FRINK Linked Data Fragments server

Matches in SemOpenAlex for { <https://semopenalex.org/work/W2087850885> ?p ?o ?g. }

• W2087850885 endingPage "91" @default.
• W2087850885 startingPage "85" @default.
• W2087850885 abstract "Performance of livestock grazing pasture is inherently variable. Pastures must be managed to optimize quantity and quality of herbage to meet the nutrient requirements of a specific class of livestock involved in a defined production goal. Consumer desires for healthier meat products have shifted the emphasis to lean, trim carcasses from livestock production systems using forage crops. The purpose of this study was to characterize herbage nutritive value changes in grass-legume pastures grazed during autumn and to compare growing lamb (Ovis aries) performance and carcass quality when grazing autumn pasture or fed concentrate in feedlot. Less crude protein (CP) from legume was available for use by grazers in 1992 than in 1991. Frequent clipping of autumn pasture resulted in herbage with greater nutritive value (lower neutral detergent fiber [NDF] and higher in vitro organic matter disappearance [IVOMD]) than more mature stockpiled herbage. A computer model of energy determined from acid detergent fiber (ADF) nutritive value and herbage mass data predicted greater potential for lamb growth on intensively managed (clipped) vs. stockpiled herbage. Lambs fed grain had greater (P ≤ 0.05) cumulative weight gain, average daily gain (ADG), slaughter weights, chilled carcass weights, dressing percentages, leg conformation scores, ribeye area (REA), fat over rib, quality grade, and yield grades than lambs grazed on autumn pasture. However, carcasses from lambs grazing pasture in autumn had 14% less fat and about 8% more protein than lambs fed grain. While total fat content of carcasses was lower for pasturegrazed than grain-fed lambs, saturated fatty acid composition and cholesterol concentrations in lean tissue were not different. Percentage legume in the sward may have influenced the proportion of individual fatty acids in lean and fat. Market weight lambs may be produced from botanically complex autumn pasture. Research Question Livestock performance varies on pasture probably as a result of fluctuations in forage plant nutritive value, herbage productivity, and botanical composition. Canopy management, as well as livestock genetics, can influence the variability. Our study characterized herbage nutritive value changes of grass-legume pastures resulting from grazing during the autumn growth interval. In addition, performance and carcass quality were compared for lambs that grazed autumn pasture or were fed concentrate in feedlot. Literature Summary Extensive knowledge of the dynamics of grass-legume swards exists for the cool-temperate, continental climatic zone of the eastern USA. Most of what is known about autumn management of cool-season forages has been obtained from studies of stockpiled, grass-dominated canopies with relatively limited information obtained under actual grazing conditions. Finishing lambs on forage rather than concentrate leads to relatively lean carcasses. Consumer desires for healthier meat products (e.g., less fat) have shifted the emphasis to leaner, trimmer carcasses from livestock production systems. Study Description An established mixed sward of orchardgrass and white clover growing in southem West Virginia was used. Growing lambs grazed either pasture or were fed concentrate in feedlot. Herbage nutritive value in pasture was monitored for 3 yr during the autumn grazing interval and lamb performance and carcass quality were determined in each of 2 yr. Applied Questions Did autumn grazing management of grass-legume pastures influence herbage nutritive value? Less crude protein was available for use by grazers in 1992 than in 1991 resulting primarily from less legume in the sward in 1992. Herbage of higher nutritive value (lower neutral detergent fiber and greater digestibility) was available from intensively managed (frequent clipping) canopies compared with that of stockpiled canopies. Did autumn pasture or concentrate feed influence lamb performance and carcass quality? Lambs fed concentrate had greater cumulative weight gain, average daily gain, slaughter weights, chilled carcass weights, dressing percentages, leg conformation scores, ribeye area, fat over rib, quality grade, and yield grade than lambs grazed on autumn pasture. Total fat content of carcasses was lower for pasturegrazed than grain-fed lambs, but saturated fatty acid composition and cholesterol levels were greater. Recommendation We are suggesting that market weight animals may be produced from mixed-plant-species autumn pasture. Results depend upon animal genetics and the subsequent potential for rapid and efficient gain on pasture, as well as carcass weight and composition desired by the market at any given time." @default.
• W2087850885 created "2016-06-24" @default.
• W2087850885 creator A5060514471 @default.
• W2087850885 creator A5062506738 @default.
• W2087850885 creator A5074462970 @default.
• W2087850885 creator A5076797105 @default.
• W2087850885 date "1998-01-01" @default.
• W2087850885 modified "2023-09-29" @default.
• W2087850885 title "Autumn-Grazed Orchardgrass-White Clover Pasture: Nutritive Value of Herbage and Lamb Performance" @default.
• W2087850885 cites W2005333265 @default.
• W2087850885 cites W2010881618 @default.
• W2087850885 cites W2017806815 @default.
• W2087850885 cites W2051980970 @default.
• W2087850885 cites W2052001564 @default.
• W2087850885 cites W2055238775 @default.
• W2087850885 cites W2057740941 @default.
• W2087850885 cites W2066394966 @default.
• W2087850885 cites W2069747942 @default.
• W2087850885 cites W212245207 @default.
• W2087850885 cites W2169074771 @default.
• W2087850885 cites W2400905519 @default.
• W2087850885 cites W2401321413 @default.
• W2087850885 cites W2411212928 @default.
• W2087850885 cites W2416866231 @default.
• W2087850885 cites W2419143407 @default.
• W2087850885 cites W275681501 @default.
• W2087850885 doi "https://doi.org/10.2134/jpa1998.0085" @default.
• W2087850885 hasPublicationYear "1998" @default.
• W2087850885 type Work @default.
• W2087850885 sameAs 2087850885 @default.
• W2087850885 citedByCount "7" @default.
• W2087850885 countsByYear W20878508852014 @default.
• W2087850885 countsByYear W20878508852023 @default.
• W2087850885 crossrefType "journal-article" @default.
• W2087850885 hasAuthorship W2087850885A5060514471 @default.
• W2087850885 hasAuthorship W2087850885A5062506738 @default.
• W2087850885 hasAuthorship W2087850885A5074462970 @default.
• W2087850885 hasAuthorship W2087850885A5076797105 @default.
• W2087850885 hasConcept C112964050 @default.
• W2087850885 hasConcept C140793950 @default.
• W2087850885 hasConcept C142796444 @default.
• W2087850885 hasConcept C18903297 @default.
• W2087850885 hasConcept C2776632002 @default.
• W2087850885 hasConcept C2777904157 @default.
• W2087850885 hasConcept C2778053677 @default.
• W2087850885 hasConcept C2779039770 @default.
• W2087850885 hasConcept C2779329348 @default.
• W2087850885 hasConcept C2779370140 @default.
• W2087850885 hasConcept C2780138947 @default.
• W2087850885 hasConcept C6557445 @default.
• W2087850885 hasConcept C86803240 @default.
• W2087850885 hasConceptScore W2087850885C112964050 @default.
• W2087850885 hasConceptScore W2087850885C140793950 @default.
• W2087850885 hasConceptScore W2087850885C142796444 @default.
• W2087850885 hasConceptScore W2087850885C18903297 @default.
• W2087850885 hasConceptScore W2087850885C2776632002 @default.
• W2087850885 hasConceptScore W2087850885C2777904157 @default.
• W2087850885 hasConceptScore W2087850885C2778053677 @default.
• W2087850885 hasConceptScore W2087850885C2779039770 @default.
• W2087850885 hasConceptScore W2087850885C2779329348 @default.
• W2087850885 hasConceptScore W2087850885C2779370140 @default.
• W2087850885 hasConceptScore W2087850885C2780138947 @default.
• W2087850885 hasConceptScore W2087850885C6557445 @default.
• W2087850885 hasConceptScore W2087850885C86803240 @default.
• W2087850885 hasIssue "1" @default.
• W2087850885 hasLocation W20878508851 @default.
• W2087850885 hasOpenAccess W2087850885 @default.
• W2087850885 hasPrimaryLocation W20878508851 @default.
• W2087850885 hasRelatedWork W1963651766 @default.
• W2087850885 hasRelatedWork W1967048007 @default.
• W2087850885 hasRelatedWork W2004996075 @default.
• W2087850885 hasRelatedWork W2037638138 @default.
• W2087850885 hasRelatedWork W2051081949 @default.
• W2087850885 hasRelatedWork W2171190574 @default.
• W2087850885 hasRelatedWork W2333664555 @default.
• W2087850885 hasRelatedWork W2406407404 @default.
• W2087850885 hasRelatedWork W2564242426 @default.
• W2087850885 hasRelatedWork W2124940014 @default.
• W2087850885 hasVolume "11" @default.
• W2087850885 isParatext "false" @default.
• W2087850885 isRetracted "false" @default.
• W2087850885 magId "2087850885" @default.
• W2087850885 workType "article" @default.