FRINK Linked Data Fragments server

Matches in SemOpenAlex for { <https://semopenalex.org/work/W2092253752> ?p ?o ?g. }

• W2092253752 endingPage "1710" @default.
• W2092253752 startingPage "1702" @default.
• W2092253752 abstract "Objective To assess the current state of electronic health record (EHR) use by ophthalmologists, including adoption rate, user satisfaction, functionality, benefits, barriers, and knowledge of meaningful use criteria. Design Population-based, cross-sectional study. Participants A total of 492 members of the American Academy of Ophthalmology (AAO). Methods A random sample of 1500 AAO members were selected on the basis of their practice location and solicited to participate in a study of EHR use, practice management, and image management system use. Participants completed the survey via the Internet, phone, or fax. The survey included questions about the adoption of EHRs, available functionality, benefits, barriers, satisfaction, and understanding of meaningful use criteria and health information technology concepts. Main Outcome Measures Current adoption rate of EHRs, user satisfaction, benefits and barriers, and availability of EHR functionality. Results Overall, 32% of the practices surveyed had already implemented an EHR, 15% had implemented an EHR for some of their physicians or were in the process of implementation, and another 31% had plans to do so within 2 years. Among those with an EHR in their practice, 49% were satisfied or extremely satisfied with their system, 42% reported increased or stable overall productivity, 19% reported decreased or stable overall costs, and 55% would recommend an EHR to a fellow ophthalmologist. For those with an electronic image management system, only 15% had all devices integrated, 33% had images directly uploaded into their system, and 12% had electronic association of patient demographics with the image. Conclusions The adoption of EHRs by ophthalmology practices more than doubled from 2007 to 2011. The satisfaction of ophthalmologists with their EHR and their perception of beneficial effects on productivity and costs were all lower in 2011 than in 2007. Knowledge about meaningful use is high, but the percentage of physicians actually receiving incentive payments is relatively low. Given the importance of imaging in ophthalmology, the shortcomings in current image management systems need to be addressed. Financial Disclosure(s) The author(s) have no proprietary or commercial interest in any materials discussed in this article. To assess the current state of electronic health record (EHR) use by ophthalmologists, including adoption rate, user satisfaction, functionality, benefits, barriers, and knowledge of meaningful use criteria. Population-based, cross-sectional study. A total of 492 members of the American Academy of Ophthalmology (AAO). A random sample of 1500 AAO members were selected on the basis of their practice location and solicited to participate in a study of EHR use, practice management, and image management system use. Participants completed the survey via the Internet, phone, or fax. The survey included questions about the adoption of EHRs, available functionality, benefits, barriers, satisfaction, and understanding of meaningful use criteria and health information technology concepts. Current adoption rate of EHRs, user satisfaction, benefits and barriers, and availability of EHR functionality. Overall, 32% of the practices surveyed had already implemented an EHR, 15% had implemented an EHR for some of their physicians or were in the process of implementation, and another 31% had plans to do so within 2 years. Among those with an EHR in their practice, 49% were satisfied or extremely satisfied with their system, 42% reported increased or stable overall productivity, 19% reported decreased or stable overall costs, and 55% would recommend an EHR to a fellow ophthalmologist. For those with an electronic image management system, only 15% had all devices integrated, 33% had images directly uploaded into their system, and 12% had electronic association of patient demographics with the image. The adoption of EHRs by ophthalmology practices more than doubled from 2007 to 2011. The satisfaction of ophthalmologists with their EHR and their perception of beneficial effects on productivity and costs were all lower in 2011 than in 2007. Knowledge about meaningful use is high, but the percentage of physicians actually receiving incentive payments is relatively low. Given the importance of imaging in ophthalmology, the shortcomings in current image management systems need to be addressed." @default.
• W2092253752 created "2016-06-24" @default.
• W2092253752 creator A5007666642 @default.
• W2092253752 creator A5025094935 @default.
• W2092253752 creator A5032325357 @default.
• W2092253752 creator A5054028651 @default.
• W2092253752 creator A5058348644 @default.
• W2092253752 creator A5070959753 @default.
• W2092253752 creator A5071664471 @default.
• W2092253752 creator A5085382539 @default.
• W2092253752 date "2013-08-01" @default.
• W2092253752 modified "2023-09-29" @default.
• W2092253752 title "Adoption of Electronic Health Records and Preparations for Demonstrating Meaningful Use" @default.
• W2092253752 cites W1963918827 @default.
• W2092253752 cites W2000352018 @default.
• W2092253752 cites W2054370988 @default.
• W2092253752 cites W2072118644 @default.
• W2092253752 cites W2100711705 @default.
• W2092253752 cites W2104026855 @default.
• W2092253752 cites W2150217040 @default.
• W2092253752 doi "https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ophtha.2013.04.029" @default.
• W2092253752 hasPubMedId "https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/23806425" @default.
• W2092253752 hasPublicationYear "2013" @default.
• W2092253752 type Work @default.
• W2092253752 sameAs 2092253752 @default.
• W2092253752 citedByCount "46" @default.
• W2092253752 countsByYear W20922537522014 @default.
• W2092253752 countsByYear W20922537522015 @default.
• W2092253752 countsByYear W20922537522016 @default.
• W2092253752 countsByYear W20922537522017 @default.
• W2092253752 countsByYear W20922537522018 @default.
• W2092253752 countsByYear W20922537522019 @default.
• W2092253752 countsByYear W20922537522020 @default.
• W2092253752 countsByYear W20922537522021 @default.
• W2092253752 countsByYear W20922537522023 @default.
• W2092253752 crossrefType "journal-article" @default.
• W2092253752 hasAuthorship W2092253752A5007666642 @default.
• W2092253752 hasAuthorship W2092253752A5025094935 @default.
• W2092253752 hasAuthorship W2092253752A5032325357 @default.
• W2092253752 hasAuthorship W2092253752A5054028651 @default.
• W2092253752 hasAuthorship W2092253752A5058348644 @default.
• W2092253752 hasAuthorship W2092253752A5070959753 @default.
• W2092253752 hasAuthorship W2092253752A5071664471 @default.
• W2092253752 hasAuthorship W2092253752A5085382539 @default.
• W2092253752 hasConcept C110875604 @default.
• W2092253752 hasConcept C136764020 @default.
• W2092253752 hasConcept C138885662 @default.
• W2092253752 hasConcept C159110408 @default.
• W2092253752 hasConcept C160735492 @default.
• W2092253752 hasConcept C162324750 @default.
• W2092253752 hasConcept C2776354556 @default.
• W2092253752 hasConcept C2778707766 @default.
• W2092253752 hasConcept C3019659195 @default.
• W2092253752 hasConcept C3020144179 @default.
• W2092253752 hasConcept C41008148 @default.
• W2092253752 hasConcept C41895202 @default.
• W2092253752 hasConcept C50522688 @default.
• W2092253752 hasConcept C509550671 @default.
• W2092253752 hasConcept C512399662 @default.
• W2092253752 hasConcept C71901391 @default.
• W2092253752 hasConcept C71924100 @default.
• W2092253752 hasConceptScore W2092253752C110875604 @default.
• W2092253752 hasConceptScore W2092253752C136764020 @default.
• W2092253752 hasConceptScore W2092253752C138885662 @default.
• W2092253752 hasConceptScore W2092253752C159110408 @default.
• W2092253752 hasConceptScore W2092253752C160735492 @default.
• W2092253752 hasConceptScore W2092253752C162324750 @default.
• W2092253752 hasConceptScore W2092253752C2776354556 @default.
• W2092253752 hasConceptScore W2092253752C2778707766 @default.
• W2092253752 hasConceptScore W2092253752C3019659195 @default.
• W2092253752 hasConceptScore W2092253752C3020144179 @default.
• W2092253752 hasConceptScore W2092253752C41008148 @default.
• W2092253752 hasConceptScore W2092253752C41895202 @default.
• W2092253752 hasConceptScore W2092253752C50522688 @default.
• W2092253752 hasConceptScore W2092253752C509550671 @default.
• W2092253752 hasConceptScore W2092253752C512399662 @default.
• W2092253752 hasConceptScore W2092253752C71901391 @default.
• W2092253752 hasConceptScore W2092253752C71924100 @default.
• W2092253752 hasIssue "8" @default.
• W2092253752 hasLocation W20922537521 @default.
• W2092253752 hasLocation W20922537522 @default.
• W2092253752 hasOpenAccess W2092253752 @default.
• W2092253752 hasPrimaryLocation W20922537521 @default.
• W2092253752 hasRelatedWork W1641026212 @default.
• W2092253752 hasRelatedWork W1967428313 @default.
• W2092253752 hasRelatedWork W2001175314 @default.
• W2092253752 hasRelatedWork W2037817819 @default.
• W2092253752 hasRelatedWork W2049073175 @default.
• W2092253752 hasRelatedWork W2290173036 @default.
• W2092253752 hasRelatedWork W4206221372 @default.
• W2092253752 hasRelatedWork W9475614 @default.
• W2092253752 hasRelatedWork W1484434731 @default.
• W2092253752 hasRelatedWork W2241025436 @default.
• W2092253752 hasVolume "120" @default.
• W2092253752 isParatext "false" @default.
• W2092253752 isRetracted "false" @default.
• W2092253752 magId "2092253752" @default.
• W2092253752 workType "article" @default.