Matches in SemOpenAlex for { <https://semopenalex.org/work/W2093238437> ?p ?o ?g. }
Showing items 1 to 77 of
77
with 100 items per page.
- W2093238437 endingPage "344" @default.
- W2093238437 startingPage "318" @default.
- W2093238437 abstract "Does a person who is voluntarily drunk remain capable of giving valid consent to sex? The Court of Appeal in Bree held that ‘a drunken consent is still (valid) consent’, though it further recognises that the capacity to consent may evaporate well before a complainant becomes unconscious. This decision is a move in the right direction, yet this article argues that it has not gone far enough, and that s. 74 of the Sexual Offences Act 2003 which governs these scenarios allows—and even requires—a more drastic interpretation: a drunken consent is not consent when the person is very drunk. Based on a distinction between factual and legal consent, the article starts by setting up the legal framework as set out in s. 74, and developed in Bree and H. It then goes on to criticise the current case law and its interpretation of s. 74 for not being restrictive enough, by examining two possible theoretical rationales, mentioned in the judgments. The first, which is based on an analogy with the law relating to intoxicated offenders, is criticised on the grounds of differences between consent and intent. The second, which is based on the general argument that this position recognises the positive aspect of sexual autonomy, is criticised for its failure to distinguish between claims of normative facts and claims of public policy and for giving too much weight to the latter considerations. From the discussion an alternative, more restrictive position, emerges in line with s. 74 of the 2003 Act, according to which a drunken consent is not consent. This position can be adopted by judges, through the provision of better guidance to juries, but failing that a reform of the law might be needed." @default.
- W2093238437 created "2016-06-24" @default.
- W2093238437 creator A5005418447 @default.
- W2093238437 date "2009-08-01" @default.
- W2093238437 modified "2023-09-26" @default.
- W2093238437 title "‘A Drunken Consent is Still Consent’—Or is it? A Critical Analysis of the Law on a Drunken Consent to Sex following Bree" @default.
- W2093238437 cites W2026908610 @default.
- W2093238437 cites W2051437523 @default.
- W2093238437 cites W2053953988 @default.
- W2093238437 cites W2054800919 @default.
- W2093238437 cites W2071535717 @default.
- W2093238437 cites W2074320107 @default.
- W2093238437 cites W3122754213 @default.
- W2093238437 cites W4239626675 @default.
- W2093238437 cites W2089371147 @default.
- W2093238437 doi "https://doi.org/10.1350/jcla.2009.73.4.582" @default.
- W2093238437 hasPublicationYear "2009" @default.
- W2093238437 type Work @default.
- W2093238437 sameAs 2093238437 @default.
- W2093238437 citedByCount "24" @default.
- W2093238437 countsByYear W20932384372012 @default.
- W2093238437 countsByYear W20932384372013 @default.
- W2093238437 countsByYear W20932384372016 @default.
- W2093238437 countsByYear W20932384372018 @default.
- W2093238437 countsByYear W20932384372019 @default.
- W2093238437 countsByYear W20932384372020 @default.
- W2093238437 crossrefType "journal-article" @default.
- W2093238437 hasAuthorship W2093238437A5005418447 @default.
- W2093238437 hasConcept C142724271 @default.
- W2093238437 hasConcept C15744967 @default.
- W2093238437 hasConcept C17744445 @default.
- W2093238437 hasConcept C199539241 @default.
- W2093238437 hasConcept C204787440 @default.
- W2093238437 hasConcept C2778449503 @default.
- W2093238437 hasConcept C68122502 @default.
- W2093238437 hasConcept C71924100 @default.
- W2093238437 hasConcept C73484699 @default.
- W2093238437 hasConceptScore W2093238437C142724271 @default.
- W2093238437 hasConceptScore W2093238437C15744967 @default.
- W2093238437 hasConceptScore W2093238437C17744445 @default.
- W2093238437 hasConceptScore W2093238437C199539241 @default.
- W2093238437 hasConceptScore W2093238437C204787440 @default.
- W2093238437 hasConceptScore W2093238437C2778449503 @default.
- W2093238437 hasConceptScore W2093238437C68122502 @default.
- W2093238437 hasConceptScore W2093238437C71924100 @default.
- W2093238437 hasConceptScore W2093238437C73484699 @default.
- W2093238437 hasIssue "4" @default.
- W2093238437 hasLocation W20932384371 @default.
- W2093238437 hasOpenAccess W2093238437 @default.
- W2093238437 hasPrimaryLocation W20932384371 @default.
- W2093238437 hasRelatedWork W1988222372 @default.
- W2093238437 hasRelatedWork W1992567913 @default.
- W2093238437 hasRelatedWork W2033240716 @default.
- W2093238437 hasRelatedWork W2190306890 @default.
- W2093238437 hasRelatedWork W2209961495 @default.
- W2093238437 hasRelatedWork W2498522349 @default.
- W2093238437 hasRelatedWork W2501311478 @default.
- W2093238437 hasRelatedWork W2619387185 @default.
- W2093238437 hasRelatedWork W2620601659 @default.
- W2093238437 hasRelatedWork W2668999109 @default.
- W2093238437 hasRelatedWork W2782736039 @default.
- W2093238437 hasRelatedWork W2938638226 @default.
- W2093238437 hasRelatedWork W2964564580 @default.
- W2093238437 hasRelatedWork W3119484338 @default.
- W2093238437 hasRelatedWork W3123127157 @default.
- W2093238437 hasRelatedWork W3125641746 @default.
- W2093238437 hasRelatedWork W3132599801 @default.
- W2093238437 hasRelatedWork W3157156073 @default.
- W2093238437 hasRelatedWork W67905847 @default.
- W2093238437 hasRelatedWork W844654997 @default.
- W2093238437 hasVolume "73" @default.
- W2093238437 isParatext "false" @default.
- W2093238437 isRetracted "false" @default.
- W2093238437 magId "2093238437" @default.
- W2093238437 workType "article" @default.