Matches in SemOpenAlex for { <https://semopenalex.org/work/W2090435711> ?p ?o ?g. }
Showing items 1 to 62 of
62
with 100 items per page.
- W2090435711 endingPage "49" @default.
- W2090435711 startingPage "31" @default.
- W2090435711 abstract "This article critically evaluates the competing theories of judicial review to arrive at the conclusion, advanced by the writer, that the ultra vires doctrine does not provide a sufficient rubric as a justification for judicial review. It is the writer's view that rights based review has the attraction of objectivity and would be more appropriate as the basis for judicial review. It is contended that the justification for the ultra vires doctrine, as the basis for judicial review, is, at best, tenuous in England and can have no legitimacy, whatsoever, in other countries, with written constitutions, where the constitutional arrangements are quite different." @default.
- W2090435711 created "2016-06-24" @default.
- W2090435711 creator A5070834557 @default.
- W2090435711 date "2001-12-01" @default.
- W2090435711 modified "2023-09-25" @default.
- W2090435711 title "Is rights based review justified?" @default.
- W2090435711 cites W1982497259 @default.
- W2090435711 cites W1999668590 @default.
- W2090435711 cites W2096778382 @default.
- W2090435711 cites W2108524767 @default.
- W2090435711 cites W2120650880 @default.
- W2090435711 cites W2155835998 @default.
- W2090435711 doi "https://doi.org/10.1080/14760400108522886" @default.
- W2090435711 hasPublicationYear "2001" @default.
- W2090435711 type Work @default.
- W2090435711 sameAs 2090435711 @default.
- W2090435711 citedByCount "0" @default.
- W2090435711 crossrefType "journal-article" @default.
- W2090435711 hasAuthorship W2090435711A5070834557 @default.
- W2090435711 hasConcept C111640148 @default.
- W2090435711 hasConcept C144024400 @default.
- W2090435711 hasConcept C17744445 @default.
- W2090435711 hasConcept C190253527 @default.
- W2090435711 hasConcept C19417346 @default.
- W2090435711 hasConcept C199539241 @default.
- W2090435711 hasConcept C2776211767 @default.
- W2090435711 hasConcept C2777804265 @default.
- W2090435711 hasConcept C46295352 @default.
- W2090435711 hasConcept C48764862 @default.
- W2090435711 hasConcept C94625758 @default.
- W2090435711 hasConceptScore W2090435711C111640148 @default.
- W2090435711 hasConceptScore W2090435711C144024400 @default.
- W2090435711 hasConceptScore W2090435711C17744445 @default.
- W2090435711 hasConceptScore W2090435711C190253527 @default.
- W2090435711 hasConceptScore W2090435711C19417346 @default.
- W2090435711 hasConceptScore W2090435711C199539241 @default.
- W2090435711 hasConceptScore W2090435711C2776211767 @default.
- W2090435711 hasConceptScore W2090435711C2777804265 @default.
- W2090435711 hasConceptScore W2090435711C46295352 @default.
- W2090435711 hasConceptScore W2090435711C48764862 @default.
- W2090435711 hasConceptScore W2090435711C94625758 @default.
- W2090435711 hasIssue "1" @default.
- W2090435711 hasLocation W20904357111 @default.
- W2090435711 hasOpenAccess W2090435711 @default.
- W2090435711 hasPrimaryLocation W20904357111 @default.
- W2090435711 hasRelatedWork W1496553065 @default.
- W2090435711 hasRelatedWork W2090435711 @default.
- W2090435711 hasRelatedWork W2096778382 @default.
- W2090435711 hasRelatedWork W2108524767 @default.
- W2090435711 hasRelatedWork W2499660320 @default.
- W2090435711 hasRelatedWork W2761569754 @default.
- W2090435711 hasRelatedWork W2946077860 @default.
- W2090435711 hasRelatedWork W3123850168 @default.
- W2090435711 hasRelatedWork W765389598 @default.
- W2090435711 hasRelatedWork W3123542232 @default.
- W2090435711 hasVolume "1" @default.
- W2090435711 isParatext "false" @default.
- W2090435711 isRetracted "false" @default.
- W2090435711 magId "2090435711" @default.
- W2090435711 workType "article" @default.