Matches in SemOpenAlex for { <https://semopenalex.org/work/W2090956601> ?p ?o ?g. }
Showing items 1 to 85 of
85
with 100 items per page.
- W2090956601 endingPage "218" @default.
- W2090956601 startingPage "213" @default.
- W2090956601 abstract "The aim of the present study was to evaluate the clinical performance of two types of ceramics: a slurry-powder ceramic (Duceram Plus, Degussa) - D and a hot-pressed leucite-based glass-ceramic (IPS Empress, Ivoclar Vivadent) - IPS. Eighty-six restorations, 44 IPS and 42 D, were made by one operator. A total of 33 onlays and 53 inlays on twenty-seven premolars and 59 molars were cemented in 35 patients of both sexes, mean age 35 years. All restorations were cemented with the dual-resin cement (Variolink, Ivoclar-Vivadent) under rubber dam and were evaluated at the baseline and after six months, using the modified U.S.P.H.S. criteria for postoperative sensitivity, secondary caries, fracture, color match, marginal discoloration, marginal integrity and surface texture. Additionally radiographs and intraoral photographs were carried out. At baseline 86 restorations were analyzed and all of them received Alfa rating, except for the following that received Bravo rating for postoperative sensitivity - IPS (2.27%); D (7.14%); for color match - IPS (2.27%); D (2.38%) and for surface texture - IPS (2.27%); D (11.90%). After 6 months 100% of the restorations were analyzed and the following received Bravo rating: color match - IPS (4.55%) and D (9.52%); surface texture - IPS (2.27%) and D (11.9%); marginal discoloration - IPS (6.82%) and D (4.76%) and marginal integrity - IPS (4.55%) and D (7.14%). The results were submitted to the Fisher and McNemar Statistical Tests. No significant differences were noticed between the two ceramics. Both ceramics demonstrated satisfactory clinical performance after six months." @default.
- W2090956601 created "2016-06-24" @default.
- W2090956601 creator A5002712323 @default.
- W2090956601 creator A5007023367 @default.
- W2090956601 creator A5026445572 @default.
- W2090956601 creator A5026820056 @default.
- W2090956601 creator A5067053187 @default.
- W2090956601 creator A5078539345 @default.
- W2090956601 creator A5079103193 @default.
- W2090956601 date "2004-09-01" @default.
- W2090956601 modified "2023-10-02" @default.
- W2090956601 title "Clinical evaluation of two types of ceramic inlays and onlays after 6 months" @default.
- W2090956601 cites W1807770742 @default.
- W2090956601 cites W2006855310 @default.
- W2090956601 cites W2028462037 @default.
- W2090956601 cites W2054173501 @default.
- W2090956601 cites W2061531288 @default.
- W2090956601 cites W2061617595 @default.
- W2090956601 cites W2062728165 @default.
- W2090956601 cites W2078182963 @default.
- W2090956601 cites W2085732349 @default.
- W2090956601 cites W2089380489 @default.
- W2090956601 cites W2095493736 @default.
- W2090956601 cites W2119842222 @default.
- W2090956601 cites W2123096888 @default.
- W2090956601 cites W2170212910 @default.
- W2090956601 doi "https://doi.org/10.1590/s1678-77572004000300010" @default.
- W2090956601 hasPubMedId "https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/21049255" @default.
- W2090956601 hasPublicationYear "2004" @default.
- W2090956601 type Work @default.
- W2090956601 sameAs 2090956601 @default.
- W2090956601 citedByCount "8" @default.
- W2090956601 countsByYear W20909566012012 @default.
- W2090956601 countsByYear W20909566012013 @default.
- W2090956601 countsByYear W20909566012015 @default.
- W2090956601 countsByYear W20909566012022 @default.
- W2090956601 crossrefType "journal-article" @default.
- W2090956601 hasAuthorship W2090956601A5002712323 @default.
- W2090956601 hasAuthorship W2090956601A5007023367 @default.
- W2090956601 hasAuthorship W2090956601A5026445572 @default.
- W2090956601 hasAuthorship W2090956601A5026820056 @default.
- W2090956601 hasAuthorship W2090956601A5067053187 @default.
- W2090956601 hasAuthorship W2090956601A5078539345 @default.
- W2090956601 hasAuthorship W2090956601A5079103193 @default.
- W2090956601 hasBestOaLocation W20909566011 @default.
- W2090956601 hasConcept C105795698 @default.
- W2090956601 hasConcept C186282968 @default.
- W2090956601 hasConcept C190719290 @default.
- W2090956601 hasConcept C192562407 @default.
- W2090956601 hasConcept C199343813 @default.
- W2090956601 hasConcept C202271784 @default.
- W2090956601 hasConcept C29694066 @default.
- W2090956601 hasConcept C33923547 @default.
- W2090956601 hasConcept C71924100 @default.
- W2090956601 hasConceptScore W2090956601C105795698 @default.
- W2090956601 hasConceptScore W2090956601C186282968 @default.
- W2090956601 hasConceptScore W2090956601C190719290 @default.
- W2090956601 hasConceptScore W2090956601C192562407 @default.
- W2090956601 hasConceptScore W2090956601C199343813 @default.
- W2090956601 hasConceptScore W2090956601C202271784 @default.
- W2090956601 hasConceptScore W2090956601C29694066 @default.
- W2090956601 hasConceptScore W2090956601C33923547 @default.
- W2090956601 hasConceptScore W2090956601C71924100 @default.
- W2090956601 hasIssue "3" @default.
- W2090956601 hasLocation W20909566011 @default.
- W2090956601 hasLocation W20909566012 @default.
- W2090956601 hasOpenAccess W2090956601 @default.
- W2090956601 hasPrimaryLocation W20909566011 @default.
- W2090956601 hasRelatedWork W1986052725 @default.
- W2090956601 hasRelatedWork W1999317855 @default.
- W2090956601 hasRelatedWork W202161368 @default.
- W2090956601 hasRelatedWork W2139397975 @default.
- W2090956601 hasRelatedWork W2370041310 @default.
- W2090956601 hasRelatedWork W2396506784 @default.
- W2090956601 hasRelatedWork W2416406309 @default.
- W2090956601 hasRelatedWork W2416670673 @default.
- W2090956601 hasRelatedWork W2624312981 @default.
- W2090956601 hasRelatedWork W2753395725 @default.
- W2090956601 hasVolume "12" @default.
- W2090956601 isParatext "false" @default.
- W2090956601 isRetracted "false" @default.
- W2090956601 magId "2090956601" @default.
- W2090956601 workType "article" @default.