FRINK Linked Data Fragments server

Matches in SemOpenAlex for { <https://semopenalex.org/work/W2085254757> ?p ?o ?g. }

• W2085254757 abstract "Abstract Oil companies use statistical decision-making techniques, like portfolio analysis, to make more informed decisions and estimate resource volumes more accurately. In general companies using these techniques are more successful. Probabilistic aggregation and dependency estimation are essential in portfolio methods and resource estimation. However, current methods have some very real limitations. Probabilistic aggregation and dependency estimation are recognised in the SPE/WPC/AAPG/SPEE Petroleum Resources Management System (PRMS) for multi-field integrated projects. However, Section 4.2.1 of the PRMS recommends that results reporting beyond this (field, property, or project) level should use arithmetic summation by category but should caution that the aggregate Proved may be a very conservative estimate and aggregate 3P may be very optimistic depending on the number of items in the aggregate Arithmetic summation understates the true value of the resource estimates within a portfolio. Potentially, this could result in deferral of a project, or loss of lucrative business and commercial opportunities, such as project investment, facility-sizing decisions or incremental gas supply commitments. Statistically-robust tools that appropriately use expert opinion are essential for aggregation of resource estimates. Using two integrated project examples we will demonstrate methods for: probabilistic aggregation of the resource estimates for multiple fields; andestimating a measure of dependency between the resource estimates of individual fields. The methods reviewed for probabilistic aggregation include both Monte-Carlo simulation and analytical methods. We present a new analytical method based on multivariate skew-normal distributions. These can model a wide range of skewness through a shape parameter and are used heavily in financial and actuarial applications. This method will allow a wide range of skewness to be incorporated in the probabilistic aggregation of resource estimates for multiple fields. This paper presents methods for evaluating measures of dependency between the resource estimates from a portfolio of fields. In cases where the multiple realizations approach is used as a basis for the uncertainty framework for the individual fields, tornado diagrams are generated. These describe the dependence of the individual field estimates on reservoir parameters. When experimental design and response surface methods are used, a surrogate model for estimates based on a response surface will be available. Incorporating the expertise and knowledge of oil and gas professionals is a critical step, allowing the uncertainties and dependencies to be identified and quantified. These methodologies for probabilistic aggregation and estimating dependencies were developed within the context of the oil industry. However, their use is not limited to the oil industry. They are general and can be used in any situation where there is a probabilistic aggregation problem. The techniques require limited time and effort, compared to individual field studies and can have a profound impact on the total P90 reserves for the project." @default.
• W2085254757 created "2016-06-24" @default.
• W2085254757 creator A5032576109 @default.
• W2085254757 creator A5032938713 @default.
• W2085254757 creator A5071880696 @default.
• W2085254757 date "2008-10-20" @default.
• W2085254757 modified "2023-10-11" @default.
• W2085254757 title "Probabilistic Aggregation of Oil and Gas Field Resource Estimates and Project Portfolio Analysis" @default.
• W2085254757 cites W1978199796 @default.
• W2085254757 cites W1994665973 @default.
• W2085254757 cites W1996617158 @default.
• W2085254757 cites W2007013632 @default.
• W2085254757 cites W2010424508 @default.
• W2085254757 cites W2025355990 @default.
• W2085254757 cites W2029891710 @default.
• W2085254757 cites W2039725446 @default.
• W2085254757 cites W2040134344 @default.
• W2085254757 cites W2045596084 @default.
• W2085254757 cites W2053154595 @default.
• W2085254757 cites W2055320898 @default.
• W2085254757 cites W2059711353 @default.
• W2085254757 cites W2071284115 @default.
• W2085254757 cites W2073689244 @default.
• W2085254757 cites W2082510242 @default.
• W2085254757 cites W2093410464 @default.
• W2085254757 cites W2111125713 @default.
• W2085254757 cites W2120860882 @default.
• W2085254757 cites W2171050536 @default.
• W2085254757 cites W2502182352 @default.
• W2085254757 doi "https://doi.org/10.2118/116395-ms" @default.
• W2085254757 hasPublicationYear "2008" @default.
• W2085254757 type Work @default.
• W2085254757 sameAs 2085254757 @default.
• W2085254757 citedByCount "1" @default.
• W2085254757 countsByYear W20852547572012 @default.
• W2085254757 crossrefType "proceedings-article" @default.
• W2085254757 hasAuthorship W2085254757A5032576109 @default.
• W2085254757 hasAuthorship W2085254757A5032938713 @default.
• W2085254757 hasAuthorship W2085254757A5071880696 @default.
• W2085254757 hasConcept C106159729 @default.
• W2085254757 hasConcept C149782125 @default.
• W2085254757 hasConcept C154945302 @default.
• W2085254757 hasConcept C15952604 @default.
• W2085254757 hasConcept C159985019 @default.
• W2085254757 hasConcept C162324750 @default.
• W2085254757 hasConcept C187736073 @default.
• W2085254757 hasConcept C192562407 @default.
• W2085254757 hasConcept C206345919 @default.
• W2085254757 hasConcept C2780821815 @default.
• W2085254757 hasConcept C31258907 @default.
• W2085254757 hasConcept C33923547 @default.
• W2085254757 hasConcept C41008148 @default.
• W2085254757 hasConcept C42475967 @default.
• W2085254757 hasConcept C4679612 @default.
• W2085254757 hasConcept C49937458 @default.
• W2085254757 hasConcept C74510933 @default.
• W2085254757 hasConceptScore W2085254757C106159729 @default.
• W2085254757 hasConceptScore W2085254757C149782125 @default.
• W2085254757 hasConceptScore W2085254757C154945302 @default.
• W2085254757 hasConceptScore W2085254757C15952604 @default.
• W2085254757 hasConceptScore W2085254757C159985019 @default.
• W2085254757 hasConceptScore W2085254757C162324750 @default.
• W2085254757 hasConceptScore W2085254757C187736073 @default.
• W2085254757 hasConceptScore W2085254757C192562407 @default.
• W2085254757 hasConceptScore W2085254757C206345919 @default.
• W2085254757 hasConceptScore W2085254757C2780821815 @default.
• W2085254757 hasConceptScore W2085254757C31258907 @default.
• W2085254757 hasConceptScore W2085254757C33923547 @default.
• W2085254757 hasConceptScore W2085254757C41008148 @default.
• W2085254757 hasConceptScore W2085254757C42475967 @default.
• W2085254757 hasConceptScore W2085254757C4679612 @default.
• W2085254757 hasConceptScore W2085254757C49937458 @default.
• W2085254757 hasConceptScore W2085254757C74510933 @default.
• W2085254757 hasLocation W20852547571 @default.
• W2085254757 hasOpenAccess W2085254757 @default.
• W2085254757 hasPrimaryLocation W20852547571 @default.
• W2085254757 hasRelatedWork W2030292806 @default.
• W2085254757 hasRelatedWork W2147155098 @default.
• W2085254757 hasRelatedWork W2215759665 @default.
• W2085254757 hasRelatedWork W2494523064 @default.
• W2085254757 hasRelatedWork W2943623134 @default.
• W2085254757 hasRelatedWork W2960358116 @default.
• W2085254757 hasRelatedWork W3198108659 @default.
• W2085254757 hasRelatedWork W4287727129 @default.
• W2085254757 hasRelatedWork W4377695609 @default.
• W2085254757 hasRelatedWork W4385232313 @default.
• W2085254757 isParatext "false" @default.
• W2085254757 isRetracted "false" @default.
• W2085254757 magId "2085254757" @default.
• W2085254757 workType "article" @default.