FRINK Linked Data Fragments server

Matches in SemOpenAlex for { <https://semopenalex.org/work/W2093016786> ?p ?o ?g. }

• W2093016786 endingPage "13355" @default.
• W2093016786 startingPage "13350" @default.
• W2093016786 abstract "Oxidation of low density lipoprotein (LDL) is the key step for the development of atherosclerosis. The 12/15-lipoxygenase expressed in macrophages is capable of oxygenating linoleic acid esterified to cholesterol in the LDL particle, and thus this enzyme is presumed to initiate LDL oxidation. We recently reported that LDL receptor-related protein (LRP) was required for the enzyme-mediated LDL oxidation by macrophages and suggested the selective uptake of cholesterol ester from LDL to the plasma membrane (Xu, W., Takahashi, Y., Sakashita, T., Iwasaki, T., Hattori, H., and Yoshimoto. T. (2001) J. Biol. Chem. 276, 36454–36459). To elucidate precise mechanisms of lipoxygenase-mediated LDL oxidation, we investigated the intracellular localization of 12/15-lipoxygenase. The 12/15-lipoxygenase was predominantly detected in cytosol of resting peritoneal macrophages and of macrophage-like J774A.1 cells permanently transfected with the cDNA for the enzyme. When the cells were treated with LDL and subjected to subcellular fractionation, the 12/15-lipoxygenase was detected in the membranes with a concomitant decrease in cytosol as shown by Western blot analysis. The levels of the enzyme associated with the membrane reached maximum in 15 min after LDL addition and then decreased. However, the enzymatic activity of 12/15-lipoxygenase in the membrane fraction was very weak even after LDL treatment. This fact supports the suicide inactivation of the enzyme by the oxygenation of cholesterol ester transferred from the LDL particle to the plasma membrane. Immunohistochemical analysis using an antibody against 12/15-lipoxygenase revealed that the plasma membrane was the major site of the enzyme translocation by the LDL treatment. LDL-dependent 12/15-lipoxygenase translocation was inhibited by a blocking antibody against LRP. Furthermore, an enzyme translocation inhibitor, L655238, inhibited the LDL oxidation caused by the 12/15-lipoxygenase. We propose that cholesterol ester selectively transferred from the LDL particle to the plasma membrane via LRP is oxygenated by 12/15-lipoxygenase translocated to this membrane. Oxidation of low density lipoprotein (LDL) is the key step for the development of atherosclerosis. The 12/15-lipoxygenase expressed in macrophages is capable of oxygenating linoleic acid esterified to cholesterol in the LDL particle, and thus this enzyme is presumed to initiate LDL oxidation. We recently reported that LDL receptor-related protein (LRP) was required for the enzyme-mediated LDL oxidation by macrophages and suggested the selective uptake of cholesterol ester from LDL to the plasma membrane (Xu, W., Takahashi, Y., Sakashita, T., Iwasaki, T., Hattori, H., and Yoshimoto. T. (2001) J. Biol. Chem. 276, 36454–36459). To elucidate precise mechanisms of lipoxygenase-mediated LDL oxidation, we investigated the intracellular localization of 12/15-lipoxygenase. The 12/15-lipoxygenase was predominantly detected in cytosol of resting peritoneal macrophages and of macrophage-like J774A.1 cells permanently transfected with the cDNA for the enzyme. When the cells were treated with LDL and subjected to subcellular fractionation, the 12/15-lipoxygenase was detected in the membranes with a concomitant decrease in cytosol as shown by Western blot analysis. The levels of the enzyme associated with the membrane reached maximum in 15 min after LDL addition and then decreased. However, the enzymatic activity of 12/15-lipoxygenase in the membrane fraction was very weak even after LDL treatment. This fact supports the suicide inactivation of the enzyme by the oxygenation of cholesterol ester transferred from the LDL particle to the plasma membrane. Immunohistochemical analysis using an antibody against 12/15-lipoxygenase revealed that the plasma membrane was the major site of the enzyme translocation by the LDL treatment. LDL-dependent 12/15-lipoxygenase translocation was inhibited by a blocking antibody against LRP. Furthermore, an enzyme translocation inhibitor, L655238, inhibited the LDL oxidation caused by the 12/15-lipoxygenase. We propose that cholesterol ester selectively transferred from the LDL particle to the plasma membrane via LRP is oxygenated by 12/15-lipoxygenase translocated to this membrane. low density lipoprotein Dulbecco's modified Eagle's medium LDL receptor-related protein thiobarbituric acid reactive substance 12/15-Lipoxygenase is a member of the lipoxygenase family, which incorporates one molecule of oxygen in regiospecific and stereospecific manners to unsaturated fatty acids such as arachidonic and linoleic acids (1Takahashi Y. Yoshimoto T. Res. Adv. Cancer. 2002; 2: 221-229Google Scholar, 2Funk C.D. Science. 2001; 294: 1871-1875Crossref PubMed Scopus (3070) Google Scholar, 3Brash A.R. J. Biol. Chem. 1999; 274: 23679-23682Abstract Full Text Full Text PDF PubMed Scopus (1155) Google Scholar, 4Kuhn H. Thiele B.J. FEBS Lett. 1999; 449: 7-11Crossref PubMed Scopus (285) Google Scholar). The enzyme consists of leukocyte-type 12-lipoxygenase found in rats, mice, cows, and pigs, and reticulocyte-type 15-lipoxygenase (15-lipoxygenase-1) expressed in humans and rabbits, oxygenating the position 12 and 15 of arachidonic acid, respectively (5Funk C.D. Biochim. Biophys. Acta. 1996; 1304: 65-84Crossref PubMed Scopus (238) Google Scholar). The notable feature of the 12/15-lipoxygenase is that the enzyme directly oxygenates not only free fatty acids but also complex substrates such as phospholipids, cholesterol ester, and the cholesterol ester present in the low density lipoprotein (LDL)1 particle (1Takahashi Y. Yoshimoto T. Res. Adv. Cancer. 2002; 2: 221-229Google Scholar, 2Funk C.D. Science. 2001; 294: 1871-1875Crossref PubMed Scopus (3070) Google Scholar, 3Brash A.R. J. Biol. Chem. 1999; 274: 23679-23682Abstract Full Text Full Text PDF PubMed Scopus (1155) Google Scholar, 4Kuhn H. Thiele B.J. FEBS Lett. 1999; 449: 7-11Crossref PubMed Scopus (285) Google Scholar). Oxidation of LDL is the first key step for the development of atherosclerosis (6Brown M.S. Goldstein J.L. Science. 1986; 232: 34-47Crossref PubMed Scopus (4383) Google Scholar, 7Witztum J.L. Steinberg D. J. Clin. Invest. 1991; 88: 1785-1792Crossref PubMed Scopus (2474) Google Scholar), and the roles of the 12/15-lipoxygenase in the process of LDL oxidation and the progress of atherogenesis have been extensively investigated. Recent study using 12/15-lipoxygenase-knockout mice (8Cyrus T. Witztum J.L. Rader D.J. Tangirala R. Fazio S. Linton M.F. Funk C.D. J. Clin. Invest. 1999; 103: 1597-1604Crossref PubMed Scopus (466) Google Scholar) and the study using 12/15-lipoxygenase-transgenic mice (9Harats D. Shaish A. George J. Mulkins M. Kurihara H. Levkovitz H. Sigal E. Arterioscler. Thromb. Vasc. Biol. 2000; 20: 2100-2105Crossref PubMed Scopus (212) Google Scholar) established that the enzyme was involved in the development of atherosclerosis, although contrary results were obtained using 12/15-lipoxygenase-transgenic rabbits (10Shen J. Kuhn H. Petho-Schramm A. Chan L. FASEB J. 1995; 9: 1623-1631Crossref PubMed Scopus (56) Google Scholar,11Funk C.D. Cyrus T. Trends Cardiovasc. Med. 2001; 11: 116-124Crossref PubMed Scopus (118) Google Scholar). Using a macrophage-like cell line J774A.1, which did not have endogenous 12/15-lipoxygenase activity, we permanently transfected the cells with the 12/15-lipoxyganase cDNA and demonstrated that 12/15-lipoxygenase expressed in normal macrophages at a high level was required for LDL oxidation (12Sakashita T. Takahashi Y. Kinoshita T. Yoshimoto T. Eur. J. Biochem. 1999; 265: 825-831Crossref PubMed Scopus (35) Google Scholar). However, the mechanism of extracellular LDL oxidation by intracellular 12/15-lipoxygenase has not been established. Recently, we revealed that the lipoxygenase-mediated LDL oxidation by macrophages required the binding of LDL to LDL receptor-related protein (LRP) but not to the LDL receptor, both of which are expressed on the surface of J774A.1 cells and are capable of binding native LDL (13Xu W. Takahashi Y. Sakashita T. Iwasaki T. Hattori H. Yoshimoto T. J. Biol. Chem. 2001; 276: 36454-36459Abstract Full Text Full Text PDF PubMed Scopus (29) Google Scholar). The LDL is processed by the LDL receptor via receptor-mediated endocytosis in which cholesterol ester in the LDL particle is delivered to lysosomes where it is degraded (6Brown M.S. Goldstein J.L. Science. 1986; 232: 34-47Crossref PubMed Scopus (4383) Google Scholar). In contrast, the binding of LDL to LRP has been demonstrated to selectively take up the cholesterol ester from LDL in the plasma membrane without endocytosis and degradation of the LDL particle (14Swarnakar S. Beers J. Strickland D.K. Azhar S. Williams D.L. J. Biol. Chem. 2001; 276: 21121-21128Abstract Full Text Full Text PDF PubMed Scopus (39) Google Scholar). For the efficient enzymatic oxygenation of the cholesterol ester transferred to the plasma membrane via LRP, the 12/15-lipoxygenase itself should also be localized in the plasma membrane or its neighborhood. However, the 12/15-lipoxygenase is predominantly present in cytoplasm and not in the membranes in various cells (15Yoshimoto T. Yamamoto S. J. Lipid Mediat. Cell. Signal. 1995; 12: 195-212Crossref PubMed Scopus (40) Google Scholar). Recent study has shown that the translocation of 12/15-lipoxygenase from the cytosol to the plasma membrane was observed in macrophages when incubated with apoptotic cells (16Miller Y.I. Chang M.K. Funk C.D. Feramisco J.R. Witztum J.L. J. Biol. Chem. 2001; 276: 19431-19439Abstract Full Text Full Text PDF PubMed Scopus (67) Google Scholar). Here we demonstrate that the binding of LDL to LRP expressed in normal macrophages and 12/15-lipoxygenase-expressing macrophage-like J774A.1 cells translocates the enzyme from cytoplasm to the plasma membrane. The translocation is necessary for the cell-mediated oxidation of LDL. This study reveals a novel function of LRP in the development of atherosclerosis. Dulbecco's modified Eagle's medium (DMEM) was obtained from Nissui (Tokyo, Japan), fetal bovine serum from JRH biosciences (Lenexa, KS), lipoprotein-deficient serum from Sigma (St. Louis, MO), and 2-thiobarbituric acid and 1,1,3,3-tetramethoxypropane(bismalondialdehyde) from Wako (Osaka, Japan), [1-14C]arachidonic acid (2.1 GBq/mmol) and ECL Western blotting detection reagents from Amersham Biosciences(Bucks, UK), biotinylated and peroxidase-labeled anti-rabbit IgG from Vector (Burlingame, CA), L655238 from BIOMOL (Plymouth Meeting, PA), silica gel thin-layer plates from Merck (Darmstadt, Germany), polyvinylidene difluoride membranes from Millipore (Bedford, MA), Lab-Tek chamber slide from Nalge Nunc International (Naperville, IL), swine serum and horseradish peroxidase-conjugated streptavidin from Dakopatts (Carpenteria, CA), and Glicidether 100 from Selva Feinbiochemica (Heidelberg, Germany). An antiserum against 12/15-lipoxygenase was raised using purified recombinant rat pineal 12-lipoxygenase as an antigen as described previously (17Kawajiri H. Qiao N. Zhuang D.M. Yoshimoto T. Hagiya H. Yamamoto S. Sei H. Morita Y. Biochem. Biophys. Res. Commun. 1997; 238: 229-233Crossref PubMed Scopus (12) Google Scholar). An anti-LDL receptor antibody was raised as described and purified to IgG using protein A-Sepharose (13Xu W. Takahashi Y. Sakashita T. Iwasaki T. Hattori H. Yoshimoto T. J. Biol. Chem. 2001; 276: 36454-36459Abstract Full Text Full Text PDF PubMed Scopus (29) Google Scholar). Human LDL was prepared from healthy volunteers and dialyzed against phosphate-buffered saline at 4 °C for 24 h before each experiment as described previously (12Sakashita T. Takahashi Y. Kinoshita T. Yoshimoto T. Eur. J. Biochem. 1999; 265: 825-831Crossref PubMed Scopus (35) Google Scholar, 13Xu W. Takahashi Y. Sakashita T. Iwasaki T. Hattori H. Yoshimoto T. J. Biol. Chem. 2001; 276: 36454-36459Abstract Full Text Full Text PDF PubMed Scopus (29) Google Scholar). A murine macrophage-like cell line J774A.1 was kindly provided by Dr. Y. Saeki of Shiga University of Medical Science. An expression vector, pEF-BOS having a elongation factor-1α promoter (18Mizushima S. Nagata S. Nucleic Acids Res. 1990; 18: 5322Crossref PubMed Scopus (1499) Google Scholar) was kindly provided by Dr. S. Nagata of Osaka University. An anti-LRP antibody (19Kowal R.C. Herz J. Goldstein J.L. Esser V. Brown M.S. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U. S. A. 1989; 86: 5810-5814Crossref PubMed Scopus (457) Google Scholar) was a generous gift from Dr. Joachim Herz of University of Texas Southwestern Medical Center. J774A.1 cells permanently transfected with the pEF-BOS vector carrying porcine leukocyte 12/15-lipoxygenase cDNA and mock-transfected cells were establish as describe previously (12Sakashita T. Takahashi Y. Kinoshita T. Yoshimoto T. Eur. J. Biochem. 1999; 265: 825-831Crossref PubMed Scopus (35) Google Scholar). The cells were cultured at 37 °C with 5% CO2 in DMEM supplemented with 10% fetal bovine serum, 100 units/ml penicillin G and 100 μg/ml streptomycin sulfate, and subcultured every 2–3 days using a standard trypsin protocol. Mouse peritoneal macrophages were collected from C57BL/6 mice as described previously (20Zhuang D. Kawajiri H. Takahashi Y. Yoshimoto T. J. Biochem. (Tokyo). 2000; 127: 451-456Crossref PubMed Scopus (10) Google Scholar) except that thioglycollate was not injected before harvesting the cells. The 12/15-lipoxygenase-expressing cells were cultured in 100-mm dishes in DMEM with 10% lipoprotein-deficient serum for 48 h, then LDL at 400 μg/ml was added to the medium. After incubation at 37 °C for various periods, cells were washed with ice-cold phosphate-buffered saline at pH 7.4 and suspended in 50 mm Tris-HCl buffer at pH 7.4 containing 1 mm EDTA. The cells were sonicated twice on ice, each for 5 s, at 20 kHz by a Branson sonifier model 250 (Danbury, CT), followed by ultracentrifugation at 265,000 ×g at 4 °C for 2 h. The supernatant was referred to as cytosol, and the pellet resuspended in 50 mm Tris-HCl at pH 7.4 containing 1 mm EDTA was referred to as “membranes.” 12/15-Lipoxygenase activity was determined as described previously (12Sakashita T. Takahashi Y. Kinoshita T. Yoshimoto T. Eur. J. Biochem. 1999; 265: 825-831Crossref PubMed Scopus (35) Google Scholar). Briefly, the cytosol and the membranes were incubated in a 200-μl reaction mixture containing 50 mm Tris-HCl buffer at pH 7.4 and 25 μm [1-14C]arachidonic acid (1.85 kBq). The reaction was carried out at 30 °C for 10 min with constant mixing and quenched by the addition of 1 ml of an ice-cold mixture of diethyl ether/methanol/1 m citric acid (30:4:1, v/v). The ether layer was spotted onto a silica gel thin layer plate, and the plate was developed at 4 °C for 60 min with a solvent system of diethyl ether/petroleum ether/acetic acid (85:15:0.1, v/v). The radioactive products on the plate were detected and quantified by a Fujix BAS 1000 imaging analyzer (Tokyo, Japan). Protein concentration was determined by the method of Lowry et al. (21Lowry O.H. J. Biol. Chem. 1951; 193: 265-275Abstract Full Text PDF PubMed Google Scholar) with bovine serum albumin as a standard. The proteins in the cytosol and membranes were separated by 10% SDS-polyacrylamide gel electrophoresis and transferred to a polyvinylidene difluoride membrane, followed by blocking with 10% (w/v) nonfat dry milk in 20 mm Tris-HCl at pH7.4 containing 136 mm NaCl and 0.1% Tween 20 for 1 h at room temperature. The washed membranes were incubated for 1 h at room temperature with an anti-12/15-lipoxygenase antibody at 1:1000 dilution. 12/15-Lipoxygenase band was detected using a horseradish peroxidase-conjugated secondary antibody and ECL chemiluminescence reagents according to the manufacturer's instruction. The density of 12/15-lipoxygenase band was quantified by National Institutes of Health Image 1.60 analysis software (Bethesda, MD). The intensity of the 12/15-lipoxygenase band increased linearly with the amount of the enzyme loaded onto the gel. The 12/15-lipoxygenase-expressing cells (2 × 105) were preincubated for 48 h in DMEM containing 10% of lipoprotein-deficient serum followed by the addition of a translocation inhibitor, L655238, at various concentrations. After 1 h the cells were incubated with 400 μg/ml LDL in 100 μl of DMEM containing the serum in the presence of L655238 for 12 h, and the culture medium was subjected to TBARS assay as described previously (12Sakashita T. Takahashi Y. Kinoshita T. Yoshimoto T. Eur. J. Biochem. 1999; 265: 825-831Crossref PubMed Scopus (35) Google Scholar). The light- and electron-microscopic immunohistochemical procedures were performed as described (22Yamamoto M. Fan L. Wakayama T. Amano O. Iseki S. Anat. Rec. 2001; 262: 213-220Crossref PubMed Scopus (18) Google Scholar). 12/15-Lipoxygenase-expressing cells and mouse resident macrophages collected from the peritoneal cavity were cultured for 48 h in the medium containing 10% lipoprotein-deficient serum in Lab-Tek chamber slide. The cells were then treated with LDL for 15 min followed by fixation in 0.1 m phosphate buffer at pH 7.4 containing 4% paraformaldehyde on ice for 30 min and washed twice in phosphate-buffered saline at pH 7.4. For light microscope observation, the slides were first permeabilized by incubating with phosphate-buffered saline containing 0.3% Tween 20 for 1 h, treated with 3% hydrogen peroxide in methanol for 10 min, and then incubated with 5% normal swine serum for 30 min. Subsequently, the slides were incubated at room temperature overnight with an anti-12/15-lipoxygenase antiserum. For the negative control, the antibody was replaced with preimmune rabbit serum. The sites of immunoreaction were then visualized by incubating the slides successively with biotinylated anti-rabbit IgG diluted at 1:200 for 1 h, horseradish peroxidase-conjugated streptavidin diluted at 1:300 for 1 h, and with 0.01% 3′,3′-diaminobenzidine tetrahydrochloride in the presence of 0.02% hydrogen peroxide in 50 mm Tris-HCl at pH 7.5 for 10–30 min. For electron-microscopic immunocytochemistry, the immunostained slides were postfixed with 0.5% OsO4 for 20 min. After block-staining with 1% uranyl acetate for 30 min, the slides were dehydrated in graded ethanol series and embedded in an epoxy resin based on Glicidether 100. Ultrathin sections were prepared and subjected to observation with a Hitachi H-700 electron microscope (Tokyo, Japan). 12/15-Lipoxygenase is predominantly localized in cytosol but not in the membranes (15Yoshimoto T. Yamamoto S. J. Lipid Mediat. Cell. Signal. 1995; 12: 195-212Crossref PubMed Scopus (40) Google Scholar). This was confirmed in macrophage-like J774A.1 cells overexpressing 12/15-lipoxygenase and resident peritoneal macrophages by Western blot as shown in Fig.1A. To investigate whether the subcellular localization of the 12/15-lipoxygenase is changed by LDL treatment, the enzyme-expressing cells or peritoneal macrophages were treated with LDL for various periods, and the cytosol and membranes were subjected to Western blot analysis. Fig. 1A shows that the band of 12/15-lipoxygenase at 75 kDa was detected not only in the cytosol but also in the membranes with a concomitant decrease of the enzyme level in the cytosol. Association of the enzyme to the membranes reached maximum at 15 min after LDL addition and then decreased. After 30 min the enzyme was no longer present in the membranes. Densitometric analysis revealed the increase in 12/15-lipoxygenase protein of the membranes after the LDL treatment for 5 and 15 min by 23- and 33-fold, respectively (Fig. 1B). The enzyme protein was increased by 14-fold in the membranes of macrophages by the treatment with LDL for 15 min. After 15-min treatment by LDL, the enzyme protein in the cytosol was decreased by 38 and 47% in 12/15-lipoxygenase-expressing cells and in macrophages, respectively. The results indicated that 12/15-lipoxygenase was transferred from cytosol to membranes by the LDL treatment in the resident macrophages as well as 12/15-lipoxygenase-expressing J774A.1 cells. We measured the enzyme activity in the cytosol and membranes in 12/15-lipoxygenase-expressing cells. As shown in Fig.2, the specific activity of the enzyme in the cytosol was decreased by 41% by the treatment with LDL for 15 min as compared with non-treated cells. The result was in good agreement with that from Western blot analysis (Fig. 1). The level of the increase of the enzyme activity in the membranes was significantly lower after LDL treatment. It is shown that cholesterol ester is selectively transferred from the LDL particle to the plasma membrane via LRP in Y1 murine adrenocortical cells (14Swarnakar S. Beers J. Strickland D.K. Azhar S. Williams D.L. J. Biol. Chem. 2001; 276: 21121-21128Abstract Full Text Full Text PDF PubMed Scopus (39) Google Scholar) and in our 12/15-lipoxygenase-expressing cells 2W. Xu, Y. Takahashi, T. Murakami, T. Iwasaki, H. Hattori, and T. Yoshimoto, manuscript in preparation. and that linoleic acid esterified to cholesterol in the LDL particle is regio- and stereospecifically oxygenated by the 12/15-lipoxygenase-expressing cells (12Sakashita T. Takahashi Y. Kinoshita T. Yoshimoto T. Eur. J. Biochem. 1999; 265: 825-831Crossref PubMed Scopus (35) Google Scholar). Thus, the above observations strongly support our contention that the 12/15-lipoxygenase associated with the membranes oxygenates cholesterol ester transferred to the membrane, because self-catalyzed inactivation of the 12/15-lipoxygenase, which should be observed in the enzyme reaction with cholesterol ester in the membrane, is known to occur (23Belkner J. Stender H. Kuhn H. J. Biol. Chem. 1998; 273: 23225-23232Abstract Full Text Full Text PDF PubMed Scopus (103) Google Scholar). This would explain the much lower enzyme activity in membranes. The results indicate that LDL brings about translocation of 12/15-lipoxygenase from cytosol to membranes where the oxidation of cholesterol ester from LDL takes place. We previously reported the essential requirement of LRP for the cell-mediated oxidation of LDL in macrophages (13Xu W. Takahashi Y. Sakashita T. Iwasaki T. Hattori H. Yoshimoto T. J. Biol. Chem. 2001; 276: 36454-36459Abstract Full Text Full Text PDF PubMed Scopus (29) Google Scholar). To examine whether the LRP is also involved in the translocation of the enzyme, we employed an anti-LRP antibody that blocked the binding of LDL to LRP (19Kowal R.C. Herz J. Goldstein J.L. Esser V. Brown M.S. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U. S. A. 1989; 86: 5810-5814Crossref PubMed Scopus (457) Google Scholar). The 12/15-lipoxygenase expressing cells and mouse resident peritoneal macrophages were preincubated in the presence of an anti-LDL receptor antibody or an anti-LRP antibody for 2 h. After 15-min incubation with LDL, the cytosol and membranes were subjected to Western blot analysis. As shown in Fig. 3 (A and C), the 12/15-lipoxygenase band in the membranes of the cells preincubated with an anti-LRP antibody was faint after LDL treatment as compared with that from the control. Consistent with this observation, the density of the 12/15-lipoxygenase band in the cytosol of the cells preincubated with an anti-LRP antibody was not significantly different from that of the cells that were not treated with LDL. Preincubation with an anti-LDL receptor antibody did not significantly affect the enzyme translocation by the LDL treatment (Fig. 3). The results indicate that the translocation of 12/15-lipoxygenase is mediated by binding of LDL to the LRP but not to the LDL receptor. To determine the intracellular localization of the 12/15-lipoxygenase after LDL treatment, the enzyme-expressing cells were subjected to immunohistochemical analysis using an antibody against the enzyme (Fig.4). A different staining pattern of the 12/15-lipoxygenase was observed between the cells treated with and without LDL under light microscopy. In the non-treated cells, the enzyme was predominantly stained in cytoplasm of 12/15-lipoxygenase-expressing cells (Fig. 4, C and D). When the cells were treated with LDL for 15 min, the positive staining of 12/15-lipoxygenase was observed not only in cytoplasm but also in the plasma membrane of the enzyme-expressing cells (Fig. 4, A and B). Essentially the same results were obtained with LDL-treated resident peritoneal macrophages. The control experiments with preimmune rabbit serum in place of the antiserum against 12/15-lipoxygenase exhibited negative immunostaining (data not shown). The results indicate that the plasma membrane is at least one of the major sites where 12/15-lipoxygenase translocates after LDL treatment. To investigate the precise localization of the enzyme in the LDL-treated cells, we observed the immunostained cells with an electron microscopy. As shown in Fig. 4F, non-treated cells showed diffuse staining pattern in cytoplasm. In contrast, the plasma membrane was the major site where the 12/15-lipoxygenase was localized in LDL-treated cells, although membranes of some other intracellular organelles were also stained in addition to cytoplasm (Fig. 4E). It should be noted that the nuclear envelope was essentially not stained in LDL-treated cells. To examine whether enzyme association with the membranes is required for the LDL oxidation, we employed a translocation inhibitor, L655238. This compound was first found to inhibit translocation of 5-lipoxygenase (24Evans J.F. Leville C. Mancini J.A. Prasit P. Therien M. Zamboni R. Gauthier J.Y. Fortin R. Charleson P. MacIntyre D.E. Luell S. Bach T.J. Meurer R. Guay J. Vickers P.J. Rouzer C.A. Gillard J.W. Miller D.K. Mol. Pharmacol. 1991; 40: 22-27PubMed Google Scholar) but later shown to inhibit translocation of other lipoxygenases without affecting the enzyme activity per se (25Ozeki Y. Nagamura Y. Ito H. Unemi F. Kimura Y. Igawa T. Kambayashi J. Takahashi Y. Yoshimoto T. Br. J. Pharmacol. 1999; 128: 1699-1704Crossref PubMed Scopus (25) Google Scholar). As shown in Fig. 5 (A and B), L655238 inhibited translocation of 12/15-lipoxygenase in the LDL-treated cells in a dose-dependent manner without affecting the enzyme activity. Fig. 5C shows that LDL oxidation determined as TBARS generation in the medium was blocked in a dose-dependent manner by the translocation inhibitor. The inhibitor at 10 μm, which completely suppressed the enzyme translocation (Fig. 5, A and B), inhibited the LDL oxidation to the level of mock-transfected cells (Fig.5C). The results clearly indicate that the association of the enzyme with the plasma membrane is required for the LDL oxidation. We demonstrate here that 12/15-lipoxygenase is translocated from cytosol to the membranes by LDL treatment in 12/15-lipoxygenase-expressing macrophage-like cells and resident peritoneal macrophages (Figs. 1 and 2). The translocated enzyme is preferentially localized in the plasma membrane (Fig. 4), strongly suggesting that the enzyme directly oxygenates cholesterol ester selectively transferred from the LDL particle to the plasma membrane. In fact, the LDL oxidation was inhibited by a translocation inhibitor, L655238 (Fig. 5). Regio- and stereospecific oxygenation of linoleic acid esterified to cholesterol in LDL by 12/15-lipoxygenase-expressing cells indicates that cholesterol ester is enzymatically oxygenated by the cells (12Sakashita T. Takahashi Y. Kinoshita T. Yoshimoto T. Eur. J. Biochem. 1999; 265: 825-831Crossref PubMed Scopus (35) Google Scholar). The enzymatic oxygenation is presumed to be the first key step for the generation of the completely oxidized LDL, which is made in the subsequent steps, including non-enzymatic radical chain reaction (12Sakashita T. Takahashi Y. Kinoshita T. Yoshimoto T. Eur. J. Biochem. 1999; 265: 825-831Crossref PubMed Scopus (35) Google Scholar, 23Belkner J. Stender H. Kuhn H. J. Biol. Chem. 1998; 273: 23225-23232Abstract Full Text Full Text PDF PubMed Scopus (103) Google Scholar). The fact that 12/15-lipoxygenase translocation takes place in a very short period such as 5–15 min supports this notion (Fig. 1). Furthermore, such a short time course minimizes the oxygenation of phospholipids in plasma membrane, which may cause the cell injury. The weak activity of the membrane-associated enzyme after LDL treatment strongly suggests that the enzyme in the plasma membrane reacts with colocalized substrates, including cholesterol ester and then suicides. However, the reduction of the enzyme activity may be due to other mechanisms unrelated to suicide inactivation such as poor substrate availability or conformational changes of the enzyme. It is reported that 12/15-lipoxygenase preferentially oxygenates cholesterol ester in the LDL particle, whereas phospholipids or even free fatty acids are not oxygenated, although they are present on the surface of the LDL particle (23Belkner J. Stender H. Kuhn H. J. Biol. Chem. 1998; 273: 23225-23232Abstract Full Text Full Text PDF PubMed Scopus (103) Google Scholar). These results suggest that the specific oxygenation of cholesterol ester transferred to the plasma membrane by 12/15-lipoxygenase could take place. LRP is an LDL-binding receptor that selectively transfers cholesterol ester in the LDL particle (14Swarnakar S. Beers J. Strickland D.K. Azhar S. Williams D.L. J. Biol. Chem. 2001; 276: 21121-21128Abstract Full Text Full Text PDF PubMed Scopus (39) Google Scholar).2 We show here that binding of LDL to LRP is also required for 12/15-lipoxygenase translocation (Fig. 3). 12/15-Lipoxygenase-expressing J774A.1 cells have both LRP and the LDL receptor, although the expression level of the LDL receptor is low (13Xu W. Takahashi Y. Sakashita T. Iwasaki T. Hattori H. Yoshimoto T. J. Biol. Chem. 2001; 276: 36454-36459Abstract Full Text Full Text PDF PubMed Scopus (29) Google Scholar). In contrast, normal macrophages express high level of LRP but do not express the LDL receptor (26Hiltunen T.P. Yla-Herttuala S. Atherosclerosis. 1998; 137 (suppl.): S81-S88Abstract Full Text Full Text PDF PubMed Scopus (50) Google Scholar, 27Moestrup S.K. Gliemann J. Pallesen G. Cell Tissue Res. 1992; 269: 375-382Crossref PubMed Scopus (359) Google Scholar). The contribution of LRP but not of the LDL receptor to 12/15-lipoxygenase translocation supports the notion that the LDL-dependent translocation is also mediated by LRP in normal macrophages. In fact, the enzyme translocation is inhibited in mouse peritoneal macrophages lacking the LDL receptor by the anti-LRP antibody (Fig. 3, C and D). However, we cannot completely exclude a role for the LDL receptor in the translocation, because either type of cells used in our experiments express a little or no LDL receptor where an anti-LDL receptor antibody would not be expected to have an effect. Coupling of selective uptake of cholesterol ester with 12/15-lipoxygenase translocation would cause efficient oxygenation of linoleic acid esterified to cholesterol. The mechanisms of the efflux of oxygenated cholesterol ester to the LDL particle are now under extensive investigation in our laboratory. The cholesterol ester in the high density lipoprotein is selectively transferred to the plasma membrane by scavenger receptor class B type I (28Acton S. Rigotti A. Landschulz K.T. Xu S. Hobbs H.H. Krieger M. Science. 1996; 271: 518-520Crossref PubMed Scopus (2011) Google Scholar). The same receptor is shown to mediate cholesterol efflux to high density lipoprotein (29Ji Y. Jian B. Wang N. Sun Y. Moya M.L. Phillips M.C. Rothblat G.H. Swaney J.B. Tall A.R. J. Biol. Chem. 1997; 272: 20982-20985Abstract Full Text Full Text PDF PubMed Scopus (636) Google Scholar, 30Jian B. de la Llera-Moya M. Ji Y. Wang N. Phillips M.C. Swaney J.B. Tall A.R. Rothblat G.H. J. Biol. Chem. 1998; 273: 5599-5606Abstract Full Text Full Text PDF PubMed Scopus (263) Google Scholar). It may be possible that LRP also mediates the efflux of oxygenated cholesterol ester from the plasma membrane to the LDL particle. The mechanism of translocation of 12/15-lipoxygenase in macrophages is not known (16Miller Y.I. Chang M.K. Funk C.D. Feramisco J.R. Witztum J.L. J. Biol. Chem. 2001; 276: 19431-19439Abstract Full Text Full Text PDF PubMed Scopus (67) Google Scholar), although the N-terminal C2-like domain in the enzyme is proposed to be responsible for the enzyme binding to the membrane phospholipids in a calcium dependent way (31Walther M. Anton M. Wiedmann M. Fletterick R. Kuhn H. J. Biol. Chem. 2002; 277: 27360-27366Abstract Full Text Full Text PDF PubMed Scopus (63) Google Scholar). In fact, our finding that the translocation of 12/15-lipoxygenase is inhibited by L655238 suggests the similar translocation mechanism to that of 5-lipoxygenase. L655238 was first developed as an inhibitor of 5-lipoxygenase-activating protein, which was later shown to function as a substrate transfer protein promoting the use of arachidonic acid and other unsaturated fatty acids (32Radmark O.P. Am. J. Respir. Crit. Care Med. 2000; 161: S11-S15Crossref PubMed Scopus (82) Google Scholar). In 5-lipoxygenase, the N-terminal C2-like domain is demonstrated to be a calcium-dependent membrane-targeting domain without requirement of any special docking protein (33Kulkarni S. Das S. Funk C.D. Murray D. Cho W. J. Biol. Chem. 2002; 277: 13167-13174Abstract Full Text Full Text PDF PubMed Scopus (151) Google Scholar). We have reported that 12-lipoxygenase in human platelets is activated by membrane translocation when stimulated by collagen or thrombin and that a translocation inhibitor of 5-lipoxygenase, L655238, inhibits production of 12-HETE from platelets without affecting the enzyme activity (25Ozeki Y. Nagamura Y. Ito H. Unemi F. Kimura Y. Igawa T. Kambayashi J. Takahashi Y. Yoshimoto T. Br. J. Pharmacol. 1999; 128: 1699-1704Crossref PubMed Scopus (25) Google Scholar). The results clearly indicate that L655238 is not a 5-lipoxygenase-specific inhibitor but a general translocation inhibitor of lipoxygenases. The structural difference of the C2-like domain in the enzyme has been proposed to determine the enzyme preference of the membrane type (34Cho W. J. Biol. Chem. 2001; 276: 32407-32410Abstract Full Text Full Text PDF PubMed Scopus (192) Google Scholar). For example, the C2-like domain in 5-lipoxygenase and cytosolic phospholipase A2 binds preferentially to the nuclear envelope (33Kulkarni S. Das S. Funk C.D. Murray D. Cho W. J. Biol. Chem. 2002; 277: 13167-13174Abstract Full Text Full Text PDF PubMed Scopus (151) Google Scholar, 35Nalefski E.A. McDonagh T. Somers W. Seehra J. Falke J.J. Clark J.D. J. Biol. Chem. 1998; 273: 1365-1372Abstract Full Text Full Text PDF PubMed Scopus (113) Google Scholar), whereas that in protein kinase Cα and phospholipase Cδ1 prefers targeting to the plasma membrane (36Medkova M. Cho W. J. Biol. Chem. 1999; 274: 19852-19861Abstract Full Text Full Text PDF PubMed Scopus (146) Google Scholar,37Ananthanarayanan B. Das S. Rhee S.G. Murray D. Cho W. J. Biol. Chem. 2001; 277: 3568-3575Abstract Full Text Full Text PDF PubMed Scopus (85) Google Scholar) in a calcium-dependent way. In fact, our preliminary results using 12/15-lipoxygenase-expressing cells suggested that the calcium ionophore A23187 caused translocation of the enzyme (data not shown), although different results have been reported (35Nalefski E.A. McDonagh T. Somers W. Seehra J. Falke J.J. Clark J.D. J. Biol. Chem. 1998; 273: 1365-1372Abstract Full Text Full Text PDF PubMed Scopus (113) Google Scholar). LRP is known to couple with a Gi class of heterotrimeric GTPases when it binds to apoE4 to induce apoptosis of neuronal cells (38Hashimoto Y. Jiang H. Niikura T. Ito Y. Hagiwara A. Umezawa K. Abe Y. Murayama Y. Nishimoto I. J. Neurosci. 2000; 20: 8401-8409Crossref PubMed Google Scholar). We demonstrate here that the LDL binding to LRP but not to the LDL receptor is required for the translocation of 12/15-lipoxygenase (Fig. 3). Although LDL contains apoB but not apoE as an apolipoprotein, some signal transduction pathways may be activated after the binding of LDL to LRP rather than simple membrane association via the N-terminal C2 domain-like structure of the 12/15-lipoxygenase in the cells treated by LDL. Further investigations are necessary to elucidate the mechanism of LRP-mediated membrane association of the 12/15-lipoxygenase. LRP is a multifunctional receptor capable of binding a wide variety of ligands and postulated to participate in a number of pathophysiological processes ranging from atherosclerosis, fibrinolysis, neuronal degeneration, to apoptosis (39Herz J. Strickland D.K. J. Clin. Invest. 2001; 108: 779-784Crossref PubMed Scopus (897) Google Scholar). As a role in homeostasis of plasma lipoproteins, LRP expressed in liver has been established as a remnant receptor using LRP-disrupted mice in a liver-specific manner (40Rohlmann A. Gotthardt M. Hammer R.E. Herz J. J. Clin. Invest. 1998; 101: 689-695Crossref PubMed Scopus (403) Google Scholar). However, they demonstrate that more than 70% of the remnant is cleared from plasma by the LDL receptor expressed in liver, and LRP in liver is a compensating receptor for the clearance of the remnant. We have proposed the dual functions of LRP expressed in macrophages, selective uptake of cholesterol ester from LDL, and 12/15-lipoxygenase translocation. Thus, an LRP antagonist may be anti-atherogenic by inhibition of LDL oxidation in the two ways: blocking of the binding of native LDL to macrophages followed by the selective transfer of cholesterol ester to the plasma membrane and by inhibiting the association of the plasma membrane with 12/15-lipoxygenase, which oxygenates the cholesterol ester in the plasma membrane. We are indebted to Dr. J. Herz of the University of Texas Southwestern Medical Center for the generous gift of an anti-LRP antibody, Dr. Y. Saeki of Shiga University for providing J774A.1 cells, and Dr. S. Nagata for providing the pEF-BOS vector. We thank Dr. M. R. Waterman of Vanderbilt University for critical reading of the manuscript." @default.
• W2093016786 created "2016-06-24" @default.
• W2093016786 creator A5022106943 @default.
• W2093016786 creator A5038796912 @default.
• W2093016786 creator A5041126150 @default.
• W2093016786 creator A5041971828 @default.
• W2093016786 creator A5055905669 @default.
• W2093016786 creator A5060520190 @default.
• W2093016786 creator A5071570613 @default.
• W2093016786 creator A5071891873 @default.
• W2093016786 creator A5079984773 @default.
• W2093016786 creator A5087836782 @default.
• W2093016786 date "2003-04-01" @default.
• W2093016786 modified "2023-10-12" @default.
• W2093016786 title "Low Density Lipoprotein Receptor-related Protein-mediated Membrane Translocation of 12/15-Lipoxygenase Is Required for Oxidation of Low Density Lipoprotein by Macrophages" @default.
• W2093016786 cites W1533414834 @default.
• W2093016786 cites W1581644356 @default.
• W2093016786 cites W1665187386 @default.
• W2093016786 cites W1775749144 @default.
• W2093016786 cites W1964377967 @default.
• W2093016786 cites W1976763304 @default.
• W2093016786 cites W1981239721 @default.
• W2093016786 cites W1982469575 @default.
• W2093016786 cites W1985170971 @default.
• W2093016786 cites W1985836591 @default.
• W2093016786 cites W1987215061 @default.
• W2093016786 cites W1997486430 @default.
• W2093016786 cites W2000413302 @default.
• W2093016786 cites W2003353928 @default.
• W2093016786 cites W2004357717 @default.
• W2093016786 cites W2007187686 @default.
• W2093016786 cites W2007729873 @default.
• W2093016786 cites W2022690810 @default.
• W2093016786 cites W2043617365 @default.
• W2093016786 cites W2062030534 @default.
• W2093016786 cites W2064484544 @default.
• W2093016786 cites W2065430193 @default.
• W2093016786 cites W2067089828 @default.
• W2093016786 cites W2067216007 @default.
• W2093016786 cites W2074203890 @default.
• W2093016786 cites W2077576735 @default.
• W2093016786 cites W2084744450 @default.
• W2093016786 cites W2090178694 @default.
• W2093016786 cites W2102069095 @default.
• W2093016786 cites W2122020349 @default.
• W2093016786 cites W2125441354 @default.
• W2093016786 cites W2138972132 @default.
• W2093016786 cites W2149303684 @default.
• W2093016786 cites W2159226443 @default.
• W2093016786 cites W2167974856 @default.
• W2093016786 cites W3022052022 @default.
• W2093016786 cites W3022864527 @default.
• W2093016786 cites W4248025115 @default.
• W2093016786 doi "https://doi.org/10.1074/jbc.m212104200" @default.
• W2093016786 hasPubMedId "https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/12566436" @default.
• W2093016786 hasPublicationYear "2003" @default.
• W2093016786 type Work @default.
• W2093016786 sameAs 2093016786 @default.
• W2093016786 citedByCount "56" @default.
• W2093016786 countsByYear W20930167862012 @default.
• W2093016786 countsByYear W20930167862013 @default.
• W2093016786 countsByYear W20930167862015 @default.
• W2093016786 countsByYear W20930167862016 @default.
• W2093016786 countsByYear W20930167862018 @default.
• W2093016786 countsByYear W20930167862019 @default.
• W2093016786 countsByYear W20930167862020 @default.
• W2093016786 countsByYear W20930167862021 @default.
• W2093016786 crossrefType "journal-article" @default.
• W2093016786 hasAuthorship W2093016786A5022106943 @default.
• W2093016786 hasAuthorship W2093016786A5038796912 @default.
• W2093016786 hasAuthorship W2093016786A5041126150 @default.
• W2093016786 hasAuthorship W2093016786A5041971828 @default.
• W2093016786 hasAuthorship W2093016786A5055905669 @default.
• W2093016786 hasAuthorship W2093016786A5060520190 @default.
• W2093016786 hasAuthorship W2093016786A5071570613 @default.
• W2093016786 hasAuthorship W2093016786A5071891873 @default.
• W2093016786 hasAuthorship W2093016786A5079984773 @default.
• W2093016786 hasAuthorship W2093016786A5087836782 @default.
• W2093016786 hasBestOaLocation W20930167861 @default.
• W2093016786 hasConcept C104317684 @default.
• W2093016786 hasConcept C138626823 @default.
• W2093016786 hasConcept C170493617 @default.
• W2093016786 hasConcept C174782155 @default.
• W2093016786 hasConcept C181199279 @default.
• W2093016786 hasConcept C185592680 @default.
• W2093016786 hasConcept C202751555 @default.
• W2093016786 hasConcept C2778004101 @default.
• W2093016786 hasConcept C2778163477 @default.
• W2093016786 hasConcept C2779244956 @default.
• W2093016786 hasConcept C2779620165 @default.
• W2093016786 hasConcept C2780072125 @default.
• W2093016786 hasConcept C2780857362 @default.
• W2093016786 hasConcept C2994476132 @default.
• W2093016786 hasConcept C41625074 @default.
• W2093016786 hasConcept C55493867 @default.
• W2093016786 hasConcept C8243546 @default.
• W2093016786 hasConcept C86803240 @default.
• W2093016786 hasConcept C95444343 @default.

• next