FRINK Linked Data Fragments server

Matches in SemOpenAlex for { <https://semopenalex.org/work/W2092844128> ?p ?o ?g. }

• W2092844128 abstract "ABSTRACT New concepts for platform design have been developed recently to allow for the production of oil and gas in deep water, The foundation for each leg of the platform is usually a group of piles that are subjected to both uplift and lateral loads. A conventional approach to the design of the piles is to neglect the interaction between these two types of loading, but evidence indicates that the tensile capacity and the lateral capacity can both be affected because of the combined loading. The paper describes an approach to a rational solution of the interaction problem. Both analytical and experimental studies were conducted and the influence of cyclic loading is considered. INTRODUCTION Piles that are used for foundations of offshore platforms in deep water are frequently subjected to both uplift and lateral loading. The conventional approach in design is to assume no interaction between the two types of loading. Analysis shows that soils near the mudline are most important with regard to lateral loading, and in most instances are relatively unimportant with respect to axial loads. While this assumption has apparently been satisfactory for lateral and compressive loading, some special consideration is warranted for cases where the axial loading is tensile. There are two important differences in behavior of piles in compression and in tension that might decrease the capacity of the latter type:piles loaded in compression are more apt to exhibit an increased resistance with increase in settlement, partly due to end bearing; andthe loads in skin friction along the upper portion of a pile act against a free surface in the case of uplift, but against supporting layers in the case of compression. These two handicaps for a pile in tension may be of minor importance, but could be critical in cases where the load transfer in side resistance is decreased due to deflection-softening. A consideration of decreased load transfer with relative movement between the pile and the soil indicates the need to consider the possibility of progressive failure in uplift, especially for large offshore structures. This paper considers briefly the concept that coupling of uplift and tensile loading results in the need to consider reduced load transfer in lateral resistance and in side resistance. Models for the uncoupled method are given, results from small-scale studies are presented, a model for the coupled method is shown, and design recommendations are suggested. MODELS FOR THE UNCOUPLED PROBLEM According to methods presented by the American Petroleum Institute in RP 2A (1987), the computation of axial and lateral load employs the following equations. For axial loading:(mathematical equation)(available in full paper) where:Qd = total load,Qf = skin friction resistance,Qp = total end bearing, zero for uplift resistance,f = unit skin friction capacity,As = side surface area of pile,q = unit and end bearing capacity, zero for uplift resistance, andAp = gross end area of pile. With regard to the computation of the axial movement of a pile, RP 2A implies the use of the t-z method (Coyle and Reese, 1966), where t is the load transfer and z is the relative movement of the pile." @default.
• W2092844128 created "2016-06-24" @default.
• W2092844128 creator A5017821489 @default.
• W2092844128 creator A5037303659 @default.
• W2092844128 creator A5083284763 @default.
• W2092844128 date "1990-05-07" @default.
• W2092844128 modified "2023-10-14" @default.
• W2092844128 title "Coupling Effects of Uplift Loading and Lateral Loading on Capacity of Piles" @default.
• W2092844128 doi "https://doi.org/10.4043/6320-ms" @default.
• W2092844128 hasPublicationYear "1990" @default.
• W2092844128 type Work @default.
• W2092844128 sameAs 2092844128 @default.
• W2092844128 citedByCount "4" @default.
• W2092844128 countsByYear W20928441282014 @default.
• W2092844128 countsByYear W20928441282015 @default.
• W2092844128 countsByYear W20928441282021 @default.
• W2092844128 countsByYear W20928441282023 @default.
• W2092844128 crossrefType "proceedings-article" @default.
• W2092844128 hasAuthorship W2092844128A5017821489 @default.
• W2092844128 hasAuthorship W2092844128A5037303659 @default.
• W2092844128 hasAuthorship W2092844128A5083284763 @default.
• W2092844128 hasConcept C112950240 @default.
• W2092844128 hasConcept C127313418 @default.
• W2092844128 hasConcept C127413603 @default.
• W2092844128 hasConcept C131584629 @default.
• W2092844128 hasConcept C135677250 @default.
• W2092844128 hasConcept C136764020 @default.
• W2092844128 hasConcept C145097563 @default.
• W2092844128 hasConcept C159985019 @default.
• W2092844128 hasConcept C162284963 @default.
• W2092844128 hasConcept C166957645 @default.
• W2092844128 hasConcept C180016635 @default.
• W2092844128 hasConcept C186068551 @default.
• W2092844128 hasConcept C187320778 @default.
• W2092844128 hasConcept C192562407 @default.
• W2092844128 hasConcept C2777063073 @default.
• W2092844128 hasConcept C2780966255 @default.
• W2092844128 hasConcept C41008148 @default.
• W2092844128 hasConcept C66938386 @default.
• W2092844128 hasConcept C95457728 @default.
• W2092844128 hasConceptScore W2092844128C112950240 @default.
• W2092844128 hasConceptScore W2092844128C127313418 @default.
• W2092844128 hasConceptScore W2092844128C127413603 @default.
• W2092844128 hasConceptScore W2092844128C131584629 @default.
• W2092844128 hasConceptScore W2092844128C135677250 @default.
• W2092844128 hasConceptScore W2092844128C136764020 @default.
• W2092844128 hasConceptScore W2092844128C145097563 @default.
• W2092844128 hasConceptScore W2092844128C159985019 @default.
• W2092844128 hasConceptScore W2092844128C162284963 @default.
• W2092844128 hasConceptScore W2092844128C166957645 @default.
• W2092844128 hasConceptScore W2092844128C180016635 @default.
• W2092844128 hasConceptScore W2092844128C186068551 @default.
• W2092844128 hasConceptScore W2092844128C187320778 @default.
• W2092844128 hasConceptScore W2092844128C192562407 @default.
• W2092844128 hasConceptScore W2092844128C2777063073 @default.
• W2092844128 hasConceptScore W2092844128C2780966255 @default.
• W2092844128 hasConceptScore W2092844128C41008148 @default.
• W2092844128 hasConceptScore W2092844128C66938386 @default.
• W2092844128 hasConceptScore W2092844128C95457728 @default.
• W2092844128 hasLocation W20928441281 @default.
• W2092844128 hasOpenAccess W2092844128 @default.
• W2092844128 hasPrimaryLocation W20928441281 @default.
• W2092844128 hasRelatedWork W1967600776 @default.
• W2092844128 hasRelatedWork W2172222340 @default.
• W2092844128 hasRelatedWork W2348195291 @default.
• W2092844128 hasRelatedWork W2349552061 @default.
• W2092844128 hasRelatedWork W2355105638 @default.
• W2092844128 hasRelatedWork W2507729029 @default.
• W2092844128 hasRelatedWork W2552316122 @default.
• W2092844128 hasRelatedWork W3088023813 @default.
• W2092844128 hasRelatedWork W3197489939 @default.
• W2092844128 hasRelatedWork W2121356727 @default.
• W2092844128 isParatext "false" @default.
• W2092844128 isRetracted "false" @default.
• W2092844128 magId "2092844128" @default.
• W2092844128 workType "article" @default.