FRINK Linked Data Fragments server

Matches in SemOpenAlex for { <https://semopenalex.org/work/W2093593263> ?p ?o ?g. }

• W2093593263 endingPage "524" @default.
• W2093593263 startingPage "524" @default.
• W2093593263 abstract "JAMA Effect on the Quality of Peer Review of Blinding Reviewers and Asking Them to Sign Their Reports: A Randomized Controlled Trial Fiona Godlee, BSc, MRCP; Catharine R. Gale, BSc; Christopher N. Martyn, DPhil, FRCP Context.— Anxiety about bias, lack of accountability, and poor quality of peer review has led to questions about the imbalance in anonymity between reviewers and authors. Objective.— To evaluate the effect on the quality of peer review of blinding reviewers to the authors' identities and requiring reviewers to sign their reports. Design.— Randomized controlled trial. Setting.— A general medical journal. Participants.— A total of 420 reviewers from the journal's database. Intervention.— We modified a paper accepted for publication introducing 8 areas of weakness. Reviewers were randomly allocated to 5 groups. Groups 1 and 2 received manuscripts from which the authors' names and affiliations had been removed, while groups 3 and 4 were aware of the authors' identities. Groups 1 and 3 were asked to sign their reports, while groups 2 and 4 were asked to return their reports unsigned. The fifth group was sent the paper in the usual manner of the journal, with authors' identities revealed and a request to comment anonymously. Group 5 differed from group 4 only in that its members were unaware that they were taking part in a study. Main Outcome Measure.— The number of weaknesses in the paper that were commented on by the reviewers. Results.— Reports were received from 221 reviewers (53%). The mean number of weaknesses commented on was 2 (1.7, 2.1, 1.8, and 1.9 for groups 1, 2, 3, and 4 and 5 combined, respectively). There were no statistically significant differences between groups in their performance. Reviewers who were blinded to authors' identities were less likely to recommend rejection than those who were aware of the authors' identities (odds ratio, 0.5; 95% confidence interval, 0.3-1.0). Conclusions.— Neither blinding reviewers to the authors and origin of the paper nor requiring them to sign their reports had any effect on rate of detection of errors. Such measures are unlikely to improve the quality of peer review reports. 1998;280:237-240." @default.
• W2093593263 created "2016-06-24" @default.
• W2093593263 creator A5039879095 @default.
• W2093593263 date "1999-04-01" @default.
• W2093593263 modified "2023-09-26" @default.
• W2093593263 title "Reviewers, Authors, and Editors" @default.
• W2093593263 cites W1971896716 @default.
• W2093593263 cites W1972376036 @default.
• W2093593263 cites W1987965558 @default.
• W2093593263 cites W1997120329 @default.
• W2093593263 cites W2003537372 @default.
• W2093593263 cites W2018223524 @default.
• W2093593263 cites W2025554447 @default.
• W2093593263 cites W2044137096 @default.
• W2093593263 cites W2083162471 @default.
• W2093593263 cites W1983639327 @default.
• W2093593263 doi "https://doi.org/10.1001/archopht.117.4.524" @default.
• W2093593263 hasPubMedId "https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/10206584" @default.
• W2093593263 hasPublicationYear "1999" @default.
• W2093593263 type Work @default.
• W2093593263 sameAs 2093593263 @default.
• W2093593263 citedByCount "16" @default.
• W2093593263 countsByYear W20935932632015 @default.
• W2093593263 countsByYear W20935932632016 @default.
• W2093593263 countsByYear W20935932632018 @default.
• W2093593263 countsByYear W20935932632020 @default.
• W2093593263 crossrefType "journal-article" @default.
• W2093593263 hasAuthorship W2093593263A5039879095 @default.
• W2093593263 hasConcept C118487528 @default.
• W2093593263 hasConcept C119767625 @default.
• W2093593263 hasConcept C41008148 @default.
• W2093593263 hasConcept C71924100 @default.
• W2093593263 hasConceptScore W2093593263C118487528 @default.
• W2093593263 hasConceptScore W2093593263C119767625 @default.
• W2093593263 hasConceptScore W2093593263C41008148 @default.
• W2093593263 hasConceptScore W2093593263C71924100 @default.
• W2093593263 hasIssue "4" @default.
• W2093593263 hasLocation W20935932631 @default.
• W2093593263 hasLocation W20935932632 @default.
• W2093593263 hasOpenAccess W2093593263 @default.
• W2093593263 hasPrimaryLocation W20935932631 @default.
• W2093593263 hasRelatedWork W1180973422 @default.
• W2093593263 hasRelatedWork W1995515455 @default.
• W2093593263 hasRelatedWork W2080531066 @default.
• W2093593263 hasRelatedWork W2647641574 @default.
• W2093593263 hasRelatedWork W2748952813 @default.
• W2093593263 hasRelatedWork W2899084033 @default.
• W2093593263 hasRelatedWork W3031052312 @default.
• W2093593263 hasRelatedWork W3032375762 @default.
• W2093593263 hasRelatedWork W853209576 @default.
• W2093593263 hasRelatedWork W2588051742 @default.
• W2093593263 hasVolume "117" @default.
• W2093593263 isParatext "false" @default.
• W2093593263 isRetracted "false" @default.
• W2093593263 magId "2093593263" @default.
• W2093593263 workType "article" @default.