 hasIssue "5" @default.
• W2085127789 hasLocation W20851277891 @default.
• W2085127789 hasLocation W20851277892 @default.
• W2085127789 hasOpenAccess W2085127789 @default.
• W2085127789 hasPrimaryLocation W20851277891 @default.
• W2085127789 hasRelatedWork W2060177109 @default.
• W2085127789 hasRelatedWork W2091528930 @default.
• W2085127789 hasRelatedWork W2358203531 @default.
• W2085127789 hasRelatedWork W2383305865 @default.
• W2085127789 hasRelatedWork W2385090478 @default.
• W2085127789 hasRelatedWork W2393698850 @default.
• W2085127789 hasRelatedWork W2561239879 @default.
• W2085127789 hasRelatedWork W2808278355 @default.
• W2085127789 hasRelatedWork W3123256860 @default.
• W2085127789 hasRelatedWork W4308426184 @default.
• W2085127789 hasVolume "18" @default.
• W2085127789 isParatext "false" @default.

• next