FRINK Linked Data Fragments server

Matches in SemOpenAlex for { <https://semopenalex.org/work/W2093144002> ?p ?o ?g. }

• W2093144002 endingPage "1391" @default.
• W2093144002 startingPage "1388" @default.
• W2093144002 abstract "No AccessTechnical NoteClustering of Sensor Locations Using the Effective Independence MethodMichael I. Friswell and Rafael Castro-TrigueroMichael I. FriswellCollege of Engineering, Swansea University, Swansea SA2 8PP, United Kingdom*Professor of Aerospace Structures, College of Engineering; .Search for more papers by this author and Rafael Castro-TrigueroDepartment of Mechanics, University of Cordoba, 14071 Cordoba, Spain†Department of Mechanics, Campus de Rabanales.Search for more papers by this authorPublished Online:12 Mar 2015https://doi.org/10.2514/1.J053503SectionsView Full TextPDFPDF Plus ToolsAdd to favoritesDownload citationTrack citations ShareShare onFacebookTwitterLinked InRedditEmail About References [1] Pickrel C. R., “A Practical Approach to Modal Pretest Design,” Mechanical Systems and Signal Processing, Vol. 13, No. 2, 1999, pp. 271–295. doi:https://doi.org/10.1006/mssp.1998.1212 0888-3270 CrossrefGoogle Scholar[2] Penny J. E. T., Friswell M. I. and Garvey S. D., “Automatic Choice of Measurement Locations for Dynamic Testing,” AIAA Journal, Vol. 32, No. 2, 1994, pp. 407–414. doi:https://doi.org/10.2514/3.11998 AIAJAH 0001-1452 LinkGoogle Scholar[3] Papadopoulos M. and Garcia E., “Sensor Placement Methodologies for Dynamic Testing,” AIAA Journal, Vol. 36, No. 2, 1998, pp. 256–263. doi:https://doi.org/10.2514/2.7509 AIAJAH 0001-1452 LinkGoogle Scholar[4] Garvey S. D., Friswell M. I. and Penny J. E. T., “Evaluation of a Method for Automatic Selection of Measurement Locations Based on Subspace-Matching,” XIV International Modal Analysis Conference (IMAC), Society of Experimental Mechanics, Bethel, CT, Feb. 1996, pp. 1546–1552. Google Scholar[5] He L., Lian J., Ma B. and Wang H., “Optimal Multiaxial Sensor Placement for Modal Identification of Large Structures,” Structural Control and Health Monitoring, Vol. 21, No. 1, 2014, pp. 61–79. doi:https://doi.org/10.1002/stc.1550 CrossrefGoogle Scholar[6] D'Souza K. and Epureanu B., “Sensor Placement for Damage Detection in Nonlinear Systems Using System Augmentations,” 48th AIAA/American Soc. of Mechanical Engineers/American Helicopter Soc./American Society for Composites Structures, Structural Dynamics, and Materials Conference, AIAA Paper 2007-2057, 2007. LinkGoogle Scholar[7] Reynier M. and Kandil H. A., “Sensors Location for Updating Problems,” Mechanical Systems and Signal Processing, Vol. 13, No. 2, 1999, pp. 297–314. doi:https://doi.org/10.1006/mssp.1998.1213 0888-3270 CrossrefGoogle Scholar[8] Castro-Triguero R., Murugan S. M., Gallego R. and Friswell M. I., “Robust Sensor Placement under Parametric Uncertainty,” Mechanical Systems and Signal Processing, Vol. 41, Nos. 1–2, Dec. 2013, pp. 268–287. doi:https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ymssp.2013.06.022 0888-3270 CrossrefGoogle Scholar[9] Castro-Triguero R., Saavedra Flores E. I., Diaz de la O F. A., Friswell M. I. and Gallego R., “Optimal Sensor Placement in Timber Structures by Means of a Multi-Scale Approach with Material Uncertainty,” Structural Control and Health Monitoring, Vol. 21, No. 12, Dec. 2014, pp. 1437–1452. doi:https://doi.org/10.1002/stc.1654 CrossrefGoogle Scholar[10] Kammer D. C., “Sensor Placement for On-Orbit Modal Identification and Correlation of Large Space Structures,” Journal of Guidance, Control and Dynamics, Vol. 14, No. 2, 1991, pp. 251–259. doi:https://doi.org/10.2514/3.20635 LinkGoogle Scholar[11] Kammer D. C. and Tinker M. L., “Optimal Placement of Triaxial Accelerometers for Modal Vibration Tests,” Mechanical Systems and Signal Processing, Vol. 18, No. 1, 2004, pp. 29–41. doi:https://doi.org/10.1016/S0888-3270(03)00017-7 0888-3270 CrossrefGoogle Scholar[12] Kammer D. C. and Peck J. A., “Mass-Weighting Methods for Sensor Placement Using Sensor Set Expansion Techniques,” Mechanical Systems and Signal Processing, Vol. 22, No. 7, 2008, pp. 1515–1525. doi:https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ymssp.2008.01.002 0888-3270 CrossrefGoogle Scholar[13] Hemez F. M. and Farhat C., “An Energy Based Optimum Sensor Placement Criterion and Its Application to Structural Damage Detection,” XII International Modal Analysis Conference (IMAC), Society of Experimental Mechanics, Bethel, CT, 1994, pp. 1568–1575. Google Scholar[14] Heo G., Wang M. L. and Satpathi D., “Optimal Transducer Placement for Health Monitoring of Long Span Bridge,” Soil Dynamics and Earthquake Engineering, Vol. 16, Nos. 7–8, 1997, pp. 495–502. doi:https://doi.org/10.1016/S0267-7261(97)00010-9 CrossrefGoogle Scholar[15] Papadimitriou C. and Beck J. L., “Entropy-Based Optimal Sensor Location for Structural Model Updating,” Journal of Vibration and Control, Vol. 6, No. 5, 2000, pp. 781–800. doi:https://doi.org/10.1177/107754630000600508 CrossrefGoogle Scholar[16] Papadimitriou C., “Optimal Sensor Placement Methodology for Parametric Identification of Structural Systems,” Journal of Sound and Vibration, Vol. 278, Nos. 4–5, 2004, pp. 923–947. doi:https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jsv.2003.10.063 JSVIAG 0022-460X CrossrefGoogle Scholar[17] Li D. S., Li H. N. and Fritzen C. P., “Load Dependent Sensor Placement Method: Theory and Experimental Validation,” Mechanical Systems and Signal Processing, Vol. 31, Aug. 2012, pp. 217–227. doi:https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ymssp.2012.04.014 0888-3270 CrossrefGoogle Scholar[18] Rao A. R. M. and Anandakumar G., “Optimal Sensor Placement Techniques for System Identification and Health Monitoring of Civil Structures,” Smart Structures and Systems, Vol. 4, No. 4, 2008, pp. 465–492. doi:https://doi.org/10.12989/sss.2008.4.4.465 CrossrefGoogle Scholar[19] Chang M. and Pakzad S. N., “Optimal Sensor Placement for Modal Identification of Bridge Systems Considering Number of Sensing Nodes,” Journal of Bridge Engineering, Vol. 19, No. 6, 2014, Paper 04014019. doi:https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)BE.1943-5592.0000594 CrossrefGoogle Scholar Previous article Next article" @default.
• W2093144002 created "2016-06-24" @default.
• W2093144002 creator A5071729507 @default.
• W2093144002 creator A5089782583 @default.
• W2093144002 date "2015-05-01" @default.
• W2093144002 modified "2023-10-18" @default.
• W2093144002 title "Clustering of Sensor Locations Using the Effective Independence Method" @default.
• W2093144002 cites W1579224445 @default.
• W2093144002 cites W1918051250 @default.
• W2093144002 cites W1970144169 @default.
• W2093144002 cites W1987169324 @default.
• W2093144002 cites W1993084494 @default.
• W2093144002 cites W1994410793 @default.
• W2093144002 cites W2004338573 @default.
• W2093144002 cites W2016467472 @default.
• W2093144002 cites W2021274998 @default.
• W2093144002 cites W2028116207 @default.
• W2093144002 cites W2063065475 @default.
• W2093144002 cites W2064880200 @default.
• W2093144002 cites W2065455374 @default.
• W2093144002 cites W2088390608 @default.
• W2093144002 cites W2126431552 @default.
• W2093144002 cites W2168278017 @default.
• W2093144002 cites W4241184894 @default.
• W2093144002 doi "https://doi.org/10.2514/1.j053503" @default.
• W2093144002 hasPublicationYear "2015" @default.
• W2093144002 type Work @default.
• W2093144002 sameAs 2093144002 @default.
• W2093144002 citedByCount "25" @default.
• W2093144002 countsByYear W20931440022016 @default.
• W2093144002 countsByYear W20931440022017 @default.
• W2093144002 countsByYear W20931440022018 @default.
• W2093144002 countsByYear W20931440022019 @default.
• W2093144002 countsByYear W20931440022020 @default.
• W2093144002 countsByYear W20931440022022 @default.
• W2093144002 countsByYear W20931440022023 @default.
• W2093144002 crossrefType "journal-article" @default.
• W2093144002 hasAuthorship W2093144002A5071729507 @default.
• W2093144002 hasAuthorship W2093144002A5089782583 @default.
• W2093144002 hasConcept C105795698 @default.
• W2093144002 hasConcept C11413529 @default.
• W2093144002 hasConcept C154945302 @default.
• W2093144002 hasConcept C188027245 @default.
• W2093144002 hasConcept C192562407 @default.
• W2093144002 hasConcept C33923547 @default.
• W2093144002 hasConcept C35651441 @default.
• W2093144002 hasConcept C41008148 @default.
• W2093144002 hasConcept C71139939 @default.
• W2093144002 hasConceptScore W2093144002C105795698 @default.
• W2093144002 hasConceptScore W2093144002C11413529 @default.
• W2093144002 hasConceptScore W2093144002C154945302 @default.
• W2093144002 hasConceptScore W2093144002C188027245 @default.
• W2093144002 hasConceptScore W2093144002C192562407 @default.
• W2093144002 hasConceptScore W2093144002C33923547 @default.
• W2093144002 hasConceptScore W2093144002C35651441 @default.
• W2093144002 hasConceptScore W2093144002C41008148 @default.
• W2093144002 hasConceptScore W2093144002C71139939 @default.
• W2093144002 hasIssue "5" @default.
• W2093144002 hasLocation W20931440021 @default.
• W2093144002 hasOpenAccess W2093144002 @default.
• W2093144002 hasPrimaryLocation W20931440021 @default.
• W2093144002 hasRelatedWork W1979597421 @default.
• W2093144002 hasRelatedWork W2007980826 @default.
• W2093144002 hasRelatedWork W2132611475 @default.
• W2093144002 hasRelatedWork W2386767533 @default.
• W2093144002 hasRelatedWork W2391960978 @default.
• W2093144002 hasRelatedWork W2748952813 @default.
• W2093144002 hasRelatedWork W2899084033 @default.
• W2093144002 hasRelatedWork W3048485322 @default.
• W2093144002 hasRelatedWork W4248425046 @default.
• W2093144002 hasRelatedWork W4285262424 @default.
• W2093144002 hasVolume "53" @default.
• W2093144002 isParatext "false" @default.
• W2093144002 isRetracted "false" @default.
• W2093144002 magId "2093144002" @default.
• W2093144002 workType "article" @default.