FRINK Linked Data Fragments server

Matches in SemOpenAlex for { <https://semopenalex.org/work/W2088898880> ?p ?o ?g. }

• W2088898880 endingPage "1423" @default.
• W2088898880 startingPage "1415" @default.
• W2088898880 abstract "Background The pathophysiological relevance of complex fractionated atrial electrograms (CFAE) in atrial fibrillation (AF) remains poorly understood. Objective The aim of this study was to comprehensively investigate how bipolar CFAE correlates with unipolar electrogram fractionation and the underlying electrophysiological substrate of AF. Methods Ten-second unipolar AF electrograms were recorded using a high-density electrode from the left atrium of 20 patients with AF (10 with persistent AF and 10 with paroxysmal AF) undergoing cardiac surgery. Semiautomated bipolar CFAE algorithms: complex fractionated electrogram-mean, interval confidence interval, continuous electrical activity, average complex interval, and shortest complex interval were evaluated against AF substrate complexity measures following fibrillation wave reconstruction derived from local unipolar activation time. The effect of interelectrode spacing and electrode orientation on bipolar CFAE was also examined. Results All 5 semiautomated bipolar CFAE algorithms showed poor correlation with each other and AF substrate complexity measures (conduction velocity, number of waves or breakthroughs per AF cycle, and electrical dissociation). Bipolar CFAE also correlated poorly with fractionation index derived from unipolar electrograms. Increased interelectrode spacing resulted in an increase in bipolar CFAE detected except for the interval confidence interval algorithm. CFAE appears unaffected by bipolar electrode orientation (vertical vs horizontal). By contrast, unipolar fractionation index correlated well with AF substrate complexity measures and can be regarded as a marker for conduction block. Conclusion The lack of pathophysiological relevance of bipolar CFAE analysis may in part contribute to the divergent and limited success rates of catheter ablation strategies targeting CFAE. The pathophysiological relevance of complex fractionated atrial electrograms (CFAE) in atrial fibrillation (AF) remains poorly understood. The aim of this study was to comprehensively investigate how bipolar CFAE correlates with unipolar electrogram fractionation and the underlying electrophysiological substrate of AF. Ten-second unipolar AF electrograms were recorded using a high-density electrode from the left atrium of 20 patients with AF (10 with persistent AF and 10 with paroxysmal AF) undergoing cardiac surgery. Semiautomated bipolar CFAE algorithms: complex fractionated electrogram-mean, interval confidence interval, continuous electrical activity, average complex interval, and shortest complex interval were evaluated against AF substrate complexity measures following fibrillation wave reconstruction derived from local unipolar activation time. The effect of interelectrode spacing and electrode orientation on bipolar CFAE was also examined. All 5 semiautomated bipolar CFAE algorithms showed poor correlation with each other and AF substrate complexity measures (conduction velocity, number of waves or breakthroughs per AF cycle, and electrical dissociation). Bipolar CFAE also correlated poorly with fractionation index derived from unipolar electrograms. Increased interelectrode spacing resulted in an increase in bipolar CFAE detected except for the interval confidence interval algorithm. CFAE appears unaffected by bipolar electrode orientation (vertical vs horizontal). By contrast, unipolar fractionation index correlated well with AF substrate complexity measures and can be regarded as a marker for conduction block. The lack of pathophysiological relevance of bipolar CFAE analysis may in part contribute to the divergent and limited success rates of catheter ablation strategies targeting CFAE." @default.
• W2088898880 created "2016-06-24" @default.
• W2088898880 creator A5016545357 @default.
• W2088898880 creator A5017940932 @default.
• W2088898880 creator A5018455501 @default.
• W2088898880 creator A5024756348 @default.
• W2088898880 creator A5026253511 @default.
• W2088898880 creator A5031776037 @default.
• W2088898880 creator A5041226897 @default.
• W2088898880 creator A5046773983 @default.
• W2088898880 creator A5055973896 @default.
• W2088898880 creator A5057251822 @default.
• W2088898880 creator A5083799451 @default.
• W2088898880 creator A5088308248 @default.
• W2088898880 creator A5090763481 @default.
• W2088898880 date "2015-07-01" @default.
• W2088898880 modified "2023-10-07" @default.
• W2088898880 title "Indices of bipolar complex fractionated atrial electrograms correlate poorly with each other and atrial fibrillation substrate complexity" @default.
• W2088898880 cites W1966659663 @default.
• W2088898880 cites W1967259319 @default.
• W2088898880 cites W1969348254 @default.
• W2088898880 cites W1971173299 @default.
• W2088898880 cites W1976128681 @default.
• W2088898880 cites W1976204318 @default.
• W2088898880 cites W2003708824 @default.
• W2088898880 cites W2015679007 @default.
• W2088898880 cites W2021819483 @default.
• W2088898880 cites W2024962108 @default.
• W2088898880 cites W2037795360 @default.
• W2088898880 cites W2039465542 @default.
• W2088898880 cites W2043635013 @default.
• W2088898880 cites W2057080587 @default.
• W2088898880 cites W2057384485 @default.
• W2088898880 cites W2062281498 @default.
• W2088898880 cites W2064879804 @default.
• W2088898880 cites W2068696095 @default.
• W2088898880 cites W2073774934 @default.
• W2088898880 cites W2088300516 @default.
• W2088898880 cites W2102770457 @default.
• W2088898880 cites W2103101898 @default.
• W2088898880 cites W2108580090 @default.
• W2088898880 cites W2109267099 @default.
• W2088898880 cites W2110563082 @default.
• W2088898880 cites W2117900501 @default.
• W2088898880 cites W2119174768 @default.
• W2088898880 cites W2119621911 @default.
• W2088898880 cites W2128576699 @default.
• W2088898880 cites W2139245232 @default.
• W2088898880 cites W2143779295 @default.
• W2088898880 cites W2160276811 @default.
• W2088898880 cites W23021673 @default.
• W2088898880 cites W2546826370 @default.
• W2088898880 cites W2548558756 @default.
• W2088898880 doi "https://doi.org/10.1016/j.hrthm.2015.03.017" @default.
• W2088898880 hasPubMedId "https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/25771914" @default.
• W2088898880 hasPublicationYear "2015" @default.
• W2088898880 type Work @default.
• W2088898880 sameAs 2088898880 @default.
• W2088898880 citedByCount "51" @default.
• W2088898880 countsByYear W20888988802015 @default.
• W2088898880 countsByYear W20888988802016 @default.
• W2088898880 countsByYear W20888988802017 @default.
• W2088898880 countsByYear W20888988802018 @default.
• W2088898880 countsByYear W20888988802019 @default.
• W2088898880 countsByYear W20888988802020 @default.
• W2088898880 countsByYear W20888988802021 @default.
• W2088898880 countsByYear W20888988802022 @default.
• W2088898880 countsByYear W20888988802023 @default.
• W2088898880 crossrefType "journal-article" @default.
• W2088898880 hasAuthorship W2088898880A5016545357 @default.
• W2088898880 hasAuthorship W2088898880A5017940932 @default.
• W2088898880 hasAuthorship W2088898880A5018455501 @default.
• W2088898880 hasAuthorship W2088898880A5024756348 @default.
• W2088898880 hasAuthorship W2088898880A5026253511 @default.
• W2088898880 hasAuthorship W2088898880A5031776037 @default.
• W2088898880 hasAuthorship W2088898880A5041226897 @default.
• W2088898880 hasAuthorship W2088898880A5046773983 @default.
• W2088898880 hasAuthorship W2088898880A5055973896 @default.
• W2088898880 hasAuthorship W2088898880A5057251822 @default.
• W2088898880 hasAuthorship W2088898880A5083799451 @default.
• W2088898880 hasAuthorship W2088898880A5088308248 @default.
• W2088898880 hasAuthorship W2088898880A5090763481 @default.
• W2088898880 hasConcept C126322002 @default.
• W2088898880 hasConcept C164705383 @default.
• W2088898880 hasConcept C2776131983 @default.
• W2088898880 hasConcept C2778902805 @default.
• W2088898880 hasConcept C2779161974 @default.
• W2088898880 hasConcept C44249647 @default.
• W2088898880 hasConcept C71924100 @default.
• W2088898880 hasConceptScore W2088898880C126322002 @default.
• W2088898880 hasConceptScore W2088898880C164705383 @default.
• W2088898880 hasConceptScore W2088898880C2776131983 @default.
• W2088898880 hasConceptScore W2088898880C2778902805 @default.
• W2088898880 hasConceptScore W2088898880C2779161974 @default.
• W2088898880 hasConceptScore W2088898880C44249647 @default.
• W2088898880 hasConceptScore W2088898880C71924100 @default.
• W2088898880 hasIssue "7" @default.
• W2088898880 hasLocation W20888988801 @default.

• next