FRINK Linked Data Fragments server

Matches in SemOpenAlex for { <https://semopenalex.org/work/W2090186110> ?p ?o ?g. }

• W2090186110 endingPage "316" @default.
• W2090186110 startingPage "311" @default.
• W2090186110 abstract "HomeRadiologyVol. 260, No. 2 PreviousNext Reviews and CommentaryPerspectivesDecades of Perceived Mediocrity: Prestige and RadiologyGary M. Glazer , Julie A. Ruiz-WibbelsmannGary M. Glazer , Julie A. Ruiz-WibbelsmannAuthor AffiliationsFrom the Department of Radiology, Stanford University School of Medicine, 1201 Welch Rd, Room P-263, Palo Alto, CA 94304.Address correspondence to G.M.G. (e-mail: [email protected]).Gary M. Glazer Julie A. Ruiz-WibbelsmannPublished Online:Aug 1 2011https://doi.org/10.1148/radiol.11110596MoreSectionsFull textPDF ToolsImage ViewerAdd to favoritesCiteTrack CitationsPermissionsReprints ShareShare onFacebookTwitterLinked In AbstractWe can enhance radiology’s prestige by increasing patient contact, garnering extramural funding to support the infrastructure for cutting-edge research and education, and exposing students earlier in their medical education to the excitement of radiology.References1 National University Rankings. U.S. News Education Web site. http://colleges.usnews.rankingsandreviews.com/best-colleges/rankings/national-universities. Accessed October 22, 2010. Google Scholar2 Strauss V. Top College Rankings vs. Endowments. The Washington Post Answer Sheet Web Site. http://voices.washingtonpost.com/answer-sheet/college-admissions/top-college-rankings-vs-endowm.html. Accessed October 22, 2010. Google Scholar3 Top Medical Schools. U.S. News Education Web site. http://grad-schools.usnews.rankingsandreviews.com/best-graduate-schools/top-medical-schools. Accessed March 4, 2011. Google Scholar4 Norredam M, Album D. Prestige and its significance for medical specialties and diseases. Scand J Public Health 2007;35(6):655–661. Crossref, Medline, Google Scholar5 Schwartzbaum AM, McGrath JH, Rothman RA. The perception of prestige differences among medical subspecialities. Soc Sci Med 1973;7(5):365–371. Crossref, Medline, Google Scholar6 Shortell SM. Occupational prestige differences within the medical and allied health professions. Soc Sci Med 1974;8(1):1–9. Crossref, Medline, Google Scholar7 Sallee DS, Cooper C, Ravin CE. Medical student perceptions of diagnostic radiology: influence of a senior radiology elective. Invest Radiol 1989;24(9):724–728. Crossref, Medline, Google Scholar8 Furnham A. Attitudes to the medical specialities: comparing pre-clinical students’ perceptions of nine specialities. Soc Sci Med 1986;23(6):587–594. Crossref, Medline, Google Scholar9 Rosoff SM, Leone MC. The public prestige of medical specialties: overviews and undercurrents. Soc Sci Med 1991;32(3):321–326. Crossref, Medline, Google Scholar10 Hinze SW. Gender and the body of medicine or at least some body parts: (re)constructing the prestige hierarchy of medical specialties. Sociol Q 1999;40(2):217–239. Crossref, Google Scholar11 Kazerooni EA, Blane CE, Schlesinger AE, Vydareny KH. Medical students’ attitudes toward radiology: comparison of matriculating and graduating students. Acad Radiol 1997;4(8):601–607. Crossref, Medline, Google Scholar12 Creed PA, Searle J, Rogers ME. Medical specialty prestige and lifestyle preferences for medical students. Soc Sci Med 2010;71(6):1084–1088. Crossref, Medline, Google Scholar13 Album D, Westin S. Do diseases have a prestige hierarchy? a survey among physicians and medical students. Soc Sci Med 2008;66(1):182–188. Crossref, Medline, Google Scholar14 Ebell MH. Future salary and US residency fill rate revisited. JAMA 2008;300(10):1131–1132. Crossref, Medline, Google Scholar15 Zafar HM, Lewis RS, Sunshine JH. Satisfaction of radiologists in the United States: a comparison between 2003 and 1995. Radiology 2007;244(1):223–231. Link, Google Scholar16 Fuchs VR, Sox HC. Physicians’ views of the relative importance of thirty medical innovations. Health Aff (Millwood) 2001;20(5):30–42. Crossref, Medline, Google Scholar17 Greatest engineering achievements of the 20th century. National Academy of Engineering Web site. http://www.greatachievements.org/Default.aspx. Accessed February 22, 2011. Google Scholar18 McCarty DJ. Why are today’s medical students choosing high-technology specialties over internal medicine? N Engl J Med 1987;317(9):567–569. Crossref, Medline, Google Scholar19 Smart DR. Physician trends. In: Ryder M, ed. Physician characteristics and distribution in the US 2011. Chicago, Ill: American Medical Association Press, 2010; 438. Google Scholar20 Lambert EM, Holmboe ES. The relationship between specialty choice and gender of U.S. medical students, 1990-2003. Acad Med 2005;80(9):797–802. Crossref, Medline, Google Scholar21 Dorsey ER, Jarjoura D, Rutecki GW. The influence of controllable lifestyle and sex on the specialty choices of graduating U.S. medical students, 1996-2003. Acad Med 2005;80(9):791–796. Crossref, Medline, Google Scholar22 Thornton J, Esposto F. How important are economic factors in choice of medical specialty? Health Econ 2003;12(1):67–73. Crossref, Medline, Google Scholar23 Wilder V, Dodoo MS, Phillips RL, et al.. Income disparities shape medical student specialty choice. Am Fam Physician 2010;82(6):601. Medline, Google Scholar24 Barbieri RL, Anastos L, Michels KB. Economic factors and the percentage of residency positions filled by United States medical graduates. Obstet Gynecol 2005;106(3):581–584. Crossref, Medline, Google Scholar25 Fielding JR, Major NM, Mullan BF, et al.. Choosing a specialty in medicine: female medical students and radiology. AJR Am J Roentgenol 2007;188(4):897–900. Crossref, Medline, Google Scholar26 Kassebaum DG, Szenas PL. Factors influencing the specialty choices of 1993 medical school graduates. Acad Med 1994;69(2):163–170. Crossref, Medline, Google Scholar27 Lieu TA, Schroeder SA, Altman DF. Specialty choices at one medical school: recent trends and analysis of predictive factors. Acad Med 1989;64(10):622–629. Crossref, Medline, Google Scholar28 Tardiff K, Cella D, Seiferth C, Perry S. Selection and change of specialties by medical school graduates. J Med Educ 1986;61(10):790–796. Medline, Google Scholar29 Compton MT, Frank E, Elon L, Carrera J. Changes in U.S. medical students’ specialty interests over the course of medical school. J Gen Intern Med 2008;23(7):1095–1100. Crossref, Medline, Google Scholar30 Schlesinger AE, Blane CE, Vydareny KH. First-year medical students’ attitudes toward radiology. Invest Radiol 1992;27(2):175–178. Crossref, Medline, Google Scholar31 Gunderman RB, Huynh J. Is radiology presented to medical students as a fulfilling career? J Am Coll Radiol 2007;4(10):704–710. Crossref, Medline, Google Scholar32 Hartmann GW. The relative social prestige of representative medical specialties. J Appl Psychol 1936;20(6):659–663. Crossref, Google Scholar33 Glazer GM, Ruiz-Wibbelsmann JA. The invisible radiologist. Radiology 2011;258(1):18–22. Link, Google Scholar34 Ranking Tables of NIH Funding to US Medical Schools in 2010. Blue Ridge Institute for Medical Research Web site. http://www.brimr.org/NIH_Awards/2010/NIH_Awards_2010.htm. Accessed February 22, 2011. Google Scholar35 Rogers LF. The Academy of Radiology research. AJR Am J Roentgenol 1999;172(3):583. Crossref, Medline, Google Scholar36 Maguire MA, Gore JC. The current state of NIH funding of research in diagnostic radiology at U.S. medical schools. J Am Coll Radiol 2005;2(5):436–443. Crossref, Medline, Google Scholar37 Branstetter BF, Humphrey AL, Schumann JB. The long-term impact of preclinical education on medical students’ opinions about radiology. Acad Radiol 2008;15(10):1331–1339. Crossref, Medline, Google ScholarArticle HistoryReceived March 22, 2011; final version accepted March 28.Published online: Aug 2011Published in print: Aug 2011 FiguresReferencesRelatedDetailsCited ByThe Pros and Cons of Tele-work: Promoting Radiology as a CareerEri YAung, Chantal ZJLiu2020 | Academic Radiology, Vol. 27, No. 4UK undergraduate aspirations and attitudes survey: do we have a perception problem in clinical radiology?H.C.Oliver, B.J.Hudson, C.F.Oliver, M.C.Oliver2020 | Clinical Radiology, Vol. 75, No. 2Textbook of Gastrointestinal Radiology, 2-Volume SetAna CatarinaSilva, Dean D.T.Maglinte2015El radiólogo invisibleF.J.Rodríguez Recio, M.Otero García2014 | Radiología, Vol. 56, No. 6Fluoroscopic and CT EnteroclysisDean D.T.Maglinte2013 | Radiologic Clinics of North America, Vol. 51, No. 1The Loneliness of the Long-Distance RadiologistRichard B.Gunderman, Allison A.Tillack2012 | Journal of the American College of Radiology, Vol. 9, No. 8Recommended Articles MRI of Extramural Venous Invasion in Locally Advanced Rectal Cancer: Relationship to Tumor Recurrence and Overall SurvivalRadiology2018Volume: 289Issue: 3pp. 677-685Watch-and-Wait Approach to Rectal Cancer: The Role of ImagingRadiology2023Volume: 307Issue: 1Fluoroscopy-guided versus CT-guided Lumbar Steroid Injections: Comparison of Radiation Exposure and OutcomesRadiology2019Volume: 290Issue: 3pp. 752-759Preventing Inadvertent Foreign Body Injection in AngiographyRadiology2021Volume: 299Issue: 2pp. 460-467CM-101: Type I Collagen–targeted MR Imaging Probe for Detection of Liver FibrosisRadiology2017Volume: 287Issue: 2pp. 581-589See More RSNA Education Exhibits From Walkin' To Rollin': A Review Of Cervical Spine Injuries In A Level 1 Trauma Center.Digital Posters2021Extramural Venous Invasion in Rectal Cancer Before and After Neoadjuvant Therapy Beyond Classic Findings: Recognition of Detailed Characteristics and Tumor DepositDigital Posters2022Deep Brain Stimulation (DBS) - Pre and Post Operative Imaging, From Adequate Nucleus and Fiber Tract Localization to Electrode MisplacementDigital Posters2022 RSNA Case Collection Asymmetric lactational change RSNA Case Collection2021Osteochondritis dissecansRSNA Case Collection2020Facet joint synovial cystRSNA Case Collection2020 Vol. 260, No. 2 Supplemental MaterialMetrics Altmetric Score PDF download" @default.
• W2090186110 created "2016-06-24" @default.
• W2090186110 creator A5037280074 @default.
• W2090186110 creator A5064215799 @default.
• W2090186110 date "2011-08-01" @default.
• W2090186110 modified "2023-10-12" @default.
• W2090186110 title "Decades of Perceived Mediocrity: Prestige and Radiology" @default.
• W2090186110 cites W1541835564 @default.
• W2090186110 cites W1965698581 @default.
• W2090186110 cites W1974192095 @default.
• W2090186110 cites W1974389550 @default.
• W2090186110 cites W1976128987 @default.
• W2090186110 cites W1978962207 @default.
• W2090186110 cites W1980228777 @default.
• W2090186110 cites W1982116903 @default.
• W2090186110 cites W1983560104 @default.
• W2090186110 cites W1994824026 @default.
• W2090186110 cites W1996872128 @default.
• W2090186110 cites W2001186116 @default.
• W2090186110 cites W2011416247 @default.
• W2090186110 cites W2012449354 @default.
• W2090186110 cites W2025410695 @default.
• W2090186110 cites W2032615813 @default.
• W2090186110 cites W2034898920 @default.
• W2090186110 cites W2035416750 @default.
• W2090186110 cites W2046309210 @default.
• W2090186110 cites W2047745662 @default.
• W2090186110 cites W2053225692 @default.
• W2090186110 cites W2055801674 @default.
• W2090186110 cites W2062002094 @default.
• W2090186110 cites W2065444457 @default.
• W2090186110 cites W2068618483 @default.
• W2090186110 cites W2068733436 @default.
• W2090186110 cites W2099221462 @default.
• W2090186110 cites W2100184470 @default.
• W2090186110 cites W2146448811 @default.
• W2090186110 cites W2409416365 @default.
• W2090186110 cites W2410146124 @default.
• W2090186110 doi "https://doi.org/10.1148/radiol.11110596" @default.
• W2090186110 hasPubMedId "https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/21778449" @default.
• W2090186110 hasPublicationYear "2011" @default.
• W2090186110 type Work @default.
• W2090186110 sameAs 2090186110 @default.
• W2090186110 citedByCount "12" @default.
• W2090186110 countsByYear W20901861102012 @default.
• W2090186110 countsByYear W20901861102013 @default.
• W2090186110 countsByYear W20901861102014 @default.
• W2090186110 countsByYear W20901861102015 @default.
• W2090186110 countsByYear W20901861102019 @default.
• W2090186110 countsByYear W20901861102020 @default.
• W2090186110 countsByYear W20901861102023 @default.
• W2090186110 crossrefType "journal-article" @default.
• W2090186110 hasAuthorship W2090186110A5037280074 @default.
• W2090186110 hasAuthorship W2090186110A5064215799 @default.
• W2090186110 hasConcept C117309347 @default.
• W2090186110 hasConcept C121332964 @default.
• W2090186110 hasConcept C126838900 @default.
• W2090186110 hasConcept C1276947 @default.
• W2090186110 hasConcept C138885662 @default.
• W2090186110 hasConcept C2778329345 @default.
• W2090186110 hasConcept C41895202 @default.
• W2090186110 hasConcept C71924100 @default.
• W2090186110 hasConceptScore W2090186110C117309347 @default.
• W2090186110 hasConceptScore W2090186110C121332964 @default.
• W2090186110 hasConceptScore W2090186110C126838900 @default.
• W2090186110 hasConceptScore W2090186110C1276947 @default.
• W2090186110 hasConceptScore W2090186110C138885662 @default.
• W2090186110 hasConceptScore W2090186110C2778329345 @default.
• W2090186110 hasConceptScore W2090186110C41895202 @default.
• W2090186110 hasConceptScore W2090186110C71924100 @default.
• W2090186110 hasIssue "2" @default.
• W2090186110 hasLocation W20901861101 @default.
• W2090186110 hasLocation W20901861102 @default.
• W2090186110 hasOpenAccess W2090186110 @default.
• W2090186110 hasPrimaryLocation W20901861101 @default.
• W2090186110 hasRelatedWork W1481371678 @default.
• W2090186110 hasRelatedWork W2049214470 @default.
• W2090186110 hasRelatedWork W2090186110 @default.
• W2090186110 hasRelatedWork W2152053386 @default.
• W2090186110 hasRelatedWork W2748952813 @default.
• W2090186110 hasRelatedWork W2899084033 @default.
• W2090186110 hasRelatedWork W2902148150 @default.
• W2090186110 hasRelatedWork W3031052312 @default.
• W2090186110 hasRelatedWork W3033579636 @default.
• W2090186110 hasRelatedWork W95016644 @default.
• W2090186110 hasVolume "260" @default.
• W2090186110 isParatext "false" @default.
• W2090186110 isRetracted "false" @default.
• W2090186110 magId "2090186110" @default.
• W2090186110 workType "article" @default.