FRINK Linked Data Fragments server

Matches in SemOpenAlex for { <https://semopenalex.org/work/W2090563150> ?p ?o ?g. }

• W2090563150 endingPage "543" @default.
• W2090563150 startingPage "537" @default.
• W2090563150 abstract "This study compared the structural integrity and fracture mode of teeth restored with traditionally and minimally prepared resin-bonded CAD/CAM inlays fabricated from the same material.Forty intact maxillary premolars were used and divided into four groups. Two groups were prepared according to a traditional inlay preparation design (2.0 mm occlusal reduction, a 1.5 mm wide proximal box and divergent walls) and two groups were prepared according to a newly proposed minimal preparation design (round shaped cavity with 1.0 mm occlusal reduction, a U-shaped proximal box 1.0 mm wide and parallel walls). Two restorative systems were tested: a composite system comprised of Paradigm MZ100 (3M ESPE) blocks and RelyX Unicem (3M ESPE) resin cement and a ceramic system comprised of ProCAD blocks (Ivoclar-Vivadent) and Variolink II (Ivoclar-Vivadent) resin cement. The inlays were cemented according to the manufacturers' instructions. Each specimen was loaded axially to its occlusal surface at a crosshead speed of 0.5 mm/minute in a universal testing machine until fracture. The fracture load data were analyzed using ANOVA, comparing inlays of the same restorative material. Also, the mode of fracture of the inlays was recorded and analyzed using a non-parametric test (Kruskal-Wallis).In the composite system case, the mean fracture load and SD were 1322 N (+/- 445) for the traditional inlays and 1511 N (+/- 395) for the minimal inlays, while in the ceramic system case, those values were 1135N (+/- 450) for the traditional inlays and 1761 N (+/- 494) for the minimal inlays. Statistical analysis of the results showed that there was no statistically significant difference between the two designs for the composite system, while for the ceramic system, the minimally prepared teeth showed higher mean fracture strength. Non-parametric analysis (Kruskal-Wallis) of the mode of fracture showed that there was no statistically significant difference between traditionally and minimally prepared inlays for both systems (p > .05).Under the conditions of this experimental study, only the ceramic inlays, when prepared with a minimal preparation design, demonstrated a higher fracture strength as compared to the traditionally prepared teeth. Use of the proposed minimal preparation design did not compromise the immediate post-operative structural integrity of teeth restored either with resin composite or ceramic inlays." @default.
• W2090563150 created "2016-06-24" @default.
• W2090563150 creator A5017369257 @default.
• W2090563150 creator A5029605734 @default.
• W2090563150 creator A5083277529 @default.
• W2090563150 creator A5086478105 @default.
• W2090563150 date "2009-09-01" @default.
• W2090563150 modified "2023-09-25" @default.
• W2090563150 title "Fracture Strength of Minimally Prepared Resin Bonded CEREC Inlays" @default.
• W2090563150 cites W1978386463 @default.
• W2090563150 cites W1990262520 @default.
• W2090563150 cites W1998359145 @default.
• W2090563150 cites W1998554753 @default.
• W2090563150 cites W1998975647 @default.
• W2090563150 cites W2006435697 @default.
• W2090563150 cites W2019112366 @default.
• W2090563150 cites W2036770412 @default.
• W2090563150 cites W2039728109 @default.
• W2090563150 cites W2061268176 @default.
• W2090563150 cites W2085545281 @default.
• W2090563150 cites W2088393434 @default.
• W2090563150 cites W2099674125 @default.
• W2090563150 cites W2100226028 @default.
• W2090563150 cites W2117003367 @default.
• W2090563150 cites W2120999486 @default.
• W2090563150 cites W2167535120 @default.
• W2090563150 doi "https://doi.org/10.2341/08-030-l" @default.
• W2090563150 hasPubMedId "https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/19830967" @default.
• W2090563150 hasPublicationYear "2009" @default.
• W2090563150 type Work @default.
• W2090563150 sameAs 2090563150 @default.
• W2090563150 citedByCount "8" @default.
• W2090563150 countsByYear W20905631502012 @default.
• W2090563150 countsByYear W20905631502013 @default.
• W2090563150 countsByYear W20905631502014 @default.
• W2090563150 countsByYear W20905631502015 @default.
• W2090563150 countsByYear W20905631502018 @default.
• W2090563150 countsByYear W20905631502021 @default.
• W2090563150 crossrefType "journal-article" @default.
• W2090563150 hasAuthorship W2090563150A5017369257 @default.
• W2090563150 hasAuthorship W2090563150A5029605734 @default.
• W2090563150 hasAuthorship W2090563150A5083277529 @default.
• W2090563150 hasAuthorship W2090563150A5086478105 @default.
• W2090563150 hasBestOaLocation W20905631501 @default.
• W2090563150 hasConcept C104779481 @default.
• W2090563150 hasConcept C134132462 @default.
• W2090563150 hasConcept C159985019 @default.
• W2090563150 hasConcept C190719290 @default.
• W2090563150 hasConcept C192562407 @default.
• W2090563150 hasConcept C199343813 @default.
• W2090563150 hasConcept C2779890979 @default.
• W2090563150 hasConcept C43369102 @default.
• W2090563150 hasConcept C71924100 @default.
• W2090563150 hasConceptScore W2090563150C104779481 @default.
• W2090563150 hasConceptScore W2090563150C134132462 @default.
• W2090563150 hasConceptScore W2090563150C159985019 @default.
• W2090563150 hasConceptScore W2090563150C190719290 @default.
• W2090563150 hasConceptScore W2090563150C192562407 @default.
• W2090563150 hasConceptScore W2090563150C199343813 @default.
• W2090563150 hasConceptScore W2090563150C2779890979 @default.
• W2090563150 hasConceptScore W2090563150C43369102 @default.
• W2090563150 hasConceptScore W2090563150C71924100 @default.
• W2090563150 hasIssue "5" @default.
• W2090563150 hasLocation W20905631501 @default.
• W2090563150 hasLocation W20905631502 @default.
• W2090563150 hasOpenAccess W2090563150 @default.
• W2090563150 hasPrimaryLocation W20905631501 @default.
• W2090563150 hasRelatedWork W2005496670 @default.
• W2090563150 hasRelatedWork W2030225938 @default.
• W2090563150 hasRelatedWork W2054113325 @default.
• W2090563150 hasRelatedWork W2281145519 @default.
• W2090563150 hasRelatedWork W2351738015 @default.
• W2090563150 hasRelatedWork W2375399966 @default.
• W2090563150 hasRelatedWork W2461684357 @default.
• W2090563150 hasRelatedWork W2473822392 @default.
• W2090563150 hasRelatedWork W3048672776 @default.
• W2090563150 hasRelatedWork W4200082637 @default.
• W2090563150 hasVolume "34" @default.
• W2090563150 isParatext "false" @default.
• W2090563150 isRetracted "false" @default.
• W2090563150 magId "2090563150" @default.
• W2090563150 workType "article" @default.