FRINK Linked Data Fragments server

Matches in SemOpenAlex for { <https://semopenalex.org/work/W2088075486> ?p ?o ?g. }

• W2088075486 endingPage "455" @default.
• W2088075486 startingPage "451" @default.
• W2088075486 abstract "ABSTRACT Aim To assess and compare the shaping potential of manual NiTi K-files and Rotary ProTaper instruments in narrow canals using CT. Objective To assess the shaping potential of manual NiTi K-files and Rotary ProTaper and analyzing the final outcome of shaped canals using CT and determining different variables, like • Working time • Change in volume • Change in cross-sectional area. Materials and methods From a pool of fifty freshly extracted permanent maxillary molars (1st and 2nd), 30 were selected with curvatures (20 to 40°) (Schneider 1971). Tissue fragments and calcified debries were removed from the teeth by scaling. The teeth were then stored in normal saline until used. All the mesiobuccal canals were scanned by CT to obtain preinstrumented images. Teeth were scaled and stored in normal saline. This study was divided in two groups with 15 samples each. Group I (ProTaper Rotary) Canals were instrumented with Protaper Rotary instruments using crown down technique according to manufacturer's instructions. Group II (NiTi K-file) Were instrumented by NiTi K-files using step back technique with a quarter turn/pull motion. Evaluations of working time Comparative evaluations of working time was done for both the experimental groups. CT analysis and measurements The samples were analyzed and evaluated for: • Postinstrumentation change in volume. • Postinstrumentation change in cross-sections area. Result From the observations and statistical analysis carried out in this study, it was found that: There was a statistically significant difference between all the parameters judged for the present study that is: 1. Instrumentation with ProTaper Rotary system took significantly less time than instrumentation with manual NiTi K-file. 2. Change in the canal volume following instrumentation with ProTaper Rotary was significantly greater than that produced by manual NITi K-file. 3. a. Change in cross-section area at 2 and 3 mm from the apex was significantly greater with manual NiTi K-file as compared to ProTaper Rotary. b. Change in cross sections at 4.5, 6 and 7.5 mm from the apex with ProTaper Rotary was significantly greater than that produced by manual NITi K-file. Conclusion This clearly establishes that there is a drastic difference in the shaping ability of manual and Rotary NiTi instruments used with step back and crown down technique respectively with the rotary instrumentation being faster and producing greater changes in the canal anatomy. How to cite this article Kakar S, Dhingra A, Sharma H. Shaping Potential of Manual NiTi K-File and Rotary ProTaper and Analyzing the Final Outcome of Shaped Canals using CT. J Contemp Dent Pract 2013;14(3):451-455." @default.
• W2088075486 created "2016-06-24" @default.
• W2088075486 creator A5000453411 @default.
• W2088075486 creator A5077383870 @default.
• W2088075486 creator A5087654768 @default.
• W2088075486 date "2013-01-01" @default.
• W2088075486 modified "2023-10-16" @default.
• W2088075486 title "Shaping Potential of Manual NiTi K-File and Rotary ProTaper and Analyzing the Final Outcome of Shaped Canals using CT" @default.
• W2088075486 cites W1977721649 @default.
• W2088075486 cites W2041903614 @default.
• W2088075486 cites W2042643187 @default.
• W2088075486 cites W2065098635 @default.
• W2088075486 cites W2076777037 @default.
• W2088075486 cites W2110027389 @default.
• W2088075486 cites W2114808282 @default.
• W2088075486 cites W2115484473 @default.
• W2088075486 cites W2116679380 @default.
• W2088075486 cites W2118403614 @default.
• W2088075486 cites W2119868527 @default.
• W2088075486 cites W2122223083 @default.
• W2088075486 cites W2125328810 @default.
• W2088075486 cites W2139801645 @default.
• W2088075486 cites W2146895001 @default.
• W2088075486 cites W2146978547 @default.
• W2088075486 cites W2156019496 @default.
• W2088075486 cites W2165791585 @default.
• W2088075486 doi "https://doi.org/10.5005/jp-journals-10024-1343" @default.
• W2088075486 hasPubMedId "https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/24171988" @default.
• W2088075486 hasPublicationYear "2013" @default.
• W2088075486 type Work @default.
• W2088075486 sameAs 2088075486 @default.
• W2088075486 citedByCount "1" @default.
• W2088075486 countsByYear W20880754862015 @default.
• W2088075486 crossrefType "journal-article" @default.
• W2088075486 hasAuthorship W2088075486A5000453411 @default.
• W2088075486 hasAuthorship W2088075486A5077383870 @default.
• W2088075486 hasAuthorship W2088075486A5087654768 @default.
• W2088075486 hasBestOaLocation W20880754861 @default.
• W2088075486 hasConcept C105795698 @default.
• W2088075486 hasConcept C159985019 @default.
• W2088075486 hasConcept C160798091 @default.
• W2088075486 hasConcept C192562407 @default.
• W2088075486 hasConcept C199343813 @default.
• W2088075486 hasConcept C202271784 @default.
• W2088075486 hasConcept C2780965210 @default.
• W2088075486 hasConcept C29694066 @default.
• W2088075486 hasConcept C2986587452 @default.
• W2088075486 hasConcept C3018023364 @default.
• W2088075486 hasConcept C33923547 @default.
• W2088075486 hasConcept C49097943 @default.
• W2088075486 hasConcept C71924100 @default.
• W2088075486 hasConceptScore W2088075486C105795698 @default.
• W2088075486 hasConceptScore W2088075486C159985019 @default.
• W2088075486 hasConceptScore W2088075486C160798091 @default.
• W2088075486 hasConceptScore W2088075486C192562407 @default.
• W2088075486 hasConceptScore W2088075486C199343813 @default.
• W2088075486 hasConceptScore W2088075486C202271784 @default.
• W2088075486 hasConceptScore W2088075486C2780965210 @default.
• W2088075486 hasConceptScore W2088075486C29694066 @default.
• W2088075486 hasConceptScore W2088075486C2986587452 @default.
• W2088075486 hasConceptScore W2088075486C3018023364 @default.
• W2088075486 hasConceptScore W2088075486C33923547 @default.
• W2088075486 hasConceptScore W2088075486C49097943 @default.
• W2088075486 hasConceptScore W2088075486C71924100 @default.
• W2088075486 hasIssue "3" @default.
• W2088075486 hasLocation W20880754861 @default.
• W2088075486 hasLocation W20880754862 @default.
• W2088075486 hasOpenAccess W2088075486 @default.
• W2088075486 hasPrimaryLocation W20880754861 @default.
• W2088075486 hasRelatedWork W1938296492 @default.
• W2088075486 hasRelatedWork W2047982417 @default.
• W2088075486 hasRelatedWork W2065000005 @default.
• W2088075486 hasRelatedWork W2107571849 @default.
• W2088075486 hasRelatedWork W2130914703 @default.
• W2088075486 hasRelatedWork W2158563773 @default.
• W2088075486 hasRelatedWork W2312793774 @default.
• W2088075486 hasRelatedWork W2371380409 @default.
• W2088075486 hasRelatedWork W2373029543 @default.
• W2088075486 hasRelatedWork W2383590859 @default.
• W2088075486 hasVolume "14" @default.
• W2088075486 isParatext "false" @default.
• W2088075486 isRetracted "false" @default.
• W2088075486 magId "2088075486" @default.
• W2088075486 workType "article" @default.