FRINK Linked Data Fragments server

Matches in SemOpenAlex for { <https://semopenalex.org/work/W2090662015> ?p ?o ?g. }

• W2090662015 endingPage "287" @default.
• W2090662015 startingPage "281" @default.
• W2090662015 abstract "RAND, COLLEEN S. W., JAQUELYN LISS RESNIK, AND ALEX M. C. MACGREGOR. A comparison of body size evaluations of obesity surgery patients and general population adults. Obes Res. Objective: To compare post-operative obesity surgery patients and general population adults in their assessments of a wide range of body sizes. Research Methods and Procedures: Obesity surgery patients (n = 274) and general population adults (n = 326) rated ideal and socially acceptable body sizes in separate arrays of babies, children, young adults, and middle-aged and older adults. Nine line figure drawings ranging from very thin to very obese were rated for each array. Results: Both groups selected the same ideal body size for all arrays except for babies. Both groups rejected obese and very thin body sizes as socially acceptable. However, the obesity surgery patients were more restrictive than general population adults in their ratings of socially acceptable body sizes. Current obesity status did not impact ratings for the patient or general population subjects. In the patient sample, time since surgery did not influence body size evaluations. Discussion: The study of body size ratings limited only to the “ideal” size may be misleading because it may mask subtle but meaningful differences between groups. The consistent difference in more restrictive ratings of obesity surgery patients compared to general population adults may be due to patients' greater psychological investment in endorsing the societal ideal body size. It may also be due to patients' status as peripheral group members of the normal weight community. The inability of some patients to maintain their post-operative weight loss may be particularly problematic for those who have defined “socially acceptable” body size most narrowly." @default.
• W2090662015 created "2016-06-24" @default.
• W2090662015 creator A5017924796 @default.
• W2090662015 creator A5031176727 @default.
• W2090662015 creator A5038685973 @default.
• W2090662015 date "1999-05-01" @default.
• W2090662015 modified "2023-09-25" @default.
• W2090662015 title "A Comparison of Body Size Evaluations of Obesity Surgery Patients and General Population Adults" @default.
• W2090662015 cites W189412010 @default.
• W2090662015 cites W1976126735 @default.
• W2090662015 cites W1993153068 @default.
• W2090662015 cites W2003135144 @default.
• W2090662015 cites W2013431036 @default.
• W2090662015 cites W2022822137 @default.
• W2090662015 cites W2030450440 @default.
• W2090662015 cites W2035068168 @default.
• W2090662015 cites W2036202530 @default.
• W2090662015 cites W2037174611 @default.
• W2090662015 cites W2063438494 @default.
• W2090662015 cites W2065990184 @default.
• W2090662015 cites W2070300171 @default.
• W2090662015 cites W2121598130 @default.
• W2090662015 cites W2125932725 @default.
• W2090662015 cites W2150018649 @default.
• W2090662015 cites W2164300842 @default.
• W2090662015 cites W4233667815 @default.
• W2090662015 cites W4252403025 @default.
• W2090662015 cites W4255650892 @default.
• W2090662015 cites W64977191 @default.
• W2090662015 doi "https://doi.org/10.1002/j.1550-8528.1999.tb00407.x" @default.
• W2090662015 hasPubMedId "https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/10348499" @default.
• W2090662015 hasPublicationYear "1999" @default.
• W2090662015 type Work @default.
• W2090662015 sameAs 2090662015 @default.
• W2090662015 citedByCount "2" @default.
• W2090662015 crossrefType "journal-article" @default.
• W2090662015 hasAuthorship W2090662015A5017924796 @default.
• W2090662015 hasAuthorship W2090662015A5031176727 @default.
• W2090662015 hasAuthorship W2090662015A5038685973 @default.
• W2090662015 hasBestOaLocation W20906620151 @default.
• W2090662015 hasConcept C126322002 @default.
• W2090662015 hasConcept C141071460 @default.
• W2090662015 hasConcept C144024400 @default.
• W2090662015 hasConcept C147583825 @default.
• W2090662015 hasConcept C149923435 @default.
• W2090662015 hasConcept C187212893 @default.
• W2090662015 hasConcept C2908647359 @default.
• W2090662015 hasConcept C511355011 @default.
• W2090662015 hasConcept C71924100 @default.
• W2090662015 hasConcept C99454951 @default.
• W2090662015 hasConceptScore W2090662015C126322002 @default.
• W2090662015 hasConceptScore W2090662015C141071460 @default.
• W2090662015 hasConceptScore W2090662015C144024400 @default.
• W2090662015 hasConceptScore W2090662015C147583825 @default.
• W2090662015 hasConceptScore W2090662015C149923435 @default.
• W2090662015 hasConceptScore W2090662015C187212893 @default.
• W2090662015 hasConceptScore W2090662015C2908647359 @default.
• W2090662015 hasConceptScore W2090662015C511355011 @default.
• W2090662015 hasConceptScore W2090662015C71924100 @default.
• W2090662015 hasConceptScore W2090662015C99454951 @default.
• W2090662015 hasIssue "3" @default.
• W2090662015 hasLocation W20906620151 @default.
• W2090662015 hasLocation W20906620152 @default.
• W2090662015 hasOpenAccess W2090662015 @default.
• W2090662015 hasPrimaryLocation W20906620151 @default.
• W2090662015 hasRelatedWork W1586374228 @default.
• W2090662015 hasRelatedWork W2003938723 @default.
• W2090662015 hasRelatedWork W2047967234 @default.
• W2090662015 hasRelatedWork W2089201504 @default.
• W2090662015 hasRelatedWork W2118496982 @default.
• W2090662015 hasRelatedWork W2364998975 @default.
• W2090662015 hasRelatedWork W2369162477 @default.
• W2090662015 hasRelatedWork W2439875401 @default.
• W2090662015 hasRelatedWork W4238867864 @default.
• W2090662015 hasRelatedWork W2525756941 @default.
• W2090662015 hasVolume "7" @default.
• W2090662015 isParatext "false" @default.
• W2090662015 isRetracted "false" @default.
• W2090662015 magId "2090662015" @default.
• W2090662015 workType "article" @default.