Matches in SemOpenAlex for { <https://semopenalex.org/work/W2092301799> ?p ?o ?g. }
Showing items 1 to 98 of
98
with 100 items per page.
- W2092301799 endingPage "302" @default.
- W2092301799 startingPage "279" @default.
- W2092301799 abstract "The Junior Literary Guild and the Child Reader as Citizen Anne Morey (bio) The study of American children’s literature has recently turned toward institutional histories of editing, publishing, and distribution, represented by Leonard S. Marcus’s Minders of Make-Believe (2008) and Jacalyn Eddy’s Bookwomen: Creating an Empire in Children’s Book Publishing, 1919–1939 (2006).1 Notably, neither of these good accounts discusses the Junior Literary Guild (JLG), the most important children’s book club from its founding in 1929 until the mid-1950s, when it turned its attention to serving libraries. The purpose of the present essay is to introduce the JLG into institutional histories of children’s literature and to situate it within the social concerns of the afterglow of the Progressive Era. While the JLG was successful at developing and maintaining a constituency for its wares partly because it addressed structural weaknesses in distribution within children’s publishing, it also negotiated and often reconciled an array of contradictory ways of framing the child reader as potential citizen. At a time when parental and institutional control of children’s cultural consumption was in flux owing to new standards of child rearing and the appearance of new media that threatened reading’s centrality, the JLG suggested how institutional control might foster reading as preparation for citizenship in a democracy by addressing such questions as the following: Is the reader solitary or part of a community? Should children exercise choice in their reading or should it be exercised for them? Should children read at will and primarily for pleasure, or is reading best understood, in the language of the day, to be personally or socially hygienic in some fashion? The JLG constructed a board of selectors and an advertising rhetoric that allowed it to insinuate itself between parents and children on the one hand and the newly professionalized supervisors of children’s reading—librarians—and their clientele on the other. We might expect the commercialization of expertise to arouse opposition from constituencies [End Page 279] whose power it diminishes, but it does not seem to have done so in this case because the JLG interpolated a proxy for the parental or professional guide to children’s reading within its business model, effectively planting a child welfare expert in the heart of commercial publishing in a way that did not produce objection. It prepared the ground for this intercession through advertising that played upon late Progressive Era fears of both inadequate parental expertise and excessive parental emotional involvement in children’s development. Despite book clubs’ reputations for debasing taste and annihilating choice, the JLG developed bona fides as a promoter of young citizen readers because it urged participation in the community it constructed as an accessible means of inducing children to read good books. Because—unlike other book clubs—the JLG did not offer subscribers individual choice, it instead emphasized membership in the community it fabricated and in the subcommunities established by the child’s age and gender, since books were sent to subscribers based on the cohort to which they belonged. In stressing the importance of cooperating with the judges’ enterprise, it diminished the potential for rejection of its project as crassly commercial by suggesting that it trained children to become agents of their own destiny in ways other than by selecting their own reading. The club selections might not yet reflect the child reader’s taste, but participation in its community nonetheless prepared the child for citizenship because the judges were to be understood as experts in the most up-to-date child guidance theory, which would result in the most morally and intellectually healthy adult.2 Personnel Once the Book-of-the-Month Club was founded in 1926, the idea of developing a similar organization for children suggested itself more or less immediately, with the Junior Monthly Book Service coming into being that year. It was joined by imitators such as the Junior Book Club, the Children’s Book Club, Selected Books for Juniors, and the Early Years Book Club, all founded no later than the beginning of 1929. Clearly, the existence of five book clubs aimed at children indicated a perception of a market..." @default.
- W2092301799 created "2016-06-24" @default.
- W2092301799 creator A5009678895 @default.
- W2092301799 date "2014-01-01" @default.
- W2092301799 modified "2023-09-26" @default.
- W2092301799 title "The Junior Literary Guild and the Child Reader as Citizen" @default.
- W2092301799 cites W1481170295 @default.
- W2092301799 cites W1525871378 @default.
- W2092301799 cites W1526625489 @default.
- W2092301799 cites W1586020166 @default.
- W2092301799 cites W1965680285 @default.
- W2092301799 cites W1971195781 @default.
- W2092301799 cites W2046423678 @default.
- W2092301799 cites W2122565761 @default.
- W2092301799 cites W219180701 @default.
- W2092301799 cites W2256856045 @default.
- W2092301799 cites W254690152 @default.
- W2092301799 cites W2890221567 @default.
- W2092301799 cites W46737839 @default.
- W2092301799 cites W561620757 @default.
- W2092301799 cites W574304213 @default.
- W2092301799 cites W578899723 @default.
- W2092301799 cites W586804684 @default.
- W2092301799 cites W586856759 @default.
- W2092301799 cites W587959146 @default.
- W2092301799 cites W624390545 @default.
- W2092301799 cites W632461873 @default.
- W2092301799 cites W648123761 @default.
- W2092301799 cites W649220149 @default.
- W2092301799 cites W649390973 @default.
- W2092301799 cites W659030687 @default.
- W2092301799 cites W945755743 @default.
- W2092301799 doi "https://doi.org/10.1353/uni.2014.0038" @default.
- W2092301799 hasPublicationYear "2014" @default.
- W2092301799 type Work @default.
- W2092301799 sameAs 2092301799 @default.
- W2092301799 citedByCount "0" @default.
- W2092301799 crossrefType "journal-article" @default.
- W2092301799 hasAuthorship W2092301799A5009678895 @default.
- W2092301799 hasConcept C105702510 @default.
- W2092301799 hasConcept C144024400 @default.
- W2092301799 hasConcept C151719136 @default.
- W2092301799 hasConcept C166957645 @default.
- W2092301799 hasConcept C169087156 @default.
- W2092301799 hasConcept C17744445 @default.
- W2092301799 hasConcept C185933670 @default.
- W2092301799 hasConcept C18903297 @default.
- W2092301799 hasConcept C199539241 @default.
- W2092301799 hasConcept C2776459890 @default.
- W2092301799 hasConcept C2780781376 @default.
- W2092301799 hasConcept C29595303 @default.
- W2092301799 hasConcept C554936623 @default.
- W2092301799 hasConcept C555826173 @default.
- W2092301799 hasConcept C61790302 @default.
- W2092301799 hasConcept C71924100 @default.
- W2092301799 hasConcept C86803240 @default.
- W2092301799 hasConcept C94625758 @default.
- W2092301799 hasConcept C95457728 @default.
- W2092301799 hasConceptScore W2092301799C105702510 @default.
- W2092301799 hasConceptScore W2092301799C144024400 @default.
- W2092301799 hasConceptScore W2092301799C151719136 @default.
- W2092301799 hasConceptScore W2092301799C166957645 @default.
- W2092301799 hasConceptScore W2092301799C169087156 @default.
- W2092301799 hasConceptScore W2092301799C17744445 @default.
- W2092301799 hasConceptScore W2092301799C185933670 @default.
- W2092301799 hasConceptScore W2092301799C18903297 @default.
- W2092301799 hasConceptScore W2092301799C199539241 @default.
- W2092301799 hasConceptScore W2092301799C2776459890 @default.
- W2092301799 hasConceptScore W2092301799C2780781376 @default.
- W2092301799 hasConceptScore W2092301799C29595303 @default.
- W2092301799 hasConceptScore W2092301799C554936623 @default.
- W2092301799 hasConceptScore W2092301799C555826173 @default.
- W2092301799 hasConceptScore W2092301799C61790302 @default.
- W2092301799 hasConceptScore W2092301799C71924100 @default.
- W2092301799 hasConceptScore W2092301799C86803240 @default.
- W2092301799 hasConceptScore W2092301799C94625758 @default.
- W2092301799 hasConceptScore W2092301799C95457728 @default.
- W2092301799 hasIssue "3" @default.
- W2092301799 hasLocation W20923017991 @default.
- W2092301799 hasOpenAccess W2092301799 @default.
- W2092301799 hasPrimaryLocation W20923017991 @default.
- W2092301799 hasRelatedWork W2018583342 @default.
- W2092301799 hasRelatedWork W2145705539 @default.
- W2092301799 hasRelatedWork W2298369929 @default.
- W2092301799 hasRelatedWork W2299611660 @default.
- W2092301799 hasRelatedWork W2531486936 @default.
- W2092301799 hasRelatedWork W2594727417 @default.
- W2092301799 hasRelatedWork W2596660600 @default.
- W2092301799 hasRelatedWork W2740043604 @default.
- W2092301799 hasRelatedWork W2765112357 @default.
- W2092301799 hasRelatedWork W2993502333 @default.
- W2092301799 hasVolume "38" @default.
- W2092301799 isParatext "false" @default.
- W2092301799 isRetracted "false" @default.
- W2092301799 magId "2092301799" @default.
- W2092301799 workType "article" @default.