FRINK Linked Data Fragments server

Matches in SemOpenAlex for { <https://semopenalex.org/work/W2092509460> ?p ?o ?g. }

• W2092509460 endingPage "12" @default.
• W2092509460 startingPage "4" @default.
• W2092509460 abstract "Objectives We sought to compare the diagnostic performance of 3-dimensional (3D) versus 2-dimensional (2D) echocardiography in patients with regurgitant mitral valve. Background An accurate assessment of morphology and function of the mitral valve is essential for surgical repair. Two-dimensional echocardiography has certain spatial limitations that could be overcome by 3D imaging. Methods Preoperative transesophageal 2D and 3D studies were compared with surgical findings in patients undergoing surgical repair for severe mitral regurgitation. Results A total of 81 consecutive patients underwent surgical repair (2002-2004). There was a high concordance (88%-100%) between both 2D and 3D studies and surgical findings in classification of involved segments. 3D imaging more accurately classified A1 segment defects (P = .05) and commissural dysfunction (P = .02). The 2D study incorrectly classified 22 segments, mainly corresponding to complex disease. The 3D study incorrectly classified 14 segments, unrelated to complex disease. Good agreement (94%, κ 0.845) was found between nonexpert and expert interpretations of 3D images. Conclusions Three-dimensional echocardiography offers high accuracy in mitral valve evaluation. It may complement 2D study in patients with complex valve anatomy, where surgical decisions are more difficult. The images can be easily interpreted by professionals without a high degree of experience. We sought to compare the diagnostic performance of 3-dimensional (3D) versus 2-dimensional (2D) echocardiography in patients with regurgitant mitral valve. An accurate assessment of morphology and function of the mitral valve is essential for surgical repair. Two-dimensional echocardiography has certain spatial limitations that could be overcome by 3D imaging. Preoperative transesophageal 2D and 3D studies were compared with surgical findings in patients undergoing surgical repair for severe mitral regurgitation. A total of 81 consecutive patients underwent surgical repair (2002-2004). There was a high concordance (88%-100%) between both 2D and 3D studies and surgical findings in classification of involved segments. 3D imaging more accurately classified A1 segment defects (P = .05) and commissural dysfunction (P = .02). The 2D study incorrectly classified 22 segments, mainly corresponding to complex disease. The 3D study incorrectly classified 14 segments, unrelated to complex disease. Good agreement (94%, κ 0.845) was found between nonexpert and expert interpretations of 3D images. Three-dimensional echocardiography offers high accuracy in mitral valve evaluation. It may complement 2D study in patients with complex valve anatomy, where surgical decisions are more difficult. The images can be easily interpreted by professionals without a high degree of experience." @default.
• W2092509460 created "2016-06-24" @default.
• W2092509460 creator A5009013844 @default.
• W2092509460 creator A5009506930 @default.
• W2092509460 creator A5014926566 @default.
• W2092509460 creator A5025005522 @default.
• W2092509460 creator A5044004515 @default.
• W2092509460 creator A5051192379 @default.
• W2092509460 creator A5066475377 @default.
• W2092509460 creator A5068271656 @default.
• W2092509460 creator A5075020050 @default.
• W2092509460 date "2007-01-01" @default.
• W2092509460 modified "2023-10-18" @default.
• W2092509460 title "Three-dimensional Versus Two-dimensional Transesophageal Echocardiography in Mitral Valve Repair" @default.
• W2092509460 cites W1890768807 @default.
• W2092509460 cites W2001028885 @default.
• W2092509460 cites W2011832746 @default.
• W2092509460 cites W2027750277 @default.
• W2092509460 cites W2035223363 @default.
• W2092509460 cites W2041058171 @default.
• W2092509460 cites W2049493294 @default.
• W2092509460 cites W2054650814 @default.
• W2092509460 cites W2055318780 @default.
• W2092509460 cites W2080750513 @default.
• W2092509460 cites W2083823009 @default.
• W2092509460 cites W2104724093 @default.
• W2092509460 cites W2112791501 @default.
• W2092509460 cites W2128830302 @default.
• W2092509460 cites W2141093748 @default.
• W2092509460 cites W2149235601 @default.
• W2092509460 cites W2163740518 @default.
• W2092509460 cites W4238261964 @default.
• W2092509460 doi "https://doi.org/10.1016/j.echo.2006.07.005" @default.
• W2092509460 hasPubMedId "https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/17218196" @default.
• W2092509460 hasPublicationYear "2007" @default.
• W2092509460 type Work @default.
• W2092509460 sameAs 2092509460 @default.
• W2092509460 citedByCount "81" @default.
• W2092509460 countsByYear W20925094602012 @default.
• W2092509460 countsByYear W20925094602013 @default.
• W2092509460 countsByYear W20925094602014 @default.
• W2092509460 countsByYear W20925094602015 @default.
• W2092509460 countsByYear W20925094602016 @default.
• W2092509460 countsByYear W20925094602017 @default.
• W2092509460 countsByYear W20925094602018 @default.
• W2092509460 countsByYear W20925094602020 @default.
• W2092509460 countsByYear W20925094602021 @default.
• W2092509460 countsByYear W20925094602022 @default.
• W2092509460 crossrefType "journal-article" @default.
• W2092509460 hasAuthorship W2092509460A5009013844 @default.
• W2092509460 hasAuthorship W2092509460A5009506930 @default.
• W2092509460 hasAuthorship W2092509460A5014926566 @default.
• W2092509460 hasAuthorship W2092509460A5025005522 @default.
• W2092509460 hasAuthorship W2092509460A5044004515 @default.
• W2092509460 hasAuthorship W2092509460A5051192379 @default.
• W2092509460 hasAuthorship W2092509460A5066475377 @default.
• W2092509460 hasAuthorship W2092509460A5068271656 @default.
• W2092509460 hasAuthorship W2092509460A5075020050 @default.
• W2092509460 hasConcept C126322002 @default.
• W2092509460 hasConcept C126838900 @default.
• W2092509460 hasConcept C160798450 @default.
• W2092509460 hasConcept C164705383 @default.
• W2092509460 hasConcept C2777543888 @default.
• W2092509460 hasConcept C2779370443 @default.
• W2092509460 hasConcept C2780679668 @default.
• W2092509460 hasConcept C2780966522 @default.
• W2092509460 hasConcept C2993373945 @default.
• W2092509460 hasConcept C71924100 @default.
• W2092509460 hasConceptScore W2092509460C126322002 @default.
• W2092509460 hasConceptScore W2092509460C126838900 @default.
• W2092509460 hasConceptScore W2092509460C160798450 @default.
• W2092509460 hasConceptScore W2092509460C164705383 @default.
• W2092509460 hasConceptScore W2092509460C2777543888 @default.
• W2092509460 hasConceptScore W2092509460C2779370443 @default.
• W2092509460 hasConceptScore W2092509460C2780679668 @default.
• W2092509460 hasConceptScore W2092509460C2780966522 @default.
• W2092509460 hasConceptScore W2092509460C2993373945 @default.
• W2092509460 hasConceptScore W2092509460C71924100 @default.
• W2092509460 hasIssue "1" @default.
• W2092509460 hasLocation W20925094601 @default.
• W2092509460 hasLocation W20925094602 @default.
• W2092509460 hasOpenAccess W2092509460 @default.
• W2092509460 hasPrimaryLocation W20925094601 @default.
• W2092509460 hasRelatedWork W1821618749 @default.
• W2092509460 hasRelatedWork W2062548440 @default.
• W2092509460 hasRelatedWork W2076491102 @default.
• W2092509460 hasRelatedWork W2092509460 @default.
• W2092509460 hasRelatedWork W2105897160 @default.
• W2092509460 hasRelatedWork W2375236459 @default.
• W2092509460 hasRelatedWork W2808674114 @default.
• W2092509460 hasRelatedWork W3165214362 @default.
• W2092509460 hasRelatedWork W3165224250 @default.
• W2092509460 hasRelatedWork W4290091347 @default.
• W2092509460 hasVolume "20" @default.
• W2092509460 isParatext "false" @default.
• W2092509460 isRetracted "false" @default.
• W2092509460 magId "2092509460" @default.
• W2092509460 workType "article" @default.