Matches in SemOpenAlex for { <https://semopenalex.org/work/W2091650408> ?p ?o ?g. }
Showing items 1 to 68 of
68
with 100 items per page.
- W2091650408 endingPage "170" @default.
- W2091650408 startingPage "157" @default.
- W2091650408 abstract "In recent years the idea has caught on that the speech sound should no longer be regarded as the smallest unit of phonetic analysis but should instead be replaced by the feature. A speech sound may be regarded as a set of features, each related to some accepted parameter of speech (either articulatorg or acoustic), such as voicing or stridency. Phonetic features have generated a great deal of interest among linguists, psycholinguists, psychophysicists, researchers in speech perception and speech production, and speech and language pathologists. The feature concept has also generated its share of controversy. Speech scientists have criticized linguists for failing to incorporate correctly the findings of experimental phonetics into their theories (Lisker and Abramson, 1971), while linguists have criticized phoneticians for failing to recognize the abstract nature of phonological descriptions. Postal (quoted in Chomsky and Halle, 1968, p. 293) says: “The phonetic transcription is the most gross and superficial aspect of linguistic structure. It is the most important but far from the only parameter determining the actual acoustic shape of the tokens of the sentence.” While emphasizing the abstractness of linguistic constructs such as features and phonetic transcriptions, the claim is also made that these constructs have an immediate relevance to the linguistic performance of human beings: “The total set of features is identical with the set of phonetic properties that can in principle be controlled in speech; they represent the phonetic capabilities of man” (Chomsky and Halle, 1968, p. 294-295). While most researchers in speech and language pathology have found a feature framework valuable as a descriptive and even as a therapeutic tool (Menyuk, 1968; McReynolds and Huston, 1971; McReynolds and Bennett, 1972; Pollack and Rees, 1972), it has come under attack by Walsh (1974). Walsh’s position seems to be that since the constructs of linguistics do not correspond to physical reality, they are of no value to the investigator of speech phenomena. Walsh apparently believes" @default.
- W2091650408 created "2016-06-24" @default.
- W2091650408 creator A5075061732 @default.
- W2091650408 date "1975-06-01" @default.
- W2091650408 modified "2023-09-26" @default.
- W2091650408 title "Phonetic feature theory: The linguist, the speech scientist and the speech pathologist" @default.
- W2091650408 cites W1598851216 @default.
- W2091650408 cites W1817406370 @default.
- W2091650408 cites W1970533835 @default.
- W2091650408 cites W1980792269 @default.
- W2091650408 cites W1991772897 @default.
- W2091650408 cites W1997927909 @default.
- W2091650408 cites W2006527162 @default.
- W2091650408 cites W2018970329 @default.
- W2091650408 cites W2026153304 @default.
- W2091650408 cites W2027399045 @default.
- W2091650408 cites W2034547827 @default.
- W2091650408 cites W2038007203 @default.
- W2091650408 cites W2040315727 @default.
- W2091650408 cites W2051799897 @default.
- W2091650408 cites W2064543931 @default.
- W2091650408 cites W2095011129 @default.
- W2091650408 cites W2329863231 @default.
- W2091650408 cites W2478617467 @default.
- W2091650408 doi "https://doi.org/10.1016/0021-9924(75)90007-6" @default.
- W2091650408 hasPubMedId "https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/803159" @default.
- W2091650408 hasPublicationYear "1975" @default.
- W2091650408 type Work @default.
- W2091650408 sameAs 2091650408 @default.
- W2091650408 citedByCount "2" @default.
- W2091650408 crossrefType "journal-article" @default.
- W2091650408 hasAuthorship W2091650408A5075061732 @default.
- W2091650408 hasConcept C138885662 @default.
- W2091650408 hasConcept C15744967 @default.
- W2091650408 hasConcept C2776401178 @default.
- W2091650408 hasConcept C37692320 @default.
- W2091650408 hasConcept C41895202 @default.
- W2091650408 hasConcept C548259974 @default.
- W2091650408 hasConcept C71924100 @default.
- W2091650408 hasConceptScore W2091650408C138885662 @default.
- W2091650408 hasConceptScore W2091650408C15744967 @default.
- W2091650408 hasConceptScore W2091650408C2776401178 @default.
- W2091650408 hasConceptScore W2091650408C37692320 @default.
- W2091650408 hasConceptScore W2091650408C41895202 @default.
- W2091650408 hasConceptScore W2091650408C548259974 @default.
- W2091650408 hasConceptScore W2091650408C71924100 @default.
- W2091650408 hasIssue "2" @default.
- W2091650408 hasLocation W20916504081 @default.
- W2091650408 hasLocation W20916504082 @default.
- W2091650408 hasOpenAccess W2091650408 @default.
- W2091650408 hasPrimaryLocation W20916504081 @default.
- W2091650408 hasRelatedWork W1979546583 @default.
- W2091650408 hasRelatedWork W1982543424 @default.
- W2091650408 hasRelatedWork W2032232147 @default.
- W2091650408 hasRelatedWork W2088071636 @default.
- W2091650408 hasRelatedWork W2126243282 @default.
- W2091650408 hasRelatedWork W2668515523 @default.
- W2091650408 hasRelatedWork W2743000573 @default.
- W2091650408 hasRelatedWork W2798073561 @default.
- W2091650408 hasRelatedWork W4253407201 @default.
- W2091650408 hasRelatedWork W607457356 @default.
- W2091650408 hasVolume "8" @default.
- W2091650408 isParatext "false" @default.
- W2091650408 isRetracted "false" @default.
- W2091650408 magId "2091650408" @default.
- W2091650408 workType "article" @default.