FRINK Linked Data Fragments server

Matches in SemOpenAlex for { <https://semopenalex.org/work/W2088894948> ?p ?o ?g. }

• W2088894948 endingPage "364" @default.
• W2088894948 startingPage "359" @default.
• W2088894948 abstract "Statement of problem The influence of different types of adhesive resin cements on the long-term prognosis of aluminum oxide ceramic posterior crowns is unclear. Purpose The purpose of this study was to evaluate the fracture resistance of aluminum oxide ceramic on maxillary posterior crowns cemented with different resin luting agents before and after cyclic thermomechanical loading. Material and methods Forty-eight maxillary first molars were prepared and restored with standardized aluminum oxide ceramic (In-Ceram Alumina) crowns. The test specimens were randomly divided into 3 groups (n=16). The crowns were luted with an acrylic resin cement (Super-Bond C&B, control, Group SB) and 2 composite luting agents (Panavia F, Group PV; and Rely X Unicem, Group RX). Half of the specimens were exposed to thermomechanical fatigue in a masticatory simulator. All specimens were tested for fracture strength (N) using quasistatic loading. The Wilcoxon rank sum test was used to compare the fracture strength (α=.05). Results All specimens survived the exposure to the simulator. The following median fracture strength values were obtained without/with thermomechanical fatigue loading: Group SB, 2726 N/2673 N; Group PV, 2520 N/2083 N; and Group RX, 2036 N/2369 N. The fracture strength in Group PV after thermomechanical fatigue loading was significantly lower compared to the fracture strength in Group PV without artificial aging (P=.016), as well as significantly lower compared to Group SB with artificial aging (P=.003). Conclusion Within the limitations of this study, all tested cements are capable of successfully luting aluminum oxide ceramic crowns. The fracture strength of Group PV after artificial aging was comparatively low. The influence of different types of adhesive resin cements on the long-term prognosis of aluminum oxide ceramic posterior crowns is unclear. The purpose of this study was to evaluate the fracture resistance of aluminum oxide ceramic on maxillary posterior crowns cemented with different resin luting agents before and after cyclic thermomechanical loading. Forty-eight maxillary first molars were prepared and restored with standardized aluminum oxide ceramic (In-Ceram Alumina) crowns. The test specimens were randomly divided into 3 groups (n=16). The crowns were luted with an acrylic resin cement (Super-Bond C&B, control, Group SB) and 2 composite luting agents (Panavia F, Group PV; and Rely X Unicem, Group RX). Half of the specimens were exposed to thermomechanical fatigue in a masticatory simulator. All specimens were tested for fracture strength (N) using quasistatic loading. The Wilcoxon rank sum test was used to compare the fracture strength (α=.05). All specimens survived the exposure to the simulator. The following median fracture strength values were obtained without/with thermomechanical fatigue loading: Group SB, 2726 N/2673 N; Group PV, 2520 N/2083 N; and Group RX, 2036 N/2369 N. The fracture strength in Group PV after thermomechanical fatigue loading was significantly lower compared to the fracture strength in Group PV without artificial aging (P=.016), as well as significantly lower compared to Group SB with artificial aging (P=.003). Within the limitations of this study, all tested cements are capable of successfully luting aluminum oxide ceramic crowns. The fracture strength of Group PV after artificial aging was comparatively low." @default.
• W2088894948 created "2016-06-24" @default.
• W2088894948 creator A5080028547 @default.
• W2088894948 creator A5088828729 @default.
• W2088894948 creator A5088993988 @default.
• W2088894948 creator A5091896265 @default.
• W2088894948 date "2004-10-01" @default.
• W2088894948 modified "2023-10-14" @default.
• W2088894948 title "Influence of different adhesive resin cements on the fracture strength of aluminum oxide ceramic posterior crowns" @default.
• W2088894948 cites W1950734360 @default.
• W2088894948 cites W1970805228 @default.
• W2088894948 cites W1974214308 @default.
• W2088894948 cites W1975443624 @default.
• W2088894948 cites W1981419212 @default.
• W2088894948 cites W1987998703 @default.
• W2088894948 cites W1988255195 @default.
• W2088894948 cites W2001128249 @default.
• W2088894948 cites W2003500951 @default.
• W2088894948 cites W2010362898 @default.
• W2088894948 cites W2010941225 @default.
• W2088894948 cites W2012079509 @default.
• W2088894948 cites W2023058759 @default.
• W2088894948 cites W2027080350 @default.
• W2088894948 cites W2027241444 @default.
• W2088894948 cites W2027665255 @default.
• W2088894948 cites W2028088094 @default.
• W2088894948 cites W2035673928 @default.
• W2088894948 cites W2048224845 @default.
• W2088894948 cites W2048841017 @default.
• W2088894948 cites W2050086026 @default.
• W2088894948 cites W2065546938 @default.
• W2088894948 cites W2072637622 @default.
• W2088894948 cites W2081008833 @default.
• W2088894948 cites W2085732349 @default.
• W2088894948 cites W2089380489 @default.
• W2088894948 cites W2094086574 @default.
• W2088894948 cites W2110736642 @default.
• W2088894948 cites W2113841839 @default.
• W2088894948 cites W2121843463 @default.
• W2088894948 cites W2130155029 @default.
• W2088894948 cites W2136904131 @default.
• W2088894948 cites W4234090068 @default.
• W2088894948 doi "https://doi.org/10.1016/j.prosdent.2004.07.018" @default.
• W2088894948 hasPubMedId "https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/15507909" @default.
• W2088894948 hasPublicationYear "2004" @default.
• W2088894948 type Work @default.
• W2088894948 sameAs 2088894948 @default.
• W2088894948 citedByCount "64" @default.
• W2088894948 countsByYear W20888949482012 @default.
• W2088894948 countsByYear W20888949482013 @default.
• W2088894948 countsByYear W20888949482014 @default.
• W2088894948 countsByYear W20888949482015 @default.
• W2088894948 countsByYear W20888949482016 @default.
• W2088894948 countsByYear W20888949482017 @default.
• W2088894948 countsByYear W20888949482018 @default.
• W2088894948 countsByYear W20888949482019 @default.
• W2088894948 countsByYear W20888949482020 @default.
• W2088894948 countsByYear W20888949482022 @default.
• W2088894948 countsByYear W20888949482023 @default.
• W2088894948 crossrefType "journal-article" @default.
• W2088894948 hasAuthorship W2088894948A5080028547 @default.
• W2088894948 hasAuthorship W2088894948A5088828729 @default.
• W2088894948 hasAuthorship W2088894948A5088993988 @default.
• W2088894948 hasAuthorship W2088894948A5091896265 @default.
• W2088894948 hasConcept C112950240 @default.
• W2088894948 hasConcept C134132462 @default.
• W2088894948 hasConcept C140013486 @default.
• W2088894948 hasConcept C159096172 @default.
• W2088894948 hasConcept C159985019 @default.
• W2088894948 hasConcept C178405089 @default.
• W2088894948 hasConcept C180478085 @default.
• W2088894948 hasConcept C192562407 @default.
• W2088894948 hasConcept C199343813 @default.
• W2088894948 hasConcept C200026651 @default.
• W2088894948 hasConcept C2779227376 @default.
• W2088894948 hasConcept C2779627239 @default.
• W2088894948 hasConcept C2781448156 @default.
• W2088894948 hasConcept C43369102 @default.
• W2088894948 hasConcept C68928338 @default.
• W2088894948 hasConcept C71924100 @default.
• W2088894948 hasConceptScore W2088894948C112950240 @default.
• W2088894948 hasConceptScore W2088894948C134132462 @default.
• W2088894948 hasConceptScore W2088894948C140013486 @default.
• W2088894948 hasConceptScore W2088894948C159096172 @default.
• W2088894948 hasConceptScore W2088894948C159985019 @default.
• W2088894948 hasConceptScore W2088894948C178405089 @default.
• W2088894948 hasConceptScore W2088894948C180478085 @default.
• W2088894948 hasConceptScore W2088894948C192562407 @default.
• W2088894948 hasConceptScore W2088894948C199343813 @default.
• W2088894948 hasConceptScore W2088894948C200026651 @default.
• W2088894948 hasConceptScore W2088894948C2779227376 @default.
• W2088894948 hasConceptScore W2088894948C2779627239 @default.
• W2088894948 hasConceptScore W2088894948C2781448156 @default.
• W2088894948 hasConceptScore W2088894948C43369102 @default.
• W2088894948 hasConceptScore W2088894948C68928338 @default.
• W2088894948 hasConceptScore W2088894948C71924100 @default.
• W2088894948 hasIssue "4" @default.
• W2088894948 hasLocation W20888949481 @default.

• next