FRINK Linked Data Fragments server

Matches in SemOpenAlex for { <https://semopenalex.org/work/W2090416321> ?p ?o ?g. }

• W2090416321 endingPage "614" @default.
• W2090416321 startingPage "605" @default.
• W2090416321 abstract "INTRODUCTION. Lyle Campbell's comments (Campbell 1997a) on Nichols & Peterson 1996 appear to be based on misunderstandings. Our paper surveyed pronominal systems with first person n and second person m, a mini-paradigm well attested in western America, and showed that (a) the n:m system is not sufficient to prove, or even to strongly suggest, genetic relatedness among the languages exhibiting it and (b) nonetheless its distribution can hardly be due to universals or chance. We argued that, though neither genetic marker nor universal, the n: m system can nonetheless be given a historical interpretation. It is one of several features with nearly identical Pacific Rim distributions (including tones, numeral classifiers, and others we did not discuss), and the set of congruent distributions strongly suggests that language populations all around the Pacific Rim, and only there, include a good many lineages ultimately dispersed from the same founding population. For the dispersal a chronology (both absolute and relative), a center, and a trajectory can be reconstructed, although, given the great time depth involved, neither a mechanism of dispersal (migration? diffusion?) nor a descent (are all n:m language families sisters? some of them? none?) can be securely established. Our point was that, despite this indeterminacy, a fairly determinate origin and history can be posited. We posited a late phase in the linguistic colonization of the Americas, in which a few successive entrants-not necessarily sister languages-all emanated from the same coastal Asian population, brought markers of that population (such as n: m pronouns, numeral classifiers, etc.) into America, and retained their coastal orientation in a southward spread from the Beringian point of entry well into South America. The set of entries began at about the end of glaciation and had ended by about 6000 BP (the chronology follows from the geography: the markers of the Pacific Rim population are nearly continuous around the Pacific, but are stopped in Australasia at the point where postglacial sea-level rise separated Australia from New Guinea, and are cut off in the far north by the more recent Chukchi-Kamchatkan and Eskimo-Aleut expansions). Our reconstruction is consistent with the linguistic facts and with what can plausibly be assumed about the colonization of the Americas. We would welcome other interpretations of the evidence; the main point of our paper was that the distribution of n:m pronoun systems cannot be dismissed as due to random chance or to universals. We have organized Campbell's remarks into two groups: those having to do broadly with method (sampling in general, construction of our sample, how we surveyed pronouns) and those having to do with our interpretation of the results. We quote or summarize each of his major criticisms in bulleted paragraphs, with our response in the following paragraph.1" @default.
• W2090416321 created "2016-06-24" @default.
• W2090416321 creator A5036400263 @default.
• W2090416321 creator A5071804148 @default.
• W2090416321 date "1998-01-01" @default.
• W2090416321 modified "2023-10-17" @default.
• W2090416321 title "Amerind personal pronouns: A reply to Campbell" @default.
• W2090416321 cites W1574047653 @default.
• W2090416321 cites W1966789438 @default.
• W2090416321 cites W2006295278 @default.
• W2090416321 cites W2008089860 @default.
• W2090416321 cites W2019649178 @default.
• W2090416321 cites W2044208796 @default.
• W2090416321 cites W2045486205 @default.
• W2090416321 cites W2095560109 @default.
• W2090416321 cites W2158516707 @default.
• W2090416321 cites W2332822865 @default.
• W2090416321 cites W3137577879 @default.
• W2090416321 cites W777219419 @default.
• W2090416321 cites W836640176 @default.
• W2090416321 doi "https://doi.org/10.1353/lan.1998.0126" @default.
• W2090416321 hasPublicationYear "1998" @default.
• W2090416321 type Work @default.
• W2090416321 sameAs 2090416321 @default.
• W2090416321 citedByCount "10" @default.
• W2090416321 countsByYear W20904163212012 @default.
• W2090416321 countsByYear W20904163212013 @default.
• W2090416321 countsByYear W20904163212017 @default.
• W2090416321 countsByYear W20904163212019 @default.
• W2090416321 countsByYear W20904163212020 @default.
• W2090416321 countsByYear W20904163212021 @default.
• W2090416321 crossrefType "journal-article" @default.
• W2090416321 hasAuthorship W2090416321A5036400263 @default.
• W2090416321 hasAuthorship W2090416321A5071804148 @default.
• W2090416321 hasConcept C138885662 @default.
• W2090416321 hasConcept C15744967 @default.
• W2090416321 hasConcept C24184978 @default.
• W2090416321 hasConcept C41895202 @default.
• W2090416321 hasConceptScore W2090416321C138885662 @default.
• W2090416321 hasConceptScore W2090416321C15744967 @default.
• W2090416321 hasConceptScore W2090416321C24184978 @default.
• W2090416321 hasConceptScore W2090416321C41895202 @default.
• W2090416321 hasIssue "3" @default.
• W2090416321 hasLocation W20904163211 @default.
• W2090416321 hasOpenAccess W2090416321 @default.
• W2090416321 hasPrimaryLocation W20904163211 @default.
• W2090416321 hasRelatedWork W1932548814 @default.
• W2090416321 hasRelatedWork W1966525407 @default.
• W2090416321 hasRelatedWork W2034753673 @default.
• W2090416321 hasRelatedWork W2038221862 @default.
• W2090416321 hasRelatedWork W2328657954 @default.
• W2090416321 hasRelatedWork W2371929142 @default.
• W2090416321 hasRelatedWork W2381365228 @default.
• W2090416321 hasRelatedWork W2613579584 @default.
• W2090416321 hasRelatedWork W2908464194 @default.
• W2090416321 hasRelatedWork W432813263 @default.
• W2090416321 hasVolume "74" @default.
• W2090416321 isParatext "false" @default.
• W2090416321 isRetracted "false" @default.
• W2090416321 magId "2090416321" @default.
• W2090416321 workType "article" @default.