Matches in SemOpenAlex for { <https://semopenalex.org/work/W2088893941> ?p ?o ?g. }
- W2088893941 endingPage "175.e8" @default.
- W2088893941 startingPage "175.e1" @default.
- W2088893941 abstract "We analyzed the cost-effectiveness (CE) and performances of commonly used prenatal Down syndrome (DS) screening strategies.We performed computer simulations to compare 8 screening options by applying empirical data from Serum, Urine, and Ultrasound Screening Study trials on the population of 110,948 pregnancies. Screening strategies outcomes, CE ratios, and incremental CE ratios were measured.The most CE DS screening strategy was the contingent screening method (CE ratio of Can$26,833 per DS case). Its incremental CE ratio compared to the second-most CE strategy (serum integrated screening) was Can$3815 per DS birth detected. Among the procedures respecting guidelines, our results identified the combined test as the screening strategy with the highest CE ratio (Can$47,358) and the highest number of procedure-related euploid miscarriages (n = 71).In regard to CE, contingent screening is the best choice. The combined test, which is the most popular screening strategy, shows many limitations." @default.
- W2088893941 created "2016-06-24" @default.
- W2088893941 creator A5018875776 @default.
- W2088893941 creator A5031454677 @default.
- W2088893941 creator A5039998960 @default.
- W2088893941 creator A5059435570 @default.
- W2088893941 creator A5069876930 @default.
- W2088893941 creator A5079655790 @default.
- W2088893941 creator A5087644309 @default.
- W2088893941 date "2011-02-01" @default.
- W2088893941 modified "2023-10-06" @default.
- W2088893941 title "Cost-effectiveness and accuracy of prenatal Down syndrome screening strategies: should the combined test continue to be widely used?" @default.
- W2088893941 cites W1964445496 @default.
- W2088893941 cites W1967882786 @default.
- W2088893941 cites W1971982532 @default.
- W2088893941 cites W1975678046 @default.
- W2088893941 cites W1992747784 @default.
- W2088893941 cites W1993347547 @default.
- W2088893941 cites W2001928042 @default.
- W2088893941 cites W2002363920 @default.
- W2088893941 cites W2003130375 @default.
- W2088893941 cites W2015487852 @default.
- W2088893941 cites W2016206843 @default.
- W2088893941 cites W2020155653 @default.
- W2088893941 cites W2021542090 @default.
- W2088893941 cites W2022791237 @default.
- W2088893941 cites W2028422452 @default.
- W2088893941 cites W2029725894 @default.
- W2088893941 cites W2032398615 @default.
- W2088893941 cites W2058607431 @default.
- W2088893941 cites W2060808856 @default.
- W2088893941 cites W2062393611 @default.
- W2088893941 cites W2063818599 @default.
- W2088893941 cites W2064552602 @default.
- W2088893941 cites W2064609638 @default.
- W2088893941 cites W2077874321 @default.
- W2088893941 cites W2087162133 @default.
- W2088893941 cites W2089034377 @default.
- W2088893941 cites W2099526046 @default.
- W2088893941 cites W2102936248 @default.
- W2088893941 cites W2109178338 @default.
- W2088893941 cites W2114387463 @default.
- W2088893941 cites W2117315526 @default.
- W2088893941 cites W2131037108 @default.
- W2088893941 cites W2136826099 @default.
- W2088893941 cites W2143810390 @default.
- W2088893941 cites W2145819417 @default.
- W2088893941 cites W2150089027 @default.
- W2088893941 cites W2160730845 @default.
- W2088893941 cites W2162812705 @default.
- W2088893941 cites W2165804407 @default.
- W2088893941 cites W2167029579 @default.
- W2088893941 cites W2326164442 @default.
- W2088893941 cites W2328757392 @default.
- W2088893941 cites W2332191095 @default.
- W2088893941 cites W2510695873 @default.
- W2088893941 cites W3146797815 @default.
- W2088893941 cites W4243601710 @default.
- W2088893941 doi "https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ajog.2010.09.017" @default.
- W2088893941 hasPubMedId "https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/21074138" @default.
- W2088893941 hasPublicationYear "2011" @default.
- W2088893941 type Work @default.
- W2088893941 sameAs 2088893941 @default.
- W2088893941 citedByCount "23" @default.
- W2088893941 countsByYear W20888939412012 @default.
- W2088893941 countsByYear W20888939412013 @default.
- W2088893941 countsByYear W20888939412014 @default.
- W2088893941 countsByYear W20888939412015 @default.
- W2088893941 countsByYear W20888939412016 @default.
- W2088893941 countsByYear W20888939412017 @default.
- W2088893941 countsByYear W20888939412018 @default.
- W2088893941 countsByYear W20888939412020 @default.
- W2088893941 crossrefType "journal-article" @default.
- W2088893941 hasAuthorship W2088893941A5018875776 @default.
- W2088893941 hasAuthorship W2088893941A5031454677 @default.
- W2088893941 hasAuthorship W2088893941A5039998960 @default.
- W2088893941 hasAuthorship W2088893941A5059435570 @default.
- W2088893941 hasAuthorship W2088893941A5069876930 @default.
- W2088893941 hasAuthorship W2088893941A5079655790 @default.
- W2088893941 hasAuthorship W2088893941A5087644309 @default.
- W2088893941 hasConcept C151730666 @default.
- W2088893941 hasConcept C172680121 @default.
- W2088893941 hasConcept C187212893 @default.
- W2088893941 hasConcept C2777267654 @default.
- W2088893941 hasConcept C2778258057 @default.
- W2088893941 hasConcept C2779234561 @default.
- W2088893941 hasConcept C2908647359 @default.
- W2088893941 hasConcept C29456083 @default.
- W2088893941 hasConcept C2992422692 @default.
- W2088893941 hasConcept C3020067899 @default.
- W2088893941 hasConcept C54355233 @default.
- W2088893941 hasConcept C71924100 @default.
- W2088893941 hasConcept C86803240 @default.
- W2088893941 hasConcept C99454951 @default.
- W2088893941 hasConceptScore W2088893941C151730666 @default.
- W2088893941 hasConceptScore W2088893941C172680121 @default.
- W2088893941 hasConceptScore W2088893941C187212893 @default.
- W2088893941 hasConceptScore W2088893941C2777267654 @default.