FRINK Linked Data Fragments server

Matches in SemOpenAlex for { <https://semopenalex.org/work/W2086671191> ?p ?o ?g. }

• W2086671191 endingPage "234" @default.
• W2086671191 startingPage "228" @default.
• W2086671191 abstract "The impact of clinical risk factor-based absolute risk methods on the prevalence of high risk for osteoporotic fracture is unknown. We applied absolute risk methods to 6646 subjects and found that the prevalence of elderly women deemed to be at high risk increased substantially, whereas the overall prevalence was highly dependent on the threshold used to designate high risk.Many groups have advocated using absolute risk methods that incorporate clinical risk factors to target patients for osteoporosis therapy. We examined how the application of such absolute risk classification systems influences the prevalence of those considered to be at high risk for osteoporotic fracture and compared these systems to one based solely on BMD.Using 6646 subjects from the Canadian Multicentre Osteoporosis Study (CaMos), a prospective, randomly selected, population-based cohort, we assessed three different systems for determining prevalence of high risk for osteoporotic fracture: a BMD-based system; a simplified risk factor system incorporating age, sex, BMD, and two clinical risk factors; and a comprehensive system, incorporating age, sex, BMD, and seven clinical risk factors. The 10-year absolute risks of incident fragility fracture were compared across systems using three different high-risk thresholds.The prevalence of a T score < or = -2.5 was 18.8% (95% CI: 17.7-19.9%) in women and 3.9% (95% CI: 3.0-4.7%) in men. Using a 15% 10-year risk of fracture threshold, the prevalence of women at high risk increased to 46.9% (95% CI: 45.4-48.4) and 42.5% (95% CI: 41.1-43.9) when the comprehensive and simplified risk factor classification systems were used, respectively. Using a 25% 10-year absolute risk threshold, the prevalence of high risk was similar to that of the BMD-based system, whereas the 20% threshold gave intermediate rates. All thresholds analyzed resulted in an increased prevalence of older women at high risk for fracture, whereas only the 15% 10-year risk of fracture threshold resulted in an increase in the prevalence of men at high risk.The application of risk factor-based systems results in an increased prevalence of older women at high risk. The prevalence of individuals at high risk may increase with changes to the methods used to determine those who are eligible for therapy. These data have important implications for the pattern of care and costs of treating osteoporotic fractures." @default.
• W2086671191 created "2016-06-24" @default.
• W2086671191 creator A5016496681 @default.
• W2086671191 creator A5017755783 @default.
• W2086671191 creator A5023518828 @default.
• W2086671191 creator A5027489501 @default.
• W2086671191 creator A5030199838 @default.
• W2086671191 creator A5032494820 @default.
• W2086671191 creator A5032907896 @default.
• W2086671191 creator A5042272023 @default.
• W2086671191 creator A5059888726 @default.
• W2086671191 creator A5059955804 @default.
• W2086671191 creator A5062747501 @default.
• W2086671191 creator A5065417302 @default.
• W2086671191 creator A5070045657 @default.
• W2086671191 creator A5075674266 @default.
• W2086671191 date "2007-02-01" @default.
• W2086671191 modified "2023-10-09" @default.
• W2086671191 title "Changes to Osteoporosis Prevalence According to Method of Risk Assessment" @default.
• W2086671191 cites W1970501743 @default.
• W2086671191 cites W1975230482 @default.
• W2086671191 cites W1981018937 @default.
• W2086671191 cites W1989950790 @default.
• W2086671191 cites W2017657202 @default.
• W2086671191 cites W2027214144 @default.
• W2086671191 cites W2036125852 @default.
• W2086671191 cites W2050587934 @default.
• W2086671191 cites W2057031543 @default.
• W2086671191 cites W2068947159 @default.
• W2086671191 cites W2069811152 @default.
• W2086671191 cites W2077494568 @default.
• W2086671191 cites W2077512165 @default.
• W2086671191 cites W2105648357 @default.
• W2086671191 cites W2115660903 @default.
• W2086671191 cites W2122906075 @default.
• W2086671191 cites W2139353161 @default.
• W2086671191 cites W3139427245 @default.
• W2086671191 cites W4296492010 @default.
• W2086671191 doi "https://doi.org/10.1359/jbmr.061109" @default.
• W2086671191 hasPubMedId "https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/17129177" @default.
• W2086671191 hasPublicationYear "2007" @default.
• W2086671191 type Work @default.
• W2086671191 sameAs 2086671191 @default.
• W2086671191 citedByCount "44" @default.
• W2086671191 countsByYear W20866711912012 @default.
• W2086671191 countsByYear W20866711912013 @default.
• W2086671191 countsByYear W20866711912014 @default.
• W2086671191 countsByYear W20866711912015 @default.
• W2086671191 countsByYear W20866711912017 @default.
• W2086671191 countsByYear W20866711912018 @default.
• W2086671191 countsByYear W20866711912020 @default.
• W2086671191 countsByYear W20866711912021 @default.
• W2086671191 countsByYear W20866711912022 @default.
• W2086671191 countsByYear W20866711912023 @default.
• W2086671191 crossrefType "journal-article" @default.
• W2086671191 hasAuthorship W2086671191A5016496681 @default.
• W2086671191 hasAuthorship W2086671191A5017755783 @default.
• W2086671191 hasAuthorship W2086671191A5023518828 @default.
• W2086671191 hasAuthorship W2086671191A5027489501 @default.
• W2086671191 hasAuthorship W2086671191A5030199838 @default.
• W2086671191 hasAuthorship W2086671191A5032494820 @default.
• W2086671191 hasAuthorship W2086671191A5032907896 @default.
• W2086671191 hasAuthorship W2086671191A5042272023 @default.
• W2086671191 hasAuthorship W2086671191A5059888726 @default.
• W2086671191 hasAuthorship W2086671191A5059955804 @default.
• W2086671191 hasAuthorship W2086671191A5062747501 @default.
• W2086671191 hasAuthorship W2086671191A5065417302 @default.
• W2086671191 hasAuthorship W2086671191A5070045657 @default.
• W2086671191 hasAuthorship W2086671191A5075674266 @default.
• W2086671191 hasBestOaLocation W20866711911 @default.
• W2086671191 hasConcept C120195587 @default.
• W2086671191 hasConcept C12174686 @default.
• W2086671191 hasConcept C126322002 @default.
• W2086671191 hasConcept C1862650 @default.
• W2086671191 hasConcept C188816634 @default.
• W2086671191 hasConcept C201903717 @default.
• W2086671191 hasConcept C2776541429 @default.
• W2086671191 hasConcept C2776886416 @default.
• W2086671191 hasConcept C2908647359 @default.
• W2086671191 hasConcept C2994343686 @default.
• W2086671191 hasConcept C38652104 @default.
• W2086671191 hasConcept C41008148 @default.
• W2086671191 hasConcept C50440223 @default.
• W2086671191 hasConcept C71924100 @default.
• W2086671191 hasConcept C72563966 @default.
• W2086671191 hasConcept C99454951 @default.
• W2086671191 hasConceptScore W2086671191C120195587 @default.
• W2086671191 hasConceptScore W2086671191C12174686 @default.
• W2086671191 hasConceptScore W2086671191C126322002 @default.
• W2086671191 hasConceptScore W2086671191C1862650 @default.
• W2086671191 hasConceptScore W2086671191C188816634 @default.
• W2086671191 hasConceptScore W2086671191C201903717 @default.
• W2086671191 hasConceptScore W2086671191C2776541429 @default.
• W2086671191 hasConceptScore W2086671191C2776886416 @default.
• W2086671191 hasConceptScore W2086671191C2908647359 @default.
• W2086671191 hasConceptScore W2086671191C2994343686 @default.
• W2086671191 hasConceptScore W2086671191C38652104 @default.
• W2086671191 hasConceptScore W2086671191C41008148 @default.

• next