FRINK Linked Data Fragments server

Matches in SemOpenAlex for { <https://semopenalex.org/work/W2088890105> ?p ?o ?g. }

• W2088890105 endingPage "122" @default.
• W2088890105 startingPage "117" @default.
• W2088890105 abstract "Background The advent of natural orifice transluminal endoscopic surgery (NOTES) has accelerated the development of new technology in the field of GI endoscopy. Various suturing devices or multitasking platforms are expected to be valuable for endoluminal surgery as well as for NOTES. Objective To evaluate a new multitasking platform in performing endoscopic full-thickness resection (EFTR). Design Bench-top comparison study. Setting Research laboratory study of 10 ex vivo porcine models. Intervention Ten EFTRs (5 with a double-channel endoscope vs 5 with a new multitasking platform) assisted with percutaneous gastric lifting. Each group was given the task of resecting a full-thickness specimen of the gastric wall including a pseudolesion 10 mm in diameter with an effective margin. Main Outcome Measurements Outcome measurements included time to perform the procedure, accuracy of the resection, and efficiency for the task. Accuracy was assessed according to variability of the surgical margin and misalignment between the mucosal layer and the seromuscular layer. Efficiency was assessed according to the duty ratio, which is the percentage of time spent for the main purposes compared with the total procedure time. Results Mean diameter of the specimen was not significantly different between the groups. All other assessment items were significantly superior in group B to those in group A (P < .05). Limitations Ex vivo animal model study. Conclusion We were able to perform EFTR procedures precisely and effectively by using a new multitasking platform compared with use of a conventional endoscope in a porcine model. A multitasking platform developed for NOTES procedures would be useful for advanced endoluminal surgery such as endoscopic submucosal dissection or EFTR as well as NOTES. The advent of natural orifice transluminal endoscopic surgery (NOTES) has accelerated the development of new technology in the field of GI endoscopy. Various suturing devices or multitasking platforms are expected to be valuable for endoluminal surgery as well as for NOTES. To evaluate a new multitasking platform in performing endoscopic full-thickness resection (EFTR). Bench-top comparison study. Research laboratory study of 10 ex vivo porcine models. Ten EFTRs (5 with a double-channel endoscope vs 5 with a new multitasking platform) assisted with percutaneous gastric lifting. Each group was given the task of resecting a full-thickness specimen of the gastric wall including a pseudolesion 10 mm in diameter with an effective margin. Outcome measurements included time to perform the procedure, accuracy of the resection, and efficiency for the task. Accuracy was assessed according to variability of the surgical margin and misalignment between the mucosal layer and the seromuscular layer. Efficiency was assessed according to the duty ratio, which is the percentage of time spent for the main purposes compared with the total procedure time. Mean diameter of the specimen was not significantly different between the groups. All other assessment items were significantly superior in group B to those in group A (P < .05). Ex vivo animal model study. We were able to perform EFTR procedures precisely and effectively by using a new multitasking platform compared with use of a conventional endoscope in a porcine model. A multitasking platform developed for NOTES procedures would be useful for advanced endoluminal surgery such as endoscopic submucosal dissection or EFTR as well as NOTES." @default.
• W2088890105 created "2016-06-24" @default.
• W2088890105 creator A5051763064 @default.
• W2088890105 creator A5061401620 @default.
• W2088890105 creator A5063419576 @default.
• W2088890105 creator A5073967518 @default.
• W2088890105 creator A5075811653 @default.
• W2088890105 date "2011-01-01" @default.
• W2088890105 modified "2023-09-29" @default.
• W2088890105 title "Evaluation of a new multitasking platform for endoscopic full-thickness resection" @default.
• W2088890105 cites W1965309903 @default.
• W2088890105 cites W1983551172 @default.
• W2088890105 cites W1985022033 @default.
• W2088890105 cites W1992828838 @default.
• W2088890105 cites W1994147748 @default.
• W2088890105 cites W1995768207 @default.
• W2088890105 cites W2012455729 @default.
• W2088890105 cites W2023271847 @default.
• W2088890105 cites W2030769555 @default.
• W2088890105 cites W2032319161 @default.
• W2088890105 cites W2045569842 @default.
• W2088890105 cites W2078792432 @default.
• W2088890105 cites W2086378501 @default.
• W2088890105 cites W2119555744 @default.
• W2088890105 cites W2137079082 @default.
• W2088890105 cites W2158495340 @default.
• W2088890105 doi "https://doi.org/10.1016/j.gie.2010.09.016" @default.
• W2088890105 hasPubMedId "https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/21074762" @default.
• W2088890105 hasPublicationYear "2011" @default.
• W2088890105 type Work @default.
• W2088890105 sameAs 2088890105 @default.
• W2088890105 citedByCount "46" @default.
• W2088890105 countsByYear W20888901052012 @default.
• W2088890105 countsByYear W20888901052013 @default.
• W2088890105 countsByYear W20888901052014 @default.
• W2088890105 countsByYear W20888901052015 @default.
• W2088890105 countsByYear W20888901052016 @default.
• W2088890105 countsByYear W20888901052017 @default.
• W2088890105 countsByYear W20888901052018 @default.
• W2088890105 countsByYear W20888901052019 @default.
• W2088890105 countsByYear W20888901052020 @default.
• W2088890105 countsByYear W20888901052021 @default.
• W2088890105 countsByYear W20888901052022 @default.
• W2088890105 countsByYear W20888901052023 @default.
• W2088890105 crossrefType "journal-article" @default.
• W2088890105 hasAuthorship W2088890105A5051763064 @default.
• W2088890105 hasAuthorship W2088890105A5061401620 @default.
• W2088890105 hasAuthorship W2088890105A5063419576 @default.
• W2088890105 hasAuthorship W2088890105A5073967518 @default.
• W2088890105 hasAuthorship W2088890105A5075811653 @default.
• W2088890105 hasConcept C107418235 @default.
• W2088890105 hasConcept C141071460 @default.
• W2088890105 hasConcept C15744967 @default.
• W2088890105 hasConcept C159110652 @default.
• W2088890105 hasConcept C180747234 @default.
• W2088890105 hasConcept C2776820786 @default.
• W2088890105 hasConcept C2778451229 @default.
• W2088890105 hasConcept C2780813298 @default.
• W2088890105 hasConcept C71924100 @default.
• W2088890105 hasConceptScore W2088890105C107418235 @default.
• W2088890105 hasConceptScore W2088890105C141071460 @default.
• W2088890105 hasConceptScore W2088890105C15744967 @default.
• W2088890105 hasConceptScore W2088890105C159110652 @default.
• W2088890105 hasConceptScore W2088890105C180747234 @default.
• W2088890105 hasConceptScore W2088890105C2776820786 @default.
• W2088890105 hasConceptScore W2088890105C2778451229 @default.
• W2088890105 hasConceptScore W2088890105C2780813298 @default.
• W2088890105 hasConceptScore W2088890105C71924100 @default.
• W2088890105 hasIssue "1" @default.
• W2088890105 hasLocation W20888901051 @default.
• W2088890105 hasLocation W20888901052 @default.
• W2088890105 hasOpenAccess W2088890105 @default.
• W2088890105 hasPrimaryLocation W20888901051 @default.
• W2088890105 hasRelatedWork W2003938723 @default.
• W2088890105 hasRelatedWork W2047967234 @default.
• W2088890105 hasRelatedWork W2118496982 @default.
• W2088890105 hasRelatedWork W2120970301 @default.
• W2088890105 hasRelatedWork W2137048490 @default.
• W2088890105 hasRelatedWork W2376313638 @default.
• W2088890105 hasRelatedWork W2376445419 @default.
• W2088890105 hasRelatedWork W2395600221 @default.
• W2088890105 hasRelatedWork W2397637574 @default.
• W2088890105 hasRelatedWork W2439875401 @default.
• W2088890105 hasVolume "73" @default.
• W2088890105 isParatext "false" @default.
• W2088890105 isRetracted "false" @default.
• W2088890105 magId "2088890105" @default.
• W2088890105 workType "article" @default.