FRINK Linked Data Fragments server

Matches in SemOpenAlex for { <https://semopenalex.org/work/W2091289222> ?p ?o ?g. }

• W2091289222 endingPage "695" @default.
• W2091289222 startingPage "690" @default.
• W2091289222 abstract "In Brief Objective: Laparoscopic sleeve gastrectomy (LSG) has been proposed as an effective alternative to the current standard procedure, laparoscopic Roux-en-Y gastric bypass (LRYGB). Prospective data comparing both procedures are rare. Therefore, we performed a randomized clinical trial assessing the effectiveness and safety of these 2 operative techniques. Methods: Two hundred seventeen patients were randomized at 4 bariatric centers in Switzerland. One hundred seven patients underwent LSG using a 35-F bougie with suturing of the stapler line, and 110 patients underwent LRYGB with a 150-cm antecolic alimentary and a 50-cm biliopancreatic limb. The mean body mass index of all patients was 44 ± 11.1 kg/m2, the mean age was 43 ± 5.3 years, and 72% were female. Results: The 2 groups were similar in terms of body mass index, age, sex, comorbidities, and eating behavior. The mean operative time was less for LSG than for LRYGB (87 ± 52.3 minutes vs 108 ± 42.3 minutes; P = 0.003). The conversion rate was 0.9% in both groups. Complications (<30 days) occurred more often in LRYGB than in LSG (17.2% vs 8.4%; P = 0.067). However, the difference in severe complications did not reach statistical significance (4.5% for LRYGB vs 1% for LSG; P = 0.21). Excessive body mass index loss 1 year after the operation was similar between the 2 groups (72.3% ± 22% for LSG and 76.6% ± 21% for LRYGB; P = 0.2). Except for gastroesophageal reflux disease, which showed a higher resolution rate after LRYGB, the comorbidities and quality of life were significantly improved after both procedures. Conclusions: LSG was associated with shorter operation time and a trend toward fewer complications than with LRYGB. Both procedures were almost equally efficient regarding weight loss, improvement of comorbidities, and quality of life 1 year after surgery. Long-term follow-up data are needed to confirm these facts. We performed a randomized clinical trial assessing the effectiveness and safety of laparoscopic sleeve gastrectomy (LSG) and Roux-en-Y gastric bypass (LRYGB). A total of 107 patients underwent LSG and 110 patients underwent LRYGB. The operative time was less for LSG than for LRYGB (87 ± 52.3 minutes vs 108 ± 42.3 minutes; P = 0.003). We observed a trend toward more early complications in LRYGB than in LSG (17.2% vs 8.4%; P = 0.067). Excessive body mass index loss 1 year after the operation was similar (72.3% ± 22% for LSG and 76.6% ± 21% for LRYGB). The comorbidities and quality of life were significantly improved by both procedures." @default.
• W2091289222 created "2016-06-24" @default.
• W2091289222 creator A5001313198 @default.
• W2091289222 creator A5042127721 @default.
• W2091289222 creator A5059202204 @default.
• W2091289222 creator A5060967018 @default.
• W2091289222 creator A5067930394 @default.
• W2091289222 creator A5068934752 @default.
• W2091289222 creator A5073266858 @default.
• W2091289222 creator A5082003387 @default.
• W2091289222 creator A5086430752 @default.
• W2091289222 creator A5089112671 @default.
• W2091289222 date "2013-11-01" @default.
• W2091289222 modified "2023-10-11" @default.
• W2091289222 title "Early Results of the Swiss Multicentre Bypass or Sleeve Study (SM-BOSS)" @default.
• W2091289222 cites W1558000543 @default.
• W2091289222 cites W1973830430 @default.
• W2091289222 cites W1996281935 @default.
• W2091289222 cites W2000598831 @default.
• W2091289222 cites W2005230264 @default.
• W2091289222 cites W2022282990 @default.
• W2091289222 cites W2024559370 @default.
• W2091289222 cites W2029346223 @default.
• W2091289222 cites W2036951488 @default.
• W2091289222 cites W2037854161 @default.
• W2091289222 cites W2053835275 @default.
• W2091289222 cites W2055711839 @default.
• W2091289222 cites W2075383821 @default.
• W2091289222 cites W2081698798 @default.
• W2091289222 cites W2084614807 @default.
• W2091289222 cites W2088495732 @default.
• W2091289222 cites W2092482018 @default.
• W2091289222 cites W2092799121 @default.
• W2091289222 cites W2096998881 @default.
• W2091289222 cites W2101316711 @default.
• W2091289222 cites W2105725047 @default.
• W2091289222 cites W2110791445 @default.
• W2091289222 cites W2113318243 @default.
• W2091289222 cites W2144631980 @default.
• W2091289222 cites W2161896289 @default.
• W2091289222 cites W2163972956 @default.
• W2091289222 cites W2918121883 @default.
• W2091289222 cites W4245457490 @default.
• W2091289222 doi "https://doi.org/10.1097/sla.0b013e3182a67426" @default.
• W2091289222 hasPubMedCentralId "https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/3888472" @default.
• W2091289222 hasPubMedId "https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/23989054" @default.
• W2091289222 hasPublicationYear "2013" @default.
• W2091289222 type Work @default.
• W2091289222 sameAs 2091289222 @default.
• W2091289222 citedByCount "298" @default.
• W2091289222 countsByYear W20912892222013 @default.
• W2091289222 countsByYear W20912892222014 @default.
• W2091289222 countsByYear W20912892222015 @default.
• W2091289222 countsByYear W20912892222016 @default.
• W2091289222 countsByYear W20912892222017 @default.
• W2091289222 countsByYear W20912892222018 @default.
• W2091289222 countsByYear W20912892222019 @default.
• W2091289222 countsByYear W20912892222020 @default.
• W2091289222 countsByYear W20912892222021 @default.
• W2091289222 countsByYear W20912892222022 @default.
• W2091289222 countsByYear W20912892222023 @default.
• W2091289222 crossrefType "journal-article" @default.
• W2091289222 hasAuthorship W2091289222A5001313198 @default.
• W2091289222 hasAuthorship W2091289222A5042127721 @default.
• W2091289222 hasAuthorship W2091289222A5059202204 @default.
• W2091289222 hasAuthorship W2091289222A5060967018 @default.
• W2091289222 hasAuthorship W2091289222A5067930394 @default.
• W2091289222 hasAuthorship W2091289222A5068934752 @default.
• W2091289222 hasAuthorship W2091289222A5073266858 @default.
• W2091289222 hasAuthorship W2091289222A5082003387 @default.
• W2091289222 hasAuthorship W2091289222A5086430752 @default.
• W2091289222 hasAuthorship W2091289222A5089112671 @default.
• W2091289222 hasBestOaLocation W20912892221 @default.
• W2091289222 hasConcept C126322002 @default.
• W2091289222 hasConcept C136269033 @default.
• W2091289222 hasConcept C141071460 @default.
• W2091289222 hasConcept C168563851 @default.
• W2091289222 hasConcept C188816634 @default.
• W2091289222 hasConcept C2776266264 @default.
• W2091289222 hasConcept C2778586554 @default.
• W2091289222 hasConcept C2779134260 @default.
• W2091289222 hasConcept C2780221984 @default.
• W2091289222 hasConcept C3019402062 @default.
• W2091289222 hasConcept C43270747 @default.
• W2091289222 hasConcept C511355011 @default.
• W2091289222 hasConcept C544821477 @default.
• W2091289222 hasConcept C71924100 @default.
• W2091289222 hasConceptScore W2091289222C126322002 @default.
• W2091289222 hasConceptScore W2091289222C136269033 @default.
• W2091289222 hasConceptScore W2091289222C141071460 @default.
• W2091289222 hasConceptScore W2091289222C168563851 @default.
• W2091289222 hasConceptScore W2091289222C188816634 @default.
• W2091289222 hasConceptScore W2091289222C2776266264 @default.
• W2091289222 hasConceptScore W2091289222C2778586554 @default.
• W2091289222 hasConceptScore W2091289222C2779134260 @default.
• W2091289222 hasConceptScore W2091289222C2780221984 @default.
• W2091289222 hasConceptScore W2091289222C3019402062 @default.
• W2091289222 hasConceptScore W2091289222C43270747 @default.

• next