FRINK Linked Data Fragments server

Matches in SemOpenAlex for { <https://semopenalex.org/work/W2094990579> ?p ?o ?g. }

• W2094990579 endingPage "657" @default.
• W2094990579 startingPage "645" @default.
• W2094990579 abstract "Consensus between self-ratings and stranger ratings of personality traits was investigated. A sample of 100 adults was videotaped while entering and walking through a room, sitting down, looking into the camera, and reading a standard text. The targets then provided self-descriptions on 5 personality factors. A sample of 24 strangers who had never seen the targets before was given 1 of 4 types of information on the targets: (a) sound-film, (b) silent film, (c) still, or (d) audiotape. Strangers rated various physical attributes and 20 traits of each target. Level of information influenced the validity but not the reliability of the stranger ratings, which were most valid for extraversion and conscientiousness. Extraversion covaried most strongly with physical attributes, and implicit theories on the covariation of traits with physical attributes were more accurate for extraversion and conscientiousness than for agreeableness, emotional stability, and culture. If judges indicate their impressions of other people, their judgments usually correlate with the self-reports of the ratees. Moreover, the correlations between self-ratings and ratings by judges tend to be higher the more the judges know about the targets (Cloyd, 1977; Funder & Colvin, 1988; Norman & Goldberg, 1966; Paunonen, 1989). The highest correlations are usually found between self-reports and ratings by spouses. McCrae and Costa (1989) report correlations between self-ratings and spouse ratings from .53 to .60, whereas they report somewhat lower correlations, ranging from .32 to .54, between self-reports and ratings by a single peer. These findings indicate that (a) personality ratings reflect actual attributes of the target persons rather than illusions that exist only in the eye of the beholder, and (b) self-ratings and ratings by others agree more the more that both reflect shared information concerning the targets' personality. Consensus at Zero Acquaintance This raises the question of how much information is required in order that ratings by others possess some validity. We use the term valid to indicate that ratings by strangers or acquaintances correlate substantially with the targets' self-reports. At first glance, this is a curious usage of the idea of validity because self-reports are usually more suspect than observer ratings and are therefore frequently validated against observer ratings. But we have a special case here: Because the observers are strangers, the self-ratings are the more dependable measure of the actual personality of the ratees." @default.
• W2094990579 created "2016-06-24" @default.
• W2094990579 creator A5008173539 @default.
• W2094990579 creator A5054661230 @default.
• W2094990579 date "1992-04-01" @default.
• W2094990579 modified "2023-10-06" @default.
• W2094990579 title "Trait inferences: Sources of validity at zero acquaintance." @default.
• W2094990579 cites W1964002244 @default.
• W2094990579 cites W1972320590 @default.
• W2094990579 cites W1974928249 @default.
• W2094990579 cites W1988232504 @default.
• W2094990579 cites W2003547693 @default.
• W2094990579 cites W2012049933 @default.
• W2094990579 cites W2015191330 @default.
• W2094990579 cites W2022576329 @default.
• W2094990579 cites W2025380177 @default.
• W2094990579 cites W2026164700 @default.
• W2094990579 cites W2032466449 @default.
• W2094990579 cites W2038045216 @default.
• W2094990579 cites W2041491681 @default.
• W2094990579 cites W2047006446 @default.
• W2094990579 cites W2049689472 @default.
• W2094990579 cites W2053487789 @default.
• W2094990579 cites W2054679144 @default.
• W2094990579 cites W2064671519 @default.
• W2094990579 cites W2068867230 @default.
• W2094990579 cites W2069116232 @default.
• W2094990579 cites W2073082820 @default.
• W2094990579 cites W2084969212 @default.
• W2094990579 cites W2087344719 @default.
• W2094990579 cites W2099465598 @default.
• W2094990579 cites W2113543140 @default.
• W2094990579 cites W2123671368 @default.
• W2094990579 cites W2135356988 @default.
• W2094990579 cites W2156516654 @default.
• W2094990579 cites W2157338817 @default.
• W2094990579 cites W2164330758 @default.
• W2094990579 cites W2171099065 @default.
• W2094990579 cites W2964030878 @default.
• W2094990579 cites W637083168 @default.
• W2094990579 doi "https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-3514.62.4.645" @default.
• W2094990579 hasPublicationYear "1992" @default.
• W2094990579 type Work @default.
• W2094990579 sameAs 2094990579 @default.
• W2094990579 citedByCount "488" @default.
• W2094990579 countsByYear W20949905792012 @default.
• W2094990579 countsByYear W20949905792013 @default.
• W2094990579 countsByYear W20949905792014 @default.
• W2094990579 countsByYear W20949905792015 @default.
• W2094990579 countsByYear W20949905792016 @default.
• W2094990579 countsByYear W20949905792017 @default.
• W2094990579 countsByYear W20949905792018 @default.
• W2094990579 countsByYear W20949905792019 @default.
• W2094990579 countsByYear W20949905792020 @default.
• W2094990579 countsByYear W20949905792021 @default.
• W2094990579 countsByYear W20949905792022 @default.
• W2094990579 countsByYear W20949905792023 @default.
• W2094990579 crossrefType "journal-article" @default.
• W2094990579 hasAuthorship W2094990579A5008173539 @default.
• W2094990579 hasAuthorship W2094990579A5054661230 @default.
• W2094990579 hasBestOaLocation W20949905792 @default.
• W2094990579 hasConcept C106934330 @default.
• W2094990579 hasConcept C138885662 @default.
• W2094990579 hasConcept C15744967 @default.
• W2094990579 hasConcept C199360897 @default.
• W2094990579 hasConcept C2780813799 @default.
• W2094990579 hasConcept C41008148 @default.
• W2094990579 hasConcept C41895202 @default.
• W2094990579 hasConcept C77805123 @default.
• W2094990579 hasConceptScore W2094990579C106934330 @default.
• W2094990579 hasConceptScore W2094990579C138885662 @default.
• W2094990579 hasConceptScore W2094990579C15744967 @default.
• W2094990579 hasConceptScore W2094990579C199360897 @default.
• W2094990579 hasConceptScore W2094990579C2780813799 @default.
• W2094990579 hasConceptScore W2094990579C41008148 @default.
• W2094990579 hasConceptScore W2094990579C41895202 @default.
• W2094990579 hasConceptScore W2094990579C77805123 @default.
• W2094990579 hasIssue "4" @default.
• W2094990579 hasLocation W20949905791 @default.
• W2094990579 hasLocation W20949905792 @default.
• W2094990579 hasOpenAccess W2094990579 @default.
• W2094990579 hasPrimaryLocation W20949905791 @default.
• W2094990579 hasRelatedWork W1973174388 @default.
• W2094990579 hasRelatedWork W1989512942 @default.
• W2094990579 hasRelatedWork W2031281134 @default.
• W2094990579 hasRelatedWork W2076906699 @default.
• W2094990579 hasRelatedWork W2109062304 @default.
• W2094990579 hasRelatedWork W2131600638 @default.
• W2094990579 hasRelatedWork W2145353363 @default.
• W2094990579 hasRelatedWork W2320639322 @default.
• W2094990579 hasRelatedWork W2995079599 @default.
• W2094990579 hasRelatedWork W4231356730 @default.
• W2094990579 hasVolume "62" @default.
• W2094990579 isParatext "false" @default.
• W2094990579 isRetracted "false" @default.
• W2094990579 magId "2094990579" @default.
• W2094990579 workType "article" @default.