FRINK Linked Data Fragments server

Matches in SemOpenAlex for { <https://semopenalex.org/work/W2094867191> ?p ?o ?g. }

• W2094867191 endingPage "1356" @default.
• W2094867191 startingPage "1350" @default.
• W2094867191 abstract "Summary Statistical design of experiments is a technique to maximize the information obtained from a minimum number of experiments. This technique, however, has not been used extensively in the oil industry. With a well-designed setup, the same information obtained when one parameter is varied at a time can be obtained with significantly fewer simulation runs. Interactions among the various input parameters can be identified and estimated with a more elaborate design. The technique can be applied without profound statistical insight with commercially available packages for statistical analysis. Introduction In the evaluation and planning of a reservoir development, the common approach is to build the expected geological model with the most representative set of dynamic parameters and the best set of well locations. The platform and production facilities are optimized for this model. This combination of geological model, dynamic parameters, and technical design constitutes the base or reference case. A reservoir simulation is then performed, giving the base-case production profile and recovery factor. Finally, this production profile is combined with a fixed scenario for future oil and/or gas prices and investments to obtain the economic indicators [net present value (NPV) and return on investment (ROI)] for the project. Fig. 1 shows the different elements of this procedure. Most factors in this process are uncertain. The geological model is wrong, the dynamic parameters are incorrect, the well locations and facilities are not optimal, and the price scenario certainly will not be fulfilled. Thus, only one thing is certain: the results from the base-case calculations are definitely wrong. To evaluate how the various parameters that enter the process influence the results, a sensitivity study usually is performed. The standard approach is to vary one parameter at a time, keeping all other parameters at the base-case value. Two runs (with an optimistic and a pessimistic setting) are required for most parameters. The number of runs required for a full sensitivity study quickly becomes prohibitive. Fig. 1 gives an example (somewhat exaggerated) for a North Sea gas field and shows the sensitivities of potential interest. If there are 5 gas-sales scenarios, 5 handling capacities, 5 different numbers of wells, 2 different horizontal-well lengths, 2 vertical start positions, and 15 geological parameters with uncertainties of interest, it will take 15,500 simulations to investigate these sensitivities by varying one parameter at a time. Because a single run of this particular full-field reservoir model takes some 20 CPU hours on a Cray, the study would take about 40 years and would be finished just a few years before the scheduled field shutdown. Thus, any technique that can reduce the number of runs required will be very useful. If two or more parameters differ from their base-case values simultaneously, the effect on production may differ from the cumulative effect of varying one parameter at a time. The effect of varying several parameters simultaneously cannot be investigated by varying one parameter at a time. Thus, a technique that can shed some light on these simultaneous effects will be of value. In experimental design, several parameters are varied simultaneously according to a predefined pattern. With this technique, the same information as that obtained with the one-parameter-at-a-time method can be developed with significantly fewer simulation runs. Some understanding of the possible interactions among parameters also can be obtained. The theory behind experimental design was developed in the 1920's for agricultural applications. Box et al.1 present a basic but more modern reference, while Ross2 presents the topic within the framework of modern Japanese ideas about quality control. Sacks et al.3 introduce experimental design to computer experiments, and Morris4 extends their ideas. Experimental design has not been applied widely in the petroleum industry. Sawyer et al.5 is a very early reference, and Chu6 shows a recent application. Egeland et al.7 extend the ideas presented here. This paper presents the basic concepts of experimental design. The technique then is applied to a real case study from the North Sea, illustrating that it is possible to obtain the basic sensitivities with a minimum number of simulations and additional information about possible interaction effects from a few more runs. The results from the analysis also can be used as input to a simple Monte Carlo simulation to obtain approximate uncertainty ranges for the parameters under study. Øvreberg et al.8 present the context for such an analysis." @default.
• W2094867191 created "2016-06-24" @default.
• W2094867191 creator A5022202448 @default.
• W2094867191 creator A5024739158 @default.
• W2094867191 creator A5042213981 @default.
• W2094867191 date "1992-12-01" @default.
• W2094867191 modified "2023-09-26" @default.
• W2094867191 title "Maximum Information at Minimum Cost: A North Sea Field Development Study With an Experimental Design" @default.
• W2094867191 doi "https://doi.org/10.2118/23139-pa" @default.
• W2094867191 hasPublicationYear "1992" @default.
• W2094867191 type Work @default.
• W2094867191 sameAs 2094867191 @default.
• W2094867191 citedByCount "73" @default.
• W2094867191 countsByYear W20948671912012 @default.
• W2094867191 countsByYear W20948671912013 @default.
• W2094867191 countsByYear W20948671912014 @default.
• W2094867191 countsByYear W20948671912015 @default.
• W2094867191 countsByYear W20948671912016 @default.
• W2094867191 countsByYear W20948671912017 @default.
• W2094867191 countsByYear W20948671912018 @default.
• W2094867191 countsByYear W20948671912019 @default.
• W2094867191 countsByYear W20948671912020 @default.
• W2094867191 countsByYear W20948671912021 @default.
• W2094867191 countsByYear W20948671912022 @default.
• W2094867191 countsByYear W20948671912023 @default.
• W2094867191 crossrefType "journal-article" @default.
• W2094867191 hasAuthorship W2094867191A5022202448 @default.
• W2094867191 hasAuthorship W2094867191A5024739158 @default.
• W2094867191 hasAuthorship W2094867191A5042213981 @default.
• W2094867191 hasConcept C10138342 @default.
• W2094867191 hasConcept C111919701 @default.
• W2094867191 hasConcept C119857082 @default.
• W2094867191 hasConcept C124101348 @default.
• W2094867191 hasConcept C126255220 @default.
• W2094867191 hasConcept C127413603 @default.
• W2094867191 hasConcept C134306372 @default.
• W2094867191 hasConcept C13736549 @default.
• W2094867191 hasConcept C139719470 @default.
• W2094867191 hasConcept C162324750 @default.
• W2094867191 hasConcept C177264268 @default.
• W2094867191 hasConcept C181230689 @default.
• W2094867191 hasConcept C186394612 @default.
• W2094867191 hasConcept C199360897 @default.
• W2094867191 hasConcept C202444582 @default.
• W2094867191 hasConcept C2778348673 @default.
• W2094867191 hasConcept C33923547 @default.
• W2094867191 hasConcept C41008148 @default.
• W2094867191 hasConcept C42058472 @default.
• W2094867191 hasConcept C42475967 @default.
• W2094867191 hasConcept C6927289 @default.
• W2094867191 hasConcept C9652623 @default.
• W2094867191 hasConcept C98045186 @default.
• W2094867191 hasConceptScore W2094867191C10138342 @default.
• W2094867191 hasConceptScore W2094867191C111919701 @default.
• W2094867191 hasConceptScore W2094867191C119857082 @default.
• W2094867191 hasConceptScore W2094867191C124101348 @default.
• W2094867191 hasConceptScore W2094867191C126255220 @default.
• W2094867191 hasConceptScore W2094867191C127413603 @default.
• W2094867191 hasConceptScore W2094867191C134306372 @default.
• W2094867191 hasConceptScore W2094867191C13736549 @default.
• W2094867191 hasConceptScore W2094867191C139719470 @default.
• W2094867191 hasConceptScore W2094867191C162324750 @default.
• W2094867191 hasConceptScore W2094867191C177264268 @default.
• W2094867191 hasConceptScore W2094867191C181230689 @default.
• W2094867191 hasConceptScore W2094867191C186394612 @default.
• W2094867191 hasConceptScore W2094867191C199360897 @default.
• W2094867191 hasConceptScore W2094867191C202444582 @default.
• W2094867191 hasConceptScore W2094867191C2778348673 @default.
• W2094867191 hasConceptScore W2094867191C33923547 @default.
• W2094867191 hasConceptScore W2094867191C41008148 @default.
• W2094867191 hasConceptScore W2094867191C42058472 @default.
• W2094867191 hasConceptScore W2094867191C42475967 @default.
• W2094867191 hasConceptScore W2094867191C6927289 @default.
• W2094867191 hasConceptScore W2094867191C9652623 @default.
• W2094867191 hasConceptScore W2094867191C98045186 @default.
• W2094867191 hasIssue "12" @default.
• W2094867191 hasLocation W20948671911 @default.
• W2094867191 hasOpenAccess W2094867191 @default.
• W2094867191 hasPrimaryLocation W20948671911 @default.
• W2094867191 hasRelatedWork W2055339671 @default.
• W2094867191 hasRelatedWork W2726892016 @default.
• W2094867191 hasRelatedWork W2917646158 @default.
• W2094867191 hasRelatedWork W3081652542 @default.
• W2094867191 hasRelatedWork W3107575701 @default.
• W2094867191 hasRelatedWork W3196850433 @default.
• W2094867191 hasRelatedWork W3209703476 @default.
• W2094867191 hasRelatedWork W4206292358 @default.
• W2094867191 hasRelatedWork W4206958541 @default.
• W2094867191 hasRelatedWork W4231276671 @default.
• W2094867191 hasVolume "44" @default.
• W2094867191 isParatext "false" @default.
• W2094867191 isRetracted "false" @default.
• W2094867191 magId "2094867191" @default.
• W2094867191 workType "article" @default.