FRINK Linked Data Fragments server

Matches in SemOpenAlex for { <https://semopenalex.org/work/W2088642712> ?p ?o ?g. }

• W2088642712 endingPage "1000" @default.
• W2088642712 startingPage "993" @default.
• W2088642712 abstract "Background Color Doppler jet area (CDJA) is an important measure used to classify mitral regurgitation (MR) severity. The investigators hypothesized that the presence and configuration of multiple regurgitant jets can alter CDJA quantification for fixed regurgitant volumes. This has relevance to MR assessment prior to the treatment of valves with multiple regurgitant orifices or after surgical or percutaneous double-orifice mitral valve repair. Methods An in vitro model was developed to create jets flowing through a simulated mitral orifice into an imaging chamber. The flow loop was driven with a pulsatile pump at 60 beats/min containing a water-glycerol solution approximating the viscosity of blood. At the orifice, simulated regurgitant stroke volumes of 2.5 to 25 mL were created through plates having either single openings with orifice areas from 0.125 to 0.50 cm2 or two to four openings with total orifice area of 0.25 cm2 and varied linear spacing. An 8-MHz transthoracic two-dimensional ultrasound probe was used to acquire jet velocities by continuous-wave Doppler as well as color Doppler for offline analysis. CDJA values were obtained with custom automated pixel-counting software. Results Peak jet velocities ranged from 30 to 550 cm/sec. For single jets, normalized average CDJA values increased nonlinearly as a function of average Reynolds number. Peak CDJA values were up to 62% higher for multiple jets compared with single jets with similar total orifice areas and simulated regurgitant stroke volumes. The presence or absence of multiple jets, rather than the total number of jets, appeared to have a greater effect on maximum CDJA. In addition, peak CDJA values for multiple jets increased with increased linear spacing. Conclusions A fixed regurgitant volume involving multiple jets will have a larger CDJA value than the same total volume from a single jet. The source of this discrepancy appears to be increased ambient fluid entrainment from adjacent regurgitant jets. This potential overestimation of MR severity using color Doppler flow jets should be taken into consideration when assessing MR prior to treatment or when assessing residual MR after double-orifice mitral valve repair. Color Doppler jet area (CDJA) is an important measure used to classify mitral regurgitation (MR) severity. The investigators hypothesized that the presence and configuration of multiple regurgitant jets can alter CDJA quantification for fixed regurgitant volumes. This has relevance to MR assessment prior to the treatment of valves with multiple regurgitant orifices or after surgical or percutaneous double-orifice mitral valve repair. An in vitro model was developed to create jets flowing through a simulated mitral orifice into an imaging chamber. The flow loop was driven with a pulsatile pump at 60 beats/min containing a water-glycerol solution approximating the viscosity of blood. At the orifice, simulated regurgitant stroke volumes of 2.5 to 25 mL were created through plates having either single openings with orifice areas from 0.125 to 0.50 cm2 or two to four openings with total orifice area of 0.25 cm2 and varied linear spacing. An 8-MHz transthoracic two-dimensional ultrasound probe was used to acquire jet velocities by continuous-wave Doppler as well as color Doppler for offline analysis. CDJA values were obtained with custom automated pixel-counting software. Peak jet velocities ranged from 30 to 550 cm/sec. For single jets, normalized average CDJA values increased nonlinearly as a function of average Reynolds number. Peak CDJA values were up to 62% higher for multiple jets compared with single jets with similar total orifice areas and simulated regurgitant stroke volumes. The presence or absence of multiple jets, rather than the total number of jets, appeared to have a greater effect on maximum CDJA. In addition, peak CDJA values for multiple jets increased with increased linear spacing. A fixed regurgitant volume involving multiple jets will have a larger CDJA value than the same total volume from a single jet. The source of this discrepancy appears to be increased ambient fluid entrainment from adjacent regurgitant jets. This potential overestimation of MR severity using color Doppler flow jets should be taken into consideration when assessing MR prior to treatment or when assessing residual MR after double-orifice mitral valve repair." @default.
• W2088642712 created "2016-06-24" @default.
• W2088642712 creator A5003076379 @default.
• W2088642712 creator A5022830903 @default.
• W2088642712 creator A5043787754 @default.
• W2088642712 creator A5060149925 @default.
• W2088642712 creator A5060700740 @default.
• W2088642712 creator A5077393198 @default.
• W2088642712 creator A5081217615 @default.
• W2088642712 date "2010-09-01" @default.
• W2088642712 modified "2023-10-16" @default.
• W2088642712 title "Color Doppler Jet Area Overestimates Regurgitant Volume when Multiple Jets are Present" @default.
• W2088642712 cites W1972801551 @default.
• W2088642712 cites W1976445120 @default.
• W2088642712 cites W1988935719 @default.
• W2088642712 cites W1992148767 @default.
• W2088642712 cites W1995236808 @default.
• W2088642712 cites W2015005491 @default.
• W2088642712 cites W2021504902 @default.
• W2088642712 cites W203013263 @default.
• W2088642712 cites W2044053271 @default.
• W2088642712 cites W2048933265 @default.
• W2088642712 cites W2056771089 @default.
• W2088642712 cites W2096743139 @default.
• W2088642712 cites W2106910203 @default.
• W2088642712 cites W2112582507 @default.
• W2088642712 cites W2112836115 @default.
• W2088642712 cites W2118156772 @default.
• W2088642712 cites W2121842052 @default.
• W2088642712 cites W2151056165 @default.
• W2088642712 cites W2154054862 @default.
• W2088642712 cites W2163886168 @default.
• W2088642712 doi "https://doi.org/10.1016/j.echo.2010.06.011" @default.
• W2088642712 hasPubMedId "https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/20696550" @default.
• W2088642712 hasPublicationYear "2010" @default.
• W2088642712 type Work @default.
• W2088642712 sameAs 2088642712 @default.
• W2088642712 citedByCount "55" @default.
• W2088642712 countsByYear W20886427122012 @default.
• W2088642712 countsByYear W20886427122013 @default.
• W2088642712 countsByYear W20886427122014 @default.
• W2088642712 countsByYear W20886427122015 @default.
• W2088642712 countsByYear W20886427122016 @default.
• W2088642712 countsByYear W20886427122017 @default.
• W2088642712 countsByYear W20886427122018 @default.
• W2088642712 countsByYear W20886427122019 @default.
• W2088642712 countsByYear W20886427122020 @default.
• W2088642712 countsByYear W20886427122021 @default.
• W2088642712 countsByYear W20886427122022 @default.
• W2088642712 countsByYear W20886427122023 @default.
• W2088642712 crossrefType "journal-article" @default.
• W2088642712 hasAuthorship W2088642712A5003076379 @default.
• W2088642712 hasAuthorship W2088642712A5022830903 @default.
• W2088642712 hasAuthorship W2088642712A5043787754 @default.
• W2088642712 hasAuthorship W2088642712A5060149925 @default.
• W2088642712 hasAuthorship W2088642712A5060700740 @default.
• W2088642712 hasAuthorship W2088642712A5077393198 @default.
• W2088642712 hasAuthorship W2088642712A5081217615 @default.
• W2088642712 hasConcept C105702510 @default.
• W2088642712 hasConcept C119947313 @default.
• W2088642712 hasConcept C121332964 @default.
• W2088642712 hasConcept C126838900 @default.
• W2088642712 hasConcept C1276947 @default.
• W2088642712 hasConcept C136229726 @default.
• W2088642712 hasConcept C142757262 @default.
• W2088642712 hasConcept C164705383 @default.
• W2088642712 hasConcept C182748727 @default.
• W2088642712 hasConcept C194242075 @default.
• W2088642712 hasConcept C196558001 @default.
• W2088642712 hasConcept C2780168065 @default.
• W2088642712 hasConcept C2989005 @default.
• W2088642712 hasConcept C2993373945 @default.
• W2088642712 hasConcept C3019130837 @default.
• W2088642712 hasConcept C529618451 @default.
• W2088642712 hasConcept C57879066 @default.
• W2088642712 hasConcept C71924100 @default.
• W2088642712 hasConcept C79191276 @default.
• W2088642712 hasConceptScore W2088642712C105702510 @default.
• W2088642712 hasConceptScore W2088642712C119947313 @default.
• W2088642712 hasConceptScore W2088642712C121332964 @default.
• W2088642712 hasConceptScore W2088642712C126838900 @default.
• W2088642712 hasConceptScore W2088642712C1276947 @default.
• W2088642712 hasConceptScore W2088642712C136229726 @default.
• W2088642712 hasConceptScore W2088642712C142757262 @default.
• W2088642712 hasConceptScore W2088642712C164705383 @default.
• W2088642712 hasConceptScore W2088642712C182748727 @default.
• W2088642712 hasConceptScore W2088642712C194242075 @default.
• W2088642712 hasConceptScore W2088642712C196558001 @default.
• W2088642712 hasConceptScore W2088642712C2780168065 @default.
• W2088642712 hasConceptScore W2088642712C2989005 @default.
• W2088642712 hasConceptScore W2088642712C2993373945 @default.
• W2088642712 hasConceptScore W2088642712C3019130837 @default.
• W2088642712 hasConceptScore W2088642712C529618451 @default.
• W2088642712 hasConceptScore W2088642712C57879066 @default.
• W2088642712 hasConceptScore W2088642712C71924100 @default.
• W2088642712 hasConceptScore W2088642712C79191276 @default.
• W2088642712 hasIssue "9" @default.
• W2088642712 hasLocation W20886427121 @default.

• next