FRINK Linked Data Fragments server

Matches in SemOpenAlex for { <https://semopenalex.org/work/W2088333721> ?p ?o ?g. }

• W2088333721 endingPage "456" @default.
• W2088333721 startingPage "449" @default.
• W2088333721 abstract "Quantitatively evaluate plain radiographs, relative to computed tomography (CT) scans, for assessment of articular fragment displacement (step and gap) in displaced acetabular fractures and in canine osteotomized acetabular specimens.Retrospective evaluation of a consecutive series of CT scans and plain radiographs of patients with displaced acetabular fractures and canine acetabulae osteotomized to represent acetabular fractures with displacement.Level I trauma center.Computed tomography scans and plain radiographic images of 62 consecutive patients with displaced acetabular fractures were reviewed; 20 patients met the inclusion criteria regarding location, fracture pattern, availability of plain radiographs and CT scans, and the position of the femoral head at the time of radiographic assessment. The hemipelvi of five adult mongrels underwent osteotomy of the acetabulum and similar radiographic evaluation.Three independent reviewers measured step and gap deformity on plain radiographs and CT scans utilizing a standardized measurement technique.Sensitivity and specificity of plain radiographs for detecting step and gap displacement (2 mm and 4 mm) relative to CT scans were determined. Intraclass correlation coefficient and intraobserver reliability was also calculated. For the canine specimens, sensitivities of each imaging method were determined relative to actual fragment displacement measurements.In the clinical images, when compared to CT, plain radiographs showed poor sensitivity at detecting step deformity (sensitivity = 25%). When analyzed by fracture type, plain radiographs were particularly poor at detecting step deformities in fractures involving a single column of the acetabulum (sensitivity = 0%). Excellent intraobserver and intraclass reliability existed among the three reviewers. Computed tomography scans were considerably more accurate in measuring step and gap displacement relative to actual measurements than plain radiographs in the canine specimens.1) Plain radiographs showed poor sensitivity for the detection of step and gap deformities in patients with acetabular fractures and in osteotomized canine specimens, relative to CT scans; 2) differences between CT and plain radiographs in both specimen types were greatest with the most clinically relevant deformity-i.e., step; and 3) CT scans are essential and should continue to be used in conjunction with plain radiographs in the preoperative evaluation of displaced acetabular fractures and perhaps should be considered in the postoperative assessment of fracture reduction." @default.
• W2088333721 created "2016-06-24" @default.
• W2088333721 creator A5002058403 @default.
• W2088333721 creator A5014469516 @default.
• W2088333721 creator A5015329932 @default.
• W2088333721 creator A5017689330 @default.
• W2088333721 date "2002-08-01" @default.
• W2088333721 modified "2023-10-18" @default.
• W2088333721 title "Assessment of Articular Fragment Displacement in Acetabular Fractures: A Comparison of Computerized Tomography and Plain Radiographs" @default.
• W2088333721 cites W1964615756 @default.
• W2088333721 cites W1972963015 @default.
• W2088333721 cites W2016839965 @default.
• W2088333721 cites W2023520953 @default.
• W2088333721 cites W2034092396 @default.
• W2088333721 cites W2038562404 @default.
• W2088333721 cites W2064730863 @default.
• W2088333721 cites W2066575389 @default.
• W2088333721 cites W2079662297 @default.
• W2088333721 cites W2085173121 @default.
• W2088333721 cites W2085930042 @default.
• W2088333721 cites W2181664190 @default.
• W2088333721 cites W2290442895 @default.
• W2088333721 cites W4294116652 @default.
• W2088333721 cites W4295993092 @default.
• W2088333721 doi "https://doi.org/10.1097/00005131-200208000-00001" @default.
• W2088333721 hasPubMedId "https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/12172273" @default.
• W2088333721 hasPublicationYear "2002" @default.
• W2088333721 type Work @default.
• W2088333721 sameAs 2088333721 @default.
• W2088333721 citedByCount "102" @default.
• W2088333721 countsByYear W20883337212012 @default.
• W2088333721 countsByYear W20883337212013 @default.
• W2088333721 countsByYear W20883337212014 @default.
• W2088333721 countsByYear W20883337212015 @default.
• W2088333721 countsByYear W20883337212016 @default.
• W2088333721 countsByYear W20883337212017 @default.
• W2088333721 countsByYear W20883337212018 @default.
• W2088333721 countsByYear W20883337212019 @default.
• W2088333721 countsByYear W20883337212020 @default.
• W2088333721 countsByYear W20883337212021 @default.
• W2088333721 countsByYear W20883337212022 @default.
• W2088333721 countsByYear W20883337212023 @default.
• W2088333721 crossrefType "journal-article" @default.
• W2088333721 hasAuthorship W2088333721A5002058403 @default.
• W2088333721 hasAuthorship W2088333721A5014469516 @default.
• W2088333721 hasAuthorship W2088333721A5015329932 @default.
• W2088333721 hasAuthorship W2088333721A5017689330 @default.
• W2088333721 hasConcept C104709138 @default.
• W2088333721 hasConcept C107551265 @default.
• W2088333721 hasConcept C126838900 @default.
• W2088333721 hasConcept C141071460 @default.
• W2088333721 hasConcept C15744967 @default.
• W2088333721 hasConcept C163716698 @default.
• W2088333721 hasConcept C171606756 @default.
• W2088333721 hasConcept C2779982284 @default.
• W2088333721 hasConcept C2780107948 @default.
• W2088333721 hasConcept C29694066 @default.
• W2088333721 hasConcept C2989005 @default.
• W2088333721 hasConcept C36454342 @default.
• W2088333721 hasConcept C542102704 @default.
• W2088333721 hasConcept C70410870 @default.
• W2088333721 hasConcept C71924100 @default.
• W2088333721 hasConcept C72202192 @default.
• W2088333721 hasConceptScore W2088333721C104709138 @default.
• W2088333721 hasConceptScore W2088333721C107551265 @default.
• W2088333721 hasConceptScore W2088333721C126838900 @default.
• W2088333721 hasConceptScore W2088333721C141071460 @default.
• W2088333721 hasConceptScore W2088333721C15744967 @default.
• W2088333721 hasConceptScore W2088333721C163716698 @default.
• W2088333721 hasConceptScore W2088333721C171606756 @default.
• W2088333721 hasConceptScore W2088333721C2779982284 @default.
• W2088333721 hasConceptScore W2088333721C2780107948 @default.
• W2088333721 hasConceptScore W2088333721C29694066 @default.
• W2088333721 hasConceptScore W2088333721C2989005 @default.
• W2088333721 hasConceptScore W2088333721C36454342 @default.
• W2088333721 hasConceptScore W2088333721C542102704 @default.
• W2088333721 hasConceptScore W2088333721C70410870 @default.
• W2088333721 hasConceptScore W2088333721C71924100 @default.
• W2088333721 hasConceptScore W2088333721C72202192 @default.
• W2088333721 hasIssue "7" @default.
• W2088333721 hasLocation W20883337211 @default.
• W2088333721 hasLocation W20883337212 @default.
• W2088333721 hasOpenAccess W2088333721 @default.
• W2088333721 hasPrimaryLocation W20883337211 @default.
• W2088333721 hasRelatedWork W1988316404 @default.
• W2088333721 hasRelatedWork W2001751833 @default.
• W2088333721 hasRelatedWork W2385472968 @default.
• W2088333721 hasRelatedWork W2407118493 @default.
• W2088333721 hasRelatedWork W2622925284 @default.
• W2088333721 hasRelatedWork W2911408548 @default.
• W2088333721 hasRelatedWork W3115372989 @default.
• W2088333721 hasRelatedWork W3167759503 @default.
• W2088333721 hasRelatedWork W3199575718 @default.
• W2088333721 hasRelatedWork W369650384 @default.
• W2088333721 hasVolume "16" @default.
• W2088333721 isParatext "false" @default.
• W2088333721 isRetracted "false" @default.
• W2088333721 magId "2088333721" @default.

• next