FRINK Linked Data Fragments server

Matches in SemOpenAlex for { <https://semopenalex.org/work/W2092716963> ?p ?o ?g. }

• W2092716963 endingPage "1205" @default.
• W2092716963 startingPage "1202" @default.
• W2092716963 abstract "This study clarifies the relation between the results of the Scoliosis Research Society Outcomes Instrument (SRS-24) and radiographic parameters of back deformity in Japanese idiopathic scoliosis patients.To investigate the relation between magnitude of back deformity and results of the SRS-24 in untreated patients.In idiopathic scoliosis, it is necessary to clarify the relation between patient-perceived outcomes of the deformity and magnitude of back deformity before considering treatment. The relation between the magnitude of spinal deformity and outcomes of untreated patients, however, has not been fully investigated.Patients (n = 166) under 30 years of age with untreated scoliosis were evaluated. Radiologic examination included Cobb angle, rotation angle of apical vertebrae, and translation of C7 vertebra from the central sacral line (C7 translation) on the coronal plane. Patient evaluation using section 1 (15 questions) of the SRS-24 was compared with radiologic findings using Spearman's correlation coefficient by rank (rs).The average pain domain score was 27.0 +/- 2.2 points, general self-image 9.9 +/- 1.7 points, general function 12.7 +/- 1.1 points, and overall level of activity 14.9 +/- 0.6 points. In radiologic deformity, the average Cobb angle and rotation angle of the thoracic curve were 35.8 degrees +/- 12.1 degrees (range, 17 degrees-73 degrees) and 13.9 degrees +/- 8.2 degrees (range, 0 degrees-38 degrees), respectively. The average Cobb and rotation angle of the lumbar curve were 31.4 degrees +/- 9.3 degrees (range, 13 degrees-56 degrees) and 15.4 degrees +/- 9.7 degrees (range, 2 degrees-36 degrees), respectively. The mean C7 translation was 12.4 +/- 9.7 mm (range, 0-48 mm). Comparison between individual domains and radiologic measurements revealed that the total pain (rs = -0.33; P < 0.0001) and general self-image (rs = -0.25; P = 0.0024) domain scores had a significant inverse correlation with thoracic curve Cobb angle. Comparison between the scores of individual questions and radiologic measurements revealed that the scores of question 3 (total pain domain) had a significant inverse correlation with thoracic curve Cobb angle (rs = -0.36; P < 0.0001). The scores of question 5 (general self-image domain) had a significant inverse correlation with thoracic curve Cobb angle (rs = -0.41; P < 0.0001) and rotation angle (rs = -0.30; P = 0.0006).The patients did not have negative self-image regarding back appearance when the thoracic curve Cobb angle was less than 30 degrees but had a negative self-image when the thoracic curve Cobb angle was more than 40 degrees and the rotation angle was more than 20 degrees. On the other hand, the lumbar curve Cobb angle and the rotation angle did not correlate with patient self-image. The results of the present study will help to define the parameters for the initiation of active treatment and physicians should maintain or reduce scoliotic deformity so that the thoracic curve Cobb angle is less than 40 degrees and the rotation angle is less than 20 degrees in idiopathic scoliosis." @default.
• W2092716963 created "2016-06-24" @default.
• W2092716963 creator A5026898221 @default.
• W2092716963 creator A5031581472 @default.
• W2092716963 creator A5037662951 @default.
• W2092716963 creator A5040210110 @default.
• W2092716963 creator A5091358195 @default.
• W2092716963 date "2005-05-01" @default.
• W2092716963 modified "2023-10-14" @default.
• W2092716963 title "Use of the Scoliosis Research Society Outcomes Instrument to Evaluate Patient Outcome in Untreated Idiopathic Scoliosis Patients in Japan" @default.
• W2092716963 cites W1481510821 @default.
• W2092716963 cites W1998515838 @default.
• W2092716963 cites W2000981575 @default.
• W2092716963 cites W2035646953 @default.
• W2092716963 cites W2042729534 @default.
• W2092716963 cites W2066834691 @default.
• W2092716963 cites W2129699994 @default.
• W2092716963 cites W2134206948 @default.
• W2092716963 cites W2146513202 @default.
• W2092716963 cites W2160330988 @default.
• W2092716963 cites W4230525267 @default.
• W2092716963 doi "https://doi.org/10.1097/01.brs.0000162285.12045.81" @default.
• W2092716963 hasPubMedId "https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/15897836" @default.
• W2092716963 hasPublicationYear "2005" @default.
• W2092716963 type Work @default.
• W2092716963 sameAs 2092716963 @default.
• W2092716963 citedByCount "41" @default.
• W2092716963 countsByYear W20927169632012 @default.
• W2092716963 countsByYear W20927169632013 @default.
• W2092716963 countsByYear W20927169632014 @default.
• W2092716963 countsByYear W20927169632015 @default.
• W2092716963 countsByYear W20927169632016 @default.
• W2092716963 countsByYear W20927169632017 @default.
• W2092716963 countsByYear W20927169632018 @default.
• W2092716963 countsByYear W20927169632019 @default.
• W2092716963 countsByYear W20927169632020 @default.
• W2092716963 countsByYear W20927169632021 @default.
• W2092716963 countsByYear W20927169632022 @default.
• W2092716963 countsByYear W20927169632023 @default.
• W2092716963 crossrefType "journal-article" @default.
• W2092716963 hasAuthorship W2092716963A5026898221 @default.
• W2092716963 hasAuthorship W2092716963A5031581472 @default.
• W2092716963 hasAuthorship W2092716963A5037662951 @default.
• W2092716963 hasAuthorship W2092716963A5040210110 @default.
• W2092716963 hasAuthorship W2092716963A5091358195 @default.
• W2092716963 hasConcept C105702510 @default.
• W2092716963 hasConcept C13483470 @default.
• W2092716963 hasConcept C141071460 @default.
• W2092716963 hasConcept C2776412215 @default.
• W2092716963 hasConcept C2778871979 @default.
• W2092716963 hasConcept C2779982284 @default.
• W2092716963 hasConcept C2780955175 @default.
• W2092716963 hasConcept C29694066 @default.
• W2092716963 hasConcept C36454342 @default.
• W2092716963 hasConcept C44575665 @default.
• W2092716963 hasConcept C71924100 @default.
• W2092716963 hasConceptScore W2092716963C105702510 @default.
• W2092716963 hasConceptScore W2092716963C13483470 @default.
• W2092716963 hasConceptScore W2092716963C141071460 @default.
• W2092716963 hasConceptScore W2092716963C2776412215 @default.
• W2092716963 hasConceptScore W2092716963C2778871979 @default.
• W2092716963 hasConceptScore W2092716963C2779982284 @default.
• W2092716963 hasConceptScore W2092716963C2780955175 @default.
• W2092716963 hasConceptScore W2092716963C29694066 @default.
• W2092716963 hasConceptScore W2092716963C36454342 @default.
• W2092716963 hasConceptScore W2092716963C44575665 @default.
• W2092716963 hasConceptScore W2092716963C71924100 @default.
• W2092716963 hasIssue "10" @default.
• W2092716963 hasLocation W20927169631 @default.
• W2092716963 hasLocation W20927169632 @default.
• W2092716963 hasOpenAccess W2092716963 @default.
• W2092716963 hasPrimaryLocation W20927169631 @default.
• W2092716963 hasRelatedWork W2062840085 @default.
• W2092716963 hasRelatedWork W2394406611 @default.
• W2092716963 hasRelatedWork W2465193852 @default.
• W2092716963 hasRelatedWork W2607998649 @default.
• W2092716963 hasRelatedWork W2609121789 @default.
• W2092716963 hasRelatedWork W2765912754 @default.
• W2092716963 hasRelatedWork W2910159991 @default.
• W2092716963 hasRelatedWork W2968509133 @default.
• W2092716963 hasRelatedWork W4294974937 @default.
• W2092716963 hasRelatedWork W4322751534 @default.
• W2092716963 hasVolume "30" @default.
• W2092716963 isParatext "false" @default.
• W2092716963 isRetracted "false" @default.
• W2092716963 magId "2092716963" @default.
• W2092716963 workType "article" @default.