FRINK Linked Data Fragments server

Matches in SemOpenAlex for { <https://semopenalex.org/work/W2088216713> ?p ?o ?g. }

• W2088216713 endingPage "586" @default.
• W2088216713 startingPage "553" @default.
• W2088216713 abstract "Advocates of restorative justice (RJ) hypothesize that the diversion of criminal cases to RJ conferences should be more effective in lowering the rate of reoffending than traditional prosecution in court processing because the conferences more effectively engage the psychological mechanisms of reintegrative shaming and procedural justice. This study uses longitudinal data from the drinking-and-driving study in the Australian Reintegrative Shaming Experiments (RISE) to evaluate the long-term impact of reintegrative shaming and procedural justice on support for the law and on later recidivism as assessed through the use of police records and by self-report. Analysis first suggests that there is no direct effect of experimental condition on later recidivism. However, it further suggests that both traditional court-based prosecution and RJ conferences increase support for the law and lower the rate of future reoffending when they engage the social psychological mechanisms of reintegrative shaming and procedural justice and thereby increase the legitimacy of the law. Hence, the results argue for the potential value of procedures such as the RJ conference but indicate that those procedures will only achieve their objectives if they are effectively designed and implemented. A core issue for legal authorities is better understanding how to bring people's behavior into compliance with the law (Tyler 2003, 2006a, 2006b). In an ideal society the issue of responding to rule-breaking would never arise, but societies never achieve this ideal and must often confront the question of how to deal with offenders and with the consequences of offending behavior. Lawbreaking confronts society with a number of issues, including how to constructively manage offenders who, after they are punished, might reoffend in the future. This article is concerned with the issue of how to deal with offenders so as to increase support for the law and lower the rate of subsequent reoffending. One approach to lowering reoffending rates is to punish wrongdoers. Punishment incapacitates those who have broken the law during the time that they are in custody, inflicts the costs of punishment on them, and may instill fear of future punishment in them and in others. Deterrence-based strategies are the most common means used within the United States to decrease recidivism. Those strategies have been widely used and are often found to shape behavior (Nagin 1998), although their use has disadvantages, including that deterrence effects are often small (MacCoun 1993), that deterrence systems are costly to maintain, that they undermine the relationship between legal authorities and the public, and that they do not rehabilitate criminals, leading to high levels of recidivism (Luna 2003). The problems associated with deterrence strategies are well known. However, it is not clear that more effective alternatives exist. In particular, rehabilitation, once thought to be the most important response to criminal behavior, has been argued to be ineffective (Allen 1981) and is unpopular among many public policy makers. If criminals cannot be rehabilitated, then the threat of punishment is often said, by default, to be the primary manner in which societies must maintain social order. This study tests the effectiveness of two social psychological mechanisms for reducing recidivism: procedural justice and reintegrative shaming. Theory underpinning each of these mechanisms suggests that there are ways to respond to wrongdoing that increase offenders' support for and likelihood of future compliance with the law. While many types of experience could potentially activate these psychological mechanisms, both have been linked to the use of restorative justice (RJ) conferences in lieu of prosecution through the courts. In such conferences offenders meet with the victim in the company of their friends and family and other interested parties, in the presence of a trained facilitator. …" @default.
• W2088216713 created "2016-06-24" @default.
• W2088216713 creator A5001892318 @default.
• W2088216713 creator A5040948331 @default.
• W2088216713 creator A5054838629 @default.
• W2088216713 creator A5057446459 @default.
• W2088216713 creator A5071628718 @default.
• W2088216713 date "2007-09-01" @default.
• W2088216713 modified "2023-10-17" @default.
• W2088216713 title "Reintegrative Shaming, Procedural Justice, and Recidivism: The Engagement of Offenders' Psychological Mechanisms in the Canberra RISE Drinking-and-Driving Experiment" @default.
• W2088216713 cites W1852090069 @default.
• W2088216713 cites W1965523087 @default.
• W2088216713 cites W1986396100 @default.
• W2088216713 cites W1991829326 @default.
• W2088216713 cites W2002087186 @default.
• W2088216713 cites W2020034922 @default.
• W2088216713 cites W2044359197 @default.
• W2088216713 cites W2045371085 @default.
• W2088216713 cites W2065721727 @default.
• W2088216713 cites W2083425011 @default.
• W2088216713 cites W2096320953 @default.
• W2088216713 cites W2114710355 @default.
• W2088216713 cites W2154598380 @default.
• W2088216713 cites W2156716330 @default.
• W2088216713 cites W2170413988 @default.
• W2088216713 cites W2269015068 @default.
• W2088216713 cites W2323572135 @default.
• W2088216713 cites W2331211957 @default.
• W2088216713 cites W4234065443 @default.
• W2088216713 cites W4251045099 @default.
• W2088216713 doi "https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1540-5893.2007.00314.x" @default.
• W2088216713 hasPublicationYear "2007" @default.
• W2088216713 type Work @default.
• W2088216713 sameAs 2088216713 @default.
• W2088216713 citedByCount "196" @default.
• W2088216713 countsByYear W20882167132012 @default.
• W2088216713 countsByYear W20882167132013 @default.
• W2088216713 countsByYear W20882167132014 @default.
• W2088216713 countsByYear W20882167132015 @default.
• W2088216713 countsByYear W20882167132016 @default.
• W2088216713 countsByYear W20882167132017 @default.
• W2088216713 countsByYear W20882167132018 @default.
• W2088216713 countsByYear W20882167132019 @default.
• W2088216713 countsByYear W20882167132020 @default.
• W2088216713 countsByYear W20882167132021 @default.
• W2088216713 countsByYear W20882167132022 @default.
• W2088216713 countsByYear W20882167132023 @default.
• W2088216713 crossrefType "journal-article" @default.
• W2088216713 hasAuthorship W2088216713A5001892318 @default.
• W2088216713 hasAuthorship W2088216713A5040948331 @default.
• W2088216713 hasAuthorship W2088216713A5054838629 @default.
• W2088216713 hasAuthorship W2088216713A5057446459 @default.
• W2088216713 hasAuthorship W2088216713A5071628718 @default.
• W2088216713 hasConcept C139621336 @default.
• W2088216713 hasConcept C144024400 @default.
• W2088216713 hasConcept C15744967 @default.
• W2088216713 hasConcept C169760540 @default.
• W2088216713 hasConcept C17744445 @default.
• W2088216713 hasConcept C199539241 @default.
• W2088216713 hasConcept C26760741 @default.
• W2088216713 hasConcept C2776090404 @default.
• W2088216713 hasConcept C2779149496 @default.
• W2088216713 hasConcept C73484699 @default.
• W2088216713 hasConcept C77805123 @default.
• W2088216713 hasConceptScore W2088216713C139621336 @default.
• W2088216713 hasConceptScore W2088216713C144024400 @default.
• W2088216713 hasConceptScore W2088216713C15744967 @default.
• W2088216713 hasConceptScore W2088216713C169760540 @default.
• W2088216713 hasConceptScore W2088216713C17744445 @default.
• W2088216713 hasConceptScore W2088216713C199539241 @default.
• W2088216713 hasConceptScore W2088216713C26760741 @default.
• W2088216713 hasConceptScore W2088216713C2776090404 @default.
• W2088216713 hasConceptScore W2088216713C2779149496 @default.
• W2088216713 hasConceptScore W2088216713C73484699 @default.
• W2088216713 hasConceptScore W2088216713C77805123 @default.
• W2088216713 hasIssue "3" @default.
• W2088216713 hasLocation W20882167131 @default.
• W2088216713 hasOpenAccess W2088216713 @default.
• W2088216713 hasPrimaryLocation W20882167131 @default.
• W2088216713 hasRelatedWork W1486083145 @default.
• W2088216713 hasRelatedWork W1596528459 @default.
• W2088216713 hasRelatedWork W1984929651 @default.
• W2088216713 hasRelatedWork W2150633764 @default.
• W2088216713 hasRelatedWork W2748952813 @default.
• W2088216713 hasRelatedWork W2899084033 @default.
• W2088216713 hasRelatedWork W3027241694 @default.
• W2088216713 hasRelatedWork W331144825 @default.
• W2088216713 hasRelatedWork W570935608 @default.
• W2088216713 hasRelatedWork W60821219 @default.
• W2088216713 hasVolume "41" @default.
• W2088216713 isParatext "false" @default.
• W2088216713 isRetracted "false" @default.
• W2088216713 magId "2088216713" @default.
• W2088216713 workType "article" @default.