FRINK Linked Data Fragments server

Matches in SemOpenAlex for { <https://semopenalex.org/work/W2085486912> ?p ?o ?g. }

• W2085486912 endingPage "100" @default.
• W2085486912 startingPage "96" @default.
• W2085486912 abstract "The use of carotid stenting in octogenarian patients is controversial; some authors consider this population at high risk for the procedure. Anatomic vascular complexity may be an important reason for the high reported rates of periprocedural thromboembolic complications. Transcervical carotid angioplasty and stenting (TCS) with flow reversal avoids aortic arch instrumentation. In this study, we analyzed our experience with TCS in octogenarian patients and compared the results with those of carotid endarterectomy (CEA) in the same age group in terms of safety.The study included 81 patients, > or =80 years, a retrospective cohort of 45 consecutive patients treated with CEA (January 2002 to January 2005), and a prospective cohort of 36 consecutive patients treated with TCS with protective flow reversal (January 2005 to January 2007). Patients were considered symptomatic according to the North American Symptomatic Carotid Endarterectomy Trial (NASCET) criteria. Stenting indication was established on the SAPPHIRE criteria. General anesthesia was used in patients undergoing CEA, and local anesthesia in those receiving TCS. Primary endpoints were: stroke, death, or acute myocardial infarction within 30 days. Secondary endpoints were peripheral nerve paralysis and cervical hematoma. Statistical significance for between-group differences was assessed by Pearson chi(2) or Fisher exact test, and Student t test. A P value of <.05 was considered statistically significant. Follow-up was limited to 30 days.Baseline epidemiological characteristics and revascularization indications were similar between both groups. Mean age was significantly higher in the TCS group (83.5 +/- 3.35) than the CEA group (81.7 +/- 1.55) (P = .004). Percentage of symptomatic lesions was similar: 30.6% in TCS vs 44.4% in CEA (P = .2). Comorbid conditions (respiratory or cardiac) were more frequent in TCS group (61.6% vs 26.6%; P = .002). There were no significant differences between groups for the primary endpoints: 4.4% (one stroke, one acute myocardial infarction) for CEA vs 0% for TCS (P = .5). Among CEA patients, there were two peripheral nerve palsies (4.4%) and one cervical hematoma (2.2%); there were no such complications with TCS (P = .5 and P = 1, respectively). In one asymptomatic TCS patient, Doppler study at 24 hours following the procedure showed a common carotid artery dissection, which was treated by a common carotid to internal carotid bypass.In this preliminary experience, transcervical carotid angioplasty and stenting with flow reversal for cerebral protection was as safe at short term as carotid endarterectomy in octogenarian patients, who additionally had considerable comorbidity; thus, it may be possible to extend the indications for carotid revascularization in this population. Studies in larger patient series are required to confirm the trends observed in this study." @default.
• W2085486912 created "2016-06-24" @default.
• W2085486912 creator A5011835189 @default.
• W2085486912 creator A5018198302 @default.
• W2085486912 creator A5042628361 @default.
• W2085486912 creator A5059587222 @default.
• W2085486912 creator A5078260458 @default.
• W2085486912 creator A5079263465 @default.
• W2085486912 date "2008-01-01" @default.
• W2085486912 modified "2023-09-23" @default.
• W2085486912 title "Transcervical carotid stenting with flow reversal is safe in octogenarians: A preliminary safety study" @default.
• W2085486912 cites W1965652425 @default.
• W2085486912 cites W1975029410 @default.
• W2085486912 cites W2038169486 @default.
• W2085486912 cites W2038363074 @default.
• W2085486912 cites W2038884546 @default.
• W2085486912 cites W2039392119 @default.
• W2085486912 cites W2042266150 @default.
• W2085486912 cites W2063489053 @default.
• W2085486912 cites W2081385142 @default.
• W2085486912 cites W2140121283 @default.
• W2085486912 cites W2153725324 @default.
• W2085486912 cites W2167232230 @default.
• W2085486912 cites W2612334191 @default.
• W2085486912 cites W4324264875 @default.
• W2085486912 cites W4376848366 @default.
• W2085486912 doi "https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jvs.2007.09.032" @default.
• W2085486912 hasPubMedId "https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/18060727" @default.
• W2085486912 hasPublicationYear "2008" @default.
• W2085486912 type Work @default.
• W2085486912 sameAs 2085486912 @default.
• W2085486912 citedByCount "32" @default.
• W2085486912 countsByYear W20854869122012 @default.
• W2085486912 countsByYear W20854869122013 @default.
• W2085486912 countsByYear W20854869122016 @default.
• W2085486912 countsByYear W20854869122017 @default.
• W2085486912 countsByYear W20854869122019 @default.
• W2085486912 countsByYear W20854869122020 @default.
• W2085486912 countsByYear W20854869122021 @default.
• W2085486912 crossrefType "journal-article" @default.
• W2085486912 hasAuthorship W2085486912A5011835189 @default.
• W2085486912 hasAuthorship W2085486912A5018198302 @default.
• W2085486912 hasAuthorship W2085486912A5042628361 @default.
• W2085486912 hasAuthorship W2085486912A5059587222 @default.
• W2085486912 hasAuthorship W2085486912A5078260458 @default.
• W2085486912 hasAuthorship W2085486912A5079263465 @default.
• W2085486912 hasBestOaLocation W20854869121 @default.
• W2085486912 hasConcept C126322002 @default.
• W2085486912 hasConcept C127413603 @default.
• W2085486912 hasConcept C141071460 @default.
• W2085486912 hasConcept C167135981 @default.
• W2085486912 hasConcept C188816634 @default.
• W2085486912 hasConcept C2779169563 @default.
• W2085486912 hasConcept C2780326628 @default.
• W2085486912 hasConcept C2780645631 @default.
• W2085486912 hasConcept C2781068581 @default.
• W2085486912 hasConcept C2908647359 @default.
• W2085486912 hasConcept C2987047532 @default.
• W2085486912 hasConcept C71924100 @default.
• W2085486912 hasConcept C78519656 @default.
• W2085486912 hasConcept C99454951 @default.
• W2085486912 hasConceptScore W2085486912C126322002 @default.
• W2085486912 hasConceptScore W2085486912C127413603 @default.
• W2085486912 hasConceptScore W2085486912C141071460 @default.
• W2085486912 hasConceptScore W2085486912C167135981 @default.
• W2085486912 hasConceptScore W2085486912C188816634 @default.
• W2085486912 hasConceptScore W2085486912C2779169563 @default.
• W2085486912 hasConceptScore W2085486912C2780326628 @default.
• W2085486912 hasConceptScore W2085486912C2780645631 @default.
• W2085486912 hasConceptScore W2085486912C2781068581 @default.
• W2085486912 hasConceptScore W2085486912C2908647359 @default.
• W2085486912 hasConceptScore W2085486912C2987047532 @default.
• W2085486912 hasConceptScore W2085486912C71924100 @default.
• W2085486912 hasConceptScore W2085486912C78519656 @default.
• W2085486912 hasConceptScore W2085486912C99454951 @default.
• W2085486912 hasIssue "1" @default.
• W2085486912 hasLocation W20854869121 @default.
• W2085486912 hasLocation W20854869122 @default.
• W2085486912 hasOpenAccess W2085486912 @default.
• W2085486912 hasPrimaryLocation W20854869121 @default.
• W2085486912 hasRelatedWork W1994249753 @default.
• W2085486912 hasRelatedWork W2041685243 @default.
• W2085486912 hasRelatedWork W2087392442 @default.
• W2085486912 hasRelatedWork W2095595698 @default.
• W2085486912 hasRelatedWork W2096078596 @default.
• W2085486912 hasRelatedWork W2112358236 @default.
• W2085486912 hasRelatedWork W2146656800 @default.
• W2085486912 hasRelatedWork W2588619236 @default.
• W2085486912 hasRelatedWork W2977131346 @default.
• W2085486912 hasRelatedWork W4236063427 @default.
• W2085486912 hasVolume "47" @default.
• W2085486912 isParatext "false" @default.
• W2085486912 isRetracted "false" @default.
• W2085486912 magId "2085486912" @default.
• W2085486912 workType "article" @default.