Matches in SemOpenAlex for { <https://semopenalex.org/work/W2092645599> ?p ?o ?g. }
Showing items 1 to 70 of
70
with 100 items per page.
- W2092645599 endingPage "415" @default.
- W2092645599 startingPage "413" @default.
- W2092645599 abstract "A range of different sperm preparation methods have been developed during the last two decades following a rapid increase of clinics using assisted reproductive technologies (ART). Among these methods, swim-up procedures and density gradient centrifugation are widely used techniques for sperm preparation [1–3].The swim-up from a washed sperm pellet is a commonly used method, originally described by Mahadevan and Baker [4]. The conventional swim-up is based on the active movement of spermatozoa from a pre-washed cell pellet into an overlaying medium. The swim-up is usually performed for 0.5–2 h within a CO2 incubator at 37°C in many laboratories. The procedure results in the collection of a very high percentage of motile sperm, enrichment of morphologically normal spermatozoa, and the exclusion of other cells and debris.However, it is well known that the temperature of testis is 2–3°C lower than body temperature. The cooler temperature of the testis is explained by its location in the scrotum outside of the body [5]. It has been reported that an increase in the temperature of the mammalian testis causes a decrease in sperm production and is associated with infertility [6]. A similar condition is found in other mammals such as the mouse, in which the testis temperature is usually 30°C, this being 7°C lower than the body temperature [5]. Furthermore, it has been reported that spermatogenesis in the mouse is affected by a temperature-dependent regulatory process that is testis specific [7, 8].Despite the reports showing harmful effects on sperm maintained at body temperature [6], the swim-up procedure in ART is usually performed at 37°C. Therefore our aim was to compare the influence of 37°C and 34.5°C on sperm and ART outcome.We compared the sperm motility and velocity using a computer associated sperm analyzer (CASA) when swim-up was performed at 37°C and 34.5°C. Sperm samples from 28 patients who had more than 120 × 106 motile spermatozoa in the total volume of the ejaculated semen were used in this study.A liquefied semen sample was placed on top of the density gradient (90% SpermCare; InVirtoCare, USA) and the tube was centrifuged for 20 min at 300 × g. The supernatant was removed without disturbing the pellet. The sperm pellet was washed twice with 3 ml of HTF medium containing 10% of 100 mg/ml HSA solution (InVitroCare) by centrifugation at 300 × g for 5 min. The washed sperm were collected from the bottom of the tube using a clean pipette and the contents were divided between two new, clean tubes containing HTF medium with 10% of a 100 mg/ml HSA solution. Then each tube was placed at a 45° angle into separate incubators, one at 34.5°C and the other at 37°C, each containing 5% O2. In both incubators the medium was maintained at pH 7.2–7.3 using a CO2 concentration of 5.4–5.6% at 34.5°C and 6.2–6.4% at 37°C. After 2, 6, 24 h of the incubation, sperm motility and velocity were analyzed using the computer associated sperm analyzer (CASA).The results showed that a time dependent significant decrease in motility and velocity were seen both at 34.5°C and 37°C (Fig. 1). Also, the overall sperm motility was significantly lower at 37°C compared with 34.5°C (Fig. 1). Furthermore time dependent changes observed in each patient revealed that a severe decline in sperm motility was occurred in two of the 28 patients when their sperm were incubated at 37°C (Fig. 2). Fig. 1Time dependent motility and velocity changes in sperm collected at two temperaturesFig. 2The time dependent sperm motility changes in each of the 28 patients studied at 34.5°C (left) and 37°C (right) are shown. In patient A (bold pink line) and patient B (bold yellow line), a large decline of the sperm motility was observed ...Since better sperm parameters were obtained at 34.5°C, we changed the temperature of the CO2 incubator for swim-up procedures from 37°C to 34.5°C. This resulted in an improvement of fertilization and pregnancy rates when the 3 months before and after the change of temperature were compared. However, during these early stages of the study the improved fertilization and pregnancy rates, following swim-up at 34.5°C, were not statistically significant (Table 1). This early stage data analysis was performed using the statistical package StatView Ver. 5.0 (SAS Institute Inc.). Clinical characteristics were analyzed using the unpaired Student’s t test or χ2 test taking a P value of <0.05 to be statistically significant. Table 1A comparison of fertilization and pregnancy rates when sperm were collected at two temperaturesOur results suggest that insemination should be performed as soon as the swim-up procedure is finished. We have also shown that sperm incubation should not to exceed 6 h at 37°C. Since in certain patients we observed a large decrease of the sperm motility even by 6 h after incubation at 37°C, it would appear that the sperm swim-up procedure is more reliable at 34.5°C rather than 37°C. Further study will be required to determine whether sperm DNA is more prone to damage at body temperature compared with testis temperature. Also the optimal temperature for sperm preparation for ART needs to be evaluated." @default.
- W2092645599 created "2016-06-24" @default.
- W2092645599 creator A5007657641 @default.
- W2092645599 creator A5009834629 @default.
- W2092645599 creator A5040833703 @default.
- W2092645599 creator A5059008477 @default.
- W2092645599 creator A5082048240 @default.
- W2092645599 date "2008-08-01" @default.
- W2092645599 modified "2023-09-25" @default.
- W2092645599 title "A comparison of the swim-up procedure at body and testis temperatures" @default.
- W2092645599 cites W2032132526 @default.
- W2092645599 cites W2055527665 @default.
- W2092645599 cites W2070638189 @default.
- W2092645599 cites W2408047415 @default.
- W2092645599 cites W2409420785 @default.
- W2092645599 cites W30290903 @default.
- W2092645599 doi "https://doi.org/10.1007/s10815-008-9242-1" @default.
- W2092645599 hasPubMedCentralId "https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/2582120" @default.
- W2092645599 hasPubMedId "https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/18696226" @default.
- W2092645599 hasPublicationYear "2008" @default.
- W2092645599 type Work @default.
- W2092645599 sameAs 2092645599 @default.
- W2092645599 citedByCount "2" @default.
- W2092645599 countsByYear W20926455992014 @default.
- W2092645599 countsByYear W20926455992021 @default.
- W2092645599 crossrefType "journal-article" @default.
- W2092645599 hasAuthorship W2092645599A5007657641 @default.
- W2092645599 hasAuthorship W2092645599A5009834629 @default.
- W2092645599 hasAuthorship W2092645599A5040833703 @default.
- W2092645599 hasAuthorship W2092645599A5059008477 @default.
- W2092645599 hasAuthorship W2092645599A5082048240 @default.
- W2092645599 hasBestOaLocation W20926455992 @default.
- W2092645599 hasConcept C16685009 @default.
- W2092645599 hasConcept C2776210078 @default.
- W2092645599 hasConcept C2779234561 @default.
- W2092645599 hasConcept C29456083 @default.
- W2092645599 hasConcept C54355233 @default.
- W2092645599 hasConcept C71924100 @default.
- W2092645599 hasConcept C86803240 @default.
- W2092645599 hasConceptScore W2092645599C16685009 @default.
- W2092645599 hasConceptScore W2092645599C2776210078 @default.
- W2092645599 hasConceptScore W2092645599C2779234561 @default.
- W2092645599 hasConceptScore W2092645599C29456083 @default.
- W2092645599 hasConceptScore W2092645599C54355233 @default.
- W2092645599 hasConceptScore W2092645599C71924100 @default.
- W2092645599 hasConceptScore W2092645599C86803240 @default.
- W2092645599 hasIssue "8" @default.
- W2092645599 hasLocation W20926455991 @default.
- W2092645599 hasLocation W20926455992 @default.
- W2092645599 hasLocation W20926455993 @default.
- W2092645599 hasLocation W20926455994 @default.
- W2092645599 hasOpenAccess W2092645599 @default.
- W2092645599 hasPrimaryLocation W20926455991 @default.
- W2092645599 hasRelatedWork W1966900718 @default.
- W2092645599 hasRelatedWork W1999344589 @default.
- W2092645599 hasRelatedWork W2067597975 @default.
- W2092645599 hasRelatedWork W2076717602 @default.
- W2092645599 hasRelatedWork W2081930197 @default.
- W2092645599 hasRelatedWork W2091038903 @default.
- W2092645599 hasRelatedWork W2163456790 @default.
- W2092645599 hasRelatedWork W2183685009 @default.
- W2092645599 hasRelatedWork W2213904053 @default.
- W2092645599 hasRelatedWork W2789448498 @default.
- W2092645599 hasVolume "25" @default.
- W2092645599 isParatext "false" @default.
- W2092645599 isRetracted "false" @default.
- W2092645599 magId "2092645599" @default.
- W2092645599 workType "article" @default.