FRINK Linked Data Fragments server

Matches in SemOpenAlex for { <https://semopenalex.org/work/W2088789882> ?p ?o ?g. }

• W2088789882 endingPage "1541" @default.
• W2088789882 startingPage "1532" @default.
• W2088789882 abstract "Quantitative PET studies of neuroreceptor tracers typically require that arterial input function be measured. The aim of this study was to explore the use of a population-based input function (PBIF) and an image-derived input function (IDIF) for [11C](R)-rolipram kinetic analysis, with the goal of reducing – and possibly eliminating – the number of arterial blood samples needed to measure parent radioligand concentrations. A PBIF was first generated using [11C](R)-rolipram parent time–activity curves from 12 healthy volunteers (Group 1). Both invasive (blood samples) and non-invasive (body weight, body surface area, and lean body mass) scaling methods for PBIF were tested. The scaling method that gave the best estimate of the Logan-VT values was then used to determine the test–retest variability of PBIF in Group 1 and then prospectively applied to another population of 25 healthy subjects (Group 2), as well as to a population of 26 patients with major depressive disorder (Group 3). Results were also compared to those obtained with an image-derived input function (IDIF) from the internal carotid artery. In some subjects, we measured arteriovenous differences in [11C](R)-rolipram concentration to see whether venous samples could be used instead of arterial samples. Finally, we assessed the ability of IDIF and PBIF to discriminate depressed patients (MDD) and healthy subjects. Arterial blood-scaled PBIF gave better results than any non-invasive scaling technique. Excellent results were obtained when the blood-scaled PBIF was prospectively applied to the subjects in Group 2 (VT ratio 1.02 ± 0.05; mean ± SD) and Group 3 (VT ratio 1.03 ± 0.04). Equally accurate results were obtained for two subpopulations of subjects drawn from Groups 2 and 3 who had very differently shaped (i.e. “flatter” or “steeper”) input functions compared to PBIF (VT ratio 1.07 ± 0.04 and 0.99 ± 0.04, respectively). Results obtained via PBIF were equivalent to those obtained via IDIF (VT ratio 0.99 ± 0.05 and 1.00 ± 0.04 for healthy subjects and MDD patients, respectively). Retest variability of PBIF was equivalent to that obtained with full input function and IDIF (14.5%, 15.2%, and 14.1%, respectively). Due to [11C](R)-rolipram arteriovenous differences, venous samples could not be substituted for arterial samples. With both IDIF and PBIF, depressed patients had a 20% reduction in [11C](R)-rolipram binding as compared to control (two-way ANOVA: p = 0.008 and 0.005, respectively). These results were almost equivalent to those obtained using 23 arterial samples. Although some arterial samples are still necessary, both PBIF and IDIF are accurate and precise alternatives to full arterial input function for [11C](R)-rolipram PET studies. Both techniques give accurate results with low variability, even for clinically different groups of subjects and those with very differently shaped input functions." @default.
• W2088789882 created "2016-06-24" @default.
• W2088789882 creator A5013529614 @default.
• W2088789882 creator A5017543455 @default.
• W2088789882 creator A5025613428 @default.
• W2088789882 creator A5029257842 @default.
• W2088789882 creator A5039918144 @default.
• W2088789882 creator A5044544424 @default.
• W2088789882 creator A5048937067 @default.
• W2088789882 creator A5065337497 @default.
• W2088789882 creator A5076548742 @default.
• W2088789882 creator A5079125204 @default.
• W2088789882 creator A5086133175 @default.
• W2088789882 date "2012-11-01" @default.
• W2088789882 modified "2023-09-27" @default.
• W2088789882 title "Population-based input function and image-derived input function for [11C](R)-rolipram PET imaging: Methodology, validation and application to the study of major depressive disorder" @default.
• W2088789882 cites W144668201 @default.
• W2088789882 cites W186368821 @default.
• W2088789882 cites W1964724689 @default.
• W2088789882 cites W1967257220 @default.
• W2088789882 cites W1973278822 @default.
• W2088789882 cites W1979843284 @default.
• W2088789882 cites W1981465403 @default.
• W2088789882 cites W1983817514 @default.
• W2088789882 cites W1996214957 @default.
• W2088789882 cites W2004275170 @default.
• W2088789882 cites W2005815716 @default.
• W2088789882 cites W2013509661 @default.
• W2088789882 cites W2014341650 @default.
• W2088789882 cites W2027387528 @default.
• W2088789882 cites W2035600436 @default.
• W2088789882 cites W2038609753 @default.
• W2088789882 cites W2051673014 @default.
• W2088789882 cites W2069755531 @default.
• W2088789882 cites W2072371345 @default.
• W2088789882 cites W2075029962 @default.
• W2088789882 cites W2089027159 @default.
• W2088789882 cites W2090203522 @default.
• W2088789882 cites W2094847554 @default.
• W2088789882 cites W2103863349 @default.
• W2088789882 cites W2110042253 @default.
• W2088789882 cites W2111251126 @default.
• W2088789882 cites W2116138279 @default.
• W2088789882 cites W2124223344 @default.
• W2088789882 cites W2128138087 @default.
• W2088789882 cites W2135307001 @default.
• W2088789882 cites W2142897390 @default.
• W2088789882 cites W2147678066 @default.
• W2088789882 cites W2148827893 @default.
• W2088789882 cites W2154579091 @default.
• W2088789882 cites W2157588905 @default.
• W2088789882 cites W2167613591 @default.
• W2088789882 cites W2293035635 @default.
• W2088789882 cites W2321904707 @default.
• W2088789882 cites W4254976214 @default.
• W2088789882 doi "https://doi.org/10.1016/j.neuroimage.2012.08.007" @default.
• W2088789882 hasPubMedCentralId "https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/3472081" @default.
• W2088789882 hasPubMedId "https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/22906792" @default.
• W2088789882 hasPublicationYear "2012" @default.
• W2088789882 type Work @default.
• W2088789882 sameAs 2088789882 @default.
• W2088789882 citedByCount "50" @default.
• W2088789882 countsByYear W20887898822013 @default.
• W2088789882 countsByYear W20887898822014 @default.
• W2088789882 countsByYear W20887898822015 @default.
• W2088789882 countsByYear W20887898822016 @default.
• W2088789882 countsByYear W20887898822017 @default.
• W2088789882 countsByYear W20887898822018 @default.
• W2088789882 countsByYear W20887898822020 @default.
• W2088789882 countsByYear W20887898822021 @default.
• W2088789882 countsByYear W20887898822022 @default.
• W2088789882 countsByYear W20887898822023 @default.
• W2088789882 crossrefType "journal-article" @default.
• W2088789882 hasAuthorship W2088789882A5013529614 @default.
• W2088789882 hasAuthorship W2088789882A5017543455 @default.
• W2088789882 hasAuthorship W2088789882A5025613428 @default.
• W2088789882 hasAuthorship W2088789882A5029257842 @default.
• W2088789882 hasAuthorship W2088789882A5039918144 @default.
• W2088789882 hasAuthorship W2088789882A5044544424 @default.
• W2088789882 hasAuthorship W2088789882A5048937067 @default.
• W2088789882 hasAuthorship W2088789882A5065337497 @default.
• W2088789882 hasAuthorship W2088789882A5076548742 @default.
• W2088789882 hasAuthorship W2088789882A5079125204 @default.
• W2088789882 hasAuthorship W2088789882A5086133175 @default.
• W2088789882 hasBestOaLocation W20887898822 @default.
• W2088789882 hasConcept C126322002 @default.
• W2088789882 hasConcept C164705383 @default.
• W2088789882 hasConcept C2779144063 @default.
• W2088789882 hasConcept C2779537118 @default.
• W2088789882 hasConcept C2780051608 @default.
• W2088789882 hasConcept C2908647359 @default.
• W2088789882 hasConcept C2989005 @default.
• W2088789882 hasConcept C71924100 @default.
• W2088789882 hasConcept C99454951 @default.
• W2088789882 hasConceptScore W2088789882C126322002 @default.
• W2088789882 hasConceptScore W2088789882C164705383 @default.
• W2088789882 hasConceptScore W2088789882C2779144063 @default.
• W2088789882 hasConceptScore W2088789882C2779537118 @default.

• next