FRINK Linked Data Fragments server

Matches in SemOpenAlex for { <https://semopenalex.org/work/W2085295567> ?p ?o ?g. }

• W2085295567 endingPage "628" @default.
• W2085295567 startingPage "622" @default.
• W2085295567 abstract "Background The purpose of this study was to analyze long-term recurrence rates and complications in patients previously enrolled in a prospective randomized trial comparing laparoscopic (LC) and open ileocolectomy (OC) for ileocolic Crohn's disease (CD). Methods Follow-up data were available on 56 of 60 patients. Demographic data, recurrence rates, need for additional surgery related to primary procedure, and medication use were recorded. Results Mean follow-up for 56 patients (27 LC vs 29 OC) was 10.5 years and comparable between LC and OC (10.0 vs 11.0, respectively; P = .64). One patient died 8 years after OC of causes unrelated to CD. Eight patients for each group underwent initial reoperative (26% LC vs 28% OC; P = .89). One patient underwent incisional hernia repair after LC (4%) versus 4 patients (14%) after OC (P = .61). Two patients in the LC group underwent adhesiolysis versus none after OC (P = .23). Incidences of anorectal disease, anorectal surgery, endoscopic or radiologic recurrence, and medication use were also similar between LC and OC. OC patients requiring operation during follow-up were significantly more likely than LC to require multiple operations (P = .006). Conclusions Long-term data from this prospective randomized trial confirm that LC is at least comparable to OC in the treatment of ileocolic CD. The purpose of this study was to analyze long-term recurrence rates and complications in patients previously enrolled in a prospective randomized trial comparing laparoscopic (LC) and open ileocolectomy (OC) for ileocolic Crohn's disease (CD). Follow-up data were available on 56 of 60 patients. Demographic data, recurrence rates, need for additional surgery related to primary procedure, and medication use were recorded. Mean follow-up for 56 patients (27 LC vs 29 OC) was 10.5 years and comparable between LC and OC (10.0 vs 11.0, respectively; P = .64). One patient died 8 years after OC of causes unrelated to CD. Eight patients for each group underwent initial reoperative (26% LC vs 28% OC; P = .89). One patient underwent incisional hernia repair after LC (4%) versus 4 patients (14%) after OC (P = .61). Two patients in the LC group underwent adhesiolysis versus none after OC (P = .23). Incidences of anorectal disease, anorectal surgery, endoscopic or radiologic recurrence, and medication use were also similar between LC and OC. OC patients requiring operation during follow-up were significantly more likely than LC to require multiple operations (P = .006). Long-term data from this prospective randomized trial confirm that LC is at least comparable to OC in the treatment of ileocolic CD." @default.
• W2085295567 created "2016-06-24" @default.
• W2085295567 creator A5010804802 @default.
• W2085295567 creator A5026198545 @default.
• W2085295567 creator A5068339279 @default.
• W2085295567 date "2008-10-01" @default.
• W2085295567 modified "2023-09-30" @default.
• W2085295567 title "Long-term outcomes of laparoscopic versus open ileocolic resection for Crohn's disease: Follow-up of a prospective randomized trial" @default.
• W2085295567 cites W1440149779 @default.
• W2085295567 cites W1574038957 @default.
• W2085295567 cites W1967410348 @default.
• W2085295567 cites W1970935971 @default.
• W2085295567 cites W1977484436 @default.
• W2085295567 cites W1996664178 @default.
• W2085295567 cites W2021818141 @default.
• W2085295567 cites W2031224084 @default.
• W2085295567 cites W2039739528 @default.
• W2085295567 cites W2061159992 @default.
• W2085295567 cites W2068376497 @default.
• W2085295567 cites W2080400412 @default.
• W2085295567 cites W2087507912 @default.
• W2085295567 cites W2098267905 @default.
• W2085295567 cites W2114377410 @default.
• W2085295567 cites W2123726787 @default.
• W2085295567 cites W2156259078 @default.
• W2085295567 cites W2164042777 @default.
• W2085295567 cites W2318885609 @default.
• W2085295567 cites W2333183832 @default.
• W2085295567 cites W4238858939 @default.
• W2085295567 doi "https://doi.org/10.1016/j.surg.2008.06.016" @default.
• W2085295567 hasPubMedId "https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/18847647" @default.
• W2085295567 hasPublicationYear "2008" @default.
• W2085295567 type Work @default.
• W2085295567 sameAs 2085295567 @default.
• W2085295567 citedByCount "128" @default.
• W2085295567 countsByYear W20852955672012 @default.
• W2085295567 countsByYear W20852955672013 @default.
• W2085295567 countsByYear W20852955672014 @default.
• W2085295567 countsByYear W20852955672015 @default.
• W2085295567 countsByYear W20852955672016 @default.
• W2085295567 countsByYear W20852955672017 @default.
• W2085295567 countsByYear W20852955672018 @default.
• W2085295567 countsByYear W20852955672019 @default.
• W2085295567 countsByYear W20852955672020 @default.
• W2085295567 countsByYear W20852955672021 @default.
• W2085295567 countsByYear W20852955672023 @default.
• W2085295567 crossrefType "journal-article" @default.
• W2085295567 hasAuthorship W2085295567A5010804802 @default.
• W2085295567 hasAuthorship W2085295567A5026198545 @default.
• W2085295567 hasAuthorship W2085295567A5068339279 @default.
• W2085295567 hasConcept C126322002 @default.
• W2085295567 hasConcept C141071460 @default.
• W2085295567 hasConcept C168563851 @default.
• W2085295567 hasConcept C188816634 @default.
• W2085295567 hasConcept C2778451229 @default.
• W2085295567 hasConcept C2779134260 @default.
• W2085295567 hasConcept C2779280984 @default.
• W2085295567 hasConcept C2780047204 @default.
• W2085295567 hasConcept C2780120127 @default.
• W2085295567 hasConcept C71924100 @default.
• W2085295567 hasConceptScore W2085295567C126322002 @default.
• W2085295567 hasConceptScore W2085295567C141071460 @default.
• W2085295567 hasConceptScore W2085295567C168563851 @default.
• W2085295567 hasConceptScore W2085295567C188816634 @default.
• W2085295567 hasConceptScore W2085295567C2778451229 @default.
• W2085295567 hasConceptScore W2085295567C2779134260 @default.
• W2085295567 hasConceptScore W2085295567C2779280984 @default.
• W2085295567 hasConceptScore W2085295567C2780047204 @default.
• W2085295567 hasConceptScore W2085295567C2780120127 @default.
• W2085295567 hasConceptScore W2085295567C71924100 @default.
• W2085295567 hasIssue "4" @default.
• W2085295567 hasLocation W20852955671 @default.
• W2085295567 hasLocation W20852955672 @default.
• W2085295567 hasOpenAccess W2085295567 @default.
• W2085295567 hasPrimaryLocation W20852955671 @default.
• W2085295567 hasRelatedWork W2003938723 @default.
• W2085295567 hasRelatedWork W2047967234 @default.
• W2085295567 hasRelatedWork W2090549966 @default.
• W2085295567 hasRelatedWork W2091749050 @default.
• W2085295567 hasRelatedWork W2118496982 @default.
• W2085295567 hasRelatedWork W2183472907 @default.
• W2085295567 hasRelatedWork W2439875401 @default.
• W2085295567 hasRelatedWork W4302076288 @default.
• W2085295567 hasRelatedWork W4319727578 @default.
• W2085295567 hasRelatedWork W2525756941 @default.
• W2085295567 hasVolume "144" @default.
• W2085295567 isParatext "false" @default.
• W2085295567 isRetracted "false" @default.
• W2085295567 magId "2085295567" @default.
• W2085295567 workType "article" @default.