FRINK Linked Data Fragments server

Matches in SemOpenAlex for { <https://semopenalex.org/work/W2090465101> ?p ?o ?g. }

• W2090465101 endingPage "351" @default.
• W2090465101 startingPage "337" @default.
• W2090465101 abstract "Abstract Throughout the world a number of testing systems are used to obtain the fertiliser spread pattern from spinning disc spreaders. Results of these tests are used to certify the bout width, which is the permitable distance between adjacent transects of the spreader truck across the field. These tests use trays aligned in one or two transverse rows to the direction of travel of the spreader which collects the fertiliser for one or more passes by the spreading vehicle. The tray size, their spacing in each row, the distance apart between transverse rows, and the number of passes all vary between tests. In this study, a field trial was constructed to simulate all international tests. The ground was covered with 0.5 × 0.5 m trays arranged as 18 transverse rows of 80 trays each, leaving spaces for the truck wheels. The amount of fertiliser landing on each tray was weighed for two replicates at each of three nominal application rates of 80, 100 and 150 kg ha − 1 of urea. These trials provide good sample statistics, which are used to estimate the confidence limits of the spread patterns for each international spread test and then to estimate the accuracy of correctly certifying the bout width. The ACCU Spread (Australia) method proved far superior in both aspects; it had the narrowest confidence limits for the spread pattern and the most accurate determination of bout width, which it could predict accurately to within one tray, or 0.5 m. The ES (Europe) method was next best, but is prone to a ‘near neighbour effect’ because the two adjacent rows of trays cannot be guaranteed to have longitudinal independence. Next were the ISO 5690/1, ISO 5690/2 and Spreadmark (New Zealand) tests, which all performed equally well. Interestingly, the ISO 5690/2 test uses a narrower tray (0.25 × 1.0 m) intended to obtain better transverse resolution, but this did not improve the accuracy of the bout width calculation. The ASAE (USA) method collects only sparse data because the trays are spaced at wide intervals across the swath, which make bout width calculations difficult without interpolation or weighting techniques. This work clearly demonstrates that multiple rows of trays, multiple passes of the spreader and long trays can enhance the accuracy of the test." @default.
• W2090465101 created "2016-06-24" @default.
• W2090465101 creator A5013164533 @default.
• W2090465101 creator A5018241188 @default.
• W2090465101 creator A5083603760 @default.
• W2090465101 date "2008-06-01" @default.
• W2090465101 modified "2023-10-18" @default.
• W2090465101 title "A statistical comparison of international fertiliser spreader test methods — Confidence in bout width calculations" @default.
• W2090465101 cites W1998443187 @default.
• W2090465101 cites W2011772679 @default.
• W2090465101 cites W2014029872 @default.
• W2090465101 cites W2015536110 @default.
• W2090465101 cites W2040720691 @default.
• W2090465101 cites W2147712322 @default.
• W2090465101 doi "https://doi.org/10.1016/j.powtec.2007.09.004" @default.
• W2090465101 hasPublicationYear "2008" @default.
• W2090465101 type Work @default.
• W2090465101 sameAs 2090465101 @default.
• W2090465101 citedByCount "11" @default.
• W2090465101 countsByYear W20904651012015 @default.
• W2090465101 countsByYear W20904651012017 @default.
• W2090465101 countsByYear W20904651012018 @default.
• W2090465101 countsByYear W20904651012019 @default.
• W2090465101 countsByYear W20904651012021 @default.
• W2090465101 countsByYear W20904651012023 @default.
• W2090465101 crossrefType "journal-article" @default.
• W2090465101 hasAuthorship W2090465101A5013164533 @default.
• W2090465101 hasAuthorship W2090465101A5018241188 @default.
• W2090465101 hasAuthorship W2090465101A5083603760 @default.
• W2090465101 hasConcept C105795698 @default.
• W2090465101 hasConcept C127413603 @default.
• W2090465101 hasConcept C200601418 @default.
• W2090465101 hasConcept C2777267654 @default.
• W2090465101 hasConcept C33923547 @default.
• W2090465101 hasConcept C39432304 @default.
• W2090465101 hasConcept C44249647 @default.
• W2090465101 hasConcept C59822182 @default.
• W2090465101 hasConcept C86803240 @default.
• W2090465101 hasConcept C88463610 @default.
• W2090465101 hasConceptScore W2090465101C105795698 @default.
• W2090465101 hasConceptScore W2090465101C127413603 @default.
• W2090465101 hasConceptScore W2090465101C200601418 @default.
• W2090465101 hasConceptScore W2090465101C2777267654 @default.
• W2090465101 hasConceptScore W2090465101C33923547 @default.
• W2090465101 hasConceptScore W2090465101C39432304 @default.
• W2090465101 hasConceptScore W2090465101C44249647 @default.
• W2090465101 hasConceptScore W2090465101C59822182 @default.
• W2090465101 hasConceptScore W2090465101C86803240 @default.
• W2090465101 hasConceptScore W2090465101C88463610 @default.
• W2090465101 hasIssue "3" @default.
• W2090465101 hasLocation W20904651011 @default.
• W2090465101 hasOpenAccess W2090465101 @default.
• W2090465101 hasPrimaryLocation W20904651011 @default.
• W2090465101 hasRelatedWork W1592683135 @default.
• W2090465101 hasRelatedWork W1899429405 @default.
• W2090465101 hasRelatedWork W1973036726 @default.
• W2090465101 hasRelatedWork W2051221975 @default.
• W2090465101 hasRelatedWork W2113937888 @default.
• W2090465101 hasRelatedWork W2119158312 @default.
• W2090465101 hasRelatedWork W2140208577 @default.
• W2090465101 hasRelatedWork W2401903608 @default.
• W2090465101 hasRelatedWork W2995364151 @default.
• W2090465101 hasRelatedWork W797163146 @default.
• W2090465101 hasVolume "184" @default.
• W2090465101 isParatext "false" @default.
• W2090465101 isRetracted "false" @default.
• W2090465101 magId "2090465101" @default.
• W2090465101 workType "article" @default.