FRINK Linked Data Fragments server

Matches in SemOpenAlex for { <https://semopenalex.org/work/W2087645771> ?p ?o ?g. }

• W2087645771 endingPage "199" @default.
• W2087645771 startingPage "193" @default.
• W2087645771 abstract "Sciatica is a common pain problem and current pharmacologic therapies have proven inadequate for many patients. The objective of this sham-controlled investigation was to compare a novel non-pharmacologic technique, percutaneous electrical nerve stimulation (PENS), to transcutaneous electrical nerve stimulation (TENS) in the management of the radicular pain associated with sciatica. Sixty-four consenting patients with sciatica due to lumbar disc herniation were treated with PENS, TENS and sham-PENS according to a randomized, single-blinded, cross-over study. All patients had been maintained on a stable oral non-opioid analgesic regimen for at least 6 weeks prior to entering the study. Each treatment modality was administered for a period of 30 min three times per week for 3 weeks, with 1 week 'off' between each modality. Both PENS and TENS treatments were administered using a stimulation frequency of 4 Hz. The pre-treatment assessment included the health status survey short form (SF-36), as well as visual analog scales (VAS) for radicular pain, physical activity and quality of sleep. The pain VAS was also repeated after each treatment session. At the end of each 3-week treatment block, the SF-36 was repeated. After receiving all three treatment modalities, a global assessment questionnaire was completed. Both PENS (42%) and TENS (23%) were significantly more effective than the sham (8%) treatments in decreasing VAS pain scores. The daily oral analgesic requirements were also significantly reduced compared to the pre-treatment values with PENS (P<0.01) and TENS (P<0.05). However, PENS was significantly more effective than TENS (and sham-PENS) in improving physical activity and quality of sleep. The SF-36 evaluation confirmed the superiority of PENS (versus TENS and sham-PENS) with respect to post-treatment functionality. In the overall assessment, 73% of the patients reported that PENS was the most desirable modality (versus 21% for TENS and 6% for sham-PENS). Finally, 71% of the patients stated that they would be willing to pay extra to receive PENS therapy compared to 22% and 3% for TENS and sham-PENS, respectively. In this sham-controlled study, we concluded that PENS was more effective than TENS when administered at a stimulation frequency of 4 Hz in providing short-term pain relief and improved functionality in patients with sciatica." @default.
• W2087645771 created "2016-06-24" @default.
• W2087645771 creator A5014157517 @default.
• W2087645771 creator A5018576610 @default.
• W2087645771 creator A5034429046 @default.
• W2087645771 creator A5039405980 @default.
• W2087645771 creator A5054324390 @default.
• W2087645771 creator A5076151013 @default.
• W2087645771 date "1999-11-01" @default.
• W2087645771 modified "2023-10-17" @default.
• W2087645771 title "Percutaneous electrical nerve stimulation: an alternative to TENS in the management of sciatica" @default.
• W2087645771 cites W1508583372 @default.
• W2087645771 cites W1973668456 @default.
• W2087645771 cites W1978735904 @default.
• W2087645771 cites W2001522058 @default.
• W2087645771 cites W2018532002 @default.
• W2087645771 cites W2052157280 @default.
• W2087645771 cites W2062081863 @default.
• W2087645771 cites W2066752130 @default.
• W2087645771 cites W2074420844 @default.
• W2087645771 cites W2171521960 @default.
• W2087645771 cites W2287055415 @default.
• W2087645771 cites W2320737839 @default.
• W2087645771 cites W2323008516 @default.
• W2087645771 cites W2331457614 @default.
• W2087645771 cites W2334366635 @default.
• W2087645771 cites W2334427329 @default.
• W2087645771 cites W4237080191 @default.
• W2087645771 cites W4292806894 @default.
• W2087645771 doi "https://doi.org/10.1016/s0304-3959(99)00097-4" @default.
• W2087645771 hasPubMedId "https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/10534590" @default.
• W2087645771 hasPublicationYear "1999" @default.
• W2087645771 type Work @default.
• W2087645771 sameAs 2087645771 @default.
• W2087645771 citedByCount "88" @default.
• W2087645771 countsByYear W20876457712012 @default.
• W2087645771 countsByYear W20876457712013 @default.
• W2087645771 countsByYear W20876457712014 @default.
• W2087645771 countsByYear W20876457712015 @default.
• W2087645771 countsByYear W20876457712016 @default.
• W2087645771 countsByYear W20876457712017 @default.
• W2087645771 countsByYear W20876457712018 @default.
• W2087645771 countsByYear W20876457712019 @default.
• W2087645771 countsByYear W20876457712020 @default.
• W2087645771 countsByYear W20876457712021 @default.
• W2087645771 countsByYear W20876457712022 @default.
• W2087645771 countsByYear W20876457712023 @default.
• W2087645771 crossrefType "journal-article" @default.
• W2087645771 hasAuthorship W2087645771A5014157517 @default.
• W2087645771 hasAuthorship W2087645771A5018576610 @default.
• W2087645771 hasAuthorship W2087645771A5034429046 @default.
• W2087645771 hasAuthorship W2087645771A5039405980 @default.
• W2087645771 hasAuthorship W2087645771A5054324390 @default.
• W2087645771 hasAuthorship W2087645771A5076151013 @default.
• W2087645771 hasConcept C126322002 @default.
• W2087645771 hasConcept C141071460 @default.
• W2087645771 hasConcept C14184104 @default.
• W2087645771 hasConcept C142724271 @default.
• W2087645771 hasConcept C168563851 @default.
• W2087645771 hasConcept C1862650 @default.
• W2087645771 hasConcept C204787440 @default.
• W2087645771 hasConcept C24998067 @default.
• W2087645771 hasConcept C2776698514 @default.
• W2087645771 hasConcept C2779978343 @default.
• W2087645771 hasConcept C2780118021 @default.
• W2087645771 hasConcept C2780813298 @default.
• W2087645771 hasConcept C2780820201 @default.
• W2087645771 hasConcept C42219234 @default.
• W2087645771 hasConcept C44575665 @default.
• W2087645771 hasConcept C536681454 @default.
• W2087645771 hasConcept C71924100 @default.
• W2087645771 hasConceptScore W2087645771C126322002 @default.
• W2087645771 hasConceptScore W2087645771C141071460 @default.
• W2087645771 hasConceptScore W2087645771C14184104 @default.
• W2087645771 hasConceptScore W2087645771C142724271 @default.
• W2087645771 hasConceptScore W2087645771C168563851 @default.
• W2087645771 hasConceptScore W2087645771C1862650 @default.
• W2087645771 hasConceptScore W2087645771C204787440 @default.
• W2087645771 hasConceptScore W2087645771C24998067 @default.
• W2087645771 hasConceptScore W2087645771C2776698514 @default.
• W2087645771 hasConceptScore W2087645771C2779978343 @default.
• W2087645771 hasConceptScore W2087645771C2780118021 @default.
• W2087645771 hasConceptScore W2087645771C2780813298 @default.
• W2087645771 hasConceptScore W2087645771C2780820201 @default.
• W2087645771 hasConceptScore W2087645771C42219234 @default.
• W2087645771 hasConceptScore W2087645771C44575665 @default.
• W2087645771 hasConceptScore W2087645771C536681454 @default.
• W2087645771 hasConceptScore W2087645771C71924100 @default.
• W2087645771 hasIssue "2" @default.
• W2087645771 hasLocation W20876457711 @default.
• W2087645771 hasLocation W20876457712 @default.
• W2087645771 hasOpenAccess W2087645771 @default.
• W2087645771 hasPrimaryLocation W20876457711 @default.
• W2087645771 hasRelatedWork W1975764706 @default.
• W2087645771 hasRelatedWork W2070650514 @default.
• W2087645771 hasRelatedWork W2131429101 @default.
• W2087645771 hasRelatedWork W2142584553 @default.
• W2087645771 hasRelatedWork W2170358606 @default.

• next